Virginia sees spike in abortions due to influx of out-of-state patients
That's according to a new report from the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization that advocates for access to reproductive care including abortion. The increase is likely due to an influx in patients from states with new or more restrictive abortion bans.
Virginia saw 5,500 more clinician-provided abortions in 2024 than the year before, a 16% increase. That's an outlier compared to the national trend, where there was just a 0.4% increase in states without total bans.
'There was an 86% increase in the number of patients traveling from out of state to Virginia for abortion care between 2023 and 2024, and we think that the Florida ban is likely playing a big role here,' said Guttmacher senior research associate Isabel DoCampo .
Most states without total abortion bans saw small changes to the number of abortions performed between 2023 and 2024. Arizona, California, Kansas, Ohio and Virginia, states that did not change their abortion legislation in the past two years, saw substantial increases. Virginia saw the most significant increase, outpaced nationwide only by Wisconsin, which restored abortion services in the latter half of 2023.
Whooping cough cases are rising again in the US, challenging public health departments
Worries about flying seem to be taking off. Here's how to cope with in-flight anxiety
Measles misinformation is on the rise — and Americans are hearing it, survey finds
States that enshrined Medicaid expansion in their constitutions could be in a bind
What is listeria? Things to know about the bacteria and how to prevent infection.
Virginia is the last state in the Southeast without a ban on abortions after six or 12 weeks of pregnancy — Florida, which previously allowed abortions up to 15 weeks, enacted a six-week ban that took effect May 1, 2024.
'Virginia is the second-closest state for Florida patients to access abortion, and it's the closest place without a waiting period to access abortion,' DoCampo said. 'It's also likely that people in the Southeast who would have traveled for care to Florida are now going to Virginia instead.'
That maps with findings from the Virginia League for Planned Parenthood, which operates clinics in Virginia Beach, Hampton and Richmond.
'Before the Dobbs decision in 2022, the amount of out-of-state patients was 2 to 3% of our entire patient population,' said Planned Parenthood spokesperson Rae Pickett, referencing the Supreme Court decision that stripped away the nation's constitutional protections for abortion . 'After the Dobbs decision, that increased very quickly to 15%. So that was a very large jump. Then, after the six-week abortion ban went into effect in Florida, our numbers went from 15 to 25 to 30% and have stayed there for that period of time.'
Virginia permits abortions during the first and second trimester, or during the third trimester if three physicians agree the pregnancy will lead to the woman's death or substantially harm her health.
VLPP increased same-day and telehealth appointment availability in anticipation of the Florida, as well as the use of patient navigators, who help patients coordinate travel. The Planned Parenthood affiliate operates a virtual clinic via telehealth, but people seeking an abortion pill for up to 11 weeks after their last period must be physically located in Virginia at the time of their appointment, and the medication is mailed to a Virginia address.
'I think the Virginia case shows us that an abortion ban in one place has a dramatic impact on the abortion care infrastructure in other parts of the country,' DoCampo said.
The Virginia Society for Human Life, an anti-abortion advocacy group, described the report as tragic.
'The new numbers suggest a deeply alarming trend,' said Olivia Gans Turner, president of VSHL, in a statement.
Virginia's constitution does not expressly prohibit or protect abortion. That could change: the General Assembly voted this session along party lines to advance a constitutional amendment that would enshrine a right to abortion in the state constitution. If the legislature passes that same resolution next year, the amendment will appear on the ballot for public referendum in 2026.
The state constitutional amendment process excludes input from the governor, but both the Republican and Democrat candidates for governor have taken positions on the issue. Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle Sears, the Republican nominee, spoke at Virginia's March for Life earlier this month.
'All those who are for abortion are already born,' she said. 'We stand for life, and how can it ever be wrong to stand for life?'
Former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger previously voted in Congress in favor of codifying the abortion protections offered in Roe v. Wade.
'Virginia is the last bastion in the South when it comes to protecting reproductive freedom — and the consequences of this reality on women and families are clear,' she said in a statement. 'In the aftermath of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, families across the Commonwealth continue to worry that extreme politicians and judges will rip away their right to privacy, jeopardize their safety, and leave their families without access to medical care.'
Kate Seltzer, kate.seltzer@virginiamedia.com, (757)713-7881
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
A MAHA Progress Report
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has spent the past six months working fast to embed his Make America Healthy Again creed into American life. Over the summer alone, he has struck deals with some food companies to phase out some petroleum-based food dyes, waged a war against pediatricians over COVID-19 vaccines for young children, seemingly toyed with the idea of shipping fresh food to Americans in ' MAHA boxes,' and pledged to reboot the nation's dietary guidelines from scratch. I spoke with the Atlantic staff writer Nicholas Florko, who reports on health policy, about how the MAHA-fication of the country is coming along. Nicholas Florko: We've seen Robert F. Kennedy Jr. take actions that will weaken our vaccination system in the United States, confirming some of public health's worst fears. But there have also been some surprising successes in his term. RFK Jr. has embraced the role of a dealmaker, and we've seen him leaning on food companies in particular to change their offerings and get rid of synthetic dyes. He's been able to do that simply by asking and by making handshake agreements, as opposed to what we would normally expect from a health secretary—for him to use his regulatory power to force these changes. Stephanie: Why are these handshake agreements proving successful? Nicholas: Food companies likely realize that it's in their best interest to get on the good side of the Trump administration. We see this throughout all sectors of business, but for the food sector, these changes are small enough that companies can make them without dramatically hurting their bottom line, while also earning a lot of brownie points with the administration. Stephanie: That reminds me of President Donald Trump's announcement in July that Coca-Cola, famously his favorite drink, had agreed to make their soda with cane sugar rather than high-fructose corn syrup. To what extent is Trump influencing health policy? Does RFK Jr. have a lot of latitude? Nicholas: The Coca-Cola issue is an interesting one because while it's true that RFK Jr. is very anti–high-fructose corn syrup, he's also publicly called sugar a 'poison.' So this is one of those instances where you wonder what is behind RFK Jr. supporting this change. He must know that this isn't actually going to significantly improve public health, but also probably realizes that this is important to his boss. That being said, I think that RFK Jr. does have some latitude. If you left Trump to his own devices, you probably wouldn't see the same level of aggression toward food companies overall, unless he had a personal stake in the situation. Stephanie: With back-to-school season under way, many students are getting up-to-date on their shots. How does this year's vaccination season compare to years past? Nicholas: We haven't seen huge changes, but we are seeing some hints of what might come. Much of the action thus far is around COVID vaccines. In February the president issued a largely symbolic executive order barring schools from enforcing COVID-19 vaccine mandates, but by the time that was issued, virtually no schools actually had such a policy. RFK Jr. also softened the CDC's recommendation for kids to get the COVID-19 vaccine. That's probably been one of his most controversial decisions, prompting a high-profile clash with pediatricians; a leading pediatrics group put out its own suggestions saying that children should be getting vaccinated. But we haven't seen major changes to the other vaccines typically required for returning to school. Stephanie: That disagreement must make it confusing for parents to know who to listen to. Nicholas: It's reasonable to assume that a good portion of people will listen to RFK Jr., but those people may be already skeptical of vaccines and see him as a trustworthy messenger, versus folks who are on the fence. I think that's really the question: Where do those people who are on the fence go? Do they take RFK Jr.'s suggestion, or do they trust their doctor? Stephanie: In May, you wrote a story that was alarming for salad lovers, specifically about how bagged lettuce should be avoided. What's happening with America's food-safety system? Nicholas: One of the earliest, most concerning changes for food safety happened when DOGE came into the federal agencies. Advisory committees focused on food-safety questions were shut down. People were being laid off—such as the administrative staff in charge of making sure that inspectors can go out to farms. Some layoffs seem to have been rescinded, but there's a broad worry about what will happen to the day-to-day operations that we all depend on to keep us safe. Stephanie: A recent story about the recall of frozen shrimp with potential radioactive contamination has caused a bit of a panic about where America's food safety is headed. How did you take that news? Nicholas: One thing that gives me some hope is the fact that this is the sort of thing that we caught, and there have been recalls by Walmart. That's really the big fear when it comes to food safety: that if we attack these federal programs, they're not going to be able to actually find the food that might get us sick before a lot of people get sick. So I think this is actually a good sign that things are working relatively well. Stephanie: Out of all the stories you've written this past summer about the MAHA movement, is there one that keeps you up at night? And is there one that makes you feel hopeful for where American health and safety is going? Nicholas: Honestly, the stories that keep me up at night are by our colleague Katie Wu. Her recent one on RFK Jr.'s COVID revenge campaign has really stuck with me. My own story that both keeps me up at night and that makes me hopeful is related to states, which are taking up the MAHA charge in a very quick fashion. It's felt like Republican governors and legislatures are all trying to out-MAHA one another to ingratiate themselves to Trump and to RFK Jr. Some of these ideas are good from a public-health perspective, but these states are doing a lot of things really fast, which is what worries me. For example, some states are blocking people from using food stamps to buy soda and other junk food. There's a question of how that policy will be implemented, how the attempts to enact these restrictions could affect the entire food-stamp system. Other states have passed laws banning artificial dyes in their school meals. Again, it's one of those ideas that's a good step, but the devil is in the details of how it's executed. How does this flurry of activity in the states actually affect people in the coming months? Does this ultimately make America healthier, or does it send our food system into chaos? Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News A New York appeals court voided the roughly $500 million civil-fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, calling it 'excessive,' but upheld the finding that Trump and his company committed long-running business fraud. Business restrictions on Trump in New York remain, and the state plans to appeal. More immigrants are leaving the U.S. than arriving, according to the Pew Research Center. The shift, affected by Trump's strict immigration policies, is the first of its kind since the 1960s. California lawmakers passed the first of three bills on a redistricting plan backed by Governor Gavin Newsom that would shift as many as five Republican-held U.S. House seats toward Democrats ahead of the 2026 midterms. The move comes a day after Texas state House Republicans passed a new congressional map that could add five U.S. House seats for the GOP. Evening Read What We Gain When We Stop Caring By Anna Holmes Sometime in the early aughts, the comedian Amy Poehler made a vulgar joke while sitting in the Saturday Night Live writers' room waiting for a midweek read-through to begin. As detailed in Tina Fey's 2011 memoir, Bossypants, Jimmy Fallon, who was also in the show's cast at the time, jokingly recoiled and told Poehler to stop it. 'It's not cute!' Fallon exclaimed. 'I don't like it.' 'Amy dropped what she was doing, went black in the eyes for a second, and wheeled around on him,' Fey writes. ''I don't fucking care if you like it.'' Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Read. In 2022, The Atlantic 's Culture writers recommended the books that they read too late —but that you should read now. Take a look. This is how the 17th-century painter Rachel Ruysch became one of the greatest still-life painters in the history of art, Zachary Fine writes. When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
CBS News
2 hours ago
- CBS News
County commissioner says "we are doing everything we can" to keep Westmoreland Manor running smoothly
Westmoreland Manor, like many other health care facilities post-COVID pandemic, has seen some hard times. Despite capacity being down in recent years, Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas says the facility is in no way in dire straits. "Westmoreland Manor is an award-winning institution," said Kopas. "And it has only been cherished and used by generations of Westmoreland County residents. We owe it to them to make sure that we are doing everything we can to keep the manor operating as best it can, at self-sufficiency and at full capacity." Kopas said that a big issue for the Westmoreland Manor is that most of its residence pay for their care through Medicaid and Medicare, and since there is uncertainty around the future of those programs, that is likely causing people to be worried right now. "Not one dollar of county property taxes has gone into Westmoreland Manor for as long as anyone can remember, and it is really my intention to keep it that way," Kopas said. Kopas went on to say that like at other health care institutions, staffing is challenging and competitive, especially for nurses. He added that many different health care facilities right now are fighting over a finite number of qualified nurses. "In Westmoreland County, we are doing our part to make sure we have adjusted wages and hours, as well as the really good benefits that the county government offers," Kopas said. "So, I think we are well-positioned to keep our staffing level at the proper levels." Right now, Westmoreland Manor is looking to fill a variety of jobs, and the county is looking for qualified candidates to fill those positions. If you would like more information or are interested in applying, you can find more online.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump VP JD Vance makes liberals explode: ‘Lying through his teeth'
Vice President JD Vance continued his tour touting President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in Georgia on Thursday — but one of his points raised the eyebrows of critics. While speaking to a crowd in Peachtree City, Vance aimed to promote how the GOP's sweeping budget bill could help working-class American families. During his remarks, he tore into former President Joe Biden's administration, claiming that some of its policies have caused rural hospitals to struggle as a result. 'So what we did is we put a lot of resources and a lot of changes and regulations to make it possible for rural hospitals to stay open, despite what the Biden administration did to them for four years,' Vance told residents just outside of Atlanta. Since Trump signed his signature policy package into law last month, rural hospitals across the country have maintained that they now have to consider tough choices, including affording services or even closing down their facilities, NBC News reported, as well as other outlets and organizations. Many rural hospitals rely on Medicaid funding, given they serve a higher share of low-income patients compared to other areas — but according to KFF, a health policy research group, the bill could lead to around 17 million people losing their health care coverage due to changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers have argued that nearly 300 rural hospitals are at risk of shutting down due to the legislation. It includes a federal spending cut more than $1 trillion over a decade from health care and food assistance, mainly stemming from new work requirements for those receiving aid and differences in how states can fund their programs through a provider tax. The bill also contains a $50 billion fund called the Rural Health Transformation Program, which has been framed as a way to offset losses for providers due to some of its provisions. Vance's comments were met with pushback from some social media users. New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) tore into his claims about rural hospitals, writing on X that 'Donald Trump's Big Ugly Bill puts 29 rural hospitals in New York on the chopping block.' 'Lying through his teeth,' she said. 'We will hold you — and your boss — accountable." MeidasTouch, a progressive network, posted that 'Rural hospitals are literally closing because of this bill. He is lying. This is beyond cruel and evil.' One user said: 'At least he believes what he's saying. Doesn't help all of the rural clinics that had to close because they lost funding. Or the major hospitals that had to cut back on services because their funding was pulled as well.' 'The simplicity in which he lies should be really concerning to people. Thankfully he's about as likable as sitting on a thumbtack,' a different user said. Someone had attached a screenshot of a story from Health Affairs, which argues that the bill does not protect rural hospitals, adding 'No, you guys are going to close rural hospitals.' Vance also went on to say that the Trump administration's health care policy is 'very simple.' 'Whether you're in a big city or a small town, we're going to fight for your access to health care. Whether you're an American citizen who's been here for 70 years, or an American citizen who's been here for two years, we're going to fight for your access to a government that serves you,' Vance said. 'But if you're an illegal alien, you do not deserve government-paid health care benefits. You need to get out of our country, and that's simple as that,' he continued. Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to
