
Pensions of 13,000 ex-civil servants being checked for errors, with one potentially owing €280,000
Minister for Public Expenditure
Jack Chambers
revealed errors at the National Shared Services Office (NSSO) on Tuesday, insisting the State will recoup any money owed.
One former senior civil servant could owe as much as €280,000 as a result of the errors.
The cohort of 13,000 former civil servants were all in work-share arrangements. Not all are necessarily affected.
READ MORE
It is believed most current Government ministers will owe money to the State due to errors in their pension deductions, although some may be due some money back. Others are unaffected.
Expected sums owed by current ministers range from hundreds of euro to just above €30,000. Other ministers may be owed hundreds or up to about €20,000.
The issue also affects pension deductions for ministers in previous Governments.
There is a third group of 30 former senior civil servants who are affected and, while some will owe as little as a few hundred euro, one individual is believed to owe €280,000 as a result of the NSSO error.
Mr Chambers said the NSSO has not yet been able to establish the full scale of the issues or the number of people affected. His department is in 'ongoing engagement' with the office that provides payroll and pensions services to public bodies and Government departments.
Mr Chambers, who updated the Cabinet on the situation on Tuesday, said the errors 'span different time periods and have been detected in different ways'.
They have arisen from 'administrative errors' in the NSSO and were 'not the fault of any of the individuals impacted', he said.
One issue, going back 20 years, relates to the 'miscalculation and underpayment' of pensions for some work-sharing civil service retirees who were in receipt of allowances.
The NSSO is seeking to establish the scale of the problem.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Mr Chambers could not offer an estimate for how much the State owes or is due.
An external audit will focus on validating all aspects of the issues identified and to identify any further issues, he said.
Mr Chambers said a pool of 13,000 retired civil servants will have their pensions checked, 'although the number affected is likely to be smaller than this' as not all will have anomalies.
He said anyone with queries about work-sharing pensions can contact the NSSO's customer contact centre.
Mr Chambers said the issue affecting current and former ministers relates to 'superannuation deductions and additional superannuation contributions with respect to salaries, allowances or gifted income'.
It is understood part of the issue arises from the treatment of part of ministers' income returned to the state in recent years and how their pension deductions were calculated as a result.
Mr Chambers said the NSSO is contacting affected people and will 'outline the issue as it relates to them and make arrangements for the recoupment of any monies owed or to issue refunds as appropriate'.
'As these are personal matters relating to individuals' pay, I'm not in a position to disclose the individual amounts,' he said.
Mr Chambers said the third issue, affecting 30 identified cases, concerns the administration of chargeable excess tax and withholding tax for senior grade civil service pensions.
Mr Chambers said the issues at the NSSO are 'completely unacceptable' and must be corrected 'as a matter of urgency'.
The Minister has appointed Derek Moran, former Department of Finance secretary general, as the new chair of the NSSO's advisory board.
He has asked Mr Moran to 'immediately' commission an external forensic audit of the NSSO systems and processes. Mr Chambers has separately requested 'a broad external review of the NSSO's capacity and structures' to ensure it is equipped to fulfil its responsibilities for the future.
Mr Chambers said the legislation underpinning the NSSO and its governance will need to be amended to ensure greater accountability and oversight.Such legislation is 'being drafted'.
He said the NSSO has advised him it is not aware of any further issues at this time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
27 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Kenmare Resources plunges to $88.6m loss after taking $100m hit on mining assets
Kenmare Resources has said it will pay an interim dividend to shareholders despite plunging to an $88.6 million (€76.17 million) loss before tax in the first six months of 2025 after taking a $100 million impairment charge on its mining assets in Mozambique. The titanium miner, which operates the Moma titanium mine in the southeast African country, announced earlier this year that it had lowered its future revenue assumptions amid uncertainty around the pricing of ilmenite, its main product. The Dublin-listed company has also been embroiled in protracted negotiations with the government in Mozambique to extend its mining contract since 2022. In half-year results published on Wednesday morning, Kenmare, which abandoned takeover talks with its former managing director Michael Carvill earlier this summer, confirmed that it took a $100.3 million impairment charge loss in the six months to the end of June. READ MORE Excluding the charge, adjusted earnings fell by 25 per cent to $47.2 million compared to the same period last year due to rising costs. Operating costs at Kenmare soared by 14 per cent in the first half of the year to $150.5 million. Costs directly related to the Moma mine rose 6 per cent, 'mainly driven by higher labour costs and production overheads', it said. Before tax, the miner fell to an $88.6 million loss for the period from a $27.7 million profit last year. Still, chief executive Tom Hickey said demand for Kenmare's products remains 'encouraging' while ilmenite prices in the first half were only 'marginally below' 2024 levels. He said the company remains 'well capitalised' to fund 'future shareholder returns', including an interim dividend of $0.10 per share that has been approved by the board.

Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Heather Humphreys races ahead in FG nomination battle as Ministers and TDs endorse her
Heather Humphreys appears certain to become Fine Gael's new candidate for the presidential election, having secured the support of the majority of the party's parliamentary party. Almost 40 ministers, TDs and senators had declared their support for the former minister within hours of her announcing her intention to seek the Fine Gael nomination on Tuesday. MEP Seán Kelly , who also announced his intention to become the Fine Gael presidential candidate on Tuesday, had secured the backing of at least six politicians, which left him 14 short of the nominations he requires. Including Fine Gael politicians who are understood to be backing Ms Humphreys but have not yet declared, it does not now seem possible for Mr Kelly to attract the 20 nominations required. READ MORE The parliamentary party members publicly backing Ms Humphreys so far include ministers Peter Burke, Helen McEntee and Patrick O'Donovan and junior ministers Neale Richmond, Hildegarde Naughton, Colm Brophy, John Cummins and Emer Higgins. Also among her backers were TDs Emer Currie, John Paul O'Shea, David Maxwell, Jerry Buttimer, Paula Butterly, Grace Boland, Frank Feighan, Naoise O'Muirí, Catherine Callaghan, Alan Dillon, Keira Keogh, Maeve O'Connell, Pete Roche, James Geoghegan, Colm Burke, John Clendennan and Micheal Carrigy and Barry Ward. Senators Seán Kyne, Maria Byrne, Nikki Bradley, Joe O'Reilly, Mark Duffy, Gareth Scahill, PJ Murphy, Cathal Byrne, Manus Boyle, Linda Nelson Murray and Noel O'Donovan also supported her. Mr Kelly has the support of TDs Michael Murphy, Joe Cooney, Brian Brennan and Noel McCarthy, and senators Garret Ahearn and Michael Kennelly. [ In Heather Humphreys, Fine Gael faithful think they've found their first president Opens in new window ] Setting out her campaign on Tuesday morning, Ms Humphreys said that she has 'never felt as good about taking on a challenge.' 'We're living in an increasingly divisive world, and I believe that the President can be a unifying force in this country that really brings people together and throughout my political career, I have always sought to break down barriers and reach out that hand of friendship,' she said.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on the European dash to Washington: pulling the emergency cord
Three days after Donald Trump's calamitous encounter with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, the sight of a hastily assembled delegation of European political heavyweights arriving at the White House underlined how grave the consequences could be. Rarely has a single presidential performance so unsettled allies while emboldening an adversary. The Americans may have intended the summit to signal progress towards ending the war in Ukraine. Instead, it left Europe scrambling to limit the damage. The source of alarm is obvious. Trump reversed his recent insistence that any peace process must begin with a ceasefire. He also appeared willing to entertain Putin's demand that Kyiv surrender territory it currently controls. To many, this looked like capitulation to Russian aggression and a betrayal of Ukraine. Monday's emergency transatlantic mission brought Volodymyr Zelenskiy to Washington flanked by some of the most senior figures in European politics. Their presence was designed both to bolster the Ukrainian president and press Trump to reaffirm positions that had been cast aside in Anchorage. Chief among these was the need for credible and durable security guarantees for Ukraine, without which any settlement would simply invite future Russian aggression. European leaders who reconvened again yesterday will have been aware that the vague Anerican assurances they received are not worth very much. But they will have been somewhat reassured that principles so recklessly discarded were at least partially restored. The price for this modest success was an unedifying spectacle of European politicians flattering and fawning over a president who appears to relish the rituals of deference more than the responsibilities of leadership. READ MORE All the same concerns remain, though. Trump had, in recent months, inched towards a more considered stance on Ukraine. That he could be swayed so abruptly by Putin confirms European fears about his longstanding admiration – bordering on obsequiousness – for the Russian leader. The path ahead is now uncertain. The Kremlin responded to the Washington meeting with a position paper that repeated the aggressive demands that accompanied the full-scale invasion in 2022. Trump believes he can engineer a direct meeting between Putin and Zelenskiy. Perhaps he can, though it is far from clear that the Russian would countenance such optics with a man he has so persistently sought to delegitimise. For now, the war grinds on with contining airstrikes on civilian targets, and Kyiv's stretched resources facing a slow but relentless Russian advance in the east. By drawing Trump into his worldview, Putin has deflected pressure for harsher sanctions, unsetttled European capitals and undermined Ukrainian morale. He has reason to view the week's work as a strategic success.