The Business Roundtable is MIA Against Trump's Attacks
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the Oval Office at the White House on May 6, 2025 in Washington, DC. Credit - Anna Moneymaker—Getty Images
President Donald Trump recently attacked Walmart, the biggest private sector employer in the United States and the largest retailer in the world.
Douglas McMillon, CEO of Walmart warned that the Trump Administration's tariffs could drive cost increases. In response, President Donald Trump took to social media.
'Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain. Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected,' seethed the President. 'Between Walmart and China they should, as is said, 'EAT THE TARIFFS,' and not charge valued customers ANYTHING. I'll be watching, and so will your customers!!!'
The rebuke comes the very same week that Trump chided revered Apple CEO Tim Cook for manufacturing in India and is merely the latest in a long line of attacks on some of America's most iconic businesses. So far during his second term, Trump has lashed out at companies such as Amazon, Bank of America, and Boeing. And organizations including AT&T, Harley-Davidson, and Merck have not been immune to Trump's wrath. However, business leaders are yet to collectively, and definitively, stand up to him.
Many completely non-political CEOs saw their firms suffer Trump-initiated stock plunges as they made prudent decisions on how to guide their companies around reckless universal trade sanctions.
As Trump's tariff tantrums threaten to plunge the American economy off a cliff—amidst significant price increases, large layoffs, plummeting business and consumer confidence, and frozen capital investments across industries—CEOs know they need to speak truth to power. But we've heard from dozens of Fortune 100 CEOs that they are having a hard time breaking through to President Trump, and conveying the very real dangers facing their businesses, their shareholders, their employees, and their communities.
Furthermore, even though 90% of CEOs agree that tariffs are backfiring, they are fearful that if they speak out on their own, they will turn into the next targets of a capricious, vindictive President—as Walmart found out the hard way.
Trump fears collective action, and relies on pitting rivals against one another through a divide-and-conquer approach. When business groups stand by in passive inaction when individual CEOs get pummeled, they cede the moral and strategic imperative to Trump's impulsive whims—ultimately leaving business leaders twisting in the wind.
Some trade groups, such as the Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, and the Chamber of Progress—along with other specialized industry groups from the automotive sector to the pharmaceutical industry—have tried to pick up the pieces. However, there are many who wonder why the Business Roundtable, a D.C.-based lobbying firm and association of more than 200 leading CEOs, seems to be missing in action. Indeed, why have they not played a greater role in catalyzing collective action beyond putting out perfunctory statements and purported behind-the-scenes lobbying?
This muted response follows other high-profile disappointments from the Business Roundtable in the Trump era, including during his first term.
In August 2017, following Trump's horrifying defense of neo-Nazis who attacked peaceful counterdemonstrators at a rally in Charlottesville, Va., the American business community stood together.
The highly-regarded CEO of Merck, Ken Frazier led the charge. In his resignation letter he wrote, 'As C.E.O. of Merck and as a matter of personal conscience, I feel a responsibility to take a stand against intolerance and extremism.'
The son of a well-read custodian, Frazier grew up in North Philadelphia and became one of few black Fortune 500 chief executives. Trump predictably attacked him, which immediately backfired. Over the next several days, CEOs who had once shunned politics came to Frazier's vocal defense, including the heads of Walmart, Intel, BlackRock, and IBM.
When Frazier exited the President's Business Advisory Group, he set off a high-profile stampede of exits. Frazier's peer CEOs walked out in solidarity, triggering the disbanding of the two of President Trump's business advisory councils: the Manufacturing Council and the Strategy and Policy Forum.
At the time, many CEOs were frustrated that the Business Roundtable remained relatively passive—especially amidst an era of perceived antitrust politicization, with Trump deputies holding up the Time Warner-AT&T deal on specious grounds for 18 months.
Similarly, when in November 2020, President Trump refused to acknowledge his electoral defeat, 22 CEOs, frustrated with inaction by the Business Roundtable, asked me to convene an immediate Zoom call for 100 of the nation's largest CEOs. All showed up—from pharma to finance, advertising to airlines, consumer goods to consulting. During this 'Chamber of Conscience' meeting, these business leaders stood up for the importance of certified elections and also certified the truth—meeting for four sessions through the presidential transition under the banner of Business Leaders for National Unity.
That silence of the Business Roundtable is a far cry from why it was created. I personally knew the highly engaged, politically diverse founding generation of Business Roundtable members—ranging from Reginald Jones of GE, Clifton Garvin of Exxon, Irving Shapiro of DuPont, George Weyerhaeuser of his eponymous timberland firm, Al Casey of American Airlines, Roger Smith of GM, Jim Burke of Johnson & Johnson, and Roy Vagelos of Merck—and they set up the Business Roundtable explicitly as a vehicle for collective action for CEOs to tackle public policy issues.
As Trump attacks our nation's most iconic enterprises, the Business Roundtable needs to return to its founding principles, purpose, and moral clarity so that CEOs are not left dangling in the wind all alone and defenseless while Trump picks them off individually. CEOs grappling with how to break through to a mercurial President as they watch their enterprises and the broader economy teeter off the ledge know there is strength in collective action—lest they become Trump's next target.
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft Stock (MSFT) Shrugs Off Macro Blues and Returns to Record Highs
Microsoft (MSFT) is rapidly solidifying its leadership in the AI race, fueled by the strength of Azure's cloud platform, the transformative impact of Microsoft 365 Copilot, and strategic investments in AI infrastructure. These growth drivers are delivering impressive revenue and earnings momentum, helping justify the stock's premium valuation, especially for long-term investors. In an AI-driven future, Microsoft's position at the top appears firmly secured. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Looking at the tech giant's share price in recent months is a far cry from where sentiment was back in March, when Donald Trump's trade policies with China and fears of a U.S. recession unsettled the stock, sending it back to $350 per share. Given the strong bounce-back, I remain bullish on the stock. Today, every Fortune 500 CEO is racing to integrate AI into their business, and Microsoft's Azure has become the engine powering that transformation. Azure's revenue soared 33% last quarter—well ahead of Wall Street's 30% estimate—with AI services accounting for nearly half of that growth. Microsoft reported $26.75 billion in cloud revenue, up 21% year-over-year, thanks to Azure's ability to deliver customized AI solutions, from predictive analytics in retail to real-time fraud detection in finance. At Build 2025, Microsoft showcased updates to its Maia AI chip, reinforcing its role as an innovation leader in the space. What stands out is the real-world impact. For instance, Walmart (WMT) is using Azure to streamline its supply chain through AI models that anticipate demand surges. Microsoft CFO Amy Hood noted on the latest earnings call that the company is working to expand data center capacity to meet what she called 'insatiable' demand. While infrastructure constraints remain a challenge, they serve as a testament to Azure's accelerating momentum. Simply put, Azure has become the digital backbone of the AI era—and Microsoft is making sure it stays that way. Let's turn to Microsoft 365 Copilot, the company's AI-powered productivity assistant that's rapidly becoming an indispensable tool for modern workplaces. Capable of drafting emails, analyzing data in Excel, and even assisting with real-time coding, Copilot is transforming how employees interact with everyday software. In the most recent quarter, Microsoft's Productivity and Business Processes segment, which includes Copilot, generated $29.94 billion in revenue, marking a 10% year-over-year increase and surpassing analyst expectations. Notably, Barclays' decision to roll out 100,000 Copilot licenses highlights growing enterprise adoption across multiple industries. What sets Copilot apart is its deep integration within the Microsoft ecosystem—seamlessly functioning across Teams, Outlook, Word, and more. This embedded approach provides users with enhanced functionality without disrupting existing workflows. At the Build 2025 conference, Microsoft showcased Copilot's ability to automate routine desktop tasks, positioning it not just as a tool but as a true digital collaborator. CEO Satya Nadella highlighted use cases in sectors like healthcare, where organizations are leveraging Copilot to streamline administrative tasks such as managing patient records, despite some initial concerns about data privacy. While the $30-per-user monthly fee may give some decision-makers pause, the potential for significant time savings makes a strong case. Ultimately, Microsoft is redefining productivity by embedding AI at the core of the digital workplace. Microsoft is allocating a massive $80 billion toward AI infrastructure this year, accelerating its data center expansion at a rapid clip. However, last quarter marked a slight decline in capital expenditures—from $22.6 billion to $21.4 billion—signaling a shift from sheer scale to strategic efficiency. Rather than cost-cutting, this appears to reflect Microsoft's growing confidence in its internal AI capabilities. As the chart indicates, MSFT's R&D spend remains the most considerable portion of its operating expenses. A prime example is the Discovery platform, which recently identified a non-toxic data center coolant in just 200 hours, showcasing how AI is already improving operational efficiency. CEO Satya Nadella has also emphasized that refining AI models, whether developed with OpenAI or independently, is significantly reducing costs while enhancing performance. This disciplined investment approach seems to be paying off. Major clients, such as Siemens, are already leveraging Microsoft's AI for advanced manufacturing processes, underscoring the tangible, real-world impact of these efforts. Microsoft's bet on more innovative AI-driven infrastructure appears not only calculated but increasingly validated. Here's where the investment case for Microsoft becomes especially compelling. Azure and Copilot aren't just driving revenue—they're fueling significant profit expansion. These high-margin segments are helping lift Microsoft's net margins toward the 45–50% range, up from the high 30% level earlier in fiscal Q1 2025. Analysts project earnings per share will grow by 13.5% this year, with Q3 FY25 already posting an impressive $3.46 per share—a robust 18% year-over-year increase. Microsoft's bottom-line growth is clearly accelerating, powered by the scalability of its AI initiatives. Yes, Microsoft stock trades at a premium P/E of 35, but exceptional companies rarely come cheap. With strong execution across cloud, AI, and productivity tools, the market's valuation reflects real momentum, not just hype. Investors waiting for a significant pullback may find themselves on the sidelines as Microsoft continues to outperform its peers. This is a business in its prime, and the long-term upside remains firmly intact. Despite trading near its highs, Wall Street remains extremely bullish on MSFT stock. MSFT features a Strong Buy consensus rating, with 31 analysts currently bullish and five neutral. Not a single analyst is bearish on the stock. MSFT's average stock forecast of $514.93 indicates upside potential of about 10% over the next twelve months. Microsoft's AI-powered rise is a standout example of strategic innovation and flawless execution. With Azure, Copilot, and well-timed infrastructure investments driving both top-line and bottom-line growth, the company's premium valuation looks well-earned. Backed by $80 billion in AI-related investments and a clear commitment to staying ahead of industry trends, Microsoft is firmly positioned at the forefront of the AI revolution. I continue to view MSFT as a premier tech holding—operating at peak performance with strong momentum and no indication of slowing down. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Times
31 minutes ago
- New York Times
Is 4,700 federal troops a big deployment?
About 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines have been sent to Los Angeles as of Tuesday morning, after President Trump bypassed California leaders who said federal forces were not needed to respond to mostly peaceful protests. Here's how the deployment compares to past military activations on domestic soil responding to social unrest. 2021: Attack on the Capitol In 2021, officials in Washington initially requested 340 National Guard members to help respond to planned protests on Jan. 5 and Jan. 6, according to the military. As the protests on Jan. 6 against the 2020 presidential election results deteriorated, with a violent mob attacking police officers and the Capitol, the mayor of Washington D.C., Muriel Bowser, requested assistance, and 1,100 D.C. National Guard members were sent. Later that night, the acting defense secretary at the time, Chris Miller, mobilized 6,200 more National Guard members from other states to ensure peace in the days leading up to former President Joseph R. Biden's inauguration. 2020: George Floyd Protests After protests sprung up around the United States in response to the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis, National Guard members were deployed to several states. As of June 3, 2020, the National Guard had deployed more than 18,000 members in 28 states to respond to civil unrest related to Mr. Floyd's murder at the request of the states' governors. Another 42,000 National Guard members were activated at the same time for the coronavirus pandemic response. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Why these actors and ‘SmartLess' podcast hosts want to help you pay less for cell service
The latest celebrity start-up trend is no longer tequila. It's telecom. Actors Sean Hayes, Will Arnett and Jason Bateman — who host the popular 'SmartLess' podcast — are launching a wireless service as an alternative to pricier unlimited data plans from major carriers like Verizon, T-Mobile or AT&T. The decision to start the company, called SmartLess Mobile, came from a simple realization: while industry giants generally push unlimited plans, most people don't actually use that much data. Even if they're glued to their phones. 'Most Americans spend almost 90% of their time under Wi-Fi. Their mobile device very seldom actually uses the actual wireless network,' said SmartLess CEO Paul McAleese, a telecom industry veteran who co-founded the company with the actors. Research published last year by the consultancy group OpenSignal found that most mobile customers spend between 77% and 88% of their on-screen time connected to a Wi-Fi network. SmartLess Mobile offers wireless plans starting at $15 per month for 5 gigabytes of high-speed data, going up to $30 monthly for 30 gigabytes. By contrast, starter unlimited plans from the major carriers range from around $35 to $65 per month. McAleese said he and Arnett started discussing the idea after the actor bought a new phone for his teenage son and was sold an unlimited plan that cost around $70 monthly. (Arnett previously served as a spokesperson for Canadian telecom giant Shaw Communications; McAleese is the company's former president.) 'And (Arnett) goes, 'Geez, it's awfully expensive,'' McAleese said in an interview with CNN. 'And I said, 'Your boy spends almost his entire life under Wi-Fi. He's at home, he's at school … he's never going to be on the network. Why would you buy all that?'' SmartLess Mobile joins a growing slate of celebrity-backed wireless carriers, including Consumer Cellular, with longtime spokesperson Ted Danson, and Ryan Reynolds' Mint Mobile, which was acquired by T-Mobile in 2023. These providers, known as mobile virtual network operators (or MVNOs), lease access to a major telecom provider's spectrum — SmartLess plans will run on T-Mobile's 5G network — and can often charge lower prices because they don't have to manage the physical infrastructure. The services have gained popularity as cell phone technology has advanced. Most phones now have digital SIM cards, making it easier for consumers to switch carriers without having to visit a retail store. And the proliferation of Wi-Fi infrastructure everywhere from subways to restaurants means many people have lesser data needs. If their partner network goes down, MVNOs do risk being the ones customers blame for losing missing service. And limited data plans aren't necessarily for everyone — ride-share drivers and delivery couriers likely use a lot more data than people who work from home or from an office with a Wi-Fi network. But the primary 'uphill battle for any MVNO is to stand out in the space,' said Jeffrey Moore, principal at wireless industry research firm Wave7, because the industry giants have much more name recognition. Major carriers also entice customers with deals on new phones, which they practically give away for free if consumers join their network. Smaller carriers 'have to stand out either in terms of offerings or in terms of marketing,' Moore said. That's where celebrity endorsements come in. SmartLess already has a significant built-in audience; the podcast ranks among the top 20 most popular shows on Apple Podcasts. And Arnett, Hayes and the SmartLess podcast have more than 2 million combined Instagram followers. 'Whether by luck or by design, they also have a brand name that has both 'smart' and 'less' in the name,' McAleese said, 'which, if you're going to be a challenger brand in this day and age, those are two pretty good head starts.' The team plans to start discussing SmartLess Mobile on the podcast in the coming weeks, he said. And the SmartLess hosts' involvement in the new carrier goes beyond typical celebrity endorsements, McAleese said. Hayes, Arnett and Bateman had already turned down the opportunity to lend their names to other types of products, and they've been involved in everything from financing to marketing the new company. 'They rely on the category for what is now one of their primary professional pursuits, which is the podcast, this is how people consume their product,' McAleese said. 'These guys are master storytellers, and they have the brand ethos of sort of an honest broker. I think it's just a perfect marriage.'
