Bad news for this telecom company, to layoff 55000 employees by…, not Ratan Tata's TCS or Narayana Murthy's Infosys, it is…
British telecommunications giant BT is now assuming additional reductions in employment after the development of artificial intelligence. They recently announced more that 55,000 job cuts by 2030 which is higher than their earlier plans.
CEO of the British telecommunications company BT, Allison Kirkby revealed this in a Sunday interview with the Financial Times. He said that progress in AI technology might result in additional reductions at the company.
BT in 2023 had planned to cut up to 55,000 jobs by 2030, to reduce its cost base by the end of this decade. However, he also informed the FT that this strategy 'did not reflect' the 'full potential' of artificial intelligence.
As now BT has increasingly used AI to change operations in areas like customer service. 'Depending on what we learn from AI … there may be an opportunity for BT to be even smaller by the end of the decade,' Kirkby said.
The company is planning to use generative AI to assist with sales and support operations in BT and its mobile network division, EE. By December, the firm reported that EE's virtual assistant, Aimee, was able to manage up to 60,000 customer conversations weekly.
BT is not only one company which is planning automation in full swing. The Swedish payments firm Klarna is also taking initiatives to use AI in customer service operations. In 2024, Klarna had revealed that its OpenAI-powered AI assistant was performing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
AI Godfather Geoffrey Hinton's chilling warning: AI could replace you unless you are a...
AI godfather Geoffrey Hinton's chilling warning In a world moving quickly toward automation, one of the creators of modern artificial intelligence is raising serious concerns about what happens next. Geoffrey Hinton , the British-Canadian computer scientist often called the 'Godfather of AI,' has made a rare public statement about what kinds of jobs are most at risk—and which ones might survive. Hinton, who helped lay the foundation for AI systems that now power everything from chatbots to medical tools, left his role at Google in 2023. Since then, he's been speaking more freely about the risks of the technology he helped create. In a recent interview on The Diary of a CEO podcast with Steven Bartlett, Hinton discussed the future of work in a world shaped by powerful machines. And in a surprising turn, he said there's one career path that may be safer than most: plumbing. AI Godfather's urgent warning: Want job security? Learn plumbing While talking about the risks of AI, Hinton made a simple point: machines are good at thinking, not at fixing pipes. 'It's going to be a long time before [AI is] as good at physical manipulation as us,' he said. 'A good bet would be to be a plumber.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Plumbing is hard to automate. It involves manual skill, real-world judgment, and problem-solving in unpredictable settings. A plumber might need to crawl under a sink, deal with unusual water pressure, or fix something without a manual. These aren't tasks AI systems are built to handle. According to Hinton, jobs that rely on hands-on skills are less likely to be taken over by AI anytime soon. While machines can handle large amounts of data and even draft documents, they still can't climb ladders or tighten valves. That gives trade jobs—especially ones like plumbing, electrical work, and carpentry—an edge in the AI era. A personal warning from the AI Godfather Now 77, Hinton didn't try to hide how conflicted he feels. He admitted that he's still processing the full consequences of his work. 'Intellectually, you can see the threat,' he said. 'But it's very hard to come to terms with it emotionally.' He said he worries about the future his children and grandchildren might face. In the interview, he painted a picture that was both realistic and unsettling. He talked about a world where AI systems could eventually control power plants and critical infrastructure. If these systems become fully independent, they may not need people at all. 'If AI ever decided to take over,' he warned, 'it would need people for a while to run the power stations—until it designed better analog machines… There are so many ways it could get rid of people, all of which would, of course, be very nasty.' Hinton didn't say this will happen. But he made it clear that it could. And in his view, that's reason enough to take it seriously. Office jobs face AI pressure, says 'Godfather of AI' While plumbers may be safe for now, Hinton believes many office jobs won't be. He pointed to legal assistants and paralegals as some of the first roles being reshaped by AI. These jobs often involve reviewing contracts, analyzing documents, or summarizing information—all tasks that large language models can already handle. With AI tools now able to draft legal text and even predict case outcomes, the need for human support roles in law firms could shrink. Hinton wasn't trying to be dramatic. He was simply stating what the data shows. 'In a society which shared out things fairly, everybody should be better off,' he said. 'But if you can replace lots of people by AIs, then the people who get replaced will be worse off.' In other words, the shift may boost productivity, but it might not help everyone equally. Growing inequality could be the real problem Beyond the risks of job loss, Hinton pointed to a deeper issue: inequality. As companies adopt AI, many workers may be pushed out, while only a small group—those who own or run these companies—stand to benefit. If not managed carefully, this could lead to a wider gap between rich and poor. People in manual jobs may still find work, but others—especially those in mid-level white-collar roles—may struggle to adapt. And while AI might create new jobs, Hinton warned that the pace of change could be too fast for many to keep up. A future that's still unwritten Hinton's message wasn't meant to scare people. It was meant to make them think. He didn't claim to know how the future will unfold. But he said it's time to have an honest conversation about what's coming. For now, the most valuable skills may not be digital ones—but physical ones. Fixing a leak, rewiring a switchboard, or installing a water heater might be harder to replace than people think. And that's something worth remembering. Also read | Written by Steve Jobs: Three 'most-important' words of Apple philosophy that define the company since almost past 50 years AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to software engineers: "AI is like an Intern today but …"
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has offered an assessment on the current capabilities of artificial intelligence in the field of software engineering. Altman described AI as an 'intern', but also predicted a rapid evolution which will soon make it rival to experienced professionals. Altman mentioned that an intern can work for a few hours, but can slowly grow to become equivalent to an experienced software engineer. His comments underline the transformative impact AI is said to have to the tech industry, especially on roles related to coding. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's message to software engineers Speaking at the Snowflake Summit 2025 , Altman said, 'Today [AI] is like an intern that can work for a couple of hours, but at some point it'll be like an experienced software engineer that can work for a couple of days.' He added that by next year, we may begin to see AI agents capable of solving complex business problems and even discovering new knowledge. Altman believes that AI will progress quickly from its present 'intern' status and reach a level where it can easily perform tasks handled by experienced software engineers . This means that there can be a future where AI systems can work independently and handle complex coding challenges, design intricate software architectures and also contribute to strategic development decisions with lesser human intervention. For software engineers, Altman's vision signifies a shift in their roles. He highlights that instead of routine coding, software engineers should increase their areas of expertise and focus on things like managing complex AI-driven projects, ensuring ethical deployment of AI and innovating on the current capabilities of AI. Impact of AI on employment Altman's comments come amid growing debate over AI's impact on employment. Recently, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned that artificial intelligence could eliminate 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within the next five years, potentially driving US unemployment to 20%. The stark prediction comes as AI technology rapidly advances, with sectors including technology, finance, law, and consulting facing the greatest disruption. "We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming," Amodei told Axios in an interview published Wednesday. The 42-year-old CEO emphasized that most people remain unaware of the impending transformation, calling it a reality that "sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it." AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
UK reconsiders 'Tax on Love' rule, NRI sponsors may benefit: What it means
The UK government is considering easing the income threshold for sponsoring family visas after public backlash over what critics have called a 'tax on love.' The move, currently under review by the UK Home Office, could have far-reaching consequences for thousands of British families — especially those of Indian origin — separated due to tough immigration policies. Currently, British citizens and residents sponsoring a spouse or partner must earn at least £29,000 annually, a rule introduced in 2024. The proposed change could lower this requirement to £23,000–£25,000, based on recommendations from the UK's Migration Advisory Committee (MAC). Why this matters Families across the UK, including many NRI households, have called the current threshold 'unfair,' especially for women, ethnic minorities, and part-time workers. Critics argue it disproportionately affects low-income British citizens married to foreign nationals and separates parents from their children. 'This judgment is not about relaxing borders — it's about reuniting families and supporting mental well-being of children and spouses,' said Carla Denyer, UK MP and Green Party leader, who has led calls to reverse the rule. What's Changing Current threshold: £29,000/year (as of April 2024) Proposed threshold: £23,000–£25,000/year Previous plan under review: £38,700 (was to take effect in 2025) According to the MAC, a reduced threshold will increase net migration by only 1–3%, adding around 8,000 more family members per year. Importantly, the report stressed that this minor fiscal impact is outweighed by the emotional and social benefits of family reunification. Why Current Rules Are Called 'Tax on Love' Since 2024, British citizens or permanent residents sponsoring a spouse or partner need a minimum income of £29,000 annually—a rule originally tied to skilled-worker salary levels. Critics argue it has forced families apart, causing psychological strain on children across the UK. One critic told BBC: 'Children are the biggest victims… we ask her to look to that evidence… those very real-life experiences.' The threshold is termed a 'tax on love' by MPs and campaigners, including Carla Denyer of the Green Party, who argue it discriminates against working-class families, women, and people of colour. The Migration Advisory Committee (MAC)—an expert panel advising the government—has recommended reducing the minimum income to £23,000–£25,000, as per The Guardian. MAC said: The current £29,000 requirement is among the highest globally, akin to Norway's Lowering it would ease family separations without significantly increasing net migration—by an estimated 1–3% (8,000 people annually) While reducing it may slightly impact public finances, this mirrors the reality of many self-sufficient British households. Legal, Humanitarian & Economic Considerations As per The Guardian, The MAC cautioned that raising the threshold further—such as the proposed £38,700—'may conflict' with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to family life Prof. Brian Bell, MAC Chair, said the choice is political: 'There is a cost to the UK economy and UK taxpayers… but… ignoring the massive impact that has on families.' MAC also highlighted cases from The Guardian, including families with children and British partners who were forced to spend months apart due to the income rule. What Happens Next? The Labour government paused the previous Conservative plan to increase the income to £38,700 and asked MAC to review the rule MAC's report is now with the Home Office, which will formulate new policy likely to be announced later this year Campaigners from Reunite Families UK argue even the new minimum wage-level threshold could still separate some deserving families What it means for you? If you're a UK citizen married to a foreign partner, the rule may change soon, making family reunification easier. If you're close to the threshold now, you might still need time to meet the lower adjusted requirement. Campaigners will watch closely—some push for removing the income requirement entirely, citing a right to family life What you should do? If you are: A UK citizen or settled person hoping to sponsor a family member — monitor Home Office announcements for official policy updates. Earning close to the proposed £23,000–25,000 band — consider preparing your documents now, as the rule may change within months.
