PM wants NZ to get behind development, progress, stem tide of Kiwis leaving for Oz
Photo:
RNZ / Giles Dexter
National leader Christopher Luxon has told the party's annual conference that the country needs to "say yes" more.
Addressing about 550 delegates, MPs and supporters at the Air Force Museum of New Zealand in Christchurch, Luxon bemoaned "activists" who opposed housing developments, agriculture, cruise ships and mines.
"If we're serious about keeping Kiwis at home, creating jobs and increasing wages for all New Zealanders, we can't afford to keep saying no to every opportunity that comes our way."
Opposition parties have heavily criticised the government for its economic policies and laid the blame at its feet for the 30,000 New Zealanders who moved to Australia last year, but Luxon said the opposition would make it worse.
"Take a look at Australia," he said. "If they shut down their mining industry or their energy industry tomorrow, as Labour and the Greens want to do here, I guarantee you would see fewer Kiwis moving across the ditch."
Luxon's speech came hot on the heels of an announcement from the United States that it would increase tariffs to 15 percent.
Still digesting the announcement and what it would mean for New Zealand exporters, Luxon acknowledged "challenging" global conditions.
"We can't just batten down the hatches and hope for the best," he said.
Luxon's speech made no mention of National's coalition partners, New Zealand First or ACT, or even the word 'coalition' itself, although deputy Nicola Willis acknowledged the "energy" it took to keep Winston Peters and David Seymour under control.
Instead, Luxon's speech was heavy on shoutouts to his National ministers and their policies, and also on blaming the previous government for the cost-of-living struggles New Zealanders currently faced.
"In the years to come, immediate action on the cost of living isn't enough," he said. "The last government spent billions of dollars in failed handouts, only to watch inflation roar and the economy falter.
"We have to keep our eyes on the prize."
Echoing his speech at Monday's post-cabinet press conference, Luxon leaned on the economic policies the government had introduced, such as tax changes, FamilyBoost and the removal of the Auckland Fuel Tax.
"We're doing what we can," he said.
The speech contained an announcement the government would
make it easier to get a concession on Department of Conservation land
.
"That means more certainty for businesses, less bureaucracy and much faster decisions, so the businesses that should be operating can get up and running."
There would still be restrictions on some parts of the DOC estate.
"Where it does make sense, we need to get to the 'yes' much faster - instead of being bogged down in process and uncertainty," Luxon said.
Charges of $20-40 for foreign visitors to high-volume sites like Cathedral Cove, Tongariro Crossing, Milford Sound, and Aoraki Mount Cook were being introduced, but New Zealanders would be exempt from the fees.
Party president Sylvia Wood, who was re-elected at the conference, said the party would select candidates for the 2026 election shortly.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Watch live: Government proposes replacing NCEA school system
The government is proposing replacing all levels of NCEA. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford are making the announcement in Auckland. Under the proposal, NCEA level 1 would be replaced with foundation literacy and numeracy tests. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford stand up Brown's Bay School in Auckland. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro Levels 2 and 3 would be replaced with a New Zealand Certificate of Education and an Advanced Certificate. Students would be required to take five subjects and pass at least four to get each certificate. Marking would be out of 100 and grades would and range from A to E. The changes would be phased in from next year, with the new certificates in place for year 12 from 2029 and year 13 the following year. Luxon said evidence showed NCEA was inconsistent and did always deliver what students needed. Consultation on the proposal begins next month. The proposal includes: '"This is about making sure our national qualification opens doors for every young person, whether they're heading into a trade, university, or straight into work," Stanford said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Watch: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford major education announcement
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford making a major education announcement. Watch the announcement in the the livestream at the top of the page from about 8.30am. Christopher Luxon told Morning Report there was nothing more/ important to New Zealand's economy and children's future than education. "We've had a lot of parents and principals and teachers raise with us some very real concerns with us about NCEA, and it's important we get that done and right." The key thing was to make sure there was a qualification comparable to overseas education. "We want to attract high paying jobs ultimately to New Zealand... our ability to do that is really contingent upon having our our kids super well-educated." Stanford signalled last month an announcement on NCEA was due within weeks and said the government was taking into account the Education Review Office report on the previous government's rollout of NCEA level 1. Westlake Boys' High School has dropped NCEA level 1 and its principal said the results so far had been "overwhelmingly positive" . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Why drilling for fossil fuels is not expected to fix our energy crisis
Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Six months ago, Taranaki businessman John Burling received an abrupt call: his gas company was increasing prices by 40 percent. Burling, who owns the Taranaki-based Carac Group engineering and manufacturing company, was floored. "What do you mean? How do I pass it on?'" The reply was stark. "There's a shortage of gas, so that's going to be the new price." Overnight, Carac Group had to cut powder coating plant operations from five days to four, shelving expansion plans and curtailing production due to the energy-intensive gas-fired ovens. Across the country, many businesses are facing the same gas woes. "The untold story here is that there's a very large number of smaller industrial businesses that rely on gas and frankly they're gonna struggle to stay afloat," says Barney Irvine, executive director of the Northern Infrastructure Forum. "A lot of these businesses are feeling very desperate and pretty lost." The Pohokura oil and gas field is 4km offshore in Taranaki. Photo: Rob Tucker New Zealand's natural gas is drawn from wells in Taranaki, on the North Island's wild west coast. Around 290,000 households use gas for cooking and heating; in business, it is burned at dairy factories, fertiliser plants and in manufacturing. It's also used to produce electricity when there's not enough power generated from wind, water or the sun. Until recently, gas was reliable, even when other energy sources were scarce. But now, our wells are old and in decline, and our gas supply is dwindling, fast. Data released by the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) in June reveals gas production has almost halved in the last ten years. Supply in February 2024 was the lowest since the 1980s. Gas reserves - the estimated available gas in the deep, underground reservoirs - have also fallen sharply, down 27 percent in the year to January. Forecasts say there is barely enough gas left in our existing oil and gas fields to last the decade, and even that is an optimistic guess. Demand now outstrips supply, forcing some businesses to struggle for gas, others onto 'demand management' plans requiring production shutdowns to support the electricity grid, and some to close operations entirely. "In my opinion gas supply is currently our most pressing energy security issue," says energy commentator Larry Blair. "The scale of the problem is huge, and we don't have any readily available alternatives to turn to." To combat the shortfall, the government has repealed the former Labour government's 2018 ban on new offshore oil and gas exploration permits. The policy aims to 'future-proof' the natural gas industry and reduce reliance on imported coal during dry years when hydro dams are low. The bill, spearheaded by Resources Minister Shane Jones, passed in the House last week. Coupled with a $200m co-investment in gas exploration, Jones says the policy will signal to international petrochemical companies New Zealand is "open for business". "It's to send a message that we will invest with you if it's appropriate as the Crown, but more importantly, there is a long-term future in New Zealand in terms of how we power our economy by using gas or coal." Industry has celebrated the law change. John Carnegie, chief executive of Energy Resources Aotearoa called the bill a "pragmatic and necessary step to help rebuild investor confidence." Jones and the Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon, have blamed the 2018 exploration ban for the current state of the gas market. "The basic problem is that we don't have enough gas thanks to Labour screwing the scrum by banning oil and gas," Luxon told Morning Report last month. Prime Minster Christopher Luxon is blaming the gas ban for the energy crisis. Official advice says it's more complex than that. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Jones has said the ban, which was implemented to address climate change, was "the most destructive decision in the history of New Zealand's industry." But experts, including the government's own officials, warned the ban was not the main driver behind a lack of investment in gas or New Zealand's high energy prices - and won't be a magic fix for them either. Global investment in speculative drilling for oil and gas has been declining since 2014, when the oil price crashed. Since then, oil companies have focused on high-ranking, lower-cost petroleum provinces, putting New Zealand at a "geographical and geological disadvantage" due to its isolation and relatively unexplored status, officials wrote in a Cabinet paper last year. Records show that even before 2018, most of the major oil companies had given up their exploration permits and left New Zealand, citing "bad data", high technical risk or better opportunities elsewhere. "Clearly the ban was an important nail in the coffin," says Green Party MP Steve Abel, who worked on Greenpeace's oil and gas campaign. "But the government also should have been well aware of the obvious evidence that gas was running out and no one was interested in drilling for more, even though a lot of oil majors came and had a look." Whether those companies can be lured back will largely depend on whether we have enough big buyers to make it worth their while. New Zealand has a closed gas market, meaning there are no exports. Instead, local supply must meet local demand. Historically, developing new gas fields has relied on big contracts from major users like methanol producer Methanex. But if demand from those large industrial users drops, it poses a risk that the remaining, smaller users might not be able to purchase enough gas to support new investment. Currently, demand is dropping rapidly - advice from officials on the $200m investment shows overall gas use has fallen by about a third since 2020, as companies close because of high prices, or decarbonise in the face of climate change. "At this point, the market is collapsing faster than we can put new reserves back into it," Larry Blair says. There is also the lingering damage by the ban to the country's reputation as a safe place to invest, and the very real risk that the policy could be re-reversed with a change of government. "The problem I see for people looking at New Zealand is there's no confidence that there's a sustainable market there in the long term." With such strong headwinds, experts say the $200m is unlikely to suddenly make it commercially viable to take a big gamble on entirely new discoveries, particularly when New Zealand hasn't found new gas in a new place for two decades or longer. It's more likely the money will be used to fossick around in our existing fields, trying to retrieve what's left. The government knows this. Its own advice has acknowledged the plan's flaws and its low certainty of success. "Investments may not all be successful. The risk of failed drilling is high in our mature fields. In the last five years around $1.8 billion has been invested in drilling 58 wells, and this investment has not managed to maintain or increase our gas reserves," MBIE's advice to Jones in March this year said. Even if the analysts are wrong, there is still the matter of timing. Data shows a new gas field could take a decade, or longer, to find, develop, and bring online. "There will be nothing left to power by then," says Consumer NZ chief executive Jon Duffy. "Why are we doubling down on expanding what is clearly an industry in decline? In my view we are taking an absolute wrong turn." Critics like Duffy say more needs to be done now to bring down gas and electricity prices and shore up energy supply. Last month, an influential collection of energy users and advocacy groups called on Luxon to urgently fix the "broken" energy sector, which they said was crippling industry and leaving families freezing during winter. "Regional employers are shutting their doors, with hundreds of jobs and decades of investment lost," it said. "Families and communities are being left behind." Luxon is also under pressure from climate advocates, who have said the bill is "tipping oil on the climate crisis fire." A government Climate Implications of Policy Assessment (CIPA) estimated that reversing the ban would lead to a "substantial increase in emissions" of approximately 14.2 million tonnes of carbon by 2035, primarily from prolonged gas usage in electricity, commercial, and industrial sectors. Drilling for gas would make it harder for New Zealand to meet climate change targets, but could also undermine its obligations under the Paris Agreement, risk trade deals and breach international law , critics said. "From a climate change point of view, which everyone should be worried about, we can't afford to burn the existing fossil fuels that have already been discovered on the planet," said Greenpeace executive director Russel Norman. "But also, potentially, you are facing liabilities from other countries who are negatively affected by you burning more and more fossil fuels and destabilizing the climate. So it's grossly irresponsible." Gas use has fallen by about a third since 2020, as companies close because of high prices, or decarbonise in the face of climate change. Photo: 123RF Jones recently said he considers climate change "largely moral hysteria." He said the recent judgment from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would not halt legitimate New Zealand industries. "Some people might try to use it, exploit it to undermine industry, undermine investment, stop manufacturing … but we will not allow our sovereignty to be compromised," Jones said. Instead, he has pitched gas as a "transition fuel" to reduce dependency on Indonesian coal to "keep the lights on". The government also plans to double geothermal energy. Plans to transition away from gas itself were shelved when the coalition was elected, alongside a plan to help fossil fuel workers retrain in low-emissions industries. While there are renewable energy projects in the pipeline it's not expected to be enough to fill the gap, especially as more companies decarbonise. Electricty Authority data shows more wind farms are in the pipeline, but critics say they need to be built now. Photo: In the same open letter sent last month, the group of concerned organisations called for the government to intervene in the market so more renewables could be built at pace. "Unlock investment in low-cost, renewable generation," it said. "Investment in new generation is being delayed, sustaining high prices, and contributing to the energy supply crisis we now face." Commentators say unless we can secure more energy soon, industry closures will begin to pile up as businesses run out of options. "I don't see a plan B for a lot of industries in New Zealand," says Blair. "That's the brutal reality of it." Consumer's Jon Duffy says he doesn't think there's a plan at all. "There's no Plan A. What we are really missing is a national energy strategy." Meanwhile, for industries like John Burling's, there are no good answers. His increased gas bill led to higher costs for running the gas-fired ovens, but Burling was unable to pass these on to customers. "It was a bit of a no-win really," Burling says. He's yet to find an alternative to his gas-fired ovens, and in any case, electricity would be even more expensive than gas. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
