
Dermorexia: ‘My pursuit of clear skin has cost me time, money and pain, but how far is too far?'
I am gripping the sides of the bed, my knuckles white.
'I am sorry,' the esthetician says, 'it'll be worth it.'
I am receiving a BroadBand light laser treatment. Priced at €500 for a single session at my usual clinic, I was offered a session free of charge if I sat as a model for a staff member in training. Lucky me, I think, as tears spring.
I easily spend over €1,000 a year in this clinic to keep skin breakouts at bay. My esthetician knows that's my limit — I can't afford to spend more. We both know that if I could, I would.
The €1,000 just about covers a salicylic acid peel I get once a month. It's a quick, noninvasive chemical peel that exfoliates and removes dead skin cells for a smoother and brighter complexion. I try to stretch it to every two months if I can — but the esthetician scolds me because for 'best results' you are supposed to get it every four weeks.
The peel, which burns to the point where I need a motorised fan to help me bear it, is one element of my overall routine.
Alongside the monthly facial appointment, there are the skin nutrition supplements. Bought in bulk, they come in at €476. I've recently added a probiotic after it was suggested this might be the missing element to the elusive clear skin I've been chasing for years. If I stick with the probiotic, it will cost an additional €438 a year.
That's almost €2,000 a year before I look at the skincare I use daily, from cleansers to toners, serums and moisturisers, SPFs and retinol. For my sanity, I refuse to tot up what it costs annually. Let's just say, I wouldn't get change from a €50 note, and that's just for the retinol, which lasts a few months.
According to market research company Kantar, Irish consumers spent €15.4m on skincare between April 2024 and April 2025, a 4.9% growth from the previous year.
Over 200 Irish aesthetic clinics are listed on WhatClinic.com. In cities like Dublin, Cork, and Galway, there seems to be one on almost every street corner. In my hometown, with a population of 850, the local beautician has rebranded and now offers treatments like micro needling and medical-grade peels.
Every other ad I get on social media is for Botox or Profilo, with influencers of all descriptions undergoing procedures and marking their bright and breezy Instagram stories #ad, #gifted, #invite. That's not to mention trends like 'the morning shed' and children going viral with 10-step skincare routines.
Given the wrap-around pro-beauty feeds, it's hard to take a step back and recognise what a normal skincare routine — and 'normal' skin — should even look like.
An unhealthy obsession
Beauty critic Jessica DeFino recently suggested we should consider introducing a medical term, dermorexia, to describe those engaging in 'obsessive behaviours' related to skin care.
Likening it to orthorexia, a term used to describe an excessive preoccupation with eating healthy food, she argued, 'The same is happening with beauty today. It warrants medical attention.'
Facialist and aesthetician Eavanna Breen believes there is 'definitely' space for the term.
'It's something I see in the clinic quite frequently,' she says. Clients come in 'obsessing' about faults they perceive with their skin, when they are presenting with 'perfectly' healthy skin.
Eavanna Breen at her Skin & Laser Clinic in Dublin. Picture: Moya Nolan
She frequently hears female clients complain about their big pores: 'I'm looking at their skin, and on a scale of one to 10, their pores are maybe a two.
'They also say that they've got congested skin, and it's just a little bit of texture.'
Caitriona Ryan, a consultant dermatologist at the Institute of Dermatologists and Blackrock Clinic, has had similar experiences.
'Healthy skin habits and an interest in skincare can be empowering, but there are people who see imperfections that aren't there,' she says.
She has 'occasionally' seen patients who exhibit worrying signs of an unhealthy preoccupation with their skin — 'they are constantly seeking the next procedure or product.'
Both practitioners believe social media has a lot to answer for when it comes to perpetuating unrealistic skincare goals.
'Education is really important,' Ryan says. 'Especially for teenage girls, and boys. What they are seeing on social media, filtered, AI images, that isn't real.'
The rise of so-called 'Sephora kids', where girls appear to be turning to expensive skincare products at an increasingly young age, has been the topic of much conversation in the media over the past year.
Professor Caitriona Ryan: 'Healthy skin habits and an interest in skincare can be empowering, but there are people who see imperfections that aren't there."
For Ryan, the concern is less about the products damaging young children's skin barriers and more about 'that preoccupation starting so young'.
'It's a culture we need to turn around,' she says. 'I worry about nine and 10-year-olds being so focused on their appearance at such a young age.'
Breen believes she may already be seeing the impact in her clinic.
'My clients who are 45, 50, upwards, are not obsessed with their skin. It's the girls who are in their 20s and 30s who are obsessed,' she says.
'Yesterday, I had a client who had three little pimples on her chin, a hormonal breakout, and she was obsessing about it being full-blown acne.'
Emotional distress
Clinical psychologist Malie Coyne says identifying whether your obsession with skincare has gone too far is about the degree to which it's impacting your daily life.
'Is there any emotional distress around minor or imagined flaws that might lead to avoidance of social situations? Are there compulsive behaviours like mirror checking and picking skin? Is your self-worth directly tied to how your skin looks?'
When I look at my relationship with my skin, it can be hard to work out whether I am just engaging in self-care — our skin is an organ, shouldn't I care for it to the best of my ability? — or whether I am obsessing over small imperfections due to our society's increasing obsession with 'flawless', poreless skin.
Clinical psychologist Malie Coyne: 'Compassion focused therapy [designed to reduce self-criticism and shame] suggests we have three emotional circles — drive, threat, and soothing."
Coyne suggests we think about what drives our motivation: 'Compassion focused therapy [designed to reduce self-criticism and shame] suggests we have three emotional circles — drive, threat, and soothing. Is your drive to engage in skincare coming from a place of threat, where you feel, if I don't get that microneedling, if I don't get that Botox, that means my skin won't look at its best, and I won't be at my best, and I'm not good enough.
'When something comes from a soothing place, it's more like, I have an hour off on Tuesday, and I really love getting a facial, so I'm going to go ahead and get that because I know I'm going to feel good afterwards. And it's not about feeling less good than other people.
'If you didn't get those treatments or procedures, would you be OK?'
For parents who might be concerned about their children's relationship to skincare, Coyne advises having a gentle conversation with them about where their interest in their skin has come from.
'My daughters are 11 and 13. I know what they're being fed on social media — what every woman gets fed — you're not good enough, and you should try this product in order to be better,' she says.
'Watch out for deeper signs of distress — if they're spending a lot of time looking in the mirror, avoiding photos, or expressing dissatisfaction with their face or overall appearance. At that stage, it might be time to bring them to a mental health professional.'
Achievable goals
Breen, who works with a roster of celebrity and influencer clients, says it's important not to compare our own skin to what we see on social media.
'When I'm doing videos to the camera [for social media], even when I'm not using a filter... that isn't how I really look. If you look at my skin up close, you can see the imperfections, pigmentation, pores,' she says.
'There is no such thing as perfect skin. We're setting ourselves up for a standard that's impossible to reach. Skin is full of texture and character, and we need to embrace that more.
'One of the nice things about my job is to be able to say to someone, don't worry about that, that is not an issue.'
While something may seem like a minor imperfection to others, Breen says addressing it can make an individual feel better about themselves: 'I had a client the other day who had a little growth on her nose, a little red dot, and her doctor dismissed it and said, 'it's nothing to worry about'. But she felt like Rudolph. I just did a little bit of diathermy [a deep heat therapy] and got rid of it.
'It's about seeking out a professional who has the compassion and the understanding to know whether something is an issue, that's the key.'
This is me
Looking back at my younger years, I recognise some of the red flags Coyne identified. I feel empathy for the girl who gave up swimming, the teen who wouldn't get in the selfie, the college student who dreaded nights out because she wasn't comfortable in her skin.
At 27, I am developing a healthier relationship with my skin. I see the facials and supplements as part of my self-care regimen, but when I have a breakout, I don't let it stop me from living my life.
I have been helped in large part by following positive skin influencers like Izzie Rodgers and Sophie Dove, who embrace skincare and make-up without covering their blemishes or using filters.
Inspired by their impact, I recently sat for a photoshoot without any make-up. It was terrifying, and it's taken me a year to look at them without shame. Today, they are printed alongside this piece. It's my battle cry against a world that keeps telling me I am not enough as I am.
Izzie Rodgers (@izzierodgers)
Sophie Dove (@skinwithsoph)
Institute of Dermatologists (@instituteofdermatologists)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Triona McCarthy: Sensitive skin and scalp? Check out these home-brand goodies with nourishing marine extracts
Seavite was founded in the 1990s by Patrick Mulrooney, who created the brand for his daughters Jane and Katherine, who both suffered from eczema. Their mother Kaye celebrated a significant birthday at the bash and, as a former schoolteacher, she spoke so eloquently about the brand's journey. Kaye described Seavite as a love story, highlighting how Patrick developed this range out of love for his little girls. It was an incredibly emotional moment. Kaye is still very much involved with the brand, working alongside her daughters and their brother Patrick, who helps manage the Dr Mulrooney Clinic, specialising in clinical dermatology. I told Kaye she is an icon, and she graciously returned the compliment, sharing her mantra: 'A compliment is like perfume; enjoy it, but just don't swallow it.' It's a quote from her late husband Patrick that I now cherish and often repeat. Here's to Irish success stories! Seavite saviours Seavite's skincare combines soothing marine extracts from Galway and is especially suitable for those with sensitive skin. While all of the brand's products are brilliant, the Seavite Super Nutrient Soothing & Replenishing Face Cream (€58, is a must for any skin, but especially sensitive or dry skin. Made from organic seaweed extracts and nourishing botanicals, it has a deeply hydrating formula, the calming seaweed extracts soothe irritations and over time, you'll find those pesky lines, wrinkles and discolouration diminishing. Smooth operator Green Angel is another great Irish skincare brand, founded in 2006 by Chris and Mary Mitchell. The products are handmade in Rathcoole, Dublin. The brand has an amazing special offer at present, where if you buy its Green Angel Sunrise Magic Smoother (€39, you get its Ocean Rich gift set containing Seaweed Body Lotion and Seaweed Hand Cream (worth €45) completely free. The exfoliating Magic Smoother is one of the brand's hero products, as it uses sea salt, argan oil and Irish seaweed to remove dead skin cells and nourish the skin. Use it during the warmer months to prepare your skin for applying tan and in the winter to keep your skin soft. Sea it, believe it Created by Irish entrepreneur Sinead Asple, Sea+Solu is another great brand using plant-forward formulations, Irish marine minerals and advanced biotechnology in its products. Hair needs a little extra TLC during the warmer months, particularly if you're hitting the pools and beaches, and the Sea+Solu Moisture Melt Shampoo and Moisture Melt Conditioner (€26.95 each, are fab. Every formula is sulphate-free, silicone-free, paraben-free and vegan, and they are good for scalp health while cleansing and strengthening your hair. They are a great choice for combating summer dryness and frizz if you're escaping to sunnier shores over the next few months. Treat Eyes on the prize I love multi-purpose products and when it comes to eyeshadow, Chanel Les Beiges Healthy Glow Natural Eyeshadow Palette (€70, is a good 'un. It can also be used as a base or highlighter. A palette of five natural colours, it allows you to create all kinds of hot looks for both day and nightime. Trick Tame the pain Like everything good in life, beauty sometimes comes at a price, gals. And as women, our hormones dictate so much of our lives, including our tolerance to pain. I hardly need to tell you that when we're on our period, we're much more sensitive to pain. So, if you're having a beauty treatment that might be a little uncomfortable, like laser hair removal, the best time to book is mid-cycle, which is when we're better able to put up with pain. Treatment Island escape Being a Corkonian, I have a real grá for Fota Island Resort and I adore its spa. It has a great offer called Summer Escape at Fota Island Resort (from €669 based on two people sharing, The spa's signature Hydra Glow Facial will leave you glowing and you also get to enjoy the hydrotherapy pool, Acacia Thermal Suite and outdoor sauna. The escape includes a two-night stay, full Irish breakfast each morning and a three-course meal.


Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Sunday Independent's View: The Leaving Cert is the least of young people's worries
It may be worth asking whether having the eyes of the whole country fixed on them as they go through that rite of passage only adds to the pressure under which students are labouring right now. Worth asking even more is whether we would be better off as a society if half as much attention was paid to young people's struggles with mental health all year round as opposed to the Leaving Cert for those few weeks each June. A survey of young people published last week by the Irish Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) team at University College Galway made for predictably grim reading. It reported that almost 50pc of Irish children and teenagers between the ages of 10 and 17 report 'feeling low' at least once a week — a figure that has more than doubled since 1998. The outlook for girls is particularly concerning, with 57.6pc disclosing being regularly unhappy, compared to 35.2pc of boys. Data from HBSC teams around Europe tells the same story. Worryingly, nearly one in four of the young people surveyed suffer from headaches. Just under one in two experience sleep disturbances. That latter figure may have much to do with excessive screen time. The devices to which we all seem to be addicted, adults and children alike, devour our waking hours. By feeding us an unending diet of anger and negativity, they contribute to a vicious cycle of worsening mental health. The irony is that the main concern in previous decades used to centre on teenage drinking and drug abuse The younger a person gets a smartphone, the more likely they are to suffer from depression later on. The more they use them, the worse their mental health. From the climate crisis to the horrors of the war in Gaza, their minds are bombarded 24/7 with reasons to feel anxious. Not knowing if they will ever be able to afford to rent or buy their own home or earn enough to keep pace with the rising cost of living adds to that unease. The irony is that the main concern in previous decades used to centre on teenage drinking and drug abuse. As the HBSC report confirms, young people are now less likely than every previous generation to report being 'really drunk' at some point, down sharply from 33pc in 1998 to 17.8pc now. Chemical highs have merely been replaced by mental and emotional lows in a world that increasingly feels as if it is falling apart. Teenagers can be forgiven for thinking that the Leaving Cert is the least of their problems. Older generations used to envy the young. No more. Until their angst is properly recognised as a public crisis, the most vulnerable among them will continue to be left to struggle alone What can be done to ease this malaise is the real issue. Addressing the launch of the HBSC report via a pre-recorded video message last week, Fianna Fáil's Junior Public Health Minister Jennifer Murnane O'Connor acknowledged the pressures undermining children's well-being, and declared: 'We need to support equality and ensure that no young person is left behind.' ADVERTISEMENT Few would disagree with that fine, if slightly glib, sentiment. Making it happen is harder. As with housing, the mental challenges being experienced by young people need to be the focus of a resolute cross-departmental approach, encompassing every arm of government. Until their angst is properly recognised as a public crisis, the most vulnerable among them will continue to be left to struggle alone, long after the annual messages of solidarity as they sit the Leaving Cert have been forgotten.

The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
FactCheck: False claims about toxins, Vitamin D and ‘cooked' skin in viral claims about suncream
SUMMER HAS BEGUN, meaning soaring temperatures (maybe), shining sun (possibly), and weeks of balmy, good weather (probably not). It's also a time you'll hear good advice to wear suncream, but an odd chorus of counter advice has taken hold with false and harmful claims that suncreams can be dangerous. These include incorrect suggestions that sun scream is full of 'toxins', can block vitamin D or cause cancer. These claims, which have long been espoused online, came to the fore in Ireland recently in reaction to the appearance of skincare expert Eavanna Breen on TV to talk about the dangers of sun exposure and the importance of wearing suncream. 'I opened a can of worms,' Breen said in a 19 May Instagram video. 'People saying in the comments that I didn't know what I was talking about. That suncreams are full of toxins and we shouldn't be putting them on our skin.' Breen is correct. Social media is rife with posts that make false claims about suncream (also called sunscreen), often from accounts that claim to give health advice, can accumulate hundreds of thousands or even millions of views. Although many of the most popular versions of these posts are not from Ireland their influence has been felt here, particularly in alternative medicine circles. 'It's this rejection of what they need – man made or synthetic – versus what they deem natural,' says David Robert Grimes, a science writer who studies how misinformation spreads. By way of example, he shows why this belief is false: 'Arsenic, Uranium and Ebola are all 'natural'.' Grimes conducted research for his PhD into UV radiation, which is what can make sunlight so damaging. 'A tan is your body's way of screaming at you 'get me out of the sun'. It is an adaptive response to UV radiation,' he summarises. 'The idea [among those spreading misinformation] is that suncream is made by man, so putting it on your skin is bad, but the sun is natural, therefore it's good,' Grimes said. He noted that a similar logic is often used by people who go against vaccines; viruses are natural, while vaccines contain ingredients which are synthetic. Nevertheless, the vaccines in use are much less likely to cause you harm than being infected with the live virus. Grimes also said that many of these outlandish claims often do well because of social media algorithms, which promote them into people's feeds. People who scroll on social media sites are more likely to click on and react to counterintuitive claims, even if it's to argue against them. On many social media sites, such interactions push those posts higher in the feed so that even more people can see them. On the flip side, standard advice can struggle to make an impression; even if it is correct, people have heard it all before. steffyweffy777 / YouTube Anti-sunscream claims tend to fall into three main categories: that suncream is toxic; that suncream does more harm than good by blocking vitamin D production; and that there were no skin cancers in the past before suncream was used. These claims can be dangerous. UV radiation, such as that from the sun or tanning beds, is the main factor for most skin cancers in Ireland. There were, on average , 7,545 cases of Basal cell carcinoma and 1,243 cases of melanoma, both types of skin cancer caused by the sun, diagnosed annually between 2018 and 2022. According to an analysis by the National Cancer Registry, rates of both these cancers are increasing. If people forego suncream, especially if they do so thinking that the sun's rays must be healthy for them, they are putting themselves at risk needlessly. Toxins One of the major claims made against suncream is that it contains toxic ingredients. 'What if slathering toxic, cancer-causing chemicals on our skin in the name of 'protection' was doing more harm than good?' one post we found on Facebook by a skincare company asked. However, unlike posts by other users that appear to be dispensing odd health advice for social media engagement, the motivation behind that one is clear: it also promotes the company's own suncream, which it says is made from beef fat and 'non-nano zinc'. (Zinc is a standard sun-blocking ingredient in mineral suncreams. It's what makes them, and other formulas like Sudocreme, white). Other false claims claiming there are toxins in suncream are not as explicit, but rather implied; they often try to sell 'non-toxic' suncream to a public while amping up the suspicion of 'chemicals', such as those listed on the back of most suncream bottles. However, as David Robert Grimes points out, even the chemical description of an apple can sound sinister when you don't know what the terms mean. 'Unless you're talking about particles of light, everything in our tangible universe is chemical,' he said. Long lists of exotic-sounding chemicals make up many anti-suncream posts, which warn that these chenmicals can be dangerous. They often refer to oxybenzone, octinoxate, oxytocinate, octisalate, octocrylene, homosalate, parabens, PUFAs, avobenzone, or nanoparticles. 'If you can't pronounce it, your liver's already struggling,' one of these posts, viewed tens of thousands of times on X, reads. 'These ingredients don't block UV rays. They absorb them. Convert them into heat. Your skin turns into a microwave. Congrats, you're cooked.' The last part of this claim is partly true, but is misleading in a way that purposely makes the process sound more sinister than it is. Some sunscreen ingredients do absorb UV rays and convert them into tiny amounts of heat, but nowhere near the levels needed to cook or microwave a person's skin. The heat generated is negligible , and is far less damaging than the DNA mutations that UV radiation can cause on the skin when they are left unblocked. Advertisement Concerns about the chemicals in suncreams are also partly based in fact — some of the ingredients do have potentially negative health effects in high doses, which is why they are regulated. In order to prevent this from happening, Europe places regulatory limits on them so they are far below any harmful thresholds when they are used in suncream. 'Sunscreens are cosmetic products and as such manufacturers must comply with strict European regulatory standards that include governance on ingredients, safety and labelling,' the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) told The Journal. 'The HPRA's role as the competent authority is to ensure cosmetic products on the Irish market are safe for consumers and meet the requirements of the cosmetics regulation. 'When a cosmetic product comes to the Irish market, it undergoes a safety report, including product testing and likely exposure levels. 'Ingredients used in cosmetic products must be safe and must abide by the minimum standards to be met by all cosmetic products placed on the market.' For sunscreams specifically, this means that only protective UV filters approved for that purpose may be used. A list of UV filters allowed in cosmetic products, as well as what concentrations and what products they can be used in, is available on the European Commission website here . 'The HPRA continuously evaluate the inclusion of cosmetic ingredients at European level and in collaboration with other EU markets, to ensure the highest standards of consumer safety are maintained. 'Consumers should check for a European address on the label. If it is not there, it might indicate that the product has been imported from outside the EU and may not meet European requirements for safety assessment.' Vitamin D and cancers A near constant refrain on posts encouraging people to forego suncream is that sunlight is needed to make vitamin D. 'Sunlight increases your body's production of Vitamin D which fights cancer. Sunscreen is full of chemicals that cause cancer,' a post by a self-described 'Naturopath' said on X last July. To date, the post has accumulated more than 2.4 million views, according to X's analytics. An identical post by an anti-Covid vaccine account using the exact same wording was also posted last August, and has accumulated a further 3.6 million views on the platform. Although research has looked at whether Vitamin D can prevent cancers, the evidence has been ' mixed ' and there is no credible evidence that skipping sunscreen to boost Vitamin D is worth the well-established risk of UV-induced skin cancers . 'We don't have rickets,' David Robert Grimes says. 'That is your bog-standard test for nutritional deficiency.' While it may seem intuitive that suncream, which blocks the sun's harmful rays, would reduce the amount of Vitamin D produced in the skin, experiments have shown that volunteers that used suncream in the sun maintained vitamin D production, while reducing sunburns . 'Our bodies can still make vitamin D from sunlight even when using suncream,' the HSE told The Journal by email. 'The Department of Health recommends vitamin D supplements for everyone. The amount you need depends on your age, skin tone, your situation and the time of year.' Cancer rates 'We were exposed to the sun for hundreds of thousands of years and were doing just fine until sunscreen was invented in 1938,' a post on X last June said. It was from an account that describes themself as 'the most canceled scientist'. 'Since then, melanoma rates began to skyrocket in the 1950s, yet people blame the sun rather than the toxic chemicals in sunscreen.' The post has been viewed more than 1,800,000 times. Melanoma is a particularly dangerous form of skin cancer. Skin cancer diagnoses have increased over the last century, but there is no evidence that sunscreen is responsible. The rise is more accurately explained by much more obvious factors. 'Improved diagnostics, better reporting, and also that we live longer, and we have more time to accumulate that DNA damage that can lead to things like skin cancer,' David Robert Grimes said, listing other reasons why more cases of skin cancer are recorded now than in the past. Melanomas have been recorded in history , including in the writings of Hippocrates, as well as archaeological evidence of melanomas on 2,400-year-old Peruvian mummies. However, historical statistics on rates of skin cancers are scant. National Cancer Registry Ireland began collecting data on cancer cases in 1994. 'Over 5,000 cases of skin cancer were diagnosed in Ireland in 1994,' a spokesperson for the HSE told The Journal. 'It can take decades for skin cancer to develop after exposure to UV radiation. Many of those diagnosed with skin cancer in 1994 would have been exposed many years earlier when sunscreen was much less widely used or available.' The connection between UV rays and skin damage is well established, as is suncream's ability to stop these rays. Pyro Labs / YouTube Grimes also listed living longer as a reason that more skin cancers are being detected nowadays. 'Cancer is primarily a disease of aging,' Grimes said. 'Most cancers manifest post your 60s, right? There are exceptions, but almost all of them are associated with aging. The damage is done much earlier on, and then decades later, the cancer emerges. You might have got some exposure in your 30s that eventually leads to cancer in your 60s. 'So as we live longer, we get more cancers.' Ingredients in suncreams are regularly revised in the EU based on the latest science and have strict limits to make sure their use is safe. Many claims about suncream being bad for you are based on incorrect data or faulty reasoning. Not wearing suncream on sunny days can quickly lead to visible radiation burns and genetic damage, which increase the likelihood of cancer developing. Want to be your own fact-checker? Visit our brand-new FactCheck Knowledge Bank for guides and toolkits The Journal's FactCheck is a signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network's Code of Principles. You can read it here . For information on how FactCheck works, what the verdicts mean, and how you can take part, check out our Reader's Guide here . You can read about the team of editors and reporters who work on the factchecks here . Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... It is vital that we surface facts from noise. Articles like this one brings you clarity, transparency and balance so you can make well-informed decisions. We set up FactCheck in 2016 to proactively expose false or misleading information, but to continue to deliver on this mission we need your support. Over 5,000 readers like you support us. If you can, please consider setting up a monthly payment or making a once-off donation to keep news free to everyone. Learn More Support The Journal