Are you the firstborn, middle child or baby of the family? Your place in the birth order affects your health.
Whether you're the oldest child, the youngest or are right in the middle (and even if you're an only child), here are some of the surprising ways birth order can have an impact on your physical and mental health.
First-born children tend to be responsible, or rule followers. They often take on the caretaking role among their siblings. They can be prone to worry and are often seen as mature for their age. They are known to be comfortable taking charge. One study found that CEOs are more likely to be the first-born child. Another showed they are more likely to get higher education and make more money than their younger siblings.
But being first-born doesn't necessarily mean an easy life start. One study found that firstborns were more likely to be born preterm and with lower birth weight compared to their later-born siblings. However, this gets balanced out because parents tend to be more attentive with their firstborn when it comes to doctor's visits and preventive care than their subsequent children — specifically, the study authors found that 'earlier-born children are more likely to participate in preventive medical screenings, their vaccine uptake rates are higher and they see their general practitioner (GP) or pediatrician more often.' Researchers say that, as parents have more children, this may change likely due to waning resources, including time and money.
Beyond the physical health aspects, Alyson Curtis, a New York-based therapist and founder of Attuned Therapy, says that because they're born first, the oldest sibling is often 'parentified,' or pushed into a parent-like role. For girls, there's even a specific term for this — eldest daughter syndrome, which describes the disproportionate responsibility often given to the oldest girl in the family.
'Essentially, the eldest child grows up too fast as a form of survival,' Curtis tells Yahoo Life. 'They learned at a young age that taking care of others is where their self-worth lies since that is what their caregiver valued in them.'
Because of this, older siblings may end up being more 'conscientious or careful, possibly because of the higher expectations placed on them, and may be more proactive in managing their health,' Claudia Giolitti-Wright, founder of Psychotherapy for Young Women, tells Yahoo Life.
But this kind of upbringing can have 'dangerous implications on their mental health,' says Curtis.
A report from Epic Research published in 2024 found that the oldest children were 48% more likely to have anxiety and 35% more likely to have depression than those who came later in the birth order.
Ah, the middle child. If you are one, then you already know the struggle of being overlooked and forgotten. There's even a term for it: middle child syndrome.
Sandwiched between the responsible eldest and the free-spirited youngest, middle children tend to be the peacemaking mediators of the family. While they can be people pleasers, they are also known to be rebels who try to carve out their own path. Research shows middle children engage in riskier behavior than their older siblings.
It might be a tough place in the birth order, but being the in-between also has its benefits. A large study published in February showed that middle children ranked highest in honesty, kindness and cooperation.
Still, Giolitti-Wright says she has seen patterns of self-silencing and feeling overlooked in middle children. They 'tend to ignore their needs because it wasn't ever about them.'
This can affect mental well-being, sometimes manifesting as anxiety or depression, especially if the middle child's role in the family wasn't clearly defined or validated, adds Giolitti-Wright.
When it comes to physical health, middle children tend to have better immune systems than the oldest because of the early exposure to germs.
Youngest children are often seen as charming free spirits. As the babies of the family, no matter their age, they are generally given more leniency than their older siblings. They are known to be fun, rebellious risk-takers.
The good news for the youngest ones is that they, just like middle children, tend to have better immunity than their oldest sibling thanks to the germs they are exposed to from the get-go, early and often. This is known as the Hygiene Hypothesis. One paper found that younger siblings are less likely to have asthma and allergies than their oldest sibling, while other research suggests that having older siblings is associated with a lower risk of food allergies.
Still, while the oldest sibling tends to have worse health outcomes at birth, that role switches as kids get older, with research showing that younger siblings are more likely to have hospitalizations because of risky behavior, including accidental injuries and drug use.
While youngest siblings are often indulged for being 'the baby' or the "protected" one, they 'might receive less one-on-one medical attention simply because parents are stretched thinner or less anxious than they were with their first child,' says Giolitti-Wright.
When it comes to mental health, Curtis says younger siblings can be prone to struggles with self-esteem and self-efficacy. 'Essentially, the pervasive dynamic of 'coming last' to older siblings leads to a reduced sense of one's own abilities,' she says. 'When you consistently can't influence outcomes due to the developmental disadvantage of being last in the birth order, you adapt by 'going with the flow.''
A younger sibling may go on to be an adult who speaks up less, continues Curtis, believing that their opinion doesn't matter as much because it didn't when they were learning how the world worked. 'A self-fulfilling prophecy is then enacted over and over again, creating a vicious cycle, wherein the individual doesn't feel very powerful in their own life. … These types of thoughts have the capacity to alter one's entire life, from what profession they choose to what kind of partner they marry,' says Curtis.
Are only children really "lonely onlys"? The idea of being an only child has strangely gotten a bad reputation in the past, even gaining the term 'only child syndrome.' This refers to the idea that children who do not have siblings are bossy, spoiled, selfish and lack coping skills. But there isn't much evidence to support this claim.
'One of the benefits I often see in both research and my own clinical work is that only children tend to be highly verbal, mature for their age and comfortable in adult spaces,' says Giolitti-Wright. 'They're often great at entertaining themselves, thinking creatively and developing a strong sense of identity because they've had a lot of solo time and adult interaction growing up.'
Still, if an only child comes from a dysfunctional household, Curtis says this is where things can get tricky. 'I … see in my practice how only children take a greater hit coming from households with complex trauma than their counterparts who had siblings. … Siblings can be a life vest for any intense pressure or dysfunction the parents are knowingly or unknowingly putting on the children.'
Like first-born children, research shows only children are more prone to anxiety and depression. 'Only children may have better access to resources but might also carry higher pressure to excel,' says Giolitti-Wright.
When it comes to physical health, research suggests there's a link between only children (and last-born children) and a higher risk of obesity in childhood and adulthood. In another study, researchers found that only and last-born children are more likely to be overweight or obese if their mothers tended to discourage them from eating and were less likely to praise them during meals.
While birth order can influence a person's life, there are no absolutes, Amy McCready, founder of Positive Parenting Solutions, tells Yahoo Life. 'As parents, we have tremendous power to help our kids avoid falling into those common stereotypes through the way we interact with them.'
When it comes to their kids, McCready says it's important for parents to try and avoid labels and comparisons, which can pigeonhole kids into roles in which they feel stuck, even into adulthood. Instead, celebrate individual strengths.
Next, check in with them. 'It's not just what we do, it's how our kids interpret it,' McCready says. She suggests asking: 'How do you feel about the jobs we each have in the family?' and 'Do you ever feel like I expect more from you than your siblings?'
For families with multiple children, it's important to 'prioritize one-on-one time,' says McCready. 'Even just 10 or 15 minutes fosters deep emotional connection and helps each child feel truly seen, heard and valued. Because it's one-on-one, your child doesn't have to compete with siblings for your attention — they get you all to themselves, reinforcing their sense of belonging and significance, no matter their birth order.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
24 minutes ago
- Medscape
Ethics of Artificial Hydration and Nutrition In Dementia
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hi. I'm Art Caplan. I'm at the Division of Medical Ethics at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. I had a difficult case brought to me recently by someone who was trying to decide what to do with a patient with very bad dementia in terms of feeding. It's not the first time I've had this kind of case brought to me by physicians, and it probably won't be the last, but it remains a thorny, tough ethics quandary. I think everybody understands that there is a right — and we've had this affirmed since cases like Terri Schiavo or Nancy Cruzan — to not force artificial feeding (meaning by tube, in the nose, or in the stomach) or artificial hydration upon someone who doesn't want it. If you have the right to refuse treatment, it's been established — certainly in American law, and I would say by standards of care within the medical profession — that hydration and feeding, when they're done by mechanical means, tubes, or using artificial substances to supply nutrition, are medicine. As a medical intervention or a medical therapy, just like other interventions, such as dialysis or even refusing an amputation for a diabetic patient, the patient ultimately, if they're competent, has the right to refuse it. The challenge comes in the case that was presented to me. A woman, let's call her Mary Taylor, some years ago knew that she was at risk of getting Alzheimer's disease. She filled out her living will and discussed with her family that when she became demented, if she was unable to care for herself, if she couldn't recognize her family and friends, she did not want any medical interventions, including specifically hydration and nutrition. Sadly, she went through the course of declining and ended up at a nursing home. At the nursing home, the doctor who was treating her noticed that nurses were offering Mary food on a spoon and liquid on a spoon, that she was opening her mouth when the spoon was presented, and she was, if you will, eating and drinking. The physician, knowing that the family remembered this advance directive living will and knowing that they were the designated decision-makers, basically said stop the spoon-feeding. The nurses did not want to do it. They said it's ordinary care. It's not medical. It's just what you do as part of what one human being deserves from another human being — to offer them ordinary ways to drink water or to eat something. The case basically raises two tough ethics questions. Is feeding by spoon the same as medical intervention with artificial forms of hydration and nutrition? I believe it is. I believe that when you say 'no more food and nutrition,' it isn't just the equipment. I'll put it simply: It's who's on the end of the spoon. If nurses or doctors are feeding, it's medical. It's professional care, and you should be able to say no to that. Secondly, I do think if someone says 'I don't want to eat or drink anymore,' their intent and their values are clear. You could certainly rediscuss it with the family and say she seems to be accepting food and swallowing, and ask if that changes their mind or makes them think she might have decided differently. However, I think the wishes of the competent person, when they made the living will, are what should drive care if the person loses competency. They thought about it, they knew where they were headed, and I do think that's the value that ought to dominate thinking about whether we have to continue to try food and water for nutrition. Does that mean that you can't offer ice, lip balm, or other comfort means if someone is suffering because they're getting dehydrated and so on? Absolutely not. That isn't the same as feeding them. Here are some lessons to consider. It's important to pay attention when someone says they don't want food and water. Are nurses or anyone in a hospital or a nursing home trying to feed them anyway because they don't think of spoon-feeding as an artificial or medical intervention? I think they need education about that, and I think it's important to make sure that does not happen if that's what they said in their advance directives. I also believe advance directives and conversations with people, when they're competent or facing the potential loss of competency, should include discussions about whether they really mean everything, such as spoon-feeding or somebody offering you a glass of water. Is that included in what you are saying you do not want? We have to be thorough and comprehensive in making sure that we're clear so there really aren't disputes of what people did say no to and might say yes to if they no longer are able to tell us directly. I'm Art Caplan, at the Division of Medical Ethics at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Thank you for watching.

Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Chaddock, a 175 Year Old Organization, Launches a Book Publishing Company to Help Kids and Families
Chad the Cougar and the Forest of Feelings is the first in a series of children's books and research based publications that draw on Chaddock's almost two centuries of success with children and families in crisis New York, Aug. 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- After almost two centuries of remarkable work, Chaddock, an organization dedicated to helping build healthy families and improve the lives of children everywhere, has launched Chaddock Books. Located in Quincy, IL, Chaddock is an internationally recognized leader in the treatment of children suffering from the psychological, emotional, and spiritual effects of significant abuse, neglect, and trauma. Chaddock's full range of preventative, educational and treatment services to children from birth to age 21 and their families include community-based services, a special education school, in-home intensive programs, residential treatment, and professional development opportunities for child-serving professionals. In the first Chaddock Book, Chad the Cougar and the Forest of Feelings, Chad learns from a wise owl that sometimes the best reaction to someone's anger or angst is no reaction at all. Instead, just be with them and be a listening ear. This series of books stands apart because it's grounded in real, evidence-informed interventions used at Chaddock every day. These are not just fictional tools or strategies—they are practices that work for children who've experienced developmental trauma and attachment disruptions, but they will also be helpful for any child. The books reflect the relational approach we teach and model, where healing happens through connection, presence, and understanding. 'Our hope is that parents and teachers and counselors of all kinds will be able to use Chaddock books as a resource to help them do their best work and start important conversations that lead to healing,' Says Chaddock CEO, Matt Obert. For more information about Chaddock and its services, visit . View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Chaddock
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
L'Avenue Derm: The Blueprint for Seven-Day Dermatologic Care, Revolutionizing Skin Health and Aesthetics
L'Avenue Derm debuts in Manhattan with a one-month waitlist, redefining holistic dermatologic care. Members receive 7-day access to top dermatologists, yoga, nutrition, and tailored aesthetic treatments—seamlessly blending convenience and clinical excellence at every Courtesy of L'Avenue Dermatology & Aesthetic Surgery PLLC NEW YORK, Aug. 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As New York City's only membership-based dermatology and aesthetic practice open seven days a week, L'Avenue Derm offers an unmatched level of access, personalization, and excellence in skin health. Signature Memberships grant exclusive access to top board-certified dermatologists, combining clinical excellence with a modern, patient-centric experience. Members receive priority care, personalized treatment plans, and curated wellness benefits—designed to elevate both outcomes and experience. A Tiered Experience Designed Around You L'Avenue Derm's memberships are offered in three thoughtfully crafted tiers, each tailored to the time and commitment needed to achieve individual skin health goals. Whether seeking transformation, maintenance, or a curated starting point, each tier is designed to align with the member's personal wellness journey and lifestyle. All tiers include weekday access to expert dermatologists, AI-powered skin and hair consultations, and virtual yoga. Higher tiers unlock nutritional evaluations and concierge support for a fully integrated wellness experience. Exclusive Signature Accents & 7-Day Availability Through its L'Avenue Noir upgrade, members enjoy guaranteed weekday after-hours appointments, weekend availability, in-home skin cancer screenings and expedited scheduling within 24 to 48 hours. This innovative model not only prioritizes continuity of care, but transforms the traditional patient-clinic relationship. By requiring membership, L'Avenue Derm ensures timely access, deeper clinical engagement, and a comprehensive care experience. 'We designed L'Avenue Derm to be a sanctuary for comprehensive, tailored skin health—available when patients truly need it,' said a spokesperson for the practice. 'This model removes friction from the patient journey and offers elevated, responsive care that supports every dimension of well-being.' Enrollment and Personalized Onboarding The enrollment process is seamless and available only through the L'Avenue Derm website, with options that reflect different lifestyle needs. From the moment members join, they are supported with concierge onboarding, immediate access to their benefits, and a care team ready to tailor services to their goals. L'Avenue Derm invites prospective members to learn more about eligibility, tier selection, and the full experience by visiting its website. About L'Avenue Dermatology & Aesthetic Surgery PLLC Based in New York City, L'Avenue Derm is the blueprint for seven-day-a-week, comprehensive and personalized dermatologic and advanced aesthetic care. Renowned for its clinical excellence, elevated patient experience, and commitment to redefining modern skin health, L'Avenue Derm sets a new standard in integrated, patient-first skincare. Contact Information: Contact Person's Name: Jennifer LewisOrganization / Company: L'Avenue Dermatology & Aesthetic Surgery PLLCCompany website: Contact Email Address: hello@ A photo accompanying this announcement is available at in to access your portfolio