State Rep. Dennis Paul announces bid for Texas Senate with backing from Dan Patrick
State Rep. Dennis Paul, R-Houston, announced Thursday he is running for the seat being vacated by state Sen. Mayes Middleton, who is forgoing reelection to run for attorney general.
Paul's announcement was quickly followed by an endorsement from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the Senate's powerful presiding officer. Patrick routinely gives his early stamp of approval to GOP Senate candidates running for vacant districts, sending a message to donors and other would-be candidates and, in turn, ensuring the chamber is filled with his political allies.
Paul, a 64-year-old engineer who has served in the House since 2015, said in a statement that he would 'remain focused' on the ongoing legislative session but wanted to 'make my intentions clear.'
He is the first candidate out of the gate to succeed Middleton, a Republican who represents a slice of southeast Texas running from Galveston to the outskirts of Houston and east Harris County. Virtually all of Paul's House District 129 overlaps with the north part of Middleton's Senate District 11.
If elected to the Senate, Paul said, 'I will faithfully represent those values which make Texas the greatest state to live, work and raise a family: faith in God; love for family and liberty.'
Patrick said Paul 'has everything that's needed to be a Texas Senator,' citing his 'track record of being a stalwart conservative' and his experience in the House.
The domino effect was set off by Attorney General Ken Paxton's decision to challenge U.S. Sen. John Cornyn in next year's primary, opening up Paxton's statewide post for the first time since 2014. Paul's bid for the state Senate means there will also be an open race for his Republican-leaning House district.
In the decade he has served in the lower chamber, Paul has largely voted as a mainstream Republican, falling toward neither the moderate nor the most conservative end of the spectrum. He has served on the House Insurance Committee in each of his six terms and has been vice chair of several committees, currently serving as vice chair of the Subcommittee on Transportation Funding.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
10 minutes ago
- CNBC
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.
Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
GOP lawmaker flips script on Newsom, Bass by defining anti-ICE riots with 1 word
EXCLUSIVE: GOP Rep. Darrell Issa is blasting elected Democrat officials in his home state of California over their response to the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles after he called for a congressional investigation into the response time of local law enforcement. "These are the same people that tell us, you know, Biden was fine, he was on the top of his game," Issa said about Democrat narratives responding to the riots that have been unfolding in Los Angeles since Friday. "So their credibility goes with what you see versus what they say. I can't think of a better example of why you shouldn't believe or vote for people in that party as long as they're willing to literally lie to your face on what you're seeing with your own eyes." Democrats across the country, from California to Washington, D.C., have downplayed the rioting and focused on the claim that the majority of the anti-ICE displays have been "peaceful." Additionally, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other Democrats have blamed President Donald Trump's mobilizing the National Guard for making the situation worse. Issa, who represents California's 48th Congressional District, took issue with that narrative. "First of all, there was damage, both vandalism and actual destruction done before Trump got involved, and that's the reason he got involved, but there's another thing that some people miss," Issa told Fox News Digital. "When ICE agents called for police support when they were being assaulted, they hunkered down and waited two hours before police responded because police couldn't get authority to react. So that alone gave a reason for the president to bring in additional federalized troops to protect the ICE agents." On Tuesday, Fox News Digital exclusively reported Issa's call for an investigation into the Department of Homeland Security's claim that the LAPD took two hours to respond to assist ICE agents being assaulted on Friday night. The LAPD, in a Sunday press conference, denied that allegation and said it took 40 minutes to respond due to traffic. "Understand that we have over 10 million people who were let into this country, and tens of thousands of them are serious criminal aliens," Issa said. "There were warrants. There were orders to deport. There are reasons that we've got to go after many of these people in cities around the country. If ICE agents can't be protected or won't be protected by people like the mayor and my governor, then the president's going to have to continue to do this, eventually create escorts for ICE agents." Issa told Fox News Digital that Trump is doing a "great job" in his response to the unrest in Los Angeles. "One thing that I'm very happy about is, I know that by taking strong action here, he's keeping it from occurring in other cities around the country, because what you don't want is what ultimately happened in 2020 where we saw it happening not just in one city but in city after city where more than two dozen people died and billions of dollars of damage occurred because it wasn't handled quickly enough, and we've learned from that." Issa told Fox News Digital that he finds it curious why Democrats have used the word "insurrection" to describe the Jan. 6th riots that lasted hours but have not used the term to describe what has unfolded in Los Angeles over several days. "We heard the word 'insurrection' for a couple of years nonstop, and now in Los Angeles, when people are directly assaulting property and law enforcement, that's the very definition of insurrection; and particularly when they're doing it on behalf of people who are sitting in jails because they were arrested for crimes, not just for entering the country illegally but for actual felonies," Issa said. "And it's sort of amazing to believe that high-ranking elected officials like Gov. Newsom would actually try to defend any of that action. And yet they're doing it." Issa went on to say that Newsom's response to the riots "might have worked in the era of print or maybe even the era of radio" but that video evidence of rioting from the scene makes his position untenable. "Television and podcasts and everyone having a cellphone, those images are going to be what the American people [is going to] see when he tries to pretend that he was a good governor," Issa said. "They're going to see a failure to do his job and an absolute resistance against those who came in to do it for him." Fox News Digital reached out to the offices of Newsom and Bass for comment. "Trump is pulling a military dragnet all across Los Angeles, well beyond his stated intent to just go after violent and serious criminals," Newsom said on Tuesday night. "His agents are arresting dishwashers, gardeners, day laborers and seamstresses. That's just weakness. Weakness masquerading as strength. Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities. They're traumatizing our communities. And that seems to be the entire point." "When Donald Trump sought blanket authority to commandeer the National Guard, he made that order apply to every state in this nation. This is about all of us. This is about you. California may be first, but it clearly will not end here. Other states are next. Democracy is next. Democracy is under assault before our eyes. This moment we have feared has arrived. He's taking a wrecking ball, a wrecking ball to our Founding Fathers' historic project."
Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
We asked 1,000 Americans about the L.A. protests. This is how they responded.
We asked 1,000 Americans about the L.A. protests. This is how they responded. We texted 1,000 Americans about the L.A. protests agitators that have no lives It will only escalate things These people just wanted to destroy suppressing freedom of speech out of control immigrants make America great This is how they responded. By Washington Post staff June 11, 2025 at 8:00 p.m. EDT 4 minutes ago What do Americans think about the protests in Los Angeles and President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and Marines there? The Washington Post and George Mason University's Schar School texted more than 1,000 people Tuesday — including more than 200 California residents — to ask. The survey finds Americans are divided in their views toward L.A. protesters and Trump's decision to send the National Guard and Marines to the city. California residents are more critical of Trump's actions, as are Democrats and political independents. Americans are also mostly negative on Trump's handling of immigration, an issue that was a strength for him early in his presidency. Participants' answers have been lightly edited for clarity and style. Do you support or oppose Trump sending the National Guard and Marines to respond to the L.A. protests? Support 41% Unsure 15% Oppose 44% Deploying the military to crush political protest is classic authoritarian fascism, and must be opposed. California man, 38, independent Quell the uprising before it gets out of control. California man, 63, Republican It doesn't seem like the city or state asked for or wanted that support and seems to be escalating an already tenuous and difficult situation. Maryland woman, 37, Democrat Show more responses Americans are roughly split on Trump sending the National Guard and Marines to respond to the protests in L.A., while a majority of Californians oppose Trump deploying the military. Support Unsure Oppose California 32% In the "undefined" group, 32 percent of people responded with "Support." 10 In the "undefined" group, 10 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 58 In the "undefined" group, 58 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Other states 43 In the "undefined" group, 43 percent of people responded with "Support." 15 In the "undefined" group, 15 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 42 In the "undefined" group, 42 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Democrats 10 In the "undefined" group, 10 percent of people responded with "Support." 14 In the "undefined" group, 14 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 76 In the "undefined" group, 76 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Republicans 86 In the "undefined" group, 86 percent of people responded with "Support." 8 In the "undefined" group, 8 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 6 In the "undefined" group, 6 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Independents/Others 33 In the "undefined" group, 33 percent of people responded with "Support." 19 In the "undefined" group, 19 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 48 In the "undefined" group, 48 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Most Democrats oppose Trump sending the National Guard and Marines to L.A., while almost 9 in 10 Republicans support it. Independents lean against Trump's action by a 15-percentage-point margin, 48 percent to 33 percent. Tuned-in Americans tend to oppose sending the National Guard and Marines to L.A. Support Unsure Oppose Paying a lot of attention to L.A. protests (34%) 37% In the "undefined" group, 37 percent of people responded with "Support." 8 In the "undefined" group, 8 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 54 In the "undefined" group, 54 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Paying some attention (40%) 42 In the "undefined" group, 42 percent of people responded with "Support." 13 In the "undefined" group, 13 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 45 In the "undefined" group, 45 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Paying a little/no attention (26%) 46 In the "undefined" group, 46 percent of people responded with "Support." 26 In the "undefined" group, 26 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 29 In the "undefined" group, 29 percent of people responded with "Oppose." The more people are paying attention to the protests in L.A., the more likely they are to oppose Trump sending in the National Guard and Marines to respond to the protests. This is partly due to Democrats following the protests more closely, although independents who are paying more attention are also more critical of Trump's decision. Do you support or oppose the protests in Los Angeles against the federal government's immigration enforcement? Support 39% Unsure 21% Oppose 40% Americans are almost evenly split over the protests against the federal government's immigration enforcement efforts, with about 4 in 10 in support and opposition, and the remainder unsure. Riots are not peaceful protests. Damaging property and injuring people is not included in the right to assemble/protest. California woman, 56, independent Los Angeles is a county of immigrants who do a lot for our community & they are our friends. Most of them are hard working, great people. California woman, 72, Democrat I believe everyone has a right to disagree and protest ICE, however arson and violence is not acceptable. Florida man, 57, independent Show more responses Support Unsure Oppose California 45% In the "undefined" group, 45 percent of people responded with "Support." 19 In the "undefined" group, 19 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 36 In the "undefined" group, 36 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Other states 38 In the "undefined" group, 38 percent of people responded with "Support." 22 In the "undefined" group, 22 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 41 In the "undefined" group, 41 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Democrats 70 In the "undefined" group, 70 percent of people responded with "Support." 18 In the "undefined" group, 18 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 11 In the "undefined" group, 11 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Republicans 6 In the "undefined" group, 6 percent of people responded with "Support." 14 In the "undefined" group, 14 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 79 In the "undefined" group, 79 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Independents/Others 39 In the "undefined" group, 39 percent of people responded with "Support." 27 In the "undefined" group, 27 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 33 In the "undefined" group, 33 percent of people responded with "Oppose." Californians are more likely to support the protests, along with 7 in 10 Democrats. Independents are slightly more likely to support the protests than to oppose them, while about 8 in 10 Republicans are opposed. Do you think the L.A. protesters have been mostly peaceful or mostly violent? Mostly peaceful 35% Unsure 27% Mostly violent 37% Americans are also split over whether the protests in L.A. are mostly peaceful or mostly violent, with over one-quarter saying they are unsure. The protests in L.A. since Friday have been largely confined to a few city blocks. There have been sporadic, violent clashes involving a few protestors that prompted the mayor to impose a curfew. Mostly peaceful Unsure Mostly violent Democrats 60% In the "undefined" group, 60 percent of people responded with "Mostly peaceful." 23 In the "undefined" group, 23 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 16 In the "undefined" group, 16 percent of people responded with "Mostly violent." Republicans 11 In the "undefined" group, 11 percent of people responded with "Mostly peaceful." 23 In the "undefined" group, 23 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 66 In the "undefined" group, 66 percent of people responded with "Mostly violent." Independents/Others 35 In the "undefined" group, 35 percent of people responded with "Mostly peaceful." 32 In the "undefined" group, 32 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 33 In the "undefined" group, 33 percent of people responded with "Mostly violent." Six in 10 Democrats say the protesters have been mostly peaceful while two-thirds of Republicans say they have been mostly violent and independents are split. Are police using too much force dealing with L.A. protesters, not using enough force or handling it about right? Too much 31% About right 43% Not enough 26% About 3 in 10 Americans say police are using too much force dealing with L.A. protesters, about a quarter say they are not using enough force and over 4 in 10 say they are handling it 'about right.' Too much About right Not enough Democrats 55% In the "undefined" group, 55 percent of people responded with "Too much." 35 In the "undefined" group, 35 percent of people responded with "About right." 9 In the "undefined" group, 9 percent of people responded with "Not enough." Republicans 4 In the "undefined" group, 4 percent of people responded with "Too much." 46 In the "undefined" group, 46 percent of people responded with "About right." 50 In the "undefined" group, 50 percent of people responded with "Not enough." Independents/Others 34 In the "undefined" group, 34 percent of people responded with "Too much." 45 In the "undefined" group, 45 percent of people responded with "About right." 21 In the "undefined" group, 21 percent of people responded with "Not enough." Most Democrats say police are using too much force, while half of Republicans say they are not using enough force. Do you approve or disapprove of the way President Trump is handling immigration enforcement, including deportations? Approve 37% Unsure 12% Disapprove 52% The poll finds the public rating Trump's immigration policy — including deportations — negatively by a 15 percentage-point margin, 52 percent to 37 percent, an issue that was a strong point for him a few months ago. Approve Unsure Disapprove Voted for Trump 75% In the "undefined" group, 75 percent of people responded with "Approve." 13 In the "undefined" group, 13 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 12 In the "undefined" group, 12 percent of people responded with "Disapprove." Voted for Harris 5 In the "undefined" group, 5 percent of people responded with "Approve." 4 In the "undefined" group, 4 percent of people responded with "Unsure." 90 In the "undefined" group, 90 percent of people responded with "Disapprove." Three-quarters of Americans who voted for Trump approve of the president's immigration policy, while 9 in 10 of those who voted for Kamala Harris disapprove.
