
We celebrate May Day and Freedom Day but SA's working class is still unfree
About 32% of the population is unemployed; of the employed, 35.9% are in informal work; and of the formally employed, nearly 40% earn less than R3,500 a month.
Each year, the end of April carries the weight of two pivotal commemorations: May Day and Freedom Day. One marks the global assertion of workers' rights. The other celebrates the defeat of apartheid and the promise of democracy in South Africa. But in 2025, the distance between these two ideals is painfully wide.
As capital deepens its grip and the state retreats from its social obligations, the working class, once the backbone of the anti-apartheid movement, is being pushed back into the shadows.
South Africa's labour movement has never been just about wages. From its early days, it was rooted in the understanding that capitalism, especially in its racialised form, could never deliver liberation for the majority. The Industrial and Commercial Workers Union (ICU), active in the 1920s and 1930s, stretched beyond the factory floor by organising workers, rural farmworkers and shackdwellers challenging the colour bar.
Later, the Federation of South African Trade Unions (Fosatu) in the 1970s and the Congress of South African Trade Unions (Cosatu) in the 1980s built not just unions but democratic, worker-led organisations. They understood, as Lenin argued, that 'the emancipation of the working classes must be conquered by the working classes themselves'.
May Day in apartheid South Africa was banned. Yet workers still marched, risking beatings, job losses and jail. In 1986, Cosatu called a two-day general strike. More than 1.5 million workers stayed away. The apartheid economy was brought to a standstill. The message was clear. The factories, the mines and the ports ran on black labour. That labour had withdrawn its consent.
What occurred was more than resistance. It was the assertion of class power. Joe Slovo described it best when he wrote: 'South Africa is not a colony but an independent state … A new type of colonialism was developed, in which the oppressing white nation occupied the same territory as the oppressed … Non-white South Africa is the colony of white South Africa itself.'
This strategic alliance between organised labour and the broader liberation movement culminated in the unbanning of political organisations in 1990 and democratic elections in 1994. But that moment of victory was also a pivot. In exchange for political freedom, economic power remained largely untouched. The working class won the vote but not the factory. They gained rights on paper, but faced a globalised neoliberal economy that demanded flexibility and austerity. Democracy was hollowed out by an elite consensus. Socialism, once central to the Freedom Charter, was pushed to the margins.
The labour market today is a testament to that betrayal. More than 31.9% of the population is unemployed. Among youth aged 15 to 24, the unemployment rate is 59.7%. These are not just statistics. They reflect a political economy that protects the rich while discarding the poor. The ruling bloc has failed to build even a basic social wage. Instead, mass unemployment has become permanent and systemic.
South African workers are not just unemployed. They are super-exploited. Of the employed, 35.9% are in informal work with no contracts or job security. A 2023 report by the University of Cape Town's Development Policy Research Unit shows that more than 70% of all new jobs created in the past five years have been precarious, short-term, low-wage or informal. Domestic workers and farmworkers remain among the most exploited groups.
Even among formally employed workers, nearly 40% earn less than R3,500 a month. The capitalist system, Lenin warned, 'does not simply enslave workers; it deprives them of dignity, of humanity'.
Real wages continue to decline. According to Statistics South Africa and the South African Reserve Bank, inflation-adjusted wages have dropped by more than 6.4% since 2020. During the same period, electricity prices increased by 45% and the cost of staple foods such as maize meal rose by 32%.
Meanwhile, the average JSE-listed chief executive earned R17.3 million annually in 2023. That is more than 500 times what a minimum wage worker earns. At Sibanye-Stillwater, the chief executive earned R189 million while mineworkers toil underground for less than R10,000 a month. This isn't mismanagement. It is the very logic of the system.
The Labour Relations Amendment Bill currently tabled at National Economic Development and Labour Council further undermines the gains made by unions over decades. It aims to curtail the right to strike, increase state oversight of unions and expand the definition of essential services to restrict collective action. These are not neutral reforms. They are class weapons. They seek to discipline the very movements that challenged racial capitalism.
The Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration, once a hard-fought institution, is being hollowed out. With more than R600 million cut from its budget since 2020, delays are now the norm. Workers wait for about 200 days for arbitration while employers act with impunity. Labour law, once a shield, is being refashioned into an instrument of erosion.
Meanwhile, outsourcing and labour broking remain central strategies of exploitation. In sectors such as cleaning and security, more than 48% of workers earn below the legal minimum wage. These jobs are racialised and gendered, designed to deepen inequality while expanding corporate profits. The post-apartheid state has allowed this to become the new normal.
We are told we must remain attractive to investors. But the only thing capital is attracted to is a cheap, fragmented and easily replaceable workforce. In this moment, the contradiction between capital and labour could not be more stark. Socialism is not a dream. It is the only credible response to a system that continues to impoverish the majority.
In the townships, the mines of Rustenburg, the farms of the Western Cape and the informal settlements surrounding every city, workers know they are not free. They may carry an identity document instead of a dompas, but they remain trapped in a system that sees them only as cost and liability.
The spirit of May Day demands reckoning, not ritual. Freedom Day, if it is to mean anything, must be understood as a project still incomplete. It is a promise denied by the continuation of racial capitalism in new clothes. The post-apartheid consensus, built on the myths of trickle-down growth and private investment-led development, has failed to deliver justice to the majority. The time for nostalgia is over.
As Walter Sisulu warned, 'We must never forget that our people's struggle was both for political and economic emancipation.' The former was achieved. The latter was deferred. And that deferral has now hardened into doctrine.
The terrain of struggle must shift. The labour movement must recover its historical mission. It must not only defend the rights won under democracy but fight for a fundamentally different future. This means breaking from party patronage networks, rejecting donor-driven funding and control that dilutes worker democracy, and returning to democratic shop-floor structures and mass-based organising.
It means placing socialism — real, living socialism — back on the agenda. Not as a slogan but as a practical programme for the redistribution of land, resources and power. As Lenin said, 'There can be no talk of real freedom without economic freedom.' The task of our generation is to build that freedom.
Chris Hani reminded us that, 'Socialism is about decent shelter for those who are homeless … It is about health care … a life of dignity for the old … and rolling back the tyranny of the market.'
Let us mark this May Day not with slogans but with renewed resolve. Let Freedom Day become not a commemoration but a confrontation with what remains undone. Because until the worker is free, South Africa is not free.
Mbuso Ngubane is the deputy general secretary of the National Union of Metalworkers South Africa. He writes in his personal capacity.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
16 hours ago
- IOL News
The congress of the people and the Freedom Charter: lessons for national social dialogue
On 26 June 2025, South Africa will mark 70 years since the historic adoption of the charter in Kliptown near Johannesburg. Image: IOL / Independent Newspapers Barely a year after the defiant campaign was launched by the African National Congress (ANC) and its alliance partners on 26 June 1952, primarily to oppose the unjust and discriminatory laws of the apartheid government, the mobilised populace of various races inspired Professor ZK Mathews. In 1953, he proposed gathering and soliciting the people's demands, immediate challenges, and suggestions regarding the future they envisioned for South Africa. Professor Mathews' proposal was accepted and culminated in extensive consultation, which led to the Congress of the People's (CoP) convention and the drafting and adoption of the Freedom Charter on 26 June 1955. This means that on 26 June 2025, South Africa will mark 70 years since the historic adoption of the charter in Kliptown near Johannesburg. This milestone and the people's document will be commemorated in the context of assessing the implementation of its clauses, or lack thereof, over thirty-one years following the democratic breakthrough in 1994. However, this article analyses how the Congress of the People and the Freedom Charter were convened and adopted, chiefly focusing on the clause 'the people shall govern', in the quest for the lessons that can be drawn for the envisaged convention of national social dialogue in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The intensive and extensive consultation, along with the politicisation of society a year before the convention of the COP, epitomised a true reflection of 'the people shall govern'. This assertion is aptly captured by a former member of the first democratic parliament of South Africa, Dr Ismail Vadi, who states that in 1954, the National Action Council (NAC) was established to oversee the comprehensive preparations for the COP and drafting of the charter. This structure of five members ensured that provincial, regional, and local action councils and committees were in place, each with well-defined roles and responsibilities. Afterwards, Vadi indicates that there was a call for volunteers to serve in the structures; the volunteers were trained to ensure that they do not only collected the demands of the people but also discussed the political issues of the moment and ensured that the elections of delegates to the COP reflected the demographic profile of, and the existing progressive organisations in, the length and breadth of the country. In his opinion, Joe Slovo, the former General Secretary of the South African Communist Party (SACP) and member of the draft team of the Freedom Charter, posited that the COP was the 'most representative assembly ever held in South Africa.' However, this document has been subjected to public scrutiny for the past decades, and political activist Professor Raymond Sutter argues that, freedom charter, today remains a document of basic human right which we can learn from as we attempt to reconstruct the future, in his view, its emancipatory character is more relevant than its content. It has been over a decade since a call was made to reset the country's vision by reconvening the national dialogue. Therefore, the Government of National Unity (GNU) and all political parties represented in Parliament must, in the context and spirit of the clause 'the people shall govern', genuinely listen to and heed South Africans' progressive call and convene a national dialogue. However, valuable lessons can be drawn from how COP was convened and how consultations, political discussions, and the critical issues of that time, which required resolution, were conducted and documented. Additionally, the processes involved in selecting and electing delegates were significant. Nevertheless, I support the call for foundations named after eminent South Africans to be empowered to fulfil a role similar to that of the National Action Council in preparing for the proposed national dialogue. Eight years ago, in support of the convention for national dialogue, former Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe stated that history is not written solely with pen and paper, but also through the actions of ordinary people who understand the socio-historical essence of dialogue as a trans-generational imperative that has shaped and continues to shape the soul of our nation. In light of the debate surrounding national dialogue in South Africa, the fundamental question is whether the parliaments of African countries genuinely reflect the people's aspirations and visions. For instance, last year in Kenya, parliament proposed a financial bill to increase taxes, including Value Added Tax. The bill faced overwhelming opposition; nevertheless, parliament adopted it, leading to widespread protests among Kenyans that forced President William Ruto to reverse it. In March this year, the Minister of Finance in South Africa, Enoch Godongwana, prepared a budget speech proposing an increase in Value Added Tax. His proposal was opposed by political parties in parliament, and in his revised speech in May 2025, he stated that the proposed VAT increase has been reversed because the government listens to South Africans. That claim by the Finance Minister is devoid of truth because politicians in parliament discussed that budget without the opinions of ordinary people. Former President Thabo Mbeki correctly said that the country's entire future cannot be delegated to politicians alone; the people must be part of the process to determine the destiny of their country. Therefore, it has become clear that 'people shall govern' has been reduced to political slogans and not necessarily a policy statement that seeks to tangibly involve the people. This highlights the need for a national social dialogue, and I do not believe that the GNU is willing to convene it. In October 2024, the Deputy President, Paul Mashatile, publicly announced that the inaugural national dialogue was to be convened on 16th December 2024, to prepare for the 2025 national social dialogue; however, he later announced the postponement without setting a new date. It has been almost eight months, and nothing seems to be progressing on that front. My assertion is supported by the Minister of Finance, who recently stated that the budget has no provision for national social dialogue. Regrettably, the fuel levy has been increased to address the shortfall in the National Budget. However, in 2018, President Cyril Ramaphosa received the Justice Nugent commission report regarding the inquiry into the South African Revenue Service (SARS). The recommendations were unequivocal, and it is alleged that over eight million was expended on the commission. I contend that SARS could have recouped sufficient funds to prevent this increase in the fuel levy had the recommendations been adequately implemented. Numerous commissions of inquiry are established without full execution or consideration of the recommendations; nevertheless, national social dialogue cannot be funded. There are some disturbing calls for the creation of independent states within the state in South Africa, serves as a pressing need for an in-depth discussion; I concur with the former Minister of Finance, Mcebisi Jonas, that the consensus of 1994 has disintegrated and a wider social conversation is necessary to revitalise the country's vision. Orapeleng Matshediso is a Masters graduate of Pan African Development Studies and Research Associate at the University of Johannesburg (Institute for Pan African Thought and Conversation). The author is also an alumnus of the then Thabo Mbeki African Leadership Institute (TMALI). Orapeleng Matshediso is a Masters graduate of Pan African Development Studies and Research Associate at the University of Johannesburg (Institute for Pan African Thought and Conversation). Image: Supplied.

IOL News
19 hours ago
- IOL News
Ramaphosa reaffirms BBBEE policies as vital for South Africa's economic transformation
President Cyril Ramaphosa has once again reaffirmed the country's commitment to defending its BBBEE laws as the only way to realise economic inclusion. Image: ANC/X South Africa's Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) policies are here to stay. These are the words of President Cyril Ramaphosa who has once again, re-affirmed the country's affirmative action policies as key to economic transformation and inclusion. This comes as the Democratic Alliance (DA) and other commentators have recently voiced their opposition to the country's economic policies. Ramaphosa and Minister of International Relations, Ronald Lamola during their recent address before the Black Business Council summit, affirmed the current legislative framework. On Monday, in his weekly newsletter, Ramaphosa indicated that the country's economy will not succeed without the current policies, adding that now is not the time to back-track on these policies as they are the corner stone of economic inclusion and the much-needed economic growth as enshrined in the constitution and the Freedom Charter. "Our Constitution reflects the promise we made to one another and to future generations to redress the injustices of our past and realise the full potential of our country. For this reason, we reaffirm that broad-based black economic empowerment is not just a policy choice but a constitutional imperative. "In recent months, the world has entered what many now term a 'poly-crisis' where global conflict, economic stagnation, mistrust in institutions and environmental degradation are challenging even the most resilient of nations." Ramaphosa said now is not the time to abandon the measures that have been put in place to drive transformation. "To the contrary, it is the time to move forward with greater purpose and raise our ambition. Since 1994 we have built a robust legislative framework to advance the transformation of our economy, anchored in the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act and the Employment Equity Act. The progress we have made is undeniable," he said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading In his address to the Black Business Council summit on Thursday, Lamola encouraged black entrepreneurs to take a firm stand in the country's ailing economy. "Promoting inclusive trade and investment can help bridge both domestic and global divides, supporting the resilience of developing countries in particular. "In the context of our country, inclusive growth has a broader meaning, it must mean the inclusion of black entrepreneurs in the mainstream of our economy and into the South African business playing a role in the world. This is a constitutional imperative. Further to the above small businesses have a key role to play, exchange program and collaboration becomes key," Lamola said. Despite the DA saying the BBBEE laws have not worked, Ramaphosa indicated through legislative frameworks such as the BBBEE policies and other interventions, the country has realised and seen real changes in ownership patterns and more businesses owned by women. "We have seen changes in management control, enterprise development and skills development. According to Statistics SA, between 2006 and 2023, black African households experienced real income growth of 46%, coloured households of 29% and Indian households of 19%. "Despite this progress, the average income of white households is still nearly five times higher than that of black African households. This is the gulf we must close through deliberate and sustained efforts to expand opportunity. Transformation is not a favour. It is a necessity," he added.

IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Employers gain flexibility in choosing EAP demographics for employment equity plans"
The Department of Employment and Labour is forging ahead with the implementation of the Employment Equity Amendment Act. Image: Leon Lestrade/ Independent Newspapers EMPLOYERS will have the option to use the applicable national or regional Economically Active Population (EAP) population as an instrument when developing employment equity (EE) plans. At a recent EE workshop held in Sandton, Department of Employment and Labour deputy director, Masilo Lefika said employers will have this option when developing EE Plans and setting annual numerical targets in their workplaces. He added that when developing EE Plans and setting annual numerical targets in their workplaces in terms of legislation, designated employers must take into account the workforce profile, the relevant five-year sectoral numerical targets, and the applicable EAP. 'The five-year sectoral numerical targets are key milestones towards achieving the equitable representation of the different designated groups within the four upper occupational levels in an employer's workforce in relation to the demographics of the applicable EAP, and for persons with disabilities,' said Lefika. This comes as the Department is forging ahead with legislative amendments to the Employment Equity Act (EEA). These amendments have their origins in 2019, when the Department, in collaboration with the Commission for Employment Equity (CEE), began sector-specific engagements aimed at setting employment equity (EE) targets. The goal was to accelerate transformation in the workplace. These efforts culminated in the Employment Equity Amendment Act No. 4 of 2022, which officially came into effect on January 1, 2025. However the changes have been met with mixed reactions as the DA has taken government to court to challenge the amendments, while others have raised concerns about applying national targets at the expense of regional demographics. According to Lefika, a designated employer will incur "no penalty or any form of disadvantage if there are reasonable grounds to justify its failure to comply with any target". Trade union federation Cosatu welcomed the option for employers to choose which demographics to apply when setting their targets. 'Cosatu engaged with the Department of Employment and Labour extensively on the 2023 amendments to the Employment Equity Act at Nedlac as well as with Parliament. We support these amendments, in particular the provisions recognising regional demographic diversity and enabling employers to utilise them or national demographics depending on their own footprint as an employer. This is critical as the demographics of Limpopo differ widely from those of the Western and Northern Cape and those differ significantly from KwaZulu-Natal. 'Enabling employers to utilise regional demographics is important to ensure local workers enjoy full worker opportunities and also to ensure workplaces represent South Africa's full diversity. This is especially important for provinces like the Western and Northern Cape where coloured workers are the largest demographic group and similarly in provinces like Gauteng and KZN. Employment equity includes all South Africans, of all racial, gender and disability categories,' Cosatu Parliamentary Coordinator, Matthew Parks said. The National Coloured Congress (NCC), which had called to meet with minister Nomakhosazana Meth over the issue, added that without proper consideration of provincial demographics, it risks the further marginalising of Coloured communities. 'The Constitutional Court has ruled you can't implement national demographics, regionally. All the labour department is doing is making it easier for businesses with vested interests to discriminate. As the custodian of employment equity, the labour department should do its job,' NCC leader, Fadiel Adams said. Cape Times National Coloured Congress (NCC) leader Fadiel Adams. Image: Supplied