More charges likely in cyclist death as Colorado biking advocates push for change
More charges likely in bicyclist death as biking advocates press for changes
More charges likely in bicyclist death as biking advocates press for changes
More charges likely in bicyclist death as biking advocates press for changes
Boulder area District Attorney Michael Dougherty says there will likely be more charges against the 23-year-old accused in the hit-and-run death of bicyclist John Wilkinson on Sunday. Dante Johnson of Denver is already accused of two charges, including failure to remain at the scene in an accident causing death. That carries a potential penalty of four to 12 years.
Dante Johnson
Boulder County
"We're going to be looking at additional charges, and there's also perhaps some aggravating circumstances," said Dougherty, explaining that the Colorado State Patrol is still working on a crash reconstruction analysis.
So far, says Dougherty, it appears the vehicle that hit Wilkinson strayed into the bike lane on the right side of 95th Street, north of Valmont Road.
The district attorney credited witnesses with providing information that led quickly to Dante Johnson.
"The witnesses were easily able to identify that something was wrong because the bike was being dragged. There was a loud sound being caused by it, and the windshield of the car was so incredibly damaged."
An affidavit in the case indicates the bicycle was dragged miles beneath the front bumper of a Toyota Highlander and found along Lookout Road. Additionally, the affidavit states Johnson later texted a friend a video recorded from inside the vehicle showing the smashed windshield. He told the friend by text he'd been hit by a rock. Johnson told investigators the vehicle he drove, which belonged to his mother, had been missing for a time.
But because of the license plate shared by witnesses, law officers were quickly able to ping Johnson's phone as he went to Clement Park in Littleton. The Highlander, believed to be the vehicle that hit Wilkinson, was found in the same area.
Cyclist John Wilkinson was struck and killed in Boulder County on Sunday.
CBS
Prosecuting the case, Dougherty has promised to "Fight like heck to make sure we get the right outcome."
But another death on Colorado's roads leads to more concern from law enforcement and safety advocates. The charge of careless driving resulting in death, which is a misdemeanor under Colorado law, was being reviewed in the Legislature this session.
"Think about that. A traffic misdemeanor. Take that up to a felony. That bill did not pass this session. I'm very confident that we'll see it introduced this next session," said Dougherty.
The family of bicyclist Magnus White, a 17-year-old killed in the Boulder area in 2023, was among those pushing for the change.
Tragedies like the death of John Wilkinson bring the issues again to the forefront.
The death of John Wilkinson hits hard for Triny Willerton, President and founder of It Could Be Me. It is a safety organization based in Boulder. Willerton is a survivor of a terrible bicycle crash in 2018.
"I feel like we take three steps forward and then one back," she said of the death of John Wilkinson. Boulder now has over 300 miles of protected bike lanes, but few roads in Colorado were originally designed with separation in mind.
Triny Willerton
CBS
"I think we all know we need to separate different modes of transportation. Unfortunately, that takes time."
Technology has created problems for sure. "There are a lot of factors that are unfortunately getting in the way of people behaving properly behind the wheel," said Willerton.
But there are potential technology solutions to some problems ahead. Automated braking systems and, hopefully, autonomous driving will improve odds, she said. There is still a need to get the message out constantly to drivers. That message is often heard more clearly after tragedies.
"It's very interesting because people start paying attention, and there's a very small window," said Willerton. The message right now is clear.
"There is nothing that is more important than a human life, said Willerton. "Whatever decision you make will change their life and your life forever."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two innocent teens wounded in broad daylight NYC shooting, third bystander narrowly missed
Two innocent teenagers were shot and a third bystander was narrowly missed when a gunman opened fire on a Bronx street in broad daylight Thursday, according to police and law enforcement sources. The pair of 17-year-old boys was in front of a five-story walk-up at 265 E. 176th St. in the Tremont section of the borough when the shots rang out around 1:20 p.m., police said. One of the teens was shot in the right arm, the other in the neck, police and sources said. Neither boy appeared to be the intended target of the shooter, but were struck in the crossfire, based on preliminary details, sources said. A bullet also went crashing through a Toyota Highlander that Christian Santos, 44, had parked just moments before. Santos got out of the car to go to work when the bullets began flying. One went blasting through the rear of the car and into the driver's seat, striking the area where his head was moments before, he told The Post. Paramedics rushed the two teens to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, where they were listed in stable condition early Friday, according to the FDNY. The gunman, a male dressed in all black, fled the scene on foot, sources said. There have been no arrests and the shooting remains under investigation. So far this year there have been 15 shooting victims and 12 shooting incidents in the 46th precinct where Thursday's shooting occurred, according to the most recent NYPD statistics. Those numbers are a slight increase from the same time last year. Overall, the shooting numbers are down nearly 24% across the Bronx, but the borough was shocked when another teenage innocent bystander, Evette Jeffrey, 16, was shot in the head and killed in May.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gov. McMaster again vetoes bill dismissing gun charge that hasn't been a crime for 15 months
A law passed in March 2024 made it legal for adults to carry a handgun openly or concealed without a permit. Legislation dismissing pending cases for unlawful carry was again vetoed by Gov. Henry McMaster on May 22, 2025. (Stock photo illustration by Getty Images) COLUMBIA — South Carolinians will continue to face sentencing for a gun charge that's no longer a crime after Gov. Henry McMaster again vetoed a bill erasing the pending cases. A law signed by McMaster 15 months ago made it legal for adults to carry handguns without a permit and allowed past convictions for unlawful carry to be expunged. It set a five-year deadline — until March 2029 — for expungement applications. One conviction per person can be expunged. But the law didn't address pending cases. Last year, McMaster vetoed legislation to dismiss those charges. The Legislature tried again this year with another version of the bill, which both chambers passed unanimously. But the governor vetoed that too. In his May 22 veto letter, the governor made clear his 'fundamental objections to the legislation remain unchanged.' As the state's former U.S. attorney and two-term attorney general, McMaster said he's wary of limiting prosecutors' authority and discretion to resolve those cases. 'Every case is unique and the prosecutors in our state should be permitted to evaluate each case based on law and the facts and then proceed as they deem appropriate,' McMaster wrote. The bill 'would universally strip prosecutors of the ability' to determine whether a case warrants dismissal or prosecution. Besides that, he wrote, it was a crime when they were charged. 'Their alleged actions were, in fact, unlawful,' he wrote. 'To be sure, those actions might not be illegal today, but that distinction misses the critical point that such actions were illegal at the time they were committed.' The question is whether the House will vote this time to override the governor's veto. Last year, the Senate voted unanimously to override the governor's veto, but it takes a supermajority vote in both chambers for a bill to become law despite a veto. And the House never took it up. So, the bill died. Last week, the Senate again voted unanimously to overrule the latest veto. The House never brought it up during the Legislature's one-day special session to adopt the budget. But this time, an override is still possible next year. House Judiciary Chairman Weston Newton said the chamber will likely take a vote when they return in January. The chamber's unanimous approval of the bill May 8 suggests an override won't be a problem, he said. 'It's dismissing charges that are no longer illegal for the purposes of consistency,' said the Bluffton Republican. Following passage in March 2024 of the law allowing any adult who can legally buy a handgun to carry it with or without a concealed carry permit, some solicitors dismissed older charges of unlawful possession on their own. But it wasn't automatic. Some solicitors didn't. As of February, 206 people in 11 of South Carolina's 16 judicial districts had charges pending for that crime alone, according to Lisa Catalanotto, the executive director for the state Commission on Prosecution Coordination. She didn't have numbers from the other five judicial districts. More cases have been dropped since she last collected the numbers in February, said Catalanotto, who didn't yet have an update. But a decline isn't good enough. No one should face conviction for something that's no longer a crime, said Sen. Deon Tedder, who was again the chief sponsor. This time, three Republicans joined him in co-sponsoring the legislation. 'We had to act as a Legislature. It's simply not fair,' said Tedder, D-Charleston. He voted against the bill that legalized carrying a handgun without a permit, which supporters dubbed 'constitutional carry.' But anyone charged with a crime the Legislature has determined is unconstitutional certainly shouldn't be convicted now, Tedder said. 'This fixes something that we missed,' he said. During legislative hearings, opponents of the bill argued some people charged with the crime were known violent offenders, and unlawful carry was just the crime they could be arrested for at the time to build a case. Catalanotto, with the prosecution commission, gave the example of a person who went to a former workplace with a gun, intending to shoot someone, but was chased away at the door. An officer arrested the person for unlawfully carrying a weapon with the intent to add additional charges later, she said. But Tedder pointed to a sentence in the law specifying that an 'immediate dismissal' isn't mandated if the charge was made 'in conjunction with any other criminal offense arising out of the same facts and circumstances. The bill also specifies that a dismissed charge can't be the basis of an unlawful arrest lawsuit — another concern of law enforcement that McMaster said in his veto letter he appreciated legislators addressing. 'We tightened this bill to do what it's supposed to do,' he said.
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Mass. lets criminals go, ICE arrests innocent people. They both need to change.
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Cases like Lopez's show that sometimes, federal authorities have a legitimate gripe with the state's progressive policies. Because of a 2017 Supreme Judicial Court decision, there are instances when the state releases dangerous criminals instead of handing them over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Advertisement But the Trump administration is also overstating how much Massachusetts' policies, as bad as they can be, are to blame for its mounting arrests of noncriminals. Both sides need to give a little bit: Massachusetts should be willing to help in cases where ICE wants to arrest a convicted criminal like Lopez. The federal government has the right to deport people who are in this country illegally, and the state should help when it comes to violent criminals. Advertisement What the federal government doesn't have the right to do is compel local law enforcement to go after law-abiding, peaceable immigrants — whether they're here illegally or not. And it shouldn't be targeting noncriminals, either — or using local sanctuary policies as a pretext for the recent arrests of people with no criminal records. Over the past month, ICE has arrested 'If sanctuary cities would change their policies and turn these violent criminal aliens over to us into our custody instead of releasing them into the public, we would not have to go out to the communities and do this,' Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons said during an ICE The state's policies date to 2017, when the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in Lunn v. Commonwealth that the Legislature would have to specifically authorize court officers to honor requests from immigration authorities to hold deportable immigrants. So far, the Democratic-led Legislature has not done so, and it passed up different bills that would allow law enforcement to cooperate on detainers for immigrants who are here illegally and have committed heinous crimes. Inaction on Lunn has drawn scrutiny from conservatives and even a member of Healey's Cabinet. For Worcester County Sheriff Lew Evangelidis, for example, law enforcement's inability to coordinate with federal immigration authorities means that some criminal migrants can be released back into the community. 'Right now, there's no ability to notify ICE and hold that person for [ICE] to make a determination whether they wish to take them into custody and then provide them the due process that they get in the federal system,' he told me. Advertisement Meanwhile, Healey's secretary of Public Safety and Security, Terrence Reidy, has In a statement, Healey's office said it does cooperate with ICE to some extent, such as by notifying ICE when a criminal in state custody is scheduled to be released. But that leaves loopholes for cases like Lopez's, which result in ICE having to rearrest a criminal. There were no collateral arrests when ICE tracked down Lopez because they were banned under the Biden administration — but there could be if a similar arrest were made now. Still, the Trump administration is exaggerating the connection between sanctuary policies and collateral arrests. Cases where criminals like Lopez were released in spite of detainers may have fueled some collateral arrests in the past month. But the Department of Homeland Security has failed to give a detailed breakdown so it's hard to know just how many. In a Advertisement Meanwhile, some of ICE's higher profile examples of collateral arrest seem to have nothing to do with Lunn. Like the case of the 18-year-old Milford student, Marcelo Gomes da Silva, who was arrested on his way to volleyball practice in an operation meant for his father. He was But so far there It isn't crazy for the Trump administration to criticize Massachusetts policies that can and have allowed convicted criminal migrants to be released into the community. In fact, most Americans would agree — a recent University of Massachusetts Amherst But that poll also found that most people Carine Hajjar is a Globe Opinion writer. She can be reached at
