
Betrayal At Langley: A CIA Man Who Became US' Most Infamous Double Agent
One by one, CIA assets deep inside the Soviet Union vanished. Some disappeared without a trace. Others turned up dead. Behind closed doors in Washington, panic quietly took hold. For years, no one could understand why America's closest secrets were unravelling like a spool of thread yanked in the dark.
Thousands of kilometres away, Oleg Gordievsky, a Russian colonel secretly working for Britain's MI6, sat alone in a safehouse, still trying to make sense of how the KGB had nearly caught him. "For nearly nine years I have been guessing," he would later say, "who was the man who betrayed me?"
The answer came on April 28, 1994, when a bespectacled CIA veteran named Aldrich Ames stood in a US courtroom and confessed to being the mole. The man who, for nine years, sold secrets to the Soviets, not for ideology, but for cash, and left a trail of betrayal behind him.
Ames's fall from grace began not with a whisper of discontent against the US, but with a chalk mark on a mailbox. That signal, a dead drop, was another handoff of top-secret intelligence to the KGB.
For years, Ames passed plastic-wrapped CIA documents detailing everything from surveillance tech to names of American assets within the USSR. These actions systematically dismantled nearly every US spy network operating in the Soviet Union.
"I felt a great deal of financial pressure," Ames would later admit. "In retrospect, I was clearly overreacting." But overreaction doesn't begin to cover the scale of his betrayal.
A Career That Should Have Ended Sooner
Ames wasn't a rising star. He bumbled through early assignments, struggled with alcohol like his father (also a CIA man) before him, and was known for poor work habits. Once, he even left a briefcase full of classified documents on a subway. Still, somehow, he kept climbing the ranks.
By 1983, despite a questionable track record, Ames was appointed head of the CIA's Soviet counterintelligence branch - a post that gave him nearly unrestricted access to the Agency's deepest secrets.
That same year, his financial woes deepened. Amid a costly divorce from his first wife and mounting expenses from his second, Rosario, Ames began to drown in debt.
So, in April 1985, with a few drinks for courage, he walked into the Soviet Embassy in Washington and offered up names of agents working secretly for the CIA within the USSR for $50,000.
The Price Of Betrayal
Ames didn't stop there. Over the next nine years, he pocketed more than $2.5 million, the highest known sum ever paid to a Soviet spy, and handed over the identities of more than 30 agents and compromised over 100 CIA operations.
"It was about the money," said FBI agent Leslie Wiser, who later led the investigation. "And I don't think he ever really tried to lead anybody to believe it was anything more than that."
The consequences were swift and brutal. In 1985, Soviet agents working with the CIA began to disappear. One by one, they were arrested, tortured, and in many cases, executed. Among them was General Dmitri Polyakov, a high-ranking Soviet army officer and long-time CIA asset.
Oleg Gordievsky, a KGB colonel who had been secretly spying for MI6 from London, narrowly avoided that fate. "I was enthusiastic. I liked the Americans," Gordievsky told the BBC. "I wanted to share my knowledge with them, and now I realise [Ames] was sitting there... which means that everything, all the new answers of my information, he must have passed to the KGB."
Tom Mangold, reporting for Newsnight, described the tragic irony best. "The top KGB defector was debriefed by the top KGB mole," he said.
Cracks In The Armour
For nearly a decade, America's worst intelligence disaster was walking its hallways in plain sight.
While the CIA searched high and low for the mole within, Aldrich Ames bought a Jaguar, paid for his wife's liposuction in cash, and moved into a $540,000 house in Arlington. All on a $60,000 government salary.
His position meant he could meet Russian handlers without raising suspicion. His downfall came not from a brilliant counterintelligence breakthrough, but from old-fashioned scrutiny of his spending habits.
By the early 1990s, the CIA and FBI grew suspicious. A joint task force finally zeroed in on Ames. On February 21, 1994, after a lengthy surveillance operation, Aldrich and Rosario Ames were arrested outside their Arlington, Virginia, home.
Ames cooperated, offering a full confession in exchange for a lighter sentence for Rosario, who served five years. He was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. A sentence he is currently serving in a federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana.
His case shook the CIA to its core, much like the exposure of Kim Philby rocked British intelligence decades earlier.
"He regrets getting caught. He doesn't regret being a spy," said FBI's Leslie Wiser of Aldrich Ames.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump again threatens 'very substantial' tariff hikes for India over Russian oil
By Andrea Shalal and Aftab Ahmed Trump again threatens 'very substantial' tariff hikes for India over Russian oil WASHINGTON/NEW DELHI -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would increase the tariff charged on imports from India from the current rate of 25% "very substantially" over the next 24 hours, in view of New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian oil. He also said a "zero tariff" offer for imports of U.S. goods into India was not good enough, alleging that India was "fuelling the war" in Ukraine. Trump's threat to India over its purchases of Russian oil started on July 31, when he announced a 25% tariff for Indian goods, along with an unspecified penalty. "They're fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy," Trump told CNBC in an interview on Tuesday, adding that the main sticking point with India was that its tariffs were too high. "Now, I will say this, India went from the highest tariffs ever. They will give us zero tariffs, and they're going to let us go in. But that's not good enough, because of what they're doing with oil, not good." An Indian government source said that India's purchases of Russian oil have helped to stabilise global oil prices by easing the pressure on supplies from other regions. India, the world's third biggest oil importer and consumer, buys more than a third of the oil it needs from Russia. "If we stop buying Russian oil, who will replace those barrels to maintain balance and at the same time prevent the prices from shooting up? We don't want a repeat of 2022 when prices shot up to $137 a barrel," the source said, referring to the oil market spike around the time when Moscow's invasion of Ukraine began. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the source was not authorised to speak to the media. Trump's latest comment followed a similar threat on Monday, which prompted India's Foreign Ministry to say the country was being unfairly singled out over its purchases of Russian oil. "It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia ," it said in a statement issued late on Monday. "It is unjustified to single out India," it added. The EU conducted 67.5 billion euros worth of trade with Russia in 2024, including record imports of liquefied natural gas that totalled 16.5 million metric tons, the Indian ministry said. The United States continues to import Russian uranium hexafluoride for use in its nuclear power industry, palladium, fertilisers and chemicals, it added, without giving a source for the export information. The U.S. embassy and the EU's delegation in New Delhi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Both the United States and EU have reduced their trade ties with Russia since it launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. SUDDEN RIFT India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. It has faced pressure from the West to distance itself from Russia over the Ukraine war. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding ties with Moscow and economic needs. India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is likely to go ahead with a scheduled visit to Russia this week, two government sources said. Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar is expected to visit in the coming weeks. The sudden rift between India and the U.S. has been deepening since July 31. Trump has said that from Friday he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end the war with Ukraine. The trade tensions have caused concern about the potential impact on India's economy. The equity benchmark BSE Sensex .BSESN closed down 0.38%, while the rupee dropped 0.17% versus the dollar. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India's economic resilience guards against tariff threats
The impact of the US's 25% tariff on imports from India appears to be far less catastrophic than what some had predicted. Meanwhile, the trade deal with the US remains in negotiation, and there is every reason to expect that once talks advance, the tariff rate could be scaled down. Estimates suggest that the 25% tariff might translate into an annual impact of just $10-11 billion — a relatively modest impact. While the India-UK FTA negotiations were multifaceted, the agreement was not solely about lowering tariffs or increasing trade volumes; it was also about redefining economic diplomacy in a multipolar world. (Bloomberg) With the American delegation scheduled to visit New Delhi later in August, both sides have ample opportunity to recalibrate their positions. Trade deals are shaped not by threats but by diligent negotiations between officials representing institutional interests of their respective countries. In that light, US President Donald Trump's statements seem part of a broader tactic aimed at bolstering America's bargaining position rather than signalling an irreversible shift in economic policy. Therefore, there is no need to panic. India's growth story is one of rising momentum, driven by deep structural shifts and smart strategic positioning. Over the past year, India has defied global headwinds that have hindered many advanced economies. While high inflation, tightening monetary policies and geopolitical uncertainty have strained markets elsewhere, India has maintained an impressive growth trajectory. India's ability to sustain high growth is anchored in robust domestic demand, strong public capital expenditure, and the sustained expansion of its booming services sector. At the same time, there has been a deliberate policy recalibration toward achieving self-reliance, integrating global supply chains and boosting manufacturing competitiveness. Initiatives like the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes across sectors such as electronics, semiconductors and renewable energy have attracted substantial foreign direct investment. Moreover, the nation's digital revolution has firmly established India as a leader in the digital economy across the Global South. In this context, the recently-signed India-UK free trade agreement (FTA) takes on added significance. While the FTA negotiations were multifaceted, the agreement was not solely about lowering tariffs or increasing trade volumes; it was also about redefining economic diplomacy in a multipolar world. For India, an ambitious FTA with the UK offers several strategic advantages. One, it sends a positive signal to global investors, affirming that India remains open for business — both strategic and reform-minded. Two, the deal provides a pathway for India to build deeper trade links with advanced economies at a time when globalisation is evolving towards regionalisation. And three, the agreement reinforces India's effort to diversify its export markets — a crucial counterbalance to the uncertainties of US trade policy and the slowing pace of growth in some of its traditional markets. The UK is currently India's 18th largest trading partner, with bilateral trade exceeding $50 billion. The FTA will serve to lower existing tariffs, ease regulatory hurdles and promote greater mobility for Indian professionals. Even contentious issues, such as agricultural trade, though politically sensitive, appear manageable. The relatively modest scale of UK agricultural exports could provide the room needed to sidestep potential disputes, easing negotiation complexities on that front. At the same time, India's impressive economic performance is underscored by several headline-grabbing trends across its major sectors. For instance, in the realm of global supply chains, India has emerged as a formidable competitor in the smartphone market. This transformation illustrates how India is successfully capitalising on new geopolitical realities and diversifying manufacturing hubs. Additionally, macroeconomic indicators have painted an encouraging picture. With retail inflation falling to a six-year low of 2.1% in June 2025, the consumer sector has found its footing amid otherwise volatile global conditions. Employment metrics reveal a healthy labour market. Exports have seen a year-on-year boost of approximately 5.9%, while remittances have reached a record $135.5 billion. The Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) in July 2025 hit a 17-year high of 59.2, reflecting robust industrial activity and strong global demand. Public health initiatives, too, have contributed significantly to the overall picture. The Jan Aushadhi Kendras, which offer affordable medicine and have saved citizens ₹38,000 crore in health care costs over the last 11 years, exemplify how policy initiatives are directly alleviating household expenses and improving standards of living. Energy and infrastructure sectors are part of this rosy picture as well. India has crossed the 1-billion-tonne mark for coal production — a symbol of its energy self-reliance — while simultaneously ramping up renewable energy capacity. With 22 gigawatts of solar and wind capacity added in the first half of 2025, India is on track to overtake the US in clean energy installations. In the digital domain, India's transformation is truly remarkable, which reinforces India's position as a hub of technological innovation. Furthermore, the growth of Global Capability Centres (GCCs) in Tier-II and Tier-III cities — now numbering over 1,700 and generating $64.6 billion in revenue — demonstrates a broader socio-economic transformation. With these centres creating tens of thousands of jobs outside the traditional Tier-I urban hubs, India is leveraging lower costs, burgeoning talent pools, and improved infrastructure to reshape its economic geography. In essence, while President Trump's statements may have generated headlines, the underlying data tells a more encouraging story. India's broad-based growth, strong macroeconomic fundamentals, and strategic policy shifts point to an economy that is far more robust and resilient than any single trade dispute could jeopardise. Rather than succumbing to external pressure, India is actively repositioning itself as a major player on the global stage, capable of turning challenges into opportunities. Ultimately, the narrative is one of confidence, adaptability and strategic foresight. India's economic resilience serves as a compelling counterpoint to any external rhetoric. The picture, then, is not one of crisis but of calculated evolution — a testament to India's ongoing journey towards becoming a robust and dynamic engine of global growth. Syed Zafar Islam is a national spokesperson of the BJP, former Member of Parliament, and former managing director, Deutsche Bank, India. The views expressed are personal.


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India-US ties in the crosswires
India's blunt response to US President Donald Trump's repeated outbursts on New Delhi's trade and defence relations with Moscow highlighted the double standards of Western powers that have criticised India for purchasing discounted Russian commodities over the past three years. Trump, who follows a completely transactional and unpredictable approach to global trade and key geo-strategic relationships, has spoken more than once in recent days about levying an unspecified penalty on India for its purchases of energy and military hardware from Russia, over and above the 25% tariff that he has already imposed on exports to the US. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. (AP) The external affairs ministry's response to Trump's latest fusillade against India has two key takeaways: One, New Delhi reserves the right to choose its trade partners and will exercise strategic autonomy to meet its security needs; and two, the West must end its hypocrisy of offering one set of principles for the rest of the world and following another set to meet its own energy imperatives. A year ago, US officials, albeit under a different administration, had assured the Indian side that Russian crude refined in a third country, such as India, is not a 'product of Russia' from a sanctions perspective. For India, Russian energy is a necessity to ensure predictable and affordable costs for Indian consumers amid volatile market conditions. At the same time, members of the EU and the US have retained their energy and other trade ties with Russia under carve-outs from sanctions packages. The EU's latest sanctions, for example, provide exemptions for Canada, Norway, Switzerland, the UK and the US from an import ban on refined products made from Russian oil. Such double standards do not sit well with Trump's sharp remarks about India. Sure, Trump's posturing may be aimed at pressuring India to conclude a trade deal that is to the advantage of the US, but this is no way to treat an important partner. While Washington has taken the moral high ground on Ukraine (one reason Trump has cited for targeting India), it appears unconcerned about Israel's war in Gaza that has claimed more than 60,000 Palestinian lives. Washington will be mistaken to take India for granted at a time when Trump is dining with the Pakistan army chief in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. Such moves may even push New Delhi closer to Moscow, a longstanding and reliable ally. India-US ties have evolved from the Cold War days, when New Delhi was allied to Moscow and Washington patronised Islamabad, to achieve a relatively balanced relationship based on mutual respect, democratic values, and strategic interests. Trump's short-sighted and transactional approach to diplomacy threatens to disrupt that journey.