
Mould covered the bathroom of my new home – I felt sick but banished it in minutes with a single buy, it's the best
BANISHING mould from your home can feel like a never-ending chore.
From constant bleaching to pricey products that don't work, there's loads of stuff out there, but more often than not the mould returns.
2
That was cleaning whizz Nicola's experience until she discovered a product that actually works and stops mould from coming back.
Taking to Instagram, Nicole explained how the Mould Magic gel worked wonders in her new home.
"If you haven't seen this before you need to get some, it works on so many different surfaces but I used it mainly on grout in the bathroom," Nicola explained.
In the viral clip she showed what the bathroom looked like when she first moved in, and sure enough the walls were covered in mould.
The formula is especially easy to apply because it comes in a tube with a nozzle designed to get into those hard to reach places.
Not only that, but according to Nicola the formula is also non-drip, so you don't have to worry about it slipping and sliding away.
After a couple of hours the product can then be wiped away, leaving your bathroom mould free.
"The mould never comes back," the cleaning whizz added.
Unsurprisingly, fellow cleaning fans were wowed by the before and after snaps of the bathroom.
One commented on the clip: "It's brilliant for washing machines too."
"Oo, thanks I'll be getting this," another said.
"Omg we recently got mould in out shower and it's right in the grout so this will be great," a third chimed in.
Meanwhile, others wanted to know if the product would work on painted walls and Nicola revealed she'd tried Mould Magic there too and was impressed with the results.
The product can be bought online for as little as £9.95 too, so it won't break the bank.
More mould cleaning tips and tricks
Use household items
If it's too late, and any condensation has had a chance to flourish and turn into mould, you can start removing it for nothing.
Natalie, from Which?, said: "A few drops of washing up liquid mixed with warm water can work on smaller areas of mould on hard surfaces like walls or floors.
"Use a sponge, cloth, or brush to work the soapy solution in small circular motions over the mould.
"If you're trying to remove particularly stubborn mould, try a 1:1 solution of white vinegar and warm water and pour it into a spray bottle to target the affected area."
If you've got a bit more in your budget, you can try buying mould or mildew remover from your nearest supermarket or retailer.
You can get it as cheap as £1.20 from B&M or £2.50 from Dunelm, at the time of writing.
Call in the professionals
You can usually treat smaller patches of mould yourself, but if the problem has gotten out of hand, you might need to call someone in.
Natalie said: "If you find new mould growing quickly in other areas of your home, or the affected area becomes too large to handle, it may be time to get professional help."
Checkatrade says it costs £25-£35 per hour or £200-£400 per room to call someone in for mould removal.
Meanwhile if you want a specialist to come and take a look to inspect for any mould, that will cost you around £50-£300.
What is mould and how to get rid of it?
Mould is more likely to grow during the winter months.
Olivia Young, Product Development Scientist at Astonish revealed exactly why this is.
"Unfortunately, mould is a common problem many people face during winter. It thrives in conditions that are warm and damp, so your bathrooms are likely to be the most affected place.
"That said, during the colder months most rooms in your home could be vulnerable to mould growing.
"This occurs primarily from condensation that builds up on your windows when you've got your radiators on.
"If you think about it, when windows and doors are closed, there's not much chance for the air to circulate and the moisture to make a swift exit.
"This build up is what can cause dreaded mould to make an appearance, especially in bathrooms, as it creates that warm and wet environment that is a breeding ground for mould.
"If left untreated, not only is it unsightly but it can also pose a serious risk to your health, so it's really important you treat it.
"The key to tackle mould is to act fast.
"Try to come into as little contact with it as you can. So, grab your gloves, tie up your hair and get to work to remove any signs of mould as soon as you notice them.
"To keep mould at bay, there are some simple solutions you can introduce throughout home.
"The first is keep it ventilated. Yes, even in the cold winter months try to leave your bathroom window open for at least 10/15 minutes post shower or bath. This will get rid of any excess moisture quickly preventing mould gathering.
"If you're having a repeat problem with mould in one particular area, it might be because the humidity levels are too high. You can get a dehumidifier that will help keep the levels low and reduce the risk of mould returning.
"The golden rule to remember when dealing with mould is the quicker you can treat it, the better. If you leave it, it will only get worse so never ignore it!
"To successfully get rid of mould every time, I recommend opting for the UK's No 1 Mould & Mildew Remover, that effectively removes mould and mildew stains almost instantly, with no scrubbing necessary."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I never thought I'd have to worry about Isobel – then she died at 21 after dismissive doctors said ‘just take ibuprofen'
WHEN Isobel Allen cried to her GP about the pain she was experiencing, the teenager was told not to worry. It would be several appointments later - and eventually, after opting to go private - that Isobel would find out that her painful periods were the first sign of the disease that would lead to her death. 13 13 13 Isobel, of Hornchurch, Essex, was a normal 19-year-old girl who liked to go out with her friends and buy new clothes. She worked as an accounts manager at a recruitment company and her parents say they never worried for her future. Something about Isobel's pain didn't sit right with mum, Sarah, but she tried to believe the doctors. But looking back, Sarah realises how Isobel was "let down". Isobel died on April 2, 2025, aged 21 years old. She was told she had incurable sarcoma cancer six months after first seeing a GP. Sarah, a former hairdresser, tells Sun Health: 'The doctors literally thought she was a teenager making a meal out of nothing. 'But I knew she wasn't, I knew that the pain she was in wasn't normal. 'Isobel felt so strongly - and we do as a family - that medics aren't listening to these youngsters. They're being misdiagnosed time and time again. 'She would scream at the TV when she saw one of those NHS adverts saying ' early diagnosis saves lives '. Because we had to pay privately for her diagnosis." Sarah, who is married to Isobel's dad, Christian Allen, 50, who works in the construction industry, adds: 'I know deep down it isn't our fault, but as parents, there have been times when we've doubted ourselves. But you believe the medical professionals. 'Isobel fought with every bone in her body. At her funeral, her dad said, 'I never thought I'd have to worry about Isabel. She was confident, outgoing, and had everything going for her'. 'And it changed so suddenly.' 13 Isobel started having painful periods and spotting - bleeding inbetween - in November 2022. Sarah says they went to the GP 'a few times' before Isobel was given an ultrasound. 'He said it was fibroids [benign growths in the womb] and she started to cry,' Sarah recalls. 'He said, 'Why are you crying?' And she said, 'I'm worried it could be something serious'. He said, 'No, no, it's just fibroids'. 'So we didn't think anything more of it. I have fibroids, a lot of women do.' But Sarah grew concerned because the pain Isobel was experiencing seemed abnormal, with painkillers barely touching the sides. By February, she was experiencing 'really bad belly pain' - which Sarah says doctors recommended ibuprofen for - and in March, the pain spread to her back and legs. They told us Isobel had cancer and it had spread to quite a few places. It wasn't like how you see it on the TV, when they hold your hand. She was told quickly, without compassion. SarahIsobel's mum Sarah took her to A&E at Queen's Hospital in Romford on two occasions in March which conducted more ultrasounds. 'By now, Isobel could hardly walk, she was hanging on to me to walk, and had been signed off work,' she says. 'The only time she was happy or comfortable was if she was in the bath or laying on the settee. 'She was running baths at three o'clock in the morning. I just knew it wasn't normal. 'I've found out since this that youngsters can sleep through pain and if they can't, it's something really bad. Now that's all adding up.' Isobel was also suffering bloating, loss of appetite, night sweats and fatigue - all red flag signs of cancer. She was referred to The London Independent Hospital and was told by a gynaecologist again that she had a fibroid in the womb. An MRI would have a six month-wait because they were 'prioritising cancer patients'. 'IT SHOULD HAVE NEVER GOT THIS FAR' The family had had enough, forking out £500 for a private MRI scan, in April 2023. Two days later, they were seen by a consultant and Sarah "could tell by her face" that it was bad news. Sarah recalls: 'The consultant said, 'This looks nasty, you should prepare yourselves. She also said it should 'never have got this far'." Isobel was then referred to Queen's, which told her to come in with a night bag. But she ended up having a 40-day hospital stay. On Friday May 12, a diagnosis was given to Isobel with her mum and dad there, following a biopsy. The 'fibroid' turned out to be a tumour on Isobel's womb. Sarah says: 'It wasn't like how you see it on the TV, when they hold your hand. She was told quickly, without compassion. 'They told us Isobel had cancer and it had spread to quite a few places.' Tumours were eventually found in her lungs, hip and kidneys. Isobel was blue-lighted to University College London Hospitals (UCLH) because she was so unwell, and a few days later, on Thursday May 18, the family were hit with another devastating blow. 13 13 The symptoms of sarcoma cancer The most common symptom of soft tissue sarcoma is a lump somewhere on the body. But this doesn't necessarily mean cancer - there are all sorts of reasons for lumps and swellings, but it must always be checked by a GP. The lump is usually found deep under the skin and might be felt before it can be seen. The lump is usually solid to the touch, painless and hard to move around under the skin. It will continue to grow and as it does, it can become painful. Other symptoms depend on where in the body the lump is. These can include: Tummy pain and constipation if there is a sarcoma near the tummy A cough that does not go away if there is a sarcoma near the lungs Source: NHS Sarah says: 'They told us it was incurable, and that they would do everything they could to prolong her life. Which, at the age of 19, is not what you want to hear. 'I didn't leave her side after that. I was just too scared, let down, devastated… just looking at her and crying. We all cried. 'She would say, 'Why me? Why couldn't I have gotten another cancer?' To go through that as a family, it was unbearable.' Sarcoma UK say more than 5,100 people are diagnosed with the disease each year. In a recent study, it was shown to take an average of almost seven weeks to diagnose in children. Sarcoma develops in the body's bones and soft tissues, such as muscles, fat, blood vessels, nerves, tendons, and joint linings. There are more than 100 subtypes, the two main ones being soft tissue and bone. 13 13 13 13 Cancer Research UK says: 'Soft tissue sarcoma incidence is unusual compared with most cancers because a sizeable proportion of cases occur in children and younger adults; however, the highest incidence rates are in older people.' Soft tissue sarcoma has a 45 per cent survival rate for 10 or more years. Devastated by the shocking survival statistics of sarcoma, Isobel knew she had to raise money in the hopes it would contribute to better outcomes for future patients. She raised £13,000 for Sarcoma UK at a charity ball, and her brother brother, Josh Allen, 24, has since ran the London Marathon, raising £27,000. Her friends are fundraising for Race For Life in July. FOUGHT 'TIL THE END Isobel started chemotherapy, but it was a means to extend her time with family, living life as normally as she could between the side effects. She returned to her work, even commuting to London two days a week, and her supportive friends would plan meet-ups around her chemotherapy schedule so she'd have the energy to join them. The nurses always laughed that she'd turn up to her chemotherapy in a new outfit, wig and full face of makeup - until she became too weak. Even when they told us about the tumour on her lung, I was sobbing and she said, 'Come on, mummy, it is what it is'. SarahIsobel's mum Eventually, the family got the news that there was nothing more that could be done. It was Christmas 2024, and they were advised to think about end-of-life care. Sarah says: 'We had some tough conversations with the consultant in January, who said it wasn't looking good. So Isobel knew the time was getting nearer. 'In March, she was struggling to breathe and they took her into hospital to drain fluid from her lungs - but it wasn't fluid, it was a tumour. 'That's when they said we need to get her home and make her comfortable. She wanted to be on the sofa, so we got her bedding down, and we actually all slept in the living room. 'She died the next day, on Wednesday at 10 to 3, at home with her family. "I just didn't realise it would be that quick. 'Isobel had protected us all along. She fought so hard to carry on as normal, even though the whole time, she had this deadly disease inside of her. 'Isobel was still talking about trying to go on holiday to Spain, she was ordering clothes two days before her death. She was just trying to live like any normal 19-year-old would. 'She was the one comforting us. Even when they told us about the tumour on her lung, I was sobbing and she said, 'Come on, mummy, it is what it is'.' Speaking of her legacy, Sarah notes a tattoo Isobel got towards the end of her life. It read 'Go Live Life'. 'We've had so many parents and other young girls message us from UCLH to say how she inspired them. 'Even her consultant wrote that she was an 'inspiring young lady'. One girl who rang the bell in December said 'Isobel changed my life'. 'She would light up daycare. She'd tell them not to stop living their life, and they were more than cancer.' A spokesperson for The London Independent Hospital, said: 'While, it would be inappropriate for us to discuss individual cases, we send our deepest condolences to the patient's family at this extremely difficult time. " All patients who are referred to us undergo a comprehensive and meticulous consultation to identify and diagnose their symptoms. Should further tests and scans be required to investigate their condition, then these are booked promptly either at our hospital or a referral is made to another appropriate facility.' Matthew Trainer, Chief Executive, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, said: 'I'd like to extend our sincere condolences to Isobel's family. We're extremely sorry for their loss.' 13


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Royal Shrewsbury Hospital's green energy push could save £1m a year
A hospital has started work on a £16.2m project to replace its boilers with heat pumps and solar Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust said the work, plus energy efficiency measures, would reduce the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital's carbon footprint by more than 3,000 tonnes a work could also save the hospital trust £1m a year in energy for the project has come through the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme. The hospital trust said the project would include an upgrade of energy management systems, better insulation and the replacement of air handling unit fans with low-energy fan systems. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Toilet paper over or under? Scientist FINALLY settles the debate - so, do you agree with their method?
It's a cause of arguments in households around the world. And over 150 years since the toilet roll was invented, the question of how exactly it should be oriented still triggers furious debate. In the 'over' position, the next square of toilet paper is facing the user, while in the 'under' position, the next square of toilet paper is facing the wall. Now, a scientist has settled the debate once and for all. Dr Primrose Freestone, professor of clinical microbiology at the University of Leicester, says the 'under' orientation is actually safer and more effective, despite the image in the original toilet paper patent. The researcher points out that the 'over' method requires a second hand to touch the toilet roll. This increases the risk of the paper being contaminated before it reaches our nether-regions – which in turn means greater risk of infection. 'There is more handling of the toilet roll from the over position,' Professor Freestone told MailOnline. Imagine you are on the toilet doing your business, and the toilet roll is in the 'over' position (with the next square facing you). In this scenario, you need to use one hand to hold the toilet roll to stop it from rotating forward, and the other hand to actually tear off the next bit of paper. In contrast, in the 'under' position, you can pin the next sheet against the wall with one hand as you simultaneously tear it off, according to the academic. So you don't have to use the second hand in the process at all – and the overall risk of transferring hand bacteria to the paper is reduced. Especially for women, accidental transfer of bacteria from the hand to the genital area can increase the risk of infection. And women generally tend to use more paper for men – for number ones and number twos. 'For the under position, there is less likely to be whole roll contamination,' Professor Freestone told MailOnline. 'You can pin the sheets against the toilet wall without having to touch the exterior of the roll.' Why is the 'under' position better for toilet roll? Unlike the 'over' position, the 'under' position (with the next square of toilet paper facing the wall) requires only one hand, not two. When you enter the bathroom, both hands are immediately exposed to high-touch surfaces potentially teeming with harmful bacteria - such as the doorknob and the toilet seat. So using just one hand instead of two, you are at best halving the risk of bacterial transfer from the hand to the toilet paper that you're about to use. Especially for women, accidental transfer of bacteria from the hand to the nether-regions can risk getting an infection. When people enter the bathroom, both hands are immediately exposed to high-touch surfaces likely teeming with harmful bacteria – including the doorknob and the toilet seat. So by touching the paper with just one hand instead of two, we are potentially halving the risk of bacterial transfer from the hand to the unused toilet paper. Of course, both hands have the potential to transfer bacteria onto toilet paper during a bathroom break – but by only using one hand throughout the whole process, we can reduce the risk of this transfer. Also, using two hands risks the spread of bacteria from the wiping hand to the other hand – because they are brought into close proximity to each other. 'If someone who has wiped say once and the faecal matter has soaked through the layers of toilet paper and makes hand contact, the presumably right hand that did the wiping will likely be contaminated,' Professor Freestone said. 'Then that right hand may contaminate anything it touches as the toilet user reaches for more toilet paper which they then fold for wipe two, possibly touching the left hand as it does so.' According to Professor Freestone, her advice is even more pertinent in public toilets, where there may be multiple sites of heavy faecal contamination all over the toilet door, stall and seat. 'This is why it is so important to wash your hands after going to the toilet, and not to eat, drink or use a phone in the toilet, either,' she told MailOnline. Dated 1891, a drawing for US Patent No. 465588A (left) features a toilet roll clearly positioned unmistakably in the over orientation Interestingly, the original patent for toilet paper more than 150 years ago shows a toilet roll in the over, not under, position. The patent from September 15, 1891 was filed by the inventor of perforated toilet paper sheets, New York business man Seth Wheeler. According to various surveys, around 70 per cent of people prefer the over position and 30 per cent the under position. There's also the argument that the under position reduces the chances of a cat or small child from pulling at the toilet paper. But the over position does have alleged advantages, such as giving you more transparency over how many square you are tearing off. When was toilet paper invented? In the 14th century, perfumed paper sheets were 'manufactured' for the Hongwu dynasty, but only the royal family and the imperial court had access to them. Around the same time in Europe, people used rags to clean up after a trip to the loo. Rich Europeans used wool, hemp or even lace. But commoners used whatever cloth they had including their sleeves. The first mention of toilet paper appeared in Europe in the 16th century in a text by French writer Rabelais. In North America, throughout the 1700s, people were still wiping with whatever they had on hand - even seashells. But by the 1800s, paper was becoming more widely available, and finally in 1857, a New Yorker named Joseph Gayetty introduced and first patented toilet paper. He called it 'Medicated Paper for the Water-Closet' and Gayetty's name was printed on every sheet. His medicated paper contained aloe and was sold in packages of 500 sheets for 50 cents. Seth Wheeler of Albany, New York, obtained the earliest US patents for toilet paper rolls and dispensers, dated 1881. Included in the patent, are Seth's declarations on his new product: 'Be it known that I, SETH WHEELER, of the city and county of Albany, and State of New York, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in Toilet-Paper Rolls.'