logo
YouTube to be part of Australia's youth social media ban

YouTube to be part of Australia's youth social media ban

BBC News7 days ago
YouTube will be included in Australia's world-first social media ban for children after the government ditched a previous exemption for the platform.The video sharing site was set to be excluded from the ban - which will limit TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, X and Snapchat and is due to start in December.YouTube, owned by Google, argued it shouldn't be blocked for under-16s as it "not a social media service" and its platform "offers benefit and value to younger Australians".Under the ban, youth will still be able to view YouTube videos but will not be permitted to have an account, which is required for uploading content or interacting on the platform.
"Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told media on Wednesday. "We know that this is not the only solution," he said of the ban, "but it will make a difference."Australia's eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant last month recommended YouTube be added to the ban as it was "the most frequently cited platform" where children aged 10 to 15 years saw "harmful content".Federal Communications Minister Anika Wells said that while there is a place for social media, "there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children".She described trying to protect children from the harms of the internet as "like trying to teach your kids to swim in the open ocean with the rips and the sharks compared to at the local council pool"."We can't control the ocean but we can police the sharks and that is why we will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said, referring to local media reports that Google planned to sue over the policy.Exclusions to the ban will include "online gaming, messaging, education and health apps" as they "pose fewer social media harms to under 16s", Wells said. Under the ban, tech companies can fined up to A$50m ($32.5m; £25.7m) if they don't comply with the age restrictions. They will need to deactivate existing accounts and prohibit any new accounts, as well as stopping any work arounds and correcting errors.More details of how the new ban will work are due to be presented to federal parliament on Wednesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I was thrilled to get a council house after 6 months of waiting – but trolls hated me for calling it my ‘forever home'
I was thrilled to get a council house after 6 months of waiting – but trolls hated me for calling it my ‘forever home'

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

I was thrilled to get a council house after 6 months of waiting – but trolls hated me for calling it my ‘forever home'

GETTING the keys to a new home is a moment of pure joy, especially for a single mother looking to build a stable future for her kids. But for Mari, a recent move-in quickly turned sour when her happiness was attacked by online trolls. After waiting just six months on the council house list, Marika, who goes by @ marikikix on TikTok, was over the moon to get a house with a huge garden. In a viral video posted on May 18, she called it a "dream come true" and her "forever home." The video quickly gained over 150,000 views, but not all the comments were positive. The backlash focused on her use of the term "forever home," with many believing a council property shouldn't be considered one. One user wrote: "When people call council houses their 'forever home', what aspiration." Another added: "A council house should never be a 'forever home'," suggesting that the term should be reserved for owned properties. The criticism highlights a common misconception about council housing. homes are "free," which is far from the truth. As one TikTok user pointed out: "I live in a council house that I pay £600 a month for. "I've never claimed benefits in my life. I work two jobs! They are not free, believe me." Trolls say council houses can't look nice but my stunning hallway will prove them wrong Amidst the negativity, other users rushed to Marika's defense. "Why's everyone being so awful in the comments?? They're happy, and that's all that counts!" one person commented. Others, however, focused on the practical side of council housing, with one user asking for advice on how Marika got a place so quickly. A helpful reply noted that "everyone's circumstances are different" and advised speaking directly with a council caseworker. Major council home rule A significant policy shift is on the horizon for council house residents, as the Labour party plans to introduce stringent new restrictions on the Right to Buy scheme. The new rules would exempt newly built council houses from the Right to Buy for a period of 35 years. 2 This marks a major change to the long-standing government initiative. However, the proposed changes have already drawn criticism. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, has labelled Deputy Labour Leader Angela Rayner a "hypocrite" for advocating the new restrictions. This is because Rayner herself previously benefited from the Right to Buy scheme. According to The Telegraph, Rayner purchased her former council house in Stockport for £79,000 in 2017, securing a 25% discount. She later sold the property for £48,500 more than her purchase price.

Australia regulator says YouTube, others 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material
Australia regulator says YouTube, others 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material

Reuters

time3 hours ago

  • Reuters

Australia regulator says YouTube, others 'turning a blind eye' to child abuse material

SYDNEY, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Australia's internet watchdog has said the world's biggest social media firms are still 'turning a blind eye' to online child sex abuse material on their platforms, and said YouTube in particular had been unresponsive to its enquiries. In a report released on Wednesday, the eSafety Commissioner said YouTube, along with Apple, failed to track the number of user reports it received of child sex abuse appearing on their platforms and also could not say how long it took them to respond to such reports. The Australian government decided last week to include YouTube in its world-first social media ban for teenagers, following eSafety's advice to overturn its planned exemption for the Alphabet-owned Google's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab video-sharing site. 'When left to their own devices, these companies aren't prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services,' eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant said in a statement. 'No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services.' Google has said previously that abuse material has no place on its platforms and that it uses a range of industry-standard techniques to identify and remove such material. Meta - owner of Facebook, Instagram and Threads, three of the biggest platforms with more than 3 billion users worldwide - says it prohibits graphic videos. The eSafety Commissioner, an office set up to protect internet users, has mandated Apple, Discord, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp to report on the measures they take to address child exploitation and abuse material in Australia. The report on their responses so far found a 'range of safety deficiencies on their services which increases the risk that child sexual exploitation and abuse material and activity appear on the services'. Safety gaps included failures to detect and prevent livestreaming of the material or block links to known child abuse material, as well as inadequate reporting mechanisms. It said platforms were also not using 'hash-matching' technology on all parts of their services to identify images of child sexual abuse by checking them against a database. Google has said before that its anti-abuse measures include hash-matching technology and artificial intelligence. The Australian regulator said some providers had not made improvements to address these safety gaps on their services despite it putting them on notice in previous years. 'In the case of Apple services and Google's YouTube, they didn't even answer our questions about how many user reports they received about child sexual abuse on their services or details of how many trust and safety personnel Apple and Google have on-staff,' Inman Grant said.

Google issues ‘critical' alert over horrifying ‘no touch' hack that hijacks your mobile without you doing ANYTHING
Google issues ‘critical' alert over horrifying ‘no touch' hack that hijacks your mobile without you doing ANYTHING

Scottish Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Google issues ‘critical' alert over horrifying ‘no touch' hack that hijacks your mobile without you doing ANYTHING

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) GOOGLE has issued a 'critical' alert to users as hackers launch a 'no touch' scheme to hijack their victim's mobile phones. The tech company is launching an urgent security patch to plug the hole in the security of a major phone brand's technology. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Google has launched an urgent update to protect Android users Credit: Alamy 2 The update prevents hackers from taking over your phone Credit: Alamy The software firm regularly releases security updates for Android devices, which are designed to cover tech vulnerabilities. The brand's security update covered 34 defects in June, 47 in May and 62 in April. However, the August update covers a major vulnerability which could be devastating to your device. The CVE-2025-48530 update covers a critical remote code execution vulnerability which allows hackers to hijack your mobile without additional execution privileges. That means scammers could access your phone without ever touching it, whenever they want. Also, the update will cover the CVE-2025-22441 and CVE-2025-48533 vulnerabilities. With both of those defects, user interaction isn't needed either which means hackers could strike from anywhere without needing to trick phone owners. None of these vulnerabilities are being actively exploited at the moment, meaning Google has moved at pace to plug the hole in the security of users' devices. Android provides its customers with its own security updates too, to give its devices an added layer of security. The news comes after Google pulled its support for three Android devices, leaving them vulnerable to future cyber flaws and hacking. Over 10 million Android users told to turn off devices after Google exposes 'infection' – exact list of models affected Typically, security support for a device is pulled when it reaches seven years of age. In this latest security cull, Google Pixel 3a, Samsung Galaxy S10 series, and OnePlus 7 will no longer receive security updates from Google. Meanwhile, Google has overhauled its iconic logo as it turns its focus to its Gemini AI technology. The older design featured four main blocks of colour forming the letter G, where the new design sees the colours blurring together. Before this, the brand spelled out its name series of letters painted in green, yellow, red and blue for its logo.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store