logo
Separatists' sit-at-home protests lead to 700 deaths in Nigeria's southeast, report says

Separatists' sit-at-home protests lead to 700 deaths in Nigeria's southeast, report says

The Star26-05-2025
FILE PHOTO: Police officers are seen conducting checks on vehicles at the Federal High court in Abuja, Nigeria October 21, 2021. REUTERS/Afolabi Sotunde/File Photo
LAGOS (Reuters) -A sit-at-home order by banned separatist group Indigenous People of Biafra in Nigeria's southeast has led to the death of over 700 people in the region over the past four years, an intelligence consultancy said in a new report.
The IPOB, campaigning for the secession of the southeast that is predominantly inhabited by the Igbo ethnic group, has been labelled a terrorist organisation by Nigerian authorities.
SBM Intelligence reported that the fatalities resulted from the killing of civilians who defied the weekly stay-at-home order every Monday and on other specific days, as well as from clashes between the IPOB and Nigerian security forces.
"IPOB's enforcement tactics, including arson, looting and targeted assassinations, have created a climate of fear," the SBM report said.
"While there was a high rate of compliance with sit-at-home orders in 2021 (82.61%), surveys reveal that actual support is much lower (29%) now, with many complying under duress."
An IPOB spokesperson denied the group was responsible for the deaths.
"Those causing the killings are the kidnappers and criminals recruited by government to blackmail and demonize IPOB," the spokesperson said.
The government did not respond to a request for comment.
The IPOB launched the sit-at-home protest in August 2021 across the five states of Nigeria's southeast, using it as leverage to demand the release of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu, who is facing trial in the capital Abuja on terrorism charges.
The group suspended the weekly protest days later, citing a "direct order" from Kanu, who has been in custody since 2021, and reinstated it only on days the IPOB leader would be appearing in court.
However, other armed groups claiming allegiance to IPOB and factions within the group have persisted in enforcing the weekly protest, launching attacks on government facilities and perceived pro-government individuals.
Despite IPOB's attempts to disassociate itself from the region's violence, the police have accused the group of involvement in several incidents, including a 2021 attack on a prison and the murder of over 30 travellers earlier this month.
The IPOB denied responsibility for those two attacks.
The SBM report added that beyond the deaths, the sit-at-home order, which suspends economic activities in the southeast every Monday and on days when Kanu appears in court, has resulted in economic losses surpassing 7.6 trillion naira ($4.79 billion).
Civil war engulfed the restive Biafra region in the late 1960s, killing more than 1 million people.
($1 = 1,598.5100 naira)
(Reporting by Ben Ezeamalu; editing by Mark Heinrich)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun
Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun

Free Malaysia Today

time3 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Safeguard constitution to ensure nation's wellbeing, says Tengku Maimun

Former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat warned that the erosion of constitutional boundaries will have consequences that extend beyond the realm of legal doctrine. KUALA LUMPUR : Constitutional adherence plays a critical role in shaping perceptions of Malaysia as a secure and stable environment for economic activity, former chief justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said today. Speaking at a lecture here, Tengku Maimun said there was an intrinsic connection between strong constitutional governance and the broader stability and wellbeing of a nation. Adding that the Federal Constitution clearly defines the roles and limits of each branch of government, she warned that when constitutional boundaries are eroded – whether through legislative overreach, executive interference or the weakening of institutional safeguards – the consequences extend far beyond the realm of legal doctrine. 'They strike at the heart of our constitutional order, which upholds the rule of law, separation of powers and, ultimately, legitimacy of public authority,' she said. 'Investors, businesses and financial institutions base their long-term investments and economic planning on expectations of legal certainty, impartial adjudication and the protection of property and contractual rights. 'A judiciary that is independent and consistent in applying the law reinforces these expectations. Conversely, when laws are applied inconsistently or when institutions appear vulnerable to external pressure, investors' confidence is undermined.' She was speaking at the Allianz Centre for Governance's Distinguished Speaker Series inaugural lecture titled 'The Sanctity of Malaysia's Federal Constitution: Threats, Solutions and Impact on National Governance'. Tengku Maimun said there would be less room for the arbitrary exercise of power when each branch of government operates within its prescribed limits and respects the institutional independence of the others. She said this, in turn, fosters public trust in the government and strengthens the credibility of public institutions. 'When this constitutional framework is disrupted, when one branch seeks to dominate or silence another, the rule of law is placed at risk,' she said. 'In such moments, the judiciary is not merely permitted but obligated to act in accordance with the solemn oath to protect, preserve and defend the Federal Constitution.' Tengku Maimun served as the country's top judge from May 2019 to July 1 this year.

Don't shoot the messenger: Court of Appeal says ‘offensive' online remarks to ‘annoy' can't be a crime in Malaysia
Don't shoot the messenger: Court of Appeal says ‘offensive' online remarks to ‘annoy' can't be a crime in Malaysia

Malay Mail

time14 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Don't shoot the messenger: Court of Appeal says ‘offensive' online remarks to ‘annoy' can't be a crime in Malaysia

The Court of Appeal ruled that it is no longer a crime in Malaysia to post 'offensive' online remarks intended to 'annoy', declaring part of the Communications and Multimedia Act's Section 233 as unconstitutional. The Court of Appeal said Section 233 gave no objective standard for what is 'offensive', warning it could criminalise speaking the truth and stifle free speech just because someone feels the online remarks are offensive. The court's decision today only applies to ongoing and future cases where individuals face charges under Section 233. The Malaysian government can still appeal to the Federal Court, but it is not known yet if it would appeal. PUTRAJAYA, Aug 19 — The Court of Appeal today unanimously ruled that it is no longer a crime in Malaysia to make 'offensive' online comments with the intention to 'annoy', and struck down parts of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998's Section 233 that had criminalised 'offensive' and annoying online speech. Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng, chairing a three-judge panel, said the court found these words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 to be unconstitutional, as they go against the Federal Constitution's Article 10(2)(a). 'We find the impugned words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 constituting an offence to be violative of Article 10(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution read with Article 8. 'It is not a permissible restriction to freedom of speech under our Federal Constitution,' he said, before striking down or making these two words in Section 233 invalid. 'We declare this decision to have prospective effect, so as not to resurrect the past,' he added. The Court of Appeal's decision's prospective effect means it will only affect ongoing or future court cases involving the crime of 'offensive' online speech intended to 'annoy' under Section 233, and will not affect past cases where the court had decided on whether those charged are guilty or not of such crimes. In reading the broad grounds of his judgment, judge Lee pointed out that there may be some people who feel offended and annoyed even when what is spoken is the truth, and cautioned against making it a crime to speak the truth. 'A premium should be given to truth, and the fact that some truths may be unpalatable does not justify criminalising the messenger merely because some masses of the people do not like the message,' the judge said. Among other things, the judge said that there is no uniform standard in society on what is 'offensive', and what a person finds offensive may not be offensive to another person in a diverse society. The judge said Section 233 does not give any standards on what would be 'offensive' or what would be an 'intent to annoy', and said freedom of speech becomes illusory and enforcement becomes arbitrary when all types of speech could potentially be 'offensive' if a single person feels it is offensive. The judge cautioned that this would result in every speech having to be 'sanitised' — whether it is true or not — to avoid committing a crime under Section 233. Without an objective standard on what is 'offensive', the judge said regulating online civil discourse would become a 'euphemism' for the authorities to police and censor undesirable speeches, which he said would result in a 'chilling effect' over the right to freedom of speech and expression which is protected under the Federal Constitution's Article 10(1)(a). The judge pointed out that if online remarks are found to be untrue, a person can still be charged under the CMA's Section 233(1) for making comments that are false with intent to abuse, threaten or harass another person. The two other judges on the panel today are Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah. When asked by reporters if the Malaysian government will be appealing today's decision, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin said he would be seeking instructions on whether to file an appeal at the Federal Court. Lawyers Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, Surendra Ananth, New Sin Yew and Nur Izni Syazwani represented activist Heidy Quah in her successful constitutional challenge today against the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233. Lawyer Kee Hui Yee held a watching brief for the Malaysian Bar, while lawyers Lim Wei Jiet and Nevyn Vinosh Venudran represented Clooney Foundation for Justice and Suara Rakyat Malaysia in assisting the Court of Appeal as amicus curiae. While the Court of Appeal's decision today has effectively removed the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' from Section 233, there is now a newer version of Section 233 that uses the words 'grossly offensive'. MORE TO COME

Anwar meets with Zahid and Hajiji, pledge cooperation to strengthen Putrajaya-Sabah ties
Anwar meets with Zahid and Hajiji, pledge cooperation to strengthen Putrajaya-Sabah ties

Malay Mail

time17 hours ago

  • Malay Mail

Anwar meets with Zahid and Hajiji, pledge cooperation to strengthen Putrajaya-Sabah ties

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 19 — Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim emphasised that close cooperation between state and federal leaders is essential to ensure the aspirations of the people are realised in a comprehensive and inclusive manner. The Pakatan Harapan (PH) chairman said he had held a meeting with Barisan Nasional (BN) chairman Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) chairman Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor, conducted in a harmonious atmosphere marked by camaraderie. 'This meeting reflects political maturity and a commitment to strengthening cooperation to ensure the country's stability, particularly in the context of relations between the federal government and the state of Sabah. 'I believe political stability is a crucial foundation for advancing development agendas and safeguarding the welfare of the people,' he said in a Facebook post yesterday. Anwar, who is also PKR president, expressed hope that this spirit of consensus will continue to underpin stronger national unity, leading to a progressive, just, and prosperous future for all in Malaysia. — Bernama

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store