First Foundation Bank review (2025): Personal and business banking with competitive online rates
Summary: First Foundation Bank (FFB) is a California-based bank that provides consumer and business banking products as well as private wealth management services. The bank was founded in 2008, though its roots date back to 1990 when it originally provided wealth management services to individuals and businesses in Orange County. Today, it operates a handful of branches in California, Florida, Hawaii, Nevada, and Texas and provides online accounts.
First Foundation Bank offers three checking account options.
Personal checking: The personal checking account requires a $100 minimum opening deposit, but there's no ongoing minimum balance required. There are also no monthly fees. However, this account does not earn interest.
Personal interest checking: This interest-bearing checking account also requires a minimum opening deposit of $100. It comes with a monthly fee of $20, which can be waived by maintaining a minimum daily balance of $2,500.
Senior interest checking: This interest-bearing account is designed for customers age 55 and older. There is no minimum balance required to avoid monthly fees or earn the highest rate. It also comes with free checks.
First Foundation Bank reimburses ATM fees (nationwide) for checking account customers up to $20 per transaction.
First Foundation Bank offers a variety of savings accounts tailored to meet different financial goals and preferences.
Personal savings: This traditional savings account requires a minimum opening balance of $100. There is a $3 monthly maintenance fee, which can be waived by maintaining a minimum daily balance of $250 or more.
Senior savings: This savings account for customers age 55 and older requires a minimum opening deposit of $100. It also charges a $3 monthly maintenance fee, which can be waived by maintaining a minimum daily balance of $250 or more.
Online savings: The online savings account offers a competitive interest rate (4.25% APY as of May 2025) and has no monthly fee. It does, however, require a larger minimum opening deposit of $1,000.
First Foundation offers personal and online money market accounts. Both accounts give you debit card and check writing access while earning a high yield on your balance. The online money market account has a 4.25% APY ($1,000 minimum deposit required), ranking it among the best money market accounts available today.
Additionally, First Foundation Bank's money market accounts have no monthly maintenance fees. They also offer ATM fee reimbursements when using a debit card.
First Foundation Bank offers various CDs, including two you can open online (four-month and 12-month terms). CDs require a $2,500 minimum deposit.
Here's a look at the common fees you may incur as a First Foundation Bank customer:
While this bank has some attractive offers, consider these pros and cons before opening an account.
Pros
Competitive interest rates on deposits: The yields on savings, CD, and money market accounts are among the best available today.
Online accounts have no monthly fees: Several of this bank's accounts, including its online accounts, have no monthly fees.
Generous ATM fee reimbursement: First Foundation reimburses up to $20 of ATM fees per transaction. There is no monthly limit on reimbursements.
Cons
Higher minimum deposit requirements: Several accounts have minimum opening deposit or monthly balance requirements to avoid the monthly maintenance fee.
Limited branch access: FFB has 31 branches in California, Florida, Hawaii, Nevada, and Texas. Some of its products can only be opened in person.
FFB has several contact methods.
You can email the Digital Bank team with questions at newaccount@ff-inc.com.
Phone support is available Monday through Thursday from 5:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. PT, Friday from 5:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. PT, and Saturday from 6:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. PT. The contact number is 888-405-4332.
First Foundation Bank's app has mostly positive reviews with a 4.1-star rating on the Google Play store and a 4.6-star rating on the Apple App Store. Many users say the app is easy to use and intuitive, while some report various technical issues.
The app lets you get a quick glance at your accounts, view statements, transfer money, pay bills, and deposit checks. While banking apps often focus on banking activities, FBB's app also lets you link external accounts for budgeting purposes.
First Foundation's corporate headquarters are located at the following address:
18101 Von Karman Ave., Suite 750
Irvine, CA 92612
For phone support, call 888-405-4332.
Yes, First Foundation Bank is FDIC-insured up to $250,000 per depositor per ownership category.
First Foundation Bank's routing number is 122287581.
As an FDIC-insured bank, FFB is very safe. Your money is insured up to the allowable limit.
Yes, First Foundation Bank is real. It is a California-based bank with physical locations in five states.
First Foundation Bank is a relatively small bank. It has $12.6 billion in bank assets and $5.1 billion in advisory assets as of March 31, 2025. It has 562 employees and 31 branch locations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta plans to automate many of its product risk assessments
An AI-powered system could soon take responsibility for evaluating the potential harms and privacy risks of up to 90% of updates made to Meta apps like Instagram and WhatsApp, according to internal documents reportedly viewed by NPR. NPR says a 2012 agreement between Facebook (now Meta) and the Federal Trade Commission requires the company to conduct privacy reviews of its products, evaluating the risks of any potential updates. Until now, those reviews have been largely conducted by human evaluators. Under the new system, Meta reportedly said product teams will be asked to fill out a questionaire about their work, then will usually receive an "instant decision" with AI-identified risks, along with requirements that an update or feature must meet before it launches. This AI-centric approach would allow Meta to update its products more quickly, but one former executive told NPR it also creates 'higher risks,' as 'negative externalities of product changes are less likely to be prevented before they start causing problems in the world.' In a statement, Meta seemed to confirm that it's changing its review system, but it insisted that only 'low-risk decisions' will be automated, while 'human expertise' will still be used to examine 'novel and complex issues.' This article originally appeared on TechCrunch at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Motor Trend
42 minutes ago
- Motor Trend
Will Brad Pitt's New "F1' Be Yet Another Near Career-Killing F1 Movie?
At first blush, it seems like a no-brainer: Put one of Hollywood's biggest stars behind the wheel of a race car in one of the world's most popular forms of motorsport, turn on the camera, and make a billion dollars. This was no doubt the guiding philosophy behind the imaginatively titled F1, a flick starring Brad Pitt and helmed by Top Gun: Maverick director Joseph Kosinski, which has been in production since mid-2023. 0:00 / 0:00 Dig a little deeper, however, and troubling details emerge. There's the fact Pitt, at 62 years old, is stretching the limits of believability for a veteran driver returning to a sport after years away to mentor a younger pilot (F1 has only ever had one winner above the age of 50, and only two in their late 40s). Moving beyond the plot, however, there's also the reported $300 million budget, a number that pushes F1 past the level of tentpole entries in the Pirates of the Caribbean, Star Wars, and Jurassic Park franchises. From a marketing perspective, it's safe to assume that dinosaurs and Jedi have a wider appeal than graybeards in an open-wheel car. Consider, too, that race fans can see actual drivers hit the track in real high-stakes Formula 1 competition, for free, every Sunday during the season, without having to shell out for a ticket (something that's not true when it comes to Jack Sparrow and the Skywalker crew). If only Pitt's producers had done their homework, they might have been able to avoid financial heartache altogether. You see, this isn't the first time a superstar has tried their hand at making Formula 1 a springboard to box office success. Don't believe us when we say open-wheel racing doesn't always equal big-ticket sales? Let us introduce you to the Al Pacino F1 movie you've never heard of: Bobby Deerfield. Let's Go Racing Napping In the mid-1970s, it's easy to argue that Pacino was at the height of his powers, coming off star turns in two blockbuster Godfather movies as well as critically acclaimed performances in both Serpico and Dog Day Afternoon. It was a run that seemingly suggested the Italian-American superstar could do no wrong when it came to picking projects, and all signs pointed toward continued success when it was announced that his next project would have him assuming the mantle of a winning Formula 1 driver. Racing pictures hadn't historically been a sure thing. Although John Frankenheimer's Grand Prix had done big business 10 years earlier, the Steve McQueen vehicle Le Mans flopped financially at the beginning of the 1970s. Still, this was superstar Pacino teaming up with future Oscar-winning director Sidney Pollack, which is as close to printing money as you could get in that cinematic decade. In the film, the titular Bobby Deerfield, played by Pacino with a startling level of reserve, is knocked off his game by the death of a teammate during a race in Europe. Ostensibly, the story centers around his investigation into what happened on the circuit, but this is a movie that takes significant sidetracks into his own emotional response to the situation, as well as his affair with a dying woman who cares more about hot air balloons than winning on Sunday. Herein lies the greatest problem with Deerfield: It's dull. Amazingly, a movie that that employed the services of legendary drivers including James Hunt and Mario Andretti in its action sequences (with Jose Carlos Pace doubling for Pacino) will lull you to sleep during the incredible gaps between those snippets of competition (which were filmed in conjunction with actual F1 events). Pollack shot the racing paddock with aggressive intimacy, taking us into the cockpit with racers as they prepare for the green flag, and the atmosphere surrounding each race is believably electric, but the sojourns there are all too brief. Instead, much of the movie consists of Pacino moping around Italy behind the wheel of his Alfa Romeo, itself not necessarily a bad time were he ever allowed to smile or perhaps speak above a whisper. Dude, Where's My Racing? Audiences felt hoodwinked by the movie's marketing, which was heavy on the fast and furious F1 fun and remarkably light on the deep exploration of 1970s angst. Most critics agreed, and theatergoers stayed away in droves once bad press and word of mouth linked up to sink Bobby Deerfield's box-office take below $10 million. The movie was quickly forgotten, and despite Pacino having spoken fondly of the experience of making it, it's been almost entirely memory-holed by his PR team whenever a career retrospective comes around. It's not hard to understand why. It would be two years before the actor made another movie (1979's And Justice for All), and five years before he was back in blockbuster country (1983's Scarface). Deerfield was such a career derail that Scarface remained Pacino's most high-profile success until his Oscar-winning Scent of a Woman resurgence in 1992. With both Pacino and McQueen burned by high-profile motorsports turkeys, racing movies that dared to flaunt the American stock car status quo were deemed largely toxic for the next 25 years. Burt Reynolds and Tom Cruise scored hits with NASCAR-themed efforts (Stroker Ace and Days of Thunder, respectively), and even Kenny Rogers sold tickets with his dirt-track exploits (the wonderfully absurd Six Pack), but open-wheel exploits proved anathema to the silver screen's biggest stars. In the end, the only major name to tempt the Formula 1 gods post-Pacino-pre-Pitt was Sylvester Stallone. Never one to question the relationship between his reach and his grasp, in 2001 he hit theaters in Driven as an aging driver brought out of retirement to shepherd the career of a young upstart. Uh oh. That sounds oddly familiar. The tiny percentage of you out there who have seen Driven are likely gnashing your teeth and shouting at the screen that the movie focused on Champ Car, not F1, which is correct. However, that venue shift only occurred because Stallone couldn't secure the financing required to set the movie in the series originally called for by the script. Even going with the cheaper series, Driven still took roughly $100 million to produce and market, and it earned just under half that in receipts. Arriving during a fallow period for the actor, the movie put Stallone in box-office jail for another five years, when he managed to claw his way out by returning to the role that made him famous in 2006's Rocky Balboa. It also sank the idea that putting the racing at the forefront, rather than making it background dressing à la Deerfield, was the key to success. Can Pitt Out-Market the F1 Machine? Since Bobby Deerfield, there's been only one successful take on Formula 1 to make it into theaters. Unfortunately for Brad Pitt, there likely aren't any useful lessons to be learned from 2013's Rush, a low-budget (roughly 10 percent of the outlay of F1) flick that relied on pre-fame performances from actors like Chris Hemsworth and Olivia Wilde to tell the story of the rivalry and friendship between legendary racing alumnus James Hunt and Nikki Lauda. If anything, Rush's ability to connect with an audience feels like a signpost for the troubles Pitt's upcoming release is potentially facing. Rather than going head to head with the glitz and glamor of the modern F1 circuit (which the sport is extremely successful at marketing even to non-fans in the form of its Drive to Survive Netflix series), Rush took audiences back to a time when media penetration of the track and trailer crowd was nowhere near the level it is today. And it portrayed real-life historic F1 heroes and storylines, something F1 also doesn't do. It's a lot easier to inhabit an imaginary world for a couple of hours if you aren't intimately familiar with it. For Pitt's F1, on top of historic box-office apathy for open-cockpit adventures, the movie's main competition is the relentless, all-encompassing, 24/7 digital video blast of the $18 billion enterprise itself, and the personalities that inhabit it for more than just the summer blockbuster season. Seen from that perspective, the movie's $300 million budget suddenly starts to feel more than a little light.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Toyota Goes Rogue (And Rugged) With Its Latest Electric Adventure
Toyota's been treating the EV game like a chore—slow, reluctant, and a little grumpy, like a teen dodging trash duty. But something's shifted. With the all-electric 2026 bZ Woodland, they're not just showing up—they're strapping on the hiking boots and heading off-road with surprising swagger. Turns out, when Toyota finally gets moving, they know exactly how to do electric adventure right. Yep, it's electric. Yep, it's an SUV. And for once, Toyota didn't play it safe—they gave the bZ Woodland 375 horses, standard all-wheel drive, and torque that might make the Subaru Trailseeker question its purpose. This thing doesn't just plug in—it shows up, takes off, and tows 3,500 pounds of whatever you're brave enough to drag through the wilderness. All without spilling your oat milk latte. You'll get about 260 miles of range if conditions are just right. No, it won't rival a Rivian in a coast-to-coast clout chase—but it'll get you from L.A. to Big Bear without begging for volts behind a roadside diner. And yes, it's finally joined the cool crowd with a NACS port. That means charging at Tesla stations—30 minutes and you're good, assuming the universe is feeling generous. Now, let's talk vibes. The bZ Woodland looks like the bZ4X went full REI, hit the trails, and came back calling everyone 'dude.' It's longer, a bit taller, and wears black overfenders like a badge of honor. With over 30 cubic feet of cargo space, you've got room for a tent, your dog, and whatever social media says counts as an 'authentic outdoor experience' this week. Inside, it's classic Toyota—no gimmicks, no nonsense, just clean, comfy functionality. It feels familiar in the best way. You've got heated SofTex seats, a massive 14-inch touchscreen, and ambient lighting that turns your night drives into low-key synthwave concerts. Go for the Premium Package, and things get extra: JBL sound, a glass roof, ventilated seats, and front radiant heaters—basically moon-base luxury, minus the spacesuit. Yeah, Toyota showed up late to the EV party. But they rolled in with a bottle of bourbon, a Bluetooth speaker, and some surprisingly solid trail cred. The bZ Woodland isn't some EV revolution—but it is a sign that Toyota's finally leaning in. It's built to be driven, not just displayed: practical, punchy, and totally down for a dusty detour. Source: Toyota, HotCars
