Pakistan lags in AI readiness, but surges in slop content – DW – 07/21/2025
A report by Oxford Insights, a UK-based think tank that assesses the readiness of governments to implement artificial intelligence (AI) in the delivery of public services, ranks Pakistan 8th out of 17 countries in South and Central Asia — behind India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.
Pakistan drafted its national AI policy in 2021, however Data Darbar, an NGO focused on Pakistan's tech industry, criticized the policy for its lack of comprehensive and systematic applications for AI in various sectors and industries.
Data Darbar's co-founder, Natasha Uderani, told DW that Pakistan still needs to establish a better national strategy and invest more into AI-focused education, and would benefit from "more vocational programs to upskill the current workforce."
In the meantime, the lack of up-to-date national regulations has provided fertile ground for the creation of so-called AI slop, a term that refers to often low-quality visual content — generated using cheap and widely available AI tools — that increasingly appears to be flooding social media platforms, blurring the lines between reality and fiction.
.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Nighat Dad, executive director of the Digital Rights Foundation (DRF), an NGO that advocates for safer digital spaces, told DW that while "technology moves fast, adoption outpaces regulation every time."
She said that the ease at which "fake news, propaganda, or hateful content" are created with AI tools "can escalate polarization and even fuel violence."
"And while these tools are built globally, we in the Global South often bear the brunt of their unregulated harms without having any real say in their design or governance," Dad added.
An investigation by DRF uncovered a network of YouTube channels that "frequently publish content on pension schemes, use generative AI for visuals, and adopt official-sounding names that misleadingly suggest affiliation with the Pakistani government."
"Among the accounts producing this content was a YouTube channel named Pak Gov Update, which began uploading such videos just weeks ago," according to DRF.
Pak Gov Update uploaded a nearly 30-minute-long video, "Jay-Z Breaks His Silence on Diddy Controversy," which features a thumbnail of the American rapper.
According to the DRF report, the publishing of AI slop has brought into question YouTube's own policies by encouraging a "growing ecosystem of deceptive, monetized content."
However, for others in Pakistan, AI-generated content has brought creative and economic opportunities.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Zubair, a 20-year-old entrepreneur based in the Pakistani city of Karachi, had been struggling to make ends meet by making clickbait YouTube videos and thumbnails.
But since he started working with AI tools, he earns around $2,000 (€1,700) per month — and has even launched his own company that creates high quality content for its clients.
"It used to take me almost five hours to edit thumbnails on Photoshop but with AI tools, I can do the same work in minutes and get paid the same," said Zubair, who did not provide his last name.
"When I started making more money in less time, I got a chance to train myself more and can work with higher value clients," he said, adding that AI has helped opened the door to even bigger opportunities.
YouTube recently announced an update to its policies to crack down on creators' revenue generation from "inauthentic" and clickbait AI-generated content.
On July 15, the company updated its YouTube Partner Program (YPP) monetization policies with more detailed guidelines around the use of AI.
However, critics say that even previously existing YouTube policies failed to address the widespread proliferation of clickbait AI-generated content. Thus, the immediate impact to demonetize channels farming such content in Pakistan will be slow if at all.
Many established creative content owners have turned to upskilling their teams and iterating their business models to make way for AI projects.
Abrar-ul-Hassan, who founded Morango Films, a media company based in Islamabad, started to pivot his production house by learning AI skills.
He acknowledged that to create authentic and high-value content on platforms, individuals and companies in Pakistan who can afford it, should invest in uplifting the country's overall AI profile globally.
"There are not many limits to creation with AI, you can create content with multiple scenarios and people from all around the world with a lot more freedom, less time and money, but we have to ensure we aren't furthering the biases in AI and society," he told DW.
"AI upskilling is not just about the tech but the ethical understanding, as well."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The French Development Agency recently ranked Pakistan as a "mid-level performer."
The agency said that Pakistan showcased "moderate advancements in infrastructure and human capital readiness."
However, NCAI chairman Yasar Ayaz noted that AI development in Pakistan is facing a chicken-and-egg situation in investment.
Ayaz suggested that an initial injection in AI technology could make Pakistan more attractive to foreign investors.
"We don't have the capacity to become AI developers but we are making strides in deployment," said Ayaz.
"We have several products and solutions that can be exported to other low-income countries as our needs are similar and can bring our solutions to a global platform that will bode well for our AI track record to be investment-ready," he told DW.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Germany allows Taliban envoys to facilitate deportations – DW – 07/21/2025
Germany is allowing two Taliban officials to work at Afghan diplomatic missions in the country, even though it does not recognize the Islamist regime. Chancellor Merz has made curbing migration a policy priority. Germany said Monday that it has allowed two envoys from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban regime to enter the country for the first time since the hardline, Islamist movement seized power in 2021. The measure was approved to facilitate further deportations of Afghan migrants, after 81 Afghans with failed asylum claims and criminal convictions were deported on Friday. That flight was the second of its kind since Germany resumed deportations to Afghanistan last year, which were halted after the Taliban returned to power and Germany closed its embassy in Kabul. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The German government, like the rest of the international community except for Russia, does not formally recognize the Taliban government because of its human rights record and in particular its treatment of women. But it does have "technical contacts" with the Taliban to deal with the deportations, which Qatar has facilitated. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has emphasized that despite the consular staff being allowed to enter and work in the country, there will be no diplomatic recognition of the Taliban Islamists. Currently, the Afghan diplomatic representations in Germany are headed by officials who were accredited before the 2021 Taliban takeover, according to the German Foreign Office, which added that staff at the Afghan missions are stretched thin. "The German government has an interest in ensuring that Afghan nationals in Germany receive adequate consular support — this includes, for example, the issuance of passports," the Foreign Office said. The Taliban envoys, who arrived in Germany over the weekend, will work at the Afghan embassy in Berlin and the Afghan consulate in Bonn, according to the German daily . To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany stopped deportations to Afghanistan in 2021 when the Taliban retook control of the country. However, amid a rise of the far-right and anti-immigrant rhetoric, the government led by the conservative bloc of Chancellor Merz has put deportations high on the agenda. The deportations had already resumed under Merz's predecessor Olaf Scholz, who had pledged to ramp up removals of rejected asylum-seekers and migrants with criminal convictions in the wake of violent attacks involving migrants. The deportations of Afghan migrants and asylum-seekers to Afghanistan has drawn sharp criticism from the United Nations. Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR) said it was "not appropriate to return people to Afghanistan," while speaking to reporters in Geneva. "We have been documenting continuing human rights violations in Afghanistan," she said. Arafat Jamal, who works for the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) in Kabul, said a "non-return advisory" was still in place for Afghanistan, highlighting that "conditions on the ground are not yet ready for returns." "We urge countries not to forcibly return to Afghanistan," he said. German government spokesman Stefan Kornelius has said that further deportation flights are in the pipeline. "The government has committed to systematic expulsions of those convicted of crimes and this will not be accomplished with just one flight," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For the latest news, explainers and analysis from Germany, follow our blog.
Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
NSITE: Rewriting The Rules Of Diverse Hiring Through Comprehensive Talent Management Solutions
Finding skilled, reliable talent is only half the battle for many employers. The other half is reaching communities that have long been overlooked. Among the most underrepresented groups in today's workforce are individuals who are blind or visually impaired. Many employers simply don't know how or where to connect with this ready and able talent pool. NSITE , a Virginia-based nonprofit founded in 2021, is committed to bridging this disconnect. It draws from decades of experience under its parent organization, the National Industries for the Blind (NIB), to make the recruitment process smoother and more accessible for both job seekers and employers. On the job seeker side, people reach out to NSITE for guidance and are connected with tailored training programs, accessible job boards, and direct employment opportunities. NSITE Connect serves as a curated job board where every listing is tailored for candidates who are blind or have low vision. It's worth noting that the organization remains involved post-hire to provide ongoing support, professional development, and workplace accommodations that align with the employee's needs. On the other hand, NSITE offers employers practical solutions to promote workforce integration. "One of the most common assumptions is that people who are blind or have a visual impairment can't perform certain jobs or that accommodating them would be too expensive or complicated," Marianne Haegeli, Director of Learning and Leadership at NSITE, shares. "We want to dispel that misconception." From consulting services to hands-on support in making digital platforms and physical spaces accessible, NSITE's experts help companies build a work environment where all employees can succeed. Training sessions focus on effective leadership, eliminating unconscious bias, and comprehensive communication strategies. For companies seeking immediate solutions, NSITE offers a flexible staffing service that provides temporary talent as organizations work toward final hiring decisions. This gives employers time to adjust, while still benefiting from talented workers. NSITE also supports employers through candidate pre-screening, onboarding assistance, and long-term relationship management. Whether a company is making its initial hire or scaling an entire team from the blind or low vision talent pool, NSITE provides support every step of the way. Partners who have worked with NSITE report powerful outcomes. One collaborator even said, "If actually getting talent who is blind hired into competitive integrated employment is critically important to you, you need to work with NSITE." In another client story, an organization partnered with NSITE to assess and improve the accessibility of its internal systems. The initiative to support one new hire eventually led to a broader redesign of digital tools, benefiting numerous employees, including those whose neurodivergence had previously gone unacknowledged. NSITE's impact can also be seen in NSITE's job board, which has seen rapid growth, with more job postings and candidate profiles added each year. The organization's professional development programs have expanded significantly, providing thousands of hours of training. Ultimately, NSITE's work is grounded in the idea that disability hiring is a strategy. Dr. Jonathan Lucus, Executive Director, remarks, "Our services aren't about charity or compromise, but about building a workforce that reflects the richness of human talent and potential." With every employer it educates and every career it helps launch, NSITE is changing what's possible for companies, communities, and individuals who deserve the chance to thrive.
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Are Trump's tariffs the new sanctions? – DW – 07/21/2025
Donald Trump is betting that tariffs rather than sanctions will fix economic and geopolitical imbalances. But does the threat of rising US inflation and retaliation make sanctions a safer choice? US President Donald Trump's reliance on tariffs rather than sanctions has been described as both the "world's worst bet" and "a powerful proven source of leverage" to protect the national interests of the United States. While tariffs essentially are taxes on imports primarily used to protect domestic industries, sanctions are penalties imposed on another country to punish and its government. Sanctions typically put restrictions on trade or his return to the White House in January, Trump's tariff threats against dozens of countries have created great uncertainty among US businesses and global trading partners. What's become known as "tariff tango" — bold pledges of steep duties on foreign goods, followed by abrupt reversals — suits Trump's shifting political or economic goals. Yet, financial markets remain on edge, not knowing how or when the president may deploy tariffs next. The tariff on China, the biggest economic and military rival to the US, reached historic highs in April, soaring to 145% before being significantly cut the following month after trade talks in London. Trump's sudden increase and later rollback of tariffs show how he uses them as a flexible way to fix what he sees as unfair trade, based on past trade disputes. "What shapes the president's views is the rapid rise of Japan in the 1980s, and the feeling that the Japanese were out-competing the iconic American car industry because the US has been too generous in its trade terms," Jennifer Burns, associate professor of history at Stanford University, told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tariffs are Trump's preferred weapon to tackle the massive US trade deficit, particularly with China, which amounted to $295 billion (€253 billion) in 2024, according to the US Census Bureau. They also align with his "America First" agenda to protect domestic industries and boost US job creation. The White House has defended the president's approach, insisting that tariffs can be quickly deployed and, unlike sanctions, don't completely shut foreign markets to US firms. "[Trump] can add this pressure when he wants and then bring it back when markets start to freak out or it stops serving his purpose," Sophia Busch, associate director of the Geoeconomic Centre at the Atlantic Council think tank, told DW. "This is much easier with tariffs than with sanctions." Although tariffs have been widely criticized for their potential to stoke inflation, they do raise revenue for the US Treasury, unlike sanctions. US tariff revenues are up 110% to $97.3 billion in the first half of the year, compared to the same period last year. Tariffs are expected to raise $360 billion next year, according to the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Tariffs give Trump direct, unilateral control, using executive orders without needing approval from the US Congress. Sanctions, on the other hand, often require complex legal frameworks and cooperation with international partners, like the European Union. The preference for tariffs over sanctions reflects Trump's aim for rapid, visible economic leverage, but raises concerns about the destabilizing effects of such policies on global trade and peace. "The reason [tariffs] have such a bad reputation is because they're linked to these episodes of de-globalization, and in the 20th century, they were linked to armed conflict," said Burns. "If low tariffs and open markets knit countries together in a way that forestalls armed conflict, does it mean that we might be moving away from that?" Trump's second-term policies suggest he is using tariffs to achieve objectives typically associated with sanctions, such as pressuring countries like Canada, Mexico and China on nontrade issues like immigration and drug trafficking. These tariffs have prompted retaliatory measures or threats, which have intensified global trade tensions. Similarly, Colombia was threatened with tariffs after it rejected US deportation flights, while threatened levies on the European Union were partly announced as a response to EU privacy and climate regulations. Earlier this month, Trump threatened to impose a 50% tariff on imports from Brazil, which were framed as retaliation for the prosecution of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally. The far-right politician faces trial for allegedly plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 election loss, including plans to assassinate political rivals. Previous US administrations have preferred sanctions over tariffs as a punitive tool to bring rogue countries into line. Since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the US has imposed more than 2,500 sanctions on Russia, targeting individuals, entities, shipping and aircraft. The US has also imposed sanctions on Venezuela, Iran and North Korea. "These economies are not crucial trading partners for the US," the Atlantic Council's Busch said, adding that Trump's tariffs on the "top US trading partners" were "more of an economic threat domestically." Trump has recently expressed more openness to deploying sanctions. Referring to a bill proposed by Senator Lindsey Graham for additional penalties on Moscow if it fails to negotiate a peace deal in good faith with Kyiv, Trump said he was "very strongly" considering fresh sanctions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video If passed, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 will target key Russian officials and oligarchs, financial institutions and the energy sector, aiming to curb Russia's ability to export oil and gas. The bill, which has bipartisan support, also proposes secondary sanctions on third countries and foreign companies, which Trump has termed "secondary tariffs" of up to 500% on countries importing Russian energy. Trump's similar "secondary tariffs" of 25% on buyers of Venezuelan oil, which took effect in March, were also designed to pressure energy importers to align with US foreign policy, a role typically reserved for sanctions. Secondary sanctions usually include blacklisting individuals and entities, asset freezes and banking restrictions. The threat of US criminal charges and travel bans is also often used. "Sanctions are more about punishing countries for violating international norms," Burns told DW. "They're in response to specific actions, and if those actions cease, the sanctions can be undone." Noting how the uncertainty around Trump's tariff policy had left US firms and global trade partners reeling, Burns warned that "years of tariff uncertainty" may cause a "serious economic slowdown, as businesses and investors wait for a more predictable landscape."
