
Abandoned Leicester care home turned into NHS facility
Patients are expected to stay at the facility at Preston Lodge, in Kingfisher Avenue, for between 21 and 28 days maximum.Emma Roberts, a head of nursing at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UHL), said patients can lose muscle condition during a stay in hospital and the aim of extending their stay is "to get them back to their peak fitness".Patients will also have access to dietitians, occupational therapists, and physiotherapists.
Prof Damian Roland, an emergency medicine consultant at Leicester Royal Infirmary, said: "We take patients who are sitting in an acute hospital bed and move them to a place where they get that rehabilitation."That gets the patient well more quickly, prevents them perhaps needing further care, but [it] also releases a bed so that we can release patients from the emergency department and other hospital areas."On an average day, there are about 100 patients in hospital beds in Leicester's three main NHS hospitals who are medically fit but there are issues with discharging them, according to UHL.Prof Roland said the project is aligned with the government's 10 year plan for the NHS, which aims to move more care into the community.
Rowena Harvey, a deputy chief nurse at UHL, added: "It's not going to solve everything but it's a step on that journey and it's about how we work as a system together to achieve the best outcome for our population."Preston Lodge was a city council-run care home and prior to it being used by the NHS, there had been discussions over it potentially becoming flats.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nurses union expected to reject pay deal amid strike vote
Nursing staff in England are widely expected to overwhelmingly reject a 3.6 per cent pay offer, with the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) having previously branded the proposed increase "grotesque". The RCN, which has been balloting its members on the prospective pay rise accepted by the Government in May, has argued the award would be "entirely swallowed up by inflation". This sentiment is echoed in BBC reports suggesting a firm rejection by nursing staff. The union highlighted that the offer falls short compared to increases received by doctors, teachers, prison officers, and the armed forces. While GMB health workers, including ambulance crews, recently rejected a similar government pay deal, any decision on potential strike action by nurses would not be made until later in the year, the public broadcaster added. The union said its members voted by 67 per cent against the 3.6 per cent pay award offered for 2025/26 in England. GMB has written to Health Secretary Wes Streeting calling for an urgent meeting to discuss pay and other issues of importance to its members working across the NHS and ambulance services. Rachel Harrison, GMB national secretary, said: 'We await his reply with interest.' The GMB represents about 50,000 health workers, including 20,000 in the ambulance service. The announcement was made on the first day of a five-day strike by resident doctors, also over pay. Analysis from the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) found nurses' pay is £8,000 lower than if wages had kept pace with inflation since 2010. Their study showed that nurses' pay has been 'severely eroded' over the past years, especially for junior staff. The RCN said addressing 'collapsing' wages for those at the start of their careers must be a priority for the government to boost recruitment and deliver its 10-Year Health Plan. Executive director for RCN England, Patricia Marquis, said nursing staff are 'tired of playing constant financial catch-up, often struggling to pay rent or get on the housing ladder'.


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
RSPCA issues disease warning over imported dogs
An animal charity has urged stricter regulations for dog imports by UK rescues, citing concerns over disease risks and behavioural issues. This call follows 2023 government statistics revealing 320,000 pets entered the UK via travel schemes, with 44,000 as commercial imports. RSPCA spokesman David Bowles likened the process to ' Deliveroo for dogs' and called on the Government to tighten regulations on animal rescues. He told the BBC: 'The RSPCA's major concern is these dogs are essentially ticking time bombs – coming over, not being health tested. 'Diseases are now coming in through these dogs. They're affecting not just the dogs that are being imported, they could also affect the dogs already in this country and their owners. 'They've almost set up a Deliveroo for dogs and that is a real problem.' There is no requirement for rescue organisations to be licensed in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. It comes weeks after a bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the Commons with cross-party support. Legislation put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been 'mutilated', including having their ears docked. The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.' He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial. He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation. 'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'


The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Is it true that … natural salt is healthier than table salt?
Flaky sea salt, pink rock salt, fleur de sel … Thanks to a generation of TV chefs sprinkling gourmet seasonings on dishes with flair, it feels instinctive that these natural, premium versions of sodium chloride are somehow healthier than humble table salt. And many of them market themselves that way – claiming that lower levels of processing and higher levels of minerals like potassium and magnesium make them the superior choice. But Sonia Pombo, a registered nutritionist and head of research and impact at Action on Salt, disagrees. 'The evidence linking a high intake of salt to raised blood pressure is very well documented,' she says. (Overconsumption is also linked to an increased risk of stomach cancer, osteoporosis and kidney problems.) 'Some of these companies may try to convince the public they're better,' she says. 'But if you look at the tiny amounts of magnesium or potassium in these salts, it's laughable. If you want micronutrients, eat a piece of fruit.' The benefits of electrolytes, too, are often overstated, she says. Saline drinks can be helpful if you're recovering from a stomach bug or training like an elite athlete on a restricted salt diet. But for most of us? 'They're not really necessary – we're already eating too much salt.' In the UK, adults are advised to consume no more than six grams of salt a day. The most recent figures show we eat 40% more than that – but even six grams isn't a target to aim for, Pombo says. 'We can survive and thrive on as little as one gram per day.' If you're worried about how much salt you use, the only 'better' kind is low-sodium salt. The real answer is to gradually reduce consumption – slowly, so you don't notice the difference. Cook at home more often and beware of hidden salt in products like bread and sauces.