logo
Lammy faces fine after Vance fishing trip licence error

Lammy faces fine after Vance fishing trip licence error

RTÉ News​a day ago
Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy could be on the hook for a £2,500 (€2,896) fine following his fishing trip last week with US Vice President JD Vance, after admitting he did not have the required licence.
Mr Vance and Mr Lammy were pictured by invited media as they fished in the lake at the foreign secretary's Chevening country residence in southeast England before a bilateral meeting as part of the vice president's working holiday to Britain.
The vice president later joked on camera that the only strain on the US-British special relationship was that while his three children had caught fish, the British foreign secretary had not.
All anglers are required by law to have a valid rod licence while they are fishing, regardless of whether they catch anything and whether they are on private land. Breaches can be punished with a fine of up to £2,500 (€2,896).
Mr Lammy's office said he had not purchased the licence before the trip and had since sought to rectify the mistake.
"The Foreign Secretary has written to the Environment Agency over an administrative oversight that meant the appropriate licences had not been acquired for fishing on a private lake as part of a diplomatic engagement at Chevening House last week," a spokesperson for Britain's Foreign Office said in a statement.
"As soon as the Foreign Secretary was made aware of the administrative error, he successfully purchased the relevant rod fishing licences."
The spokesperson had no immediate comment on whether a licence had been purchased for Mr Vance, too.
Mr Vance is in England with his wife, Usha, and their children, who are spending this week in the hamlet of Dean in the picturesque Cotswolds, following their stay at Chevening.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's the beef between this previous and current presidential hopeful?
What's the beef between this previous and current presidential hopeful?

The Journal

time5 hours ago

  • The Journal

What's the beef between this previous and current presidential hopeful?

PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFUL GARETH Sheridan, a millionaire most people in the country had not heard of before this week, kick-started his campaign today with a jaw-dropping accusation. Sheridan held the first press conference of his presidential campaign in Dublin's Shelbourne Hotel this morning and chose to open it by claiming that there has been a coordinated attack on his character. He claimed that this attack came from people associated with Seán Gallagher, the businessman and former Dragon's Den star who came second in the 2011 presidential election. The Journal put Sheridan's claims about Gallagher today to a spokesperson for Seán Gallagher, but has not received a response. So far, Gallagher has chosen not to comment on his relationship with Sheridan or on his departure from Nutriband. Addressing his past business relationship with Gallagher, Sheridan mused at the outset of his press conference today: 'Perhaps somebody is taking our breakup a little bit worse than me'. The Journal / YouTube Speaking directly to the journalists gathered in the Shelbourne Hotel in Dublin for his launch, Sheridan said the coverage they have given of his campaign so far has been 'commendable'. He continued: 'But, just one thing I wanted to bring to your attention is that there seems to be somewhat of a coordinated attack taking place on my character by people associated and in Seán Gallagher's circle.' He quickly followed this up by adding: 'Now, I'm not saying for a moment that Seán is behind this or involved in any way. 'At MacGill [Summer School] a couple of weeks ago he actually encouraged participation, asked the media to be nice to candidates that were brave to come forward and actually put their name in the ring. Advertisement 'But some of you in the room know what I'm talking about. That's all I'll say about that.' The Journal / YouTube So what the hell has gone on between the pair to merit such a statement from Sheridan at the outset of his campaign? The background How do Sheridan and Gallagher know each other? Sheridan, the 35-year-old multi-millionaire, is the founder and former CEO of US-based pharma company Nutriband. Seán Gallagher became chairman of the firm in 2018 and departed four years later in 2022. Asked about their relationship during a radio interview on Monday, Sheridan said he had not been in contact with Gallagher to get any advice about running for office. What do we know about Gallagher leaving the company? Sheridan and his company, Nutriband, only really gained mainstream recognition in Ireland earlier this week when he announced his bid for the Áras. Since then, journalists have been looking into the presidential hopeful, and there have been numerous reports on both him personally and on his company. Some of these related to Gallagher's departure from the company. On Tuesday, there were reports of 'mystery' surrounding his exit , but by Wednesday morning, the Irish Independent had reported that Gallagher had left the company's board over a row related to a $180,000 corporate box. Related Reads Millionaire Áras hopeful launches presidential campaign in the Shelbourne - here's what he said The millionaire millennial seeking the presidency: How did Gareth Sheridan get so rich? Catherine Connolly is using American-style grassroots fundraising for her presidential campaign According to the report, Gallagher raised concerns about the box at the Orlando Magic basketball arena, and in a statement to the Irish Independent, Sheridan insisted that the box makes a 'great return'. The statement from Sheridan further explained that communication broke down between the company and Gallagher in 2022, ahead of his resignation. What was the breakdown in communication about? Sheridan used his press conference today to shed some further light on this breakdown and on the pair's relationship. He explained that ahead of Nutriband being listed publicly on the stock exchange in 2021, it had received advice that it would be better to have a chairperson with capital markets experience. 'We proposed this to Seán. We asked him to voluntarily step aside on the same remuneration,' Sheridan said. He then explained that Gallagher was not agreeable to this, communication broke down, and a new chairperson was voted in by a majority of shareholders. 'I wish Seán nothing but the best in whatever he's working on now. I'd just like to be very upfront and make sure that you're aware of the situation that we're facing. Perhaps somebody is taking our break-up a little bit worse than me,' Sheridan said. Sheridan has not yet formally received a nomination to run in this year's presidential election. To date, Catherine Connolly is the only candidate formally in the race following the unexpected withdrawal today of Fine Gael's Mairead McGuinness. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... Our Explainer articles bring context and explanations in plain language to help make sense of complex issues. We're asking readers like you to support us so we can continue to provide helpful context to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay. Learn More Support The Journal

Pope Leo targeted Maga money in early days as pontiff, says Mary McAleese
Pope Leo targeted Maga money in early days as pontiff, says Mary McAleese

Irish Times

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Pope Leo targeted Maga money in early days as pontiff, says Mary McAleese

Pope Leo XIV has attempted to court Maga money from the US back into the Catholic Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of the political movement's thinking and actions, former president Mary McAleese has said. In a critical article reflecting on the new pontiff, Ms McAleese took issue with various aspects of his brief period in office , seizing on same-sex marriage and his attitude toward women in particular. Her views are set out in an article for the current UK Catholic Tablet magazine to mark the pope's first 100 days on Friday. Leo, she wrote, had followed the agenda of his predecessor Francis in support of migrants and the poor, although with reduced volume, 'as he tries to court Maga (Make United States Great Again) money back into the Church while simultaneously contesting aspects of Maga governmental thinking and acting'. READ MORE One of the main subjects considered by the cardinals before Leo's election was the parlous state of Vatican finances where, according to accounts for 2024, there was an €83 million shortfall, while its pension fund shortfall was estimated at €631 million. On May 16th last, in one of his first statements as pope, Leo affirmed Catholic teaching on marriage as founded on the 'stable union between a man and a woman,' and church teaching banning abortion. Ms McAleese said such 'uncompromising comments' could have been made by previous conservative popes Benedict, John Paul II, Paul VI or Pius XI. 'That they also appeal to the constituency of US Catholic voters who distrusted Francis and whose financial support Leo is trying to restore, is noteworthy,' she wrote. [ How a quiet American became pope Opens in new window ] She was also less than enthusiastic about the new pope's stance on women in the church, describing him as 'as bog-standard patriarchal, patronising and prone to tokenism'. Meanwhile, his views on Church teaching where LGBTIQ+ issues are concerned were anything but 'forward thinking,' she said. Noting that Leo recently appointed Rev Thomas Hennen as Bishop of Baker, Oregon in the US, she said the new bishop supported Courage International. [ Pope Leo XIV: what does he stand for? Opens in new window ] It 'advocates celibacy and caters for the spiritual needs of LGBTIQ+ Catholics within existing magisterial teaching which regards homosexuality as intrinsically disordered and homosexual acts as evil. This appointment and its accompanying spin is a worrying straw in the wind.' Overall, she felt the last 100 days showed that 'Leo is more Benedict than Francis though in fairness the latter's reputation as a reformer was well over-egged'. 'We appear at least to have pivoted dramatically from a careless pope to a cautious pope, from a sometimes narky showman to a genial shy man, from an impulsive pope to a measured pope, from a Latin American pope to an American pope.' The first American pope, Leo XIV's election on May 8th last took almost everyone by surprise, mainly due to his nationality. It tends to be Catholic Church tradition that conclaves rarely elect a pope from one of the world's major powers. Pope Leo XIV delivers his Angelus blessing from the window of his studio overlooking St. Peter's Square on August 10th. Photograph: Elisabetta Trevisan - Vatican Media via by Vatican Pool/ Getty Images As surprising was that he had been a member of the College of Cardinals, which elected him, for less than two years. He was on the Roman Curia, as prefect at the Dicastery for Bishops, for a little more than that, since January 2023. Following his election, unlike his predecessor, Pope Leo appeared on the balcony at St Peter's wearing the traditional papal stole and mozzetta. Since when he has decided to reside at the Vatican's Apostolic Palace, unlike Francis, and has already been to the papal summer residence at Castel Gandolfo twice, a place Francis never visited. Commenting on this, Ms McAleese said 'almost entirely gone from Pope Leo' papacy already are the early self-effacing elements of Francis' papacy which provoked much favourable comment about his perceived modesty'. She asked whether Leo will 'have the courage and faith to be an agent of change or are we already looking at another filibuster pope like Francis, just different in personality not outcome?'

Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine
Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine

Irish Examiner

time7 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Trump says he thinks Putin will make a deal on Ukraine

US president Donald Trump said on Thursday he thought Vladimir Putin was ready to make a deal on ending the war in Ukraine after the Russian president floated the prospect of a nuclear arms agreement on the eve of their summit in Alaska. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's summit that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. "I think he's going to make a deal," Trump said in a Fox News radio interview, adding that if the meeting went well he would call Zelenskyy and European leaders afterwards and that if it went badly he would not. The aim of Friday's talks with Putin is to set up a second meeting including Ukraine, Trump said, adding: "I don't know that we're going to get an immediate ceasefire." Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for the meeting with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska on Friday that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War Two. In televised comments, Putin said that the US was "making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict". This was happening, Putin said, "in order to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole - if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons." His comments signalled that Russia will raise the issue of nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Trump would also discuss the "huge untapped potential" for Russia-US economic ties. A senior eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. Activists dressed as Donald Trump (L) and Vladimir Putin pose after ripping up a map of Ukraine at a demonstration in front of the Brandenburg Gate. Picture: Sean Gallup/Getty "We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians, he understands all (these) dangerous things," the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said that there would be a give and take on boundaries and lands. Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine and Zelenskyy and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be "scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe but that was yesterday". Seeking clarity on security guarantees Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Zelenskyy on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Zelenskyy said the security guarantees had been discussed in "considerable detail" in comments after a meeting in London on Thursday with British prime minister Keir Starmer. Friday's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French president Emmanuel Macron said Trump insisted that the transatlantic NATO alliance should not be part of security guarantees that would be designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. Macron said, however, that Trump had also said the United States and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. It "felt like a big step forward", said the official, who did not want to be named. It was not immediately clear what such guarantees could mean in practice. On Wednesday, Trump threatened "severe consequences" if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting on Friday proves fruitless. Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands and has previously said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024. — Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store