
What price is Pakistan's Field Marshal Munir paying for free lunch with Trump?
Apart from the personal deals he might be trying to squeeze out of Munir, Trump could also be discussing terrorism cooperation against the perceived threat from the Islamic State Khorasan (ISK). A recent testimony of the Centcom chief suggests that terrorism is something on which both the US and Pakistan have been working together. Could Trump be trying to pull Pakistan out of the Chinese embrace by wooing Munir? Or is this about Iran? There is a lot of speculation about the US seeking logistics bases inside Balochistan for operations against Iran. At the very least, the US might be seeking free and unfettered use of Pakistani airspace for its Iran offensive. There is also some talk of seeking Pakistani assistance for rescue operations inside Iran in the event of US attacks on the Islamic Republic. Finally, the Americans could be even seeking intelligence cooperation from Pakistan for destabilising and changing the Iranian regime.In return, what could be Munir's ask from Trump? He could seek economic assistance and investments from the US. More importantly, he could press Trump to deliver on his assurance of mediating between India and Pakistan on Kashmir and forcing India to come to the dialogue table with Pakistan. The Pakistani delegation of MPs that travelled to the US believes Pakistan was promised US mediation as a face-saver for getting India to halt its Operation Sindoor and accept the ceasefire proposed by the Pakistan Army to end the four-day conflict. Apart from US intervention on the Kashmir issue, Munir could seek US pressure on India to back down and honour the Indus Waters Treaty. In addition, he could demand that the US pressure India to back off from its alleged support to Baloch freedom fighters and the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) insurgents.advertisementOn the eve of the lunch meeting, Munir seemed to be signalling to the US that he will play hard to get on Iran. He also hinted in his talk to members of the Pakistani diaspora that Pakistan seeks a dialogue with India to settle all their bilateral problems. Despite his recent Islamist and jihadist rants in Pakistan, Munir has tried to project himself as a democrat and someone who tolerates dissent back home, all buzzwords that the gullible US media eagerly laps up without any on-the-ground fact-checking.Munir wasn't the only one doing the signalling post-Operation Sindoor. Prime Minister Narendra Modi also ended weeks of avoiding joining issue with Trump's self-serving, self-congratulatory and self-lauding by taking credit for the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The statement by the Indian Foreign Secretary about the Trump-Modi telephone conversation set the record straight about what transpired during the four-day clash and how there was no linking of the US-India trade deal or any mention of US mediation. Modi also skillfully dodged the bullet that Trump fired by slyly inviting him to the White House on the same day he was lunching with India's arch enemy. This was nothing but Trump trying to bring Munir and Modi together in a single frame, with him playing peacemaker and mediator. That Trump resorted to this subterfuge indicates that his agenda with Munir is probably more than just fobbing off the Pakistani dictator with a lunch for his endorsement of Trump's quest for a Nobel Peace Prize.advertisementIt is quite obvious that the dubious role of the Trump administration in the recent India-Pakistan bash up has raised Indian hackles and left a bitter taste of betrayal. While there is no doubt that the entire episode has caused a significant trust deficit between India and the US, the sense of hurt in India is somewhat misplaced. The fact is that the US and India are not wedded to each other. Neither of them has sworn lifelong loyalty to each other. They are what author Seema Sirohi calls 'Friends with Benefits'. To the extent their interests match and there is mutual benefit, they engage with each other. But since this is an open relationship, both are free to seek other suitors or lovers, even those who might be unpalatable or unacceptable to the other. If the US is wooing Pakistan for its own objectives, India too was not ready to end its relationship with Russia despite the US and other Western countries taking a rather dim view of India's continuing affair with their bete noire.advertisementThere will, of course, be a pushback from India in case the US, wanting to get Pakistan back in its bed, attempts to throw India under the bus – whether on Kashmir or the Indus Waters Treaty or any other bilateral issue. A small sample of that came with the Foreign Secretary's readout of the Trump-Modi talk. But if the Americans refrain from doing anything that violates India's red lines and flirt with Pakistan to get it to once again play mercenary for de-nuclearising Iran and dismantling the regime in that country, India can live with it, like India did when the US needed Pakistan for operations in Afghanistan. Both the US and India know that once things settle down, they will kiss and make up and re-energise their 'friends with benefit' relationship.advertisementPostScript: Very little has been revealed about the meeting between Trump and Munir. On the face of it, Trump was treating Munir to lunch to thank him for backing off in the war with India. But there are some hints that the two also spoke about Iran. There is as yet no clarity on what exactly the Americans sought from Pakistan and what Pakistan agreed to do. There is also no clarity on what the quid pro quo is for Pakistan's services – is it financial, or is it all about India? Both sides are being very cagey about their new terms of engagement. This is because any cooperation that Pakistan gives the US on Iran will have its political fallout. Similarly, if Trump has shafted India to appease Pakistan, he wouldn't want to announce it publicly. But in the next few days and weeks, actions on the ground will bring to light what Faustian deals were made between Munir and Trump.(Sushant Sareen is a Senior Fellow at the Observer Research Foundation)(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump nominates conservative economist to head agency that compiles jobs, inflation data
President Donald Trump said Monday that he has nominated E.J. Antoni, chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, to head the agency that compiles and publishes the nation's employment and inflation figures. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,' Trump said on social media late Monday. Antoni, if approved by the Senate, would replace Erika McEntarfer, who was appointed commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics by former President Joe Biden. Trump fired McEntarfer August. 1 after the July jobs report showed hiring slowed sharply this spring, with job gains in May and June revised much lower than initially estimated. Trump accused McEntarfer, without evidence, of rigging the jobs data for political reasons. The announcement comes one day before the BLS is scheduled to release the latest inflation data, for July. It is forecast to show that consumer prices rose for the third straight month as tariffs are pushing up the cost of many imported goods. Antoni has criticized the bureau's' collection and publication of the jobs data for years, particularly since the Covid-19 pandemic, after which the agency has frequently revised its initial jobs estimates lower. Many conservatives have argued that this potentially benefited Biden by producing a large initial monthly job gain, only to have it reduced in subsequent months. However, revisions — including downward revisions — are not unusual and occurred during the Trump administration as well. Overall hiring jumped after the pandemic and the unemployment rate stayed low even after the revisions. Antoni called for McEntarfer to be fired after the jobs report was released August. 1. Last Monday he wrote on X, 'There are better ways to collect, process, and disseminate data — that is the task for the next BLS commissioner, and only consistent delivery of accurate data in a timely manner will rebuild the trust that has been lost over the last several years.' The BLS commissioner is the only political appointee at the agency, which is otherwise staffed by career civil servants. Most previous commissioners have been mild-mannered technocrats. Antoni, however, has been an unabashed partisan in his economic analyses posted on the Heritage website. For example, two months ago, in an analysis of the May jobs report, he wrote, 'A deep dive into the report shows any weakness started long before the Trump administration, which is making undeniable progress reprivatizing the economy.' Antoni's nomination quickly attracted an unusual level of criticism. Jason Furman, a top economist in the Obama administration, wrote on X: 'I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner. He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise.' Kyle Pomeleau, a tax expert for the right-leaning Tax Foundation and the conservative American Enterprise Institute, wrote on X: 'There are a lot of competent conservative economists that could do this job. E.J. is not one of them.'


India.com
12 minutes ago
- India.com
Is It Worth Bearing Heavy Tariffs For Cheaper Russian Oil; Has India Made A Dangerous Bargain?
New Delhi: Nobel Prize-winning economist Abhijit Banerjee has urged India to reflect on the cost of cheaper Russian oil. He questioned whether paying high U.S. tariffs is worth the savings. His comments came days after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a 25% extra tariff on Indian goods. The action targets India's continued large-scale purchases of discounted Russian crude. With the imposition of new tariff, Indian products entering the U.S. market will now face a total duty of 50%. This marks one of the highest rates imposed by Trump on any country. The additional tariff takes effect on August 27. The long-discussed India-US trade deal remains stalled. Washington seeks greater access to India's farm and dairy sectors, while New Delhi has held back on concessions. The impact could be severe. About $27 billion worth of Indian exports without special trade exemptions may lose competitiveness in the United States. Speaking to news agency PTI on the sidelines of an event at BML Munjal University, Banerjee said the government should weigh options carefully. He suggested exploring whether the United States would remove tariffs if India halted Russian oil imports. India remains the largest global buyer of Russian crude. In July, refiners purchased 1.6 million barrels per day. For August and September, no new orders have been placed. Black Sea oil now offers a discount of only about $2 per barrel. In 2024-25, India imported 88 million tonnes of Russian oil. This formed a large share of the 245 million tonnes of total crude imports. Oil contracts for August and September were finalised before Trump's tariff announcement on August 7. Banerjee emphasised that at a 25% tariff, some Indian exports had already lost their price advantage. Raising it to 50% may not change much for those products. He added that policy circles are already discussing a cut in Russian crude purchases. On the economy, he described the current year's outlook as weaker than expected. He cited low private investment and pressure on the middle class. He pointed to hiring freezes in major firms such as the Tata Consultancy Service (TCS) and stagnant wages in the information technology (IT) sector. These issues, he said, remain unresolved. India's seafood sector is already feeling the strain. The Seafood Exporters Association of India (SEAI) has urged the commerce and finance ministries for urgent relief. It says nearly $2 billion in shrimp exports face serious obstacles in the U.S. market due to Trump's tariff. The SEAI seeks a 30% increase in working capital through soft loans, with interest subsidies and a 240-day moratorium on loans for pre- and post-packing operations. SEAI Secretary-General K.N. Raghavan told PTI the shrimp industry is under heavy stress and needs immediate government intervention.


Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Where is my superstar?...': Trump praises Karoline Leavitt in front of reporters, video goes viral!
'Trump trolling or truthing?': Karoline Leavitt's rapid fire on global politics | New Media Briefing 'It's those lips…': Trump's flirty praise for Karoline Leavitt goes viral, internet explodes 'It's those lips…': Trump's flirty praise for Karoline Leavitt goes viral, internet explodes Karoline Leavitt gets fiery after press questions alleged 'white genocide' in South Africa 'What a stupid question': Leavitt snaps at reporter for questioning Trump's stance on peaceful protests 'What a stupid question': Leavitt snaps at reporter for questioning Trump's stance on peaceful protests Leavitt dubs Biden 'mentally incompetent', says Trump 'cleaning up' former president's 'messes' Rare moment! Trump's Ex Press Secy Sean Spicer questions Karoline Leavitt at White House