‘They need us.' What would be the impact of Head Start cuts in Pierce County?
A 3-year-old boy with curly brown hair is whipping up pizza on a bright, multi-colored carpet in the corner. Jace decides that the food is cold but doesn't seem to mind. His teacher, Dairi Ray, holds out an empty hand, and Jace lunges forward for a big bite of his imaginary creation: 'Ahhm!'
Jace was one of several toddlers Friday playing make believe, calculating animal shapes, coloring or pushing around a tiny bike in an Early Head Start classroom inside the Multicultural Child and Family Hope Center in Tacoma, just outside the Hilltop neighborhood.
'Some of them just need the love sometimes,' Ray said. 'To me, these kids are my kids.'
The federally funded Head Start program is an important safety net for low-income and homeless families with children up to 5 years old. Established in 1965, it serves at least hundreds of children in Pierce County, 15,000 across the state and more than 750,000 nationwide for free. The program promotes school readiness, provides meals and supplies, such as diapers and formula, and offers health screenings and parental support.
Ayesha Williams' 2-year-old son is also in Early Head Start, and her three older children passed through the program. Williams and her husband work, and she's in school to be an ultrasound technician, meaning it would be a difficult juggling act without the day-long care that's offered Monday through Friday.
'Honestly, I don't know where we would be without them,' Williams said.
Under President Donald Trump's administration, the child-care and preschool-education initiative's future has appeared uncertain.
On May 5, USA Today reported that, despite the Trump administration's proposed elimination of all financial support, there were no changes to Head Start's funding in the White House's proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year.
Even so, there are concerns that the administration is trying to illegally dismantle the program.
Head Start advocates sued the administration late last month in federal court in Washington, alleging 'a series of unrelenting attacks' on program providers. The lawsuit, whose plaintiffs include Washington state's Head Start association, noted that the federal government disbursed nearly $1 billion less in spending for the program over a three-month period this year compared to in 2024.
The complaint also criticized a federal ban on diversity, equity and inclusion; a temporary sweeping freeze on federal funding in January that forced several providers to close indefinitely; and the abrupt shutdown last month of half of all Office of Head Start locations in the United States, including the four-state Region 10 Office in Seattle, which manages grant funding and oversees local agencies providing program services.
As a result of office closures and layoffs, Head Start agencies in Washington and 22 other states faced 'unprecedented confusion that threatened their ability to operate and, indeed, their very existence,' the lawsuit said.
On Friday, the Senate Democratic caucus sent an open letter to the public, warning that Republicans were trying to cut funding for important programs such as Head Start, according to a news release from the office of U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Washington. The state received more than $189 million from the program in fiscal year 2024, her office said.
The Trump administration had proposed not funding Head Start in a draft budget document, calling the program's elimination consistent with its goals to give states and parents control of education, the Associated Press reported last month.
A message left by The News Tribune for the U.S. Department Health and Human Services, which administers Head Start, was not returned.
Federal grants are awarded to various groups to operate the program, including public agencies, private nonprofits and for-profits, schools and tribal governments.
Head Start is provided at 33 sites in Pierce County, largely at schools, according to HHS data. Most of the sites are in Tacoma.
Tacoma Public Schools operates slightly more than half of all sites, federal data shows. It was awarded a grant in 2019 to serve 400 low-income students within the district's boundaries for five years, according to TPS' 2021-22 annual report on the program.
District spokesperson Kathryn McCarthy said last week that TPS currently serves the same number of Head Start students and didn't anticipate that the figure would change next year.
Asked whether TPS held any concerns about future funding or staffing, McCarthy said only that the district understood that the Trump administration's budget proposal did not include any cuts.
'Access to high-quality early learning is critical to children in our community,' she said. 'We have continued our programming and planning for fall 2025 as normal.'
Puget Sound Educational Service District operates in Pierce and King counties as one of nine regional educational agencies in the state. It subcontracts with other Head Start sites in Pierce County, including at the Multicultural Child and Family Hope Center, federal data shows. PSESD is one of many Head Start funding grantees that gets its dollars from the Region 10 Office.
About 95% of the federal funding it receives directly supports families and more than 1,200 children in Early Head Start or Head Start programs between Pierce and King counties, according to Decca Calloway, PSESD's executive director of Early Learning. Calloway did not immediately have information about how many children were served specifically in Pierce County.
There are a dozen children enrolled for Early Head Start, which is geared toward children under 3, at the Multicultural Child and Family Hope Center, according to the center's early learning director, Amalia Perez. Many more students at the location participate in the state-funded Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program, which Calloway said couldn't simply absorb Head Start children if the federal program disappeared.
Brandi Stratton, 46, has taught Head Start for seven years and at the center for 17 altogether. She works with the infant group. In her role, she said, she develops a personal relationship with parents, calling or texting regularly and checking in if their child hasn't been to class in a while, just to make sure everything is OK.
A new family is beginning the program next week, according to Stratton. The mother, whose child is 6 weeks old, says she must return to work to make money.
'They need us,' Stratton said.
On May 5, PSESD's leaders attended a presentation hosted by the liberal policy group, the Center for American Progress, about federal actions affecting Head Start. It was discussed that program providers across the country were seeing funds slow-walked or grants not approved on time.
'What was most insightful is that we're not alone on this journey,' Calloway said in an interview.
A Head Start agency in Sunnyside, a city in south-central Washington, closed its doors in April after not receiving confirmation or updates about the status of renewed funding for weeks, affecting more than 400 children and 70 jobs, according to the federal lawsuit against the Trump administration.
While PSESD hasn't had any issues being able to draw down on funding, Calloway said she lives with the fear that the Trump administration could continue to slow down delivering funds or change its mind about not enacting cuts to Head Start in its final budget.
Stratton was also worried.
'It's scary,' she said. 'It's not fair to the family and these kids.'
If its federal funding reimbursements were delayed, PSESD would have to stop services for more than 1,000 children, according to Calloway, at a time when she said most traditional child care in Pierce and King counties is full with wait lists of eight or nine months. There would also be staffing cuts and funds redirected from much-needed expenses such as classroom air conditioning and playgrounds.
'The other thing is, children can immediately be in danger,' she said, noting that kids experiencing homelessness could be on the street all day long.
While there were concerns about what it could be facing, PSESD already has experienced effects of the Trump administration's agenda, according to Calloway.
The agency has been consistently peppered with questions about what it is doing with the money it receives, despite spelling it out in grant applications; seen a decline in enrollment and attendance as documented families fear their children could be wrongly ensnared in immigration sweeps; and forced to calculate how to continue serving a diverse population without risking funds for violating the DEI ban, she said.
Trump signed an executive order in January that terminated all related DEI activities from the federal government, including programs, grants, contracts and performance requirements, arguing that DEI was divisive and discriminatory. Running afoul of the ban could threaten funding, forcing local governments, schools and others to navigate what they consider broad and vague new standards. For example, Pierce County joined a lawsuit against the federal government earlier this month for tying critical homelessness contracts to requirements that grant funds not be used to promote DEI.
PSESD and other Head Start providers serve the most vulnerable people in their communities by design.
At least 10% of the children served in Early Head Start or Head Start by PSESD have a diagnosed delay or disability, which is a percentage mandated by the federal government, according to Calloway. The agency serves significant numbers of children from other marginalized communities, including impoverished families, immigrants and refugees, and non-English-first speakers.
PSESD also seeks to address specific populations identified by data as being in need, but it's been difficult for the agency to declare that it wants its services to be inclusive and still feel secure about not jeopardizing its grant funding.
'We feel like we run the risk every day,' Calloway said.
As a result, deciphering the way forward is tricky.
Calloway framed the struggle as such: PSESD doesn't want to over-correct for the purposes of compliance and then not be able to serve kids who most need the program, but the agency also must do enough to comply or it could ultimately find itself not being able to serve the children anyway.
'If I'm being really honest with you, we don't know what we need to do,' she said. 'Damned if you do, damned if you don't.'
In the Spotlight is a News Tribune series that digs into the high-profile local issues that readers care most about. Story idea? Email newstips@thenewstribune.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
16 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Missouri approves stadium aid for Kansas City Chiefs and Royals and disaster relief for St. Louis
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri lawmakers on Wednesday approved hundreds of millions of dollars of financial aid to try to persuade the Kansas City Chiefs and Royals to remain in the state and help the St. Louis area recover from a devastating tornado. House passage sends the legislative package to Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe, who called lawmakers into special session with a plea for urgent action. Kehoe is expected to sign the measures into law. Missouri's session paired two otherwise unrelated national trends — a movement for new taxpayer-funded sports stadiums and a reevaluation of states' roles in natural disasters as President Donald Trump's administration reassess federal aid programs. The stadium subsidies already were a top concern in Missouri when a deadly tornado struck St. Louis on May 16, causing an estimated $1.6 billion of damage a day after lawmakers had wrapped up work in their annual regular session. The disaster relief had widespread support. Lawmakers listened attentively on Wednesday as Democratic state Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins described with a cracking voice how she witnessed the tornado rip the roof off her house and damage her St. Louis neighborhood. Collins said she has no home insurance, slept in her car for days and has accepted food from others. 'Homes are crumbled and leveled,' said Collins, adding: 'It hurts me to my core to see the families that have worked so hard, the businesses that have worked so hard, to see them ripped apart.' Lawmakers approved $100 million of open-ended aid for St. Louis and $25 million for emergency housing assistance in any areas covered under requests for presidential disaster declarations. They also authorized a $5,000 income tax credit to offset insurance policy deductibles for homeowners and renters hit by this year's storms — a provision that state budget director Dan Haug said could eventually cost up to $600 million. The Chiefs and Royals currently play football and baseball in side-by-side stadiums in Jackson County, Missouri, under leases that expire in January 2031. Jackson County voters last year defeated a sales tax extension that would have helped finance an $800 million renovation of the Chiefs' Arrowhead Stadium and a $2 billion ballpark district for the Royals in downtown Kansas City. That prompted lawmakers in neighboring Kansas last year to authorize bonds for up to 70% of the cost of new stadiums in Kansas to lure the teams to their state. The Royals have bought a mortgage for property in Kansas, though the team also has continued to pursue other possible sites in Missouri. The Kansas offer is scheduled to expire June 30, creating urgency for Missouri to approve a counter-offer. Missouri's legislation authorizes bonds covering up to 50% of the cost of new or renovated stadiums, plus up to $50 million of tax credits for each stadium and unspecified aid from local governments. If they choose to stay in Missouri, the Chiefs plan a $1.15 billion renovation of Arrowhead Stadium. Though they have no specific plans in the works, the St. Louis Cardinals also would be eligible for stadium aid if they undertake a project of at least $500 million. Many economists contend public funding for stadiums isn't worth it, because sports tend to divert discretionary spending away from other forms of entertainment rather than generate new income. But supporters said Missouri stands to lose millions of dollars of tax revenue if Kansas City's most prominent professional sports teams move to Kansas. They said Missouri's reputation also would take a hit, particularly if it loses the Chiefs, which have won three of the past six Super Bowls. 'We have the chance to maybe save what is the symbol of this state,' Rep. Jim Murphy, a Republican from St. Louis County, said while illustrating cross-state support for the measure. The legislation faced some bipartisan pushback from those who described it as a subsidy for wealthy sports team owners. Others raised concerns that a property tax break for homeowners, which was added in the Senate to gain votes, violates the state constitution by providing different levels of tax relief in various counties while excluding others entirely.


The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP approves ‘technical changes' to Trump agenda bill
House Republicans on Wednesday greenlit a series of 'technical changes' to the party's tax cut and spending package, removing language that would have thrown their effort off course in the Senate. The chamber approved the tweaks — which were tucked inside a procedural rule for a separate measure — in a 213-207 vote, weeks after Republicans passed the sprawling package full of President Trump's legislative priorities. The adopted rule also tees up a final vote on the White House's bill to claw back $9.4 billion in federal spending. House GOP leaders moved to make the changes after the Senate parliamentarian scrubbed through the legislation — a procedure known as the 'Byrd bath' — and identified provisions and language that do not comply with the strict rules for the budget reconciliation process, which the GOP trifecta is using to circumvent a Democratic filibuster in the Senate and approve the bill by a simple majority. Leaving the legislation as it was risked the parliamentarian ruling that it was not compliant, which would have resulted in the threshold for passage in the Senate increasing from a simple majority to 60 votes — allowing Democratic opposition to block it. The changes to the Trump agenda bill — officially titled the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act — pertain to defense funding, energy policy and changes to Medicaid. For defense, Republicans nixed $2 billion for the enhancement of military intelligence programs; $500 million for the development, procurement and integration of maritime mines; and $62 million to convert Ohio-class submarine tubes to accept additional missiles. On the energy front, meanwhile, the changes removed a provision that would have reinstated leases for a proposed copper and nickel mine that had been renewed under the first Trump administration but revoked under Biden. The mine would have been located near an area known as the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, a nature preserve that contains canoe routes and species including black bears, moose and foxes. While leaders moved to strike some portions of the bill, they still plan to fight for those provisions when the package hits the Senate floor. 'We disagree; ultimately we're going to try it again on the Senate floor,' House Majority Leadere Steve Scalise (R-La.) said Tuesday. ' We disagree with the parliamentarian. … But you can't take the risk on any of them. You cannot take the risk because if any one of them is ruled on the Senate floor to be fatal, it's a 60-vote bill. The whole bill is a 60-vote bill — you can't take that risk.' With the changes made, the House is now expected to formally send the package to the Senate, where Republicans are mapping out their own changes to the behemoth bill. Some GOP senators want to decrease the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, others are pushing to increase the spending cuts in the bill, and a subset are pressing for a smaller rollback of the green energy tax credits that Democrats approved in 2022. Any changes to the House bill in the Senate, however, risks party leadership losing support in the lower chamber, which will have to approve the Senate's tweaks before the bill can head to Trump's desk for signature. Party leaders are still hoping to enact the package by July 4, but that timeline is coming into serious question as Republicans remain at odds over a series of high-stakes issues. Rachel Frazin contributed.


The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth takes fire from Republicans at heated Senate hearing
Republican senators came out firing during Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's hearing on Wednesday before the Senate Appropriations subcommittee on armed forces. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediately pressed Hegseth over the Russia-Ukraine war, with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) driving home the point later in the hearing; Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), the top Senate appropriator, scolded the Pentagon's delays with budget information; and Sen. Lisa Murkowski closed out the hearing by questioning the administration's focus on Greenland in its Arctic strategy. McConnell, one of three Republicans who opposed Hegseth's confirmation, gaveled in the hearing by calling out the Trump administration for what he views as a flat base-line defense budget. He then launched into strong warnings against the U.S. cozying up to Russia in its bid to end its war in Ukraine. McConnell said Washington's allies are 'wondering whether we're in the middle of brokering what appears to be allowing the Russians to define victory. I think victory is defined by the people who have to live there — the Ukrainians.' The former Senate majority leader who now chairs the subcommittee, McConnell asked Hegseth which side he wanted to win the war. The Defense chief said the Trump administration wanted the killing to end but would not choose a side. 'America's reputation is on the line,' McConnell said. 'Will we defend Democratic allies against authoritarian aggressors?' Later in the hearing, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) asked Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair Gen. Dan 'Razin' Caine Caine if Russian President Vladimir Putin is going to stop at Ukraine. 'I don't believe he is,' Caine replied. Hegseth, meanwhile, said it 'remains to be seen. Graham fired back, referring to his previous allusion to appeasement of Adolph Hitler: 'Well, he says he's not. This is the '30s all over. It doesn't remain to be seen.' The line of questioning laid bare the ideological divide within the GOP as to how the U.S. should confront Russia, seen by defense hawks as a global threat that must be countered with military assistance to prop up Ukraine and assert U.S. force in the European theater. But many in the Trump administration, including Hegseth, have taken a more ambivalent tone, arguing for an America First approach that could see American troops rotated out of bases in Europe and an end to the flow of military aid from Washington to Kyiv. 'We don't want a headline at the end of this conflict that says Russia wins and America loses,' McConnell told Hegseth. The hearing had a far more adversarial tone compared to Hegseth's appearance before the House Appropriations defense subcommittee a day prior, in which the Pentagon chief emerged largely unscathed, particularly at the hands of GOP members. Democratic and Republican senators grilled Hegseth over a sparsely outlined defense budget for next fiscal year, echoing rare bipartisan criticism during the House hearing. Collins reprimanded the Pentagon for being 'unacceptably slow' in submitting a detailed Pentagon spending request for the fiscal year 2026. Congress is waiting on the information as the GOP struggles to agree on Trump's reconciliation package. She also told Hegseth that Trump's budget request represented a reduction in buying power compared to the 2025 military budget, when inflation is taken into account, but suggested the Senate might correct that. McConnell earlier was also critical of the administration's defense spending plan, pushing back at Hegseth's argument that the U.S. would be making the largest investment in the military in 20 years via Trump's reconciliation package. McConnell said putting funneling defense dollars into that package while declining to increase military spending in the regular budget 'may well end up functioning as a shell game to avoid making the most significant annual investments that we spent years urging the Biden administration to make.' There was also no shortage of criticism from the panel's Democrats. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), bashed the Pentagon for cutting military medical research while spending $45 million for a grand military parade marking the Army's 250th birthday, set for Saturday 'This is not consistent with what the men and women in uniform deserve,' Durbin said. Others, including Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) berated Hegseth for the Trump administration's decision to send National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles this week, calling the actions a wildly out-of-proportion response to sometimes violent protests against Trump's escalating immigration crackdowns. 'Threatening to use our own troops on our own citizens at such scale is unprecedented, it is unconstitutional, and it is downright un-American,' Murray said, noting that the actions were undermining the readiness of the U.S. military. Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) pressed Hegseth to reveal the cost or timeline of refurbishing Trump's luxury jet from the Qatari government, meant to become Air Force One. 'You have signed a contract with a company to reconfigure the Qatari aircraft. What is the price of that contract?' Reed asked. Hegseth replied that the information 'cannot be revealed in this setting,' prompting Reed to fire back. 'Why can't it be revealed? This is the appropriation committee of the United States Senate. We appropriate the money that you will spend,' Reed said.