logo
The majestic bombers that used to defend Britain

The majestic bombers that used to defend Britain

Telegraph5 days ago
It's ironic that the finest hour of Britain's V-Force of strategic nuclear bombers came long after it had been stripped of its nuclear capability. On April 30 1982, a lone Avro Vulcan carried out what was then the longest bombing mission by any air force – and only surpassed recently by the US's raid on Iran's nuclear facilities – when it flew 16 hours and 6,600 nautical miles from Ascension Island to the Falklands.
The target was Port Stanley airfield (then in the possession of the Argentinians, who had invaded the islands a month earlier). Dropping 21 1,000-lb bombs, Flight Lieutenant Martin Withers was able to cause enough damage to the runway to prevent Argentine fast jets from using it, if not transport planes.
Jonathan Glancey describes this raid in detail – and the fact that another V-Force bomber, the Victor, played a significant role in both the Falklands and Gulf wars – in his impressive new history of Britain's nuclear bombers, V-Force: Britain's Nuclear Bombers and the Cold War. But, he tells us, that raid was the bombers' last hurrah. The Vulcans were taken out of service in 1984, the Victor nine years later. The original V bomber, the Valiant, last flew on operations in 1964. The meat of Glancey's book explains how the V-Force was developed originally as nuclear bombers, up until 1968 when the deterrent was transferred to the Royal Navy's Polaris-equipped submarines.
With previous books on Concorde, the Harrier and the Spitfire, Glancey is an aviation nut who's interested as much in the technical wonder of these planes as he is in the legacy they leave in the public consciousness. His book, he writes, 'looks at these winged Cold War warriors – warts, rivets and all – through the lenses of invention and engineering, of rivalry with fellow Nato countries as well as with the Soviet Union, and of popular culture too'. It is, he continues, a 'story of success, with compromise and failure along the way', and might serve as a universal parable for most defence procurement.
The author provides plenty of context. We get potted versions of the history of strategic bombing (the 'bomber will always get through,' as Stanley Baldwin said in 1932), the development of the atomic bomb, and even the technical capabilities of rival US and Soviet nuclear bombers.
Glancey is at his best, however, when he sticks to the story of the V-Force, which began with Britain's decision in 1946 to build its own atomic bomb (and later hydrogen bomb). Once we had the bomb, we needed a way to deliver it. Hence in 1947, six aviation companies were invited to tender designs for long-range jet bombers.
The two eventually chosen were Handley Page's reconfigured crescent-wing HP80 (Victor) and Avro's striking Delta-wing 698 (Vulcan), both marking 'new territory in terms of design and engineering'. The Victor, with its swept-back wings, high tailplane and giant air intakes, had the appearance of a 'deeply strange fish'; the Vulcan left 'elongated delta-shaped shadows' on the ground as it flew overhead with an 'unearthly howl'.
The first Valiants, Vulcans and Victors were delivered to RAF squadrons in 1955, 1956 and 1957, respectively. Though less advanced technically than its sister planes, the Valiant 'carried out the entire gamut of tasks asked of V-Force, short of dropping a live nuclear bomb on an enemy target'. That included conventional bombing raids (over Aden in 1956), testing an A-bomb over South Australia that same year, and, too, Britain's first H-bomb over Malden Island in the Pacific in 1957. Ultimately, V-Force would be 'the front line of aerial cavalry' were the Soviets to ever fire the first shot of World War III.
Its shelf-life, however, was relatively brief. The beginning of the end was the development of the Soviet Union's surface-to-air missiles, which could intercept enemies from the ground. Particularly the S-75 Dvina, which shot down high-altitude American U-2 spy planes in 1960 and 1962, and triggered the Cuban Missile Crisis. This forced V-Force to switch to low-level attack methods, which in turn revealed weaknesses in the Valiant's airframe. After one near-fatal accident when a rear wing-spar fractured, all 50 Valiants in service were grounded for good. There was a plan to equip them with a US-made nuclear missile, Skybolt – but then America grounded that too.
Glancey has written an engaging and affectionate account of the V-bombers, not least the figures who made it all possible: the brilliant British engineers who designed the planes; the pilots who were prepared to risk (and most often sacrifice) their lives to accomplish their missions. He also explores the political chicanery that prevented many other superb aircraft designs – military and civil – from ever becoming a reality.
There is, ultimately, a whiff of nostalgia and regret in these pages. Britain's nuclear deterrent has become increasingly reliant on US politics and technology; this is, says Glancey, partly thanks to an 'almost wilful deindustrialisation'. France, by contrast – with a smaller economy than Britain's – retains an independent nuclear deterrent, and makes its own multi-role fighter, the Rafale. It's not about money, 'but rather a lack of will, or interest perhaps'. Does this matter? Yes, argues Glancey – and he's right. It's not a question of guns over butter, but more about 'considered self-defence, of Britain being a dynamic Nato partner'. Such arguments have never been more timely.
★★★★☆
Saul David is the author of books including Sky Warriors. V-Force: Britain's Nuclear Bombers and the Cold War is published by Atlantic at £22. To order your copy at £18.99, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'We had no idea of what it would become': How Keep Calm and Carry On became a divisive 21st-Century phenomenon
'We had no idea of what it would become': How Keep Calm and Carry On became a divisive 21st-Century phenomenon

BBC News

time9 hours ago

  • BBC News

'We had no idea of what it would become': How Keep Calm and Carry On became a divisive 21st-Century phenomenon

After a forgotten WW2 propaganda poster was discovered in 2000, it found an astounding new resonance in 21st-Century Britain – becoming an endlessly memeable template that is both cherished and mocked. In the spring of 2000, a forgotten World War Two-era British propaganda poster was rediscovered in a dusty box at Barter Books, a second-hand bookshop housed in a former Victorian railway station in Alnick, Northumberland. The red poster and its bold, unadorned message beneath a Tudor crown, Keep Calm and Carry On, would resonate with a world far removed from wartime Britain, sparking a viral design trend and becoming one of the 21st Century's most recognisable and repurposed cultural slogans. Keep Calm and Carry On played upon stereotypes of British stoicism in the hope of restoring order amid the expected chaos – Dr Daniel Cowling The poster, commissioned by the British Ministry of Information in 1939 as part of a three-part series to bolster public morale amid the threat of war, was never officially released, and had rarely been displayed. Dr Daniel Cowling, senior historian at the National Army Museum, London, says the Ministry of Information often used posters, cinema, radio, books and pamphlets to influence public opinion during World War Two. In addition to the Keep Calm poster were two others, which carried the slogans Your Courage, Your Cheerfulness, Your Resolution Will Bring Us Victory and Freedom is in Peril. Defend it with All Your Might. "On the eve of the war, it was widely accepted that bombing raids would lead to the rapid and complete breakdown of society", Cowling tells the BBC. "Keep Calm and Carry On was designated as a specific response in their aftermath. It played upon stereotypes of British stoicism in the hope of restoring order amid the expected chaos."

Increase in vapes found on Britain's coastline by beach clean volunteers
Increase in vapes found on Britain's coastline by beach clean volunteers

The Guardian

time20 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Increase in vapes found on Britain's coastline by beach clean volunteers

Volunteer beach cleaners are finding more vapes than ever before as plastic pollution chokes Britain's coastline. The Marine Conservation Society (MCS) on Wednesday launches its annual beach clean, which last year involved more than 15,000 volunteers who completed more than 1,200 litter surveys. The charity is calling for swift and strong action at the UN's global plastics conference in Geneva this week, where countries are deciding on their pollution policies. Some forms of plastic are on the rise, according to MCS litter volunteers. Of those surveyed, 41% mentioned finding more plastic items (including plastic cups, bottle caps/lids, microplastics), including 19% more vapes, 26% more fishing litter (including lines/nets), 11% more dog poo bags and 11% more wet wipes. But there were some positive findings that demonstrated how good policy can make a difference. Volunteers on the beach cleans log every piece of litter they find so that a comprehensive dataset of rubbish on beaches can be built up and trends observed. Their research found that the number plastic bags littered on beaches reduced by 80% between 2015 and 2024, after a charge on carrier bags was introduced. The MCS says this shows that policy changes can quickly make a positive difference to the amount of pollution in the environment. Summer is a bad time for litter on UK beaches. Seventy-four per cent of MCS volunteers said they found an increase in beach litter during the summer, compared with winter months, due to increased visitor numbers plus a gap in public awareness around environmental impacts. Volunteers who take part in the litter pick have asked local authorities and governments in the UK to build better infrastructure including more accessible bins on beaches. Litter pickers said the problem was widespread and harming wildlife. Violet Fraser, who has been cleaning beaches on the Western Isles in Scotland, said she had found birds' nests with plastic in, while Colette Edwards in Norfolk reported regularly finding seals caught in discarded nets on her local beach. Plastic is a particular scourge on beaches as it does not biodegrade, instead breaking down into microplastics that stay in the environment indefinitely, and these are easily ingested by marine animals and can cause illness and even death. A spokesperson for the MCS said: 'The amount of plastic found on beaches increased by 9.5% between 2023 and 2024. The continued presence of plastics on our coastline highlights the need for a circular economy in which consumers have more options and access to use refillable and reusable products. 'Beachwatch data has already been used by governments across the UK as evidence to introduce litter reducing policy – such as the carrier bag charges and bans on certain single-use plastics, such as straws, cutlery, plates and bowls, and the recent UK-wide commitment to ban plastic wet wipes.' Isaac Kenyon, a volunteer, said: 'There's something deeply grounding about standing on a shoreline and knowing that your small actions are part of something much bigger. Every piece of litter picked up is one less hazard for wildlife, one less piece of plastic in the ocean, and one small step toward a healthier planet.' The Great British Beach Clean runs from 19-28 September.

Study reveals what most people think of as a high amount of sexual partners
Study reveals what most people think of as a high amount of sexual partners

Daily Mail​

timea day ago

  • Daily Mail​

Study reveals what most people think of as a high amount of sexual partners

Britons think 20 or more sexual partners is a lot a new YouGov survey has revealed. The stats come as part of a wider poll looking at modern society's sexual histories and habits and it has revealed the UK as being a surprisingly chaste nation. The average Briton claims to have only had sex with four people in their lifetime. Researchers at YouGov asked the respondents what they considered to be a 'small and large lifetime numbers of sexual partners'. Sharing the findings on X, they revealed that the majority of people see 20 or more sexual partners as a 'large' amount. Similarly, 15 or more people was seen as large by 41 per cent. People who had slept with 0-4 or 5 people were seen as having a 'small' number by the majority of those polled, and 6 to fourteen sexual partners were seen as having neither a 'small' or 'large' number. The researchers added that, unsurprisingly, people's idea of large or small is skewed by their own sexual history. The study explained: 'Whether Britons regard a number of sexual partners as large or small depends on how many people they themselves have slept with. 'At an overall level, the attitudes of men and women are effectively the same across the range. 'However, the generations do take differing views, with young people being the quickest to start saying that a number of sexual partners is "high". 'This is not necessarily surprising – the older someone is, the more chances to have sexual encounters they have had, and it is probably fair to assume that respondents are basing their answers on the tally of a person about the same age as them.' For instance, 44 per cent of people who have had one sexual partner in their life sees 10 or more partners as a 'large' number, with 27 per cent of people with four sexual partners saying the same. Meanwhile, eight per cent of people who have slept with ten to 14 people, and three per cent of people with 25 or more partners deem ten partners to be a 'large' number. Interestingly, the study found that young men and old women were notably more likely than their counterparts to consider a given number to represent a 'large number' of lifetime sexual partners. In June, a study found that women who have sex at least once a week are the 'happiest' in their relationship. While Bonnie Blue is famous for having sex with 1,000 men in a day, the average Briton has only slept with 4 people in their life So what do Britons consider to be small and large lifetime numbers of sexual partners? 0-4 people - majority see as small 5 people - 48% small / 40%… — YouGov (@YouGov) August 4, 2025 Scientists found 85 per cent of women who had sex once a week described themselves as 'sexually satisfied', according to a study of nearly 500 heterosexual women. In contrast, only 66 per cent of wives and girlfriends who had sex once a month reported the same level of relationship bliss. And the figure fell to 17 per cent among those women who had intercourse less than this. Author of the new study Alexandra Janssen, a researcher at the University Of Manchester, said the findings show the importance of regular intimate relations. She told the Daily Mail: 'While the study shows an association between frequency of sex and sexual relationship satisfaction, this is only a correlation. 'We don't know whether women are happier because they are having more sex, if they are having more sex because they are happier, or if they are happier and having more sex because of other factors-perhaps they don't have kids. 'Also, the fact that women who have less sex are also less satisfied in their relationship isn't particularly surprising.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store