Merely possessing Aadhaar, PAN card or voter ID doesn't make person Indian citizen: HC
A person does not become a citizen of India merely by possessing documents like Aadhaar card, PAN card or a voter ID, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday said while refusing bail to a man, allegedly from Bangladesh, for entering India illegally.The man is accused of staying in India for more than a decade with forged and fabricated documents.A bench of Justice Amit Borkar said provisions of the Citizenship Act lay down who can be a citizen of India and how citizenship can be acquired and documents such as the Aadhaar card, PAN card and voter ID are only meant for identification or availing services.
The court refused bail to Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, alleged to be a Bangladeshi national, who entered India illegally without a valid passport or travel documents. He allegedly procured forged Indian documents such as Aadhaar card, PAN card, voter ID and also an Indian passport. In 1955, Parliament passed the Citizenship Act which created a permanent and complete system for acquiring citizenship, Justice Borkar noted.
"In my opinion, the Citizenship Act of 1955 is the main and controlling law for deciding questions about nationality in India today. This is the statute that lays down who can be a citizen, how citizenship can be acquired and in what situations it can be lost," he said."Merely having documents such as Aadhaar card, PAN card or voter ID does not, by itself, make someone a citizen of India. These documents are meant for identification or availing services, but they do not override the basic legal requirements of citizenship as prescribed in the Citizenship Act," the HC said.The law draws a clear line between lawful citizens and illegal migrants, the bench said.People falling in the category of illegal migrants are barred from obtaining citizenship through most of the legal routes mentioned in the Citizenship Act, it added."This distinction is important because it protects the sovereignty of the country and ensures that benefits and rights meant for citizens are not wrongfully taken by those who have no legal status to stay in India," the court said.The bench, while refusing bail to Sardar, noted that verification of his documents was still on and the investigation was also still continuing, and the police's fear that he may abscond if granted bail is a genuine apprehension.The allegations in the case are not small and it is not just about staying in India without permission or overstaying, but it is about making and using fake and forged identity documents with the aim of pretending to be an Indian citizen, the HC said.Sardar was booked under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Passport (Entry to India) Act and the Foreigners Order.The court noted the investigation in the case is still going on with regard to genuineness of the Aadhaar card, which is being verified by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI).Sardar in his bail plea said he was a bona fide citizen of India and that there was no conclusive or reliable evidence to prove he is a national of Bangladesh.He further claimed his documents are linked with his income tax records and business registration and that he has been residing in Mumbai's neighbouring Thane district since 2013.The prosecution opposed the plea, claiming if the accused was released on bail, he may abscond.
The police further said a probe was on to ascertain if there was a larger organised network involving illegal immigration and identity fraud.
The court in its order noted the allegations against Sardar are not limited to a mere technical violation of immigration norms, but indicate a case of deliberate concealment of identity and creation of forged documents for obtaining the Indian citizenship benefits. When the Constitution of India was being drafted, the country had just gone through a historic transformation and the partition at the time caused a massive movement of people across borders, creating a need to decide who would be accepted as citizens of the new nation, it noted.Keeping this in mind, framers of the Constitution decided to make an arrangement for deciding citizenship, the high court said.
The Constitution laid down provisions which gave immediate clarity on who would be considered a citizen at the very beginning of the Republic and it gave the elected Parliament the powers to make laws on citizenship in future, the court noted. PTI
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bengali row: Noida hotel turns away New Town techie, son
Kolkata: A techie from New Town, along with his 14-year-old son, was on Tuesday allegedly denied stay at a hotel at Sector 44 in Noida, apparently for being a Bengali. The teenaged boy is a national-level skater, attending a championship in Noida. The father claimed the hotel receptionist cancelled his booking—he made reservations through OYO for two nights—claiming the local police station had instructed them not to allow anyone from Bangladesh, Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir to stay at hotels till Aug 15 for security reasons. The man told TOI, "The receptionist said the local police instructed them not to allow any guest from Bangladesh, Punjab and Jammu and Kashmir. I was surprised. I said we were not Bangladeshis but were from West Bengal. But the receptionist said it was the same thing and that he wouldn't let us in," he said. The father said he made multiple calls to OYO. "The customer care executive finally took the call and said they would refund my amount in 7-10 days. I had no other option but to check into another hotel in Sector 49, far from the arena," he said, adding he had booked the earlier hotel in Sector 44 as it was near the skating rink, where registrations would begin early Wednesday. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata | Gold Rates Today in Kolkata | Silver Rates Today in Kolkata An OYO official issued an apology and stated the hotel —Meera Eternity—was removed from the booking platform on Tuesday itself and that an inquiry was initiated. "OYO has neither received or given any such guideline to hotels on its platform. OYO does not promote any form of discrimination..." OYO said in a statement. Noida DCP Yamuna Prasad told TOI there had been no official instruction from the Noida Police to hotels to deny entry to people from Bengal or any other state. "Hotels are told to check ID and visa documents of people from Bangladesh but there is no directive to disallow stay to even Bangladeshi residents if they have proper papers," said Prasad. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
43 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Bihar SIR row 'largely a trust deficit issue', says Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Tuesday called the Bihar special intensive revision (SIR) exercise row 'largely a trust deficit issue' as the Election Commission (EC) claimed that roughly 6.5 crore people of the total 7.9 crore voting population of the state did not have to file any documents for themselves or their parents featured in the 2003 electoral roll. The apex court is hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the EC's June 24 directive, ordering SIR of Bihar electoral roll. The directive requires voters not listed in the 2003 electoral roll to submit documents proving their citizenship. Those born after December 2004 must also furnish the citizenship documents of both parents, with additional requirements if a parent is a foreign national. 'If out of 7.9 crore voters, 7.24 crore responded to SIR, it demolishes the theory of one crore voters missing or disenfranchised," the bench told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for petitioner and RJD leader Manoj Jha. Sibal contended that despite the residents possessing Aadhaar cards, ration cards and electoral photo identity cards (EPICs), officials refused to accept the documents. Most of the population of Bihar, Sibal also argued, do not possess the documents specified as acceptable by the EC. The Supreme Court, however, remarked that the possibility of nobody possessing these documents was "a very sweeping argument". "It is a very sweeping statement that in Bihar nobody has the documents. If this happens in Bihar, then what will happen in other parts of the country," the top court asked. Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), one of the petitioners, said that the EC had not published a list of names of the 65 lakh persons who have been deleted from the draft roll. Further, the EC had also not specified who the dead or migrated persons are, he said. Meanwhile, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for one of the petitioners, argued that the EC cannot place the burden of proof of citizenship on the voters in the guise of revising the electoral rolls. "Today, in the guise of methodology of revising the roll, they are reversing the burden of proof of citizenship, saying prove your citizenship, that too in two-and-a-half months," Singhvi said. Political activist Yogendra Yadav, who addressed the court in person, questioned the data given by the poll panel and said instead of 7.9 crore voters, there was a total adult population of 8.18 crore and the design of SIR exercise was to delete the voters. "They (EC) were not able to find any individual whose name was added and booth level officers visited house to house for deletion of names," Yadav said, calling it a case of "total disenfranchisement". The hearing will continue on Wednesday. In the previous hearings, the court had said that the EC is a constitutional authority and it is deemed to act in accordance with law, but in case of mass exclusion of voters, the court would have to step in. 'The Election Commission of India, being a constitutional authority, is deemed to act in accordance with the law. If any wrongdoing is done, you bring it to the notice of the court. We will hear you,' the court had told the petitioners. The court had observed that the petitions raised 'an important question, which goes to the very root of the functioning of the democracy in the country — the right to vote'.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Explainer: What is the new H-1B wage-based selection all about
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills The White House has approved a proposal to select H-1B petitions based on wages in a shift from the current norm of using lottery. The rule, if implemented, will likely impact those at entry-level salaries in the US, and force technology firms to make changes in their overseas talent hiring to a Bloomberg report, the approval from the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs came on August 8 and will be released to the public year, the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) approves 85,000 H-1B visas allocated to highly skilled foreign workers through a lottery system, which picks petitions at have been one of the largest beneficiaries of the visa. According to the FY24 report from the USCIS, 71% of total H-1B visas, including fresh visas and renewals, issued between October 2023 and September 2024, were to Indian nationals, followed by the Chinese at 12%.The Trump administration now wants to revive the previous proposal by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that would select H-1B petitions based on the final rule released in 2021, the USCIS said, 'Modifying the H-1B cap selection process will incentivise employers to offer higher salaries, and/or petition for higher-skilled positions, and establish a more certain path for businesses to achieve personnel needs and remain globally competitive.'This means that those with higher salaries will be prioritised, over entry-level employees. For instance, for the role of a software engineer in San Francisco, between Level 1 with annual compensation of $135,699, and Level 4 at $213,512, the latter would be preferred as per the role. The compensation was based on the current wage data from the US Department of US government decision is likely to impact hiring for entry-level positions. Immigration experts said the move may also hit diversity in hiring talent as it prioritises wages. Indian IT companies and US technology firms may also have to pay higher wages for their employees to qualify, inflating operating costs and pressuring changes yet. In 2021, the new rule for H-1B saw significant push back and was withdrawn by the then Biden administration. It was also blocked by the federal that the White House has approved the proposal, Gnanamookan Senthurjothi, founder, Visa Code, said the USCIS will release it for public feedback in the federal firm Fragomen in a note said after a period of 30-60 days, the agency will take into consideration the comments and will then publish the final rule with the implementation period. 'There is no set time frame for publication of a final rule, though the process typically takes several months,' the note said.
