First migrant is convicted of illegally working for Deliveroo - but is fined just two hours' worth of pay
Abdullah Merez, 23, admitted that he had been illicitly delivering food for the company after being caught in Woking, Surrey, on May 2 this year.
However, the 23-year-old was given a conditional discharge by Justices of the Peace after they heard that he was in debt and that the offence was his first, according to The Sun.
Merez was then ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £26, which equates to roughly two hours worth of pay for a Deliveroo driver, and will be back in court if the money is not received by September 2.
The newspaper also reported that it was undisclosed whether Merez was in Britain illegally or on a visa that did not allow him to receive paid work, such as a tourist or volunteer visa.
But his conviction is the first of its kind after a major crackdown by the Home Office, who announced they had arrested nearly 300 asylum seekers working illegally for delivery firms last month.
Some 1,780 people were stopped and spoken to as part of the operation, which was described as a 'nationwide intensification week' and targeted illegal working hotspots across the UK between July 20 and 27.
Of these, around 280 were arrested in areas including Hillingdon in north-west London, Dumfries in Scotland, and Birmingham.
Some 89 have been detained pending removal from the country and 53 are now having their asylum support reviewed, which the Government said could result in their support being suspended or withdrawn.
As well as the arrests, 51 businesses including car washes and restaurants were issued with penalty notices that could see them handed hefty fines if they are found to have hired people without the right to work in the UK.
Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat have pledged to ramp up facial verification and fraud checks over the coming months to prevent people illegally working as riders without permission from Government.
The Sun reported that Merez was the first migrant in the past six months to arrive at court while facing charges for working illegally as a delivery driver.
They say at least three others have been charged, but have since failed to appear for potential sentencing.
Asylum seekers in the UK are normally barred from work while their claim is being processed, though permission can be applied for after a year of waiting.
Border Security Minister, Dame Angela Eagle, said of the recent Home Office crackdown: 'Illegal working undermines our border security and we're cracking down hard on it.
'That's why we have intensified our enforcement activity right across the UK to crack down on those who think they can evade immigration and employment laws in the UK.'
Eddy Montgomery, Enforcement Director at the Home Office, added that officers were taking action 'around the clock' against 'those who think they can get away with working illegally'.
Officials had indicated there would be an increase in work to target areas of suspected activity, as ministers hope to tackle the 'pull factors' attracting migrants to the UK.
Immigration enforcement teams will receive £5million from the £100million in funding already announced for border security, aimed at increasing visits by officers in these areas over the coming months, it said.
The government also recently announced that it would share information about asylum hotel locations with food delivery firms in a bid to disrupt such hotspots.
Shadow Home Secretary, Chris Philp, said the Conservatives wanted to strip asylum seekers of their status and deport them if they work illegally, and claimed 'this story only happened' because he 'exposed what Labour refused to see'.
The Tory politician visited an asylum hotel in central London and posted a video showing bicycles fitted with delivery boxes for Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber Eats parked outside.
Days later, the Home Office said it had called in all three companies for a dressing down – and the meeting led to pledges to increase the use of 'facial recognition' systems on rider apps, such as those used by banks to confirm someone's identity.
However, Deliveroo was refused access to hotel location data despite assurances it would be treated confidentially, The Times reported.
Shadow Home Office minister Katie Lam said at the time: 'The fact that the Home Office is refusing to help them just shows how topsy-turvy this country's approach to migration has become.
'Crossing the Channel illegally is a crime. Working here illegally is a crime. Too many people are brazenly breaking the rules and it's a disgrace that the Home Office is aiding and abetting them.'
The Daily Mail has approached the Home Office and Deliveroo for comment in relation to Merez's conviction.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
14 minutes ago
- BBC News
Staffordshire teacher who sent underwear pics to teen banned for life
A teacher who sent pictures of herself in her underwear to a 15-year-old pupil has been banned from the profession for Lowe, now aged 27, had taught at Kingsmead School in Hednesford, Staffordshire, and was caught when "inappropriate" notes were found by the boy's relationship with her pupil began with late-night email sessions in 2021 using emojis and nicknames, months after she started in the role, a Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) panel the affair came to light, Ms Lowe was suspended by the school, but she contacted the pupil again, sending him sexual images of herself, the TRA panel was told. After resigning, the teacher was found guilty of engaging in sexual communication with a child and was handed a 14-month suspended jail term, the panel heard. 'Make me proud' Ms Lowe began working as a trainee teacher at Kingsmead School in July September that year, when she was responsible for the then 15-year-old, she began emailing him as late as 22:00, the panel was messages included heart symbol emojis, would often end with a kiss, and used nicknames, the panel Lowe wrote to the pupil using phrases like "make me proud", "try not to miss me too much" and "you've already made my day", the TRA was October 2021, the boy's mother found notes she believed were from Ms Lowe and reported her concerns to the school. An investigation was launched, and Ms Lowe was suspended, the panel having "a warning shot across her bows", the teacher contacted the boy again, and sent him intimate photos, the TRA was told. 'Gross breach of trust' Ms Lowe resigned in November 2021 and was charged by the initially denied the charge before changing her plea to guilty on the day of trial, the panel Lowe was sentenced to 14 months in jail, suspended for 18 months, and was put on the sex offenders register for 10 his sentencing remarks, the judge said Ms Lowe committed a "gross breach of trust" and "used the environment in which you were working with [the pupil] to pursue what was evidently your sexual interest in him"."You moved on to the passing of inappropriate notes to him, and ultimately, by the end of the period that we are concerned with, matters escalated to private digital communications between you and him, including you sending him images of yourself in your underwear," the judge said."The concerning aspect of your case is that after matters came to light, by his mother having found out what was going on, you were spoken to, and yet you still had another face-to-face meeting with him at school, and ultimately, when the investigation was launched and you were suspended from work, you contacted him again, and that included the sending of the images of yourself to him."On behalf of the secretary of state, decision maker Marc Cavey said Ms Lowe's behaviour was "incompatible with working as a teacher".He decided she should be prohibited from teaching indefinitely. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
People held under UK's ‘one in, one out' asylum deal say they had not heard of it
Asylum seekers locked in detention centres as part of Labour's 'one in, one out' deal have said they had not heard of the scheme before arriving in the UK on small boats and were terrified of being returned to their home countries. The prime minister, Keir Starmer, has said the plan to send one small boat arrival back to France in exchange for accepting another to live in the UK would deter the thousands from crossing the Channel. Since the first group of small boat arrivals were detained just over a week ago on 6 August, 2,363 people have crossed the Channel. More than 50,000 have crossed since Labour came into power. 'I was so happy to survive the journey across the Channel and to reach land in the UK. Then the Home Office locked me up. I'm still in a state of shock,' said one man from Eritrea, speaking to the Guardian by phone from a detention centre. 'We did not understand what was happening to us when the Home Office moved us from Manston [the former military base in Kent] where we were processed, straight to this place which is like a jail. 'When we asked why they were bringing some who arrived on the same boat as me here but letting others go free, they did not answer us. They just said it was because we crossed the Channel illegally.' The man said that neither he nor anyone he knew in northern France knew anything about the 'one in, one out' deal and was not sure it would prevent people from continuing to try to cross the Channel. 'I am very frightened here. There are people who have committed crimes in the UK locked up with us. We have done nothing wrong apart from trying to find a safe place.' He claimed to have been trafficked and tortured when he passed through Libya on his journey from Eritrea. 'I believe if I am sent back to France and the smugglers find me they will kill me,' he said. A second man from Afghanistan also spoke to the Guardian from detention. He said: 'The Home Office have just locked us in these rooms and said we cannot go from here. We are frightened of the dangerous criminals locked up with us. We are so afraid of what Home Office will do to us. 'The Taliban tried to kill me so I escaped from Afghanistan. I thought I was free when I reached [the] UK but instead I am in this prison. We knew nothing about the 'one in, one out' deal when we left France. I don't know if it will stop people crossing the Channel.' The Home Office says the first group of detainees are expected to be returned to France within three weeks, with the UK referring potential returnees to the French authorities within three days of their detention and the French expected to respond within 14 days. A leaflet given to detainees by the Home Office says those returned to France may be offered a financial incentive by the French authorities to return to their home countries. It asks detainees to notify the Home Office if they are seriously ill or a victim of rape, torture or violence, although officials are supposed to screen for these vulnerabilities before detaining people. Karris Hamilton, an advocacy manager at Gatwick Detainees Welfare Group, which is supporting those earmarked for forced return to France, said: 'We are extremely concerned about the wellbeing of the men being detained for the 'one in, one out' scheme. 'Those we have spoken with so far are in acute distress and many have been victims of torture, exploited by traffickers on their journeys or victims of modern slavery in Libya. 'People are finding it difficult to eat and sleep due to being in a prison environment, not knowing how long they will be there and fearing that they may be taken back to France. We are very worried that we will see a rise in self-harm, suicide attempts and hunger strikes due to this.'
Times
14 minutes ago
- Times
Teenage girl left alone on mental health ward was killed unlawfully
A coroner and jurors had tears in their eyes as they ruled that a teenage girl was killed unlawfully after she was left alone on a mental health ward by an agency worker using a fake name on his first shift. Ruth Szymankiewicz, 14, was meant to be under strict observation at the psychiatric intensive care unit of Huntercombe Hospital in Berkshire while being treated for a severe eating disorder when she was left on her own by the worker on February 12, 2022. The inquest had heard that the agency worker, who went by the name of Ebo Acheampong, had applied for the role under a false name and had never worked in a psychiatric hospital, the police later discovered. He never returned to work after the teenager's death and fled the UK for Ghana. Ian Wade KC, the coroner, and the jurors were clearly upset when they delivered the conclusion of unlawful killing at the inquest at Buckinghamshire coroner's court in Beaconsfield. Addressing Ruth's parents, Mark and Kate Szymankiewicz, Wade said with tears in his eyes: 'I hope you will treasure all the good memories of your lovely daughter.' The inquest had been told that she shut herself in her bedroom, where she self-harmed. She died two days later at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford. Jurors were told that the ward was missing at least half of its staff on the day Ruth was left unsupervised. Acheampong was asked to join the intensive care psychiatrist team because they were so short-staffed that nurses could not go on breaks. Michelle Hancey, a support worker with 18 years' experience at Huntercombe, raised concerns that day that the team would 'fail to monitor patients on prescribed special observation because of staff shortage'. Acheampong was assigned to watch over Ruth on his first shift at the hospital. He repeatedly left the girl alone while she was watching TV, one time for a couple of minutes, which prompted her to walk alone to her bedroom. She had been on an observation plan which meant that she had to be kept within eyesight at all times after earlier incidents of self-harm. About 15 minutes passed before a nurse discovered the teenage girl and raised the alarm. 'Ruth was not prevented from accessing the restricted material which could be used to self-harm,' the jury foreman told the hearing. 'Ruth was not prevented from accessing harmful material on the internet. Ruth's care pathway … was insufficient to allow improvement for discharge. 'From Ruth's admission to Thames ward, her responsible clinician deemed the ward to be neither suitable nor conducive to her recovery. Ruth's parents were not given adequate information about the appeal process, and refusal rights.' Ruth's parents, who are both doctors, read an emotional statement outside the court after the verdict. They said: 'There is an empty space at our table, a silent bedroom in our home, a gaping hole in our family that will never be filled … Ruth was an incredible, bright, friendly, loving and adventurous girl with a whole life of joy ahead of her. 'When, at our most vulnerable as a family, we reached out for help, we ultimately found ourselves trapped in a system that was meant to care for her, to help her, to keep her safe, but instead locked her away and harmed her.' Huntercombe Hospital was rated 'overall inadequate' by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in February 2021, and has since been closed.
