Further delays to opening of Guernsey critical care unit
It said of the issues: "These have taken longer than anticipated but we are continuing to work with the contractor to get this resolved."The BBC understands work is under way to fix the defects by contractors Rihoys and Son, which was commissioned to work on the full hospital modernisation project.HSC was negotiating with Rihoys around how this work will be funded. Rihoys chairman Gavin Rihoy said: "Working to deliver this major capital project within a working hospital and clinical environment has been challenging, though we are working to complete remedial works as soon as possible."This facility will provide many benefits for patients and staff, helping to save lives in the future."
HSC said: "We know this will be disappointing news for the community as a whole and we are extremely disappointed too. "This delay, although frustrating, does not present a clinical risk as we continue to have a fully functioning and safe Post Anaesthetic Care Unit and Critical Care Unit in the current PEH."It is important to remember that the Critical Care Unit cares for our most vulnerable patients and it is vital that we get this right for them and for our staff, given the benefits that the new units will bring."
HSC President Deputy Al Brouard said in March 2025: "We hope to officially open the post anaesthetic care and critical care units within the next few months. "We had hoped to open in April so naturally we're disappointed, but it's crucial that we get this right for patients and staff given the benefits that the new units will bring and that is our focus."It is not the first delay to the scheme to extend the hospital, as the project had been scheduled to be completed in autumn 2024.However, the States said in August 2024 "the final elements of the building work have taken longer than anticipated".
Bella Farrell, chairwoman of Guernsey's healthcare watchdog Carewatch, said she was disappointed by the delay and encouraged the new HSC committee to work towards transforming local health services."There is going to have to be a reimagining of how health and social care services are provided within these of limited resources," she said.
At the start of this project, the States said the scheme was needed as the current hospital "provided a poor experience for patients and staff". In 2019 the States approved Phase 1 of the hospital modernisation project, at a cost of £34m, but it is not yet known whether the new delays will lead to the project going over budget.In 2023 the States said the work was set to come in on time and on budget.Phase 1 of the project included the new critical care unit, a post anaesthetic care unit, relatives' facilities and staff facilities.Originally the critical care unit was planned to include eight beds, before increasing to nine beds during 2025, with capacity to increase to 12 beds.
Last year it was revealed officials HSC officials knew about a projected £30m overspend on the hospital extension in February 2023.Since then a UK firm has been employed by the States to look at how the costs of Phase 2 the project could be kept within the approved £120m budget.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
UK warned it risks exodus of 'disillusioned' doctors
Nearly one in five doctors is considering quitting in the UK, new figures show, while one in eight is thinking about leaving the country to work abroad. The General Medical Council (GMC), which commissioned the research, is warning that plans to cut hospital waiting lists will be at risk unless more is done to retain them. By July 2029, the prime minister has said 92% of patients needing routine hospital treatment like hip and knee replacements will be seen within 18 weeks. "[Poor staff retention] could threaten government ambitions to reduce waiting times and deliver better care to patients," warned the authors of the GMC's latest report. The main reason doctors gave for considering moving abroad was they are "treated better" in other countries, while the second most common reason was better pay. Some 43% said they had researched career opportunities in other countries, while 15% reported taking "hard steps" towards moving abroad, like applying for roles or contacting recruiters. "Like any profession, doctors who are disillusioned with their careers will start looking elsewhere," said Charlie Massey, chief executive of the GMC. "Doctors need to be satisfied, supported, and see a hopeful future for themselves, or we may risk losing their talent and expertise altogether." 3:13 The report - which comes after a recent five-day walkout by resident doctors - is based on the responses of 4,697 doctors around the UK and also explores how they feel about career progression. One in three said they are unable to progress their education, training and careers in the way they want. Those who didn't feel like their careers were progressing were at higher risk of burnout and were less satisfied with their work. The GMC blamed workloads, competition for jobs, and lack of senior support for development for adversely impacting the career progression of UK doctors. 2:51 'Legitimate complaints' The Department of Health and Social Care acknowledged doctors had suffered "more than a decade of neglect". "Doctors have legitimate complaints about their conditions, including issues with training bottlenecks and career progression," said a spokesperson. "We want to work with them to address these and improve their working lives, which includes our plans set out in the 10 Year Health Plan to prioritise UK graduates and increase speciality training posts. "This government is committed to improving career opportunities and working conditions, bringing in ways to recognise and reward talent - as well as freeing up clinicians' time by cutting red tape."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Study attributes 440 'excess deaths' to January's Los Angeles wildfires
LOS ANGELES, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Wildfires that devastated parts of the Los Angeles area in January indirectly led to hundreds of deaths in the ensuing weeks, far exceeding the official toll of 31 fatalities, according to a study released on Wednesday. The research, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, estimated 440 "excess deaths" were attributable to the fires from January 5 to February 1, using models that compared predicted mortality under normal circumstances to actual numbers documented during that period. The additional deaths likely reflect a mix of factors, including increased exposure of people with heart and lung disease to poor air quality from smoke and toxins released by the fires, as well as healthcare delays and disruptions, the study said. The findings "underscore the need to complement direct fatalities estimates with alternative methods to quantify the additional mortality burden of wildfires and of climate-related emergencies more broadly," the researchers wrote. Two wind-driven wildfires that erupted during the first week of January on opposite sides of Los Angeles damaged or destroyed nearly 16,000 structures combined - laying waste to much of the seaside district of Pacific Palisades and the foothill community of Altadena. Together, the blazes scorched 59 square miles (152 sq km), an area larger than Paris. The official tally of people who perished as a direct result of the fires stands at 31, after the most recent set of human remains were unearthed in Altadena in July, six months after the fires. Governor Gavin Newsom in February requested nearly $40 billion in wildfire aid from Congress. Some estimates put economic losses from the fires at more than $250 billion, making the conflagration one of the most costly natural disasters in U.S. history. The JAMA study acknowledged some limitations, saying the data may need to be revised upward in the future and the research did not reflect any fire-attributable deaths beyond Feb. 1.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I have 'Ozempic penis'. It's a new side effect that men aren't even telling their doctors... but their wives are all discussing it online!
It's the miracle drug known to curb appetite, stimulate weight loss and even help kick unhealthy addictions like smoking. But some men have claimed that taking 'GLP-1' injections, more commonly known by brand names including Ozempic and Wegovy, have brought on another surprising - and welcomed - side effect.
