Iconic Sony pulls plug on smartphones in Europe? Xperia 1 VII vanishes from stores in major shift
may be stepping away from the European smartphone market. Its latest flagship, the Xperia 1 VII, has gone missing from several local and partner stores across the continent, including Finland, raising concerns that the brand is abandoning retail channels in favor of online-only sales.
Is Sony exiting the smartphone market in Europe?
With stores in Germany and the United Kingdom among the few that still sell the model, signs point to a larger downsizing of Sony's smartphone operations, according to a story from the Finnish publication Suomimobiili.
The Xperia 1 VII and other Sony phones are not yet available on the websites of Sony Finland and its partners, and they are not anticipated to be available for some time.
ALSO READ:
Foldable iPhone in 2026? Apple's game-changer may launch at $1,800 with limited stock
Sony stated that it will not be selling the Xperia 1 VII in Finland and that it is concentrating on "online shopping channels to provide customers with a smoother shopping experience."
Live Events
According to Sony, its flagship can be purchased in a few European countries through Amazon and its own online store, as quoted in a report by GSMArena.
What does this mean for current Xperia users?
Sony's complete response to SuonmiMobiili is as follows, "The Xperia 1 VII is not available for purchase directly through Sony in Finland. However, we are constantly assessing market profitability and customer demand. We are currently focusing on online shopping channels to provide our customers with a smoother purchasing process. Currently, the Xperia 1 VII can be purchased directly from Sony's official online store and through Amazon in selected European markets. Sony remains committed to fulfilling all maintenance and upgrade obligations for existing customers as usual."
Why has the Xperia 1 VII vanished from European stores?
The situation in other European markets is comparable. The Xperia 1 VII is not available in the majority of European countries on Sony's online store; however, the UK and Germany are the two main exceptions.
It looks like Sony is actually scaling back its smartphone business in Europe. The future of Xperia phones is not looking good, especially in light of the recent problems Sony has been experiencing with its Xperia 1 VII in its home market of Japan.
FAQs
Can I still purchase the Xperia 1 VII in Europe?
In most countries, the answer is no. Sony has removed the model from its stores, but it is still available online in select countries such as Germany and the United Kingdom.
Is Sony discontinuing its phone business in Europe?
Not officially, but the move away from retail indicates a significant downsizing, with online sales now the primary focus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Would Europe actually retaliate against Trump's tariffs?
European Union officials have spent this week working to finalize a plan to retaliate against President Donald Trump 's tariffs, laying the groundwork to hit more than $100 billion worth of American imports with levies if negotiations on a new trade deal fail. But a question looms over that effort. "If it comes to it, will they?" asked Frances Burwell, a fellow at the Atlantic Council's Europe Center, a research organization. Officials from the 27-nation bloc have spent months preparing their plans to hit back, only to hold off in favor of more talks. In April, EU policymakers approved a plan to impose tariffs on 21 billion euros (nearly $25 billion) of American goods. But they abruptly suspended them in a show of goodwill when Trump pivoted at the last minute and paused some painful across-the-board tariffs. The goal was to negotiate. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Lifetime Office 365 Download Undo No deal was forthcoming. Instead, Trump said on social media last week that he planned to impose 30% tariffs on the bloc starting Aug. 1. After that announcement, EU officials chose to again delay that first batch of retaliatory tariffs -- which had been suspended only through July 14 -- to allow room for more talks. But they have also redoubled their vow to respond forcefully if necessary. Live Events Now, EU trade officials are finishing up a second list of tariffs that would target an even longer list of American goods, one that amounts to 72 billion euros ($84 billion) of products that include Boeing airplanes and Kentucky bourbon. The list was sent to member states Monday, said diplomats who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an internal process. National representatives have not yet voted on the list. That push to prepare a retaliation plan is rooted in an uncomfortable reality. The EU would prefer to come up with a negotiated solution and avoid a painful and protracted trade war, but the talks could still fail. Strength, many politicians and ministers pointed out, seems to be the only negotiating language that Trump understands. It is necessary to "flash some muscles," Lars Lokke Rasmussen, the Danish foreign minister, said Monday. "If you want peace, you have to prepare for war, and I think that's where we are." But Europe is still trying to make a deal. Maros Sefcovic, the EU trade commissioner, talked to Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, on Monday. He was expected to speak with Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, on Tuesday. Trade experts who specialize in detailed negotiations were headed to Washington, Olof Gill, a European Commission spokesperson, said in a news conference. But Sefcovic has said that European ministers have become more adamant about striking back if a negotiated solution could not be reached. He had already spent months trying to reach a broad-brush agreement. Sefcovic and other negotiators thought that they were closing in on one up until last week -- only to have the situation blow up after Trump issued his threat last week to impose 30% tariffs. "We have to protect the jobs, you have to protect the businesses," Sefcovic said at a news conference in Brussels on Monday. Yet actually following through with the plan to hit back would be no easy choice. Placing tariffs on American soybeans, handbags, machinery and other goods would make those products more expensive for consumers and businesses in France, Germany, Italy and other EU member states. Given that, discussions over what products Brussels should target have been intense. The tariffs that were prepared and nearly put into effect in April could be rolled out very quickly, because they were finalized and no longer up for debate. But they were always envisaged as only a first step: 21 billion euros' worth of goods is not a lot in the context of a 1.6 trillion euro trans-Atlantic trading relationship. "We will continue to prepare further countermeasures so we are fully prepared," Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said Sunday. EU member states would still need to vote to approve the second set of proposed tariffs that would apply to 72 billion euros worth of goods. The list initially covered 95 billion euros of products, but it was whittled down after feedback and lobbying. After that, officials could consider using a new tool, the so-called anticoercion instrument, to target big technology firms or other American service companies by imposing trade or investment restrictions on them. Such a move could hit American businesses in the pocketbook, but because it would be so painful and risk escalating the trade war, it is sometimes referred to as the "nuclear option" in Brussels. "We are not there yet," von der Leyen said Sunday, when asked about using the tool. "This is very important. This is now the time for negotiations." Europe is still trying to speak gently while reminding the world that it carries several big sticks. It would prefer not to use them. Officials are hoping that a negotiated deal can be reached in the coming weeks and that the threatened 30% tariffs never come into effect. Tariffs hurt consumers on both sides of the Atlantic, they argue. By that logic, they say, delaying retaliation is a sign of rationality, not of timidity. "I don't think this is weakness," Lokke Rasmussen said. "It's a clear signal that we don't want to escalate things." Trying to shore up goodwill and hoping for the best has not been a winning strategy to date. But "the pain threshold is quite high" for Europe to decide to retaliate, said Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe at the Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy. Rahman added that things would have to go very badly -- an across-the-board tariff rate of perhaps 15%, along with charges on sectors -- for Europe to hit back. Officials will want to avoid angering the Trump administration, especially at a time when the bloc depends heavily on the United States to help with the war in Ukraine. "The Americans will really need to go mad if the Europeans are going to retaliate," he said. But if Trump follows through with his latest threat, that would firmly push the bloc over the edge, predicted Ignacio García Bercero, a former EU trade official who is now at Bruegel, an economic think tank. "A 30% tariff would be no choice but to retaliate," he said.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
After huge US cuts, who pays for aid in the Middle East now?
After huge US cuts, who pays for aid in the Middle East now? (Image: AP) Ask around various civil society organizations working in the Middle East and the answer is always the same. "Nobody really knows what's happening," one project manager running a Syria-based project told DW about the US cuts in aid funding. "They haven't put a complete stop to it yet so we're just spending the money on a monthly basis and hoping for the best. " "We still don't know if we're going to get the funding we were promised this year," the founder of an Iraqi journalists' network in Baghdad said. "We probably won't be able to pay some of our journalists. Right now, we're approaching other organizations to try to replace the money." Neither interviewee wanted their names published because they didn't want to criticize their donors publicly. They are not alone. Since US President Donald Trump took power, he has slashed US funding for what's known as "official development aid," or ODA. Often simply called foreign aid, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development defines ODA as "government aid that promotes and specifically targets the economic development and welfare of developing countries." ODA can be bilateral — given from country to country — or multilateral, where funds are pooled by an organization like the UN, then disbursed. The US is not the only country cutting ODA. Even before what insiders described as the US' "chaotic" budget cuts, reductions in ODA were a longer-term pattern. Global ODA fell by over 7 percent in 2024, as European nations and the UK also reduced ODA in favour of channeling more money into defence. Last year marked the first time in nearly 30 years that major donors like France, Germany, the UK and the US all cut ODA. Funding cuts' impact on the Middle East? In 2023, countries in the Middle East got around $7.8 billion (€6.7 billion) out of the $42.4 billion (€36.3 billion) the US spent that year. That is why, Laith Alajlouni, a research associate at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in Bahrain, wrote in March, "the effects of US aid cuts … will be felt deeply in the Middle East, where key US partners continue to rely heavily on US assistance to meet their military and economic needs." Between 2014 and 2024, the US pledged around $106.8 billion to countries in the region. Israel gets just under a third of that, although much of the money is earmarked for military purposes. But for other countries, funds from the US were equivalent to a significant portion of their national income, Alajlouni pointed out. Now funding for emergency food and water in Sudan, medicines in Yemen, children's nutrition in Lebanon, and camps for the displaced, including families allegedly connected to the extremist "Islamic State" group in Syria are all are at risk, Alajlouni argues. Other countries, like Jordan and Egypt, are heavily reliant on foreign funding for "economic development" to keep their ailing economies afloat, he noted. It remains unclear exactly how much Middle Eastern countries will lose due to ODA cuts. Last month, researchers at Washington-based think tank, the Centre for Global Development, tried to calculate the fallout. "Some countries are projected to lose large amounts of ODA simply because of who their main donors are," they noted, "while others are projected to lose very little." For example, Yemen will likely see its ODA reduced by 19 percent between 2023 and 2026. In 2025, its three biggest donors, via the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or UNOCHA, were Saudi Arabia, the EU and the UK. Somalia, on the other hand may lose as much as 39 percent. Its main donors, via UNOCHA, were the UK, the EU and the US. Who pays for aid in the Middle East now? "It is clear that in the short term, the shortfall in aid funding will not be closed," Vincenzo Bollettino, director of the resilient communities program at Harvard University's Humanitarian Initiative in Boston, told DW. "In the mid-to-long term, it's likely there will be a tapestry of different forms of aid." Part of that will be a larger number of states "providing aid and development assistance where it aligns with their own political objectives," Bollettino predicts. Russia's main agency for international cooperation, Rossotrudnichestvo, recently announced it would restructure to be more like USAID and will open outposts in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. But at just $70 million annually, Rossotrudnichestvo's budget is comparatively small. Chinese money could be another alternative to US and European funding. "China has positioned itself as the US' greatest competitor in global development," experts at US think tank, the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, warned in July. But China isn't all that interested in the Middle East, experts point out, and is more engaged in Southeast Asia and Africa. "Neither Russia nor China have played traditionally significant roles in the international humanitarian aid system and this is unlikely to change anytime soon," Bollettino explains. How aid became more political Much more likely donors in the Middle East will be the wealthy Gulf states, says Markus Loewe, a professor and the coordinator for research on the Middle East and North Africa at the German Institute of Development and Sustainability, or IDOS. Over the last two decades, four Gulf states — Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Kuwait — have been internationally significant donors. "For example, Saudi Arabia is already offering substantial support to Syria," Loewe told DW. "They have been supporting Lebanon to quite a degree and they would definitely be ready to pay a lot of the costs of reconstruction in Gaza, provided there is an acceptable agreement on a ceasefire." Hardly any Gulf money goes into what are called "pooled" funds like those run by the UN. Most is bilateral, from country to country, because the Gulf states tend to use their ODA in a more transactional way. That is, as a diplomatic tool where it ties into different Gulf states' often-competing foreign policy aims. "Aid recipients who are considered politically important for Gulf donors tend to receive more aid," Khaled AlMezaini, a professor at the UAE's Zayed University, wrote in a recent analysis. For example, despite waging war on parts of Yemen from 2015, Saudi Arabia and the UAE were also the country's biggest donors. But as Harvard's Bollettino points out, ODA is not meant to be political. That goes against basic humanitarian principles of neutrality and impartiality. "The essential problem with instrumentalized aid is that it's just as likely to be a catalyst of conflict and violence as a source of peace and security," he argues. "The so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation — where 'humanitarian aid' being delivered to starving civilians has resulted in hundreds of Palestinians being killed — is a case in point."
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
MORNING BID EUROPE-Tariff imprint spied in US CPI
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Kevin Buckland The investing world will be watching U.S. factory inflation on Wednesday, after consumer price data pulled Wall Street back from all-time highs overnight, with Fed predictions of tariff-induced inflationary effects starting to be realized. Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq - and by extension, MSCI's world equities index - retreated from record peaks after traders shaved back bets of U.S. rate cuts this year as prices rose for things such as coffee and couches, while staying steady for tariff-exempted items such as cars. That swung the spotlight squarely onto producer price data due later today, which could reveal an even bigger building of price pressures, because businesses may still be holding back on passing higher costs to consumers. This validates Fed Chair Jay Powell's repeated assertion that an expected emergence of tariff-led inflation uptick this summer is cause to hold off on further interest rate cuts for now. Traders were listening, trimming back bets to 43 basis points of cuts over the rest of the year, from closer to 50 basis points earlier in the week. President Donald Trump's reading of the data was different though, as he took to his Truth Social platform to post, "Consumer Prices LOW. Bring down the Fed Rate, NOW!!!" Trump has repeatedly railed against the Fed for not cutting rates, even calling for Powell's resignation, which has fuelled concerns that the U.S. President aims to put the Fed under his thumb. Powell's tenure ends in May next year, but he has a seat on the Board of Governors until January 2028. Trump said Tuesday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent could be a candidate to replace Powell, but "because I like the job he's doing" currently, he may not end up as a contender. Bessent, meanwhile, said in an interview on Bloomberg Surveillance that a "formal process" is already starting to identify the next Fed Chair. As if that wasn't enough to keep investors busy, the U.S. earnings season has also just gotten underway. JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup beat expectations on Tuesday, but were met with a mixed market response. Bank earnings due Wednesday include Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America, while Johnson & Johnson will give more of a snapshot of how consumers are faring. The corporate calendar by contrast is relatively quiet in Europe, where stock futures are pointing to a mixed open, and Britain's FTSE reopens after hitting an all-time peak on Tuesday only to then end the day down 0.7%, its biggest fall since post-"Liberation Day" tariff turmoil in early April. The main event will be UK consumer price data, with the consensus among economists for headline inflation to hold steady at 3.4%. Bank of England policymaker Catherine Mann said on Tuesday that inflation pressures remained a challenge despite a fall in the pace of pay growth in recent months. Key developments that could influence markets on Wednesday: - UK consumer price index for June. - U.S. earnings: Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Johnson & Johnson. - U.S. industrial production, producer price index . - U.S. Federal Reserve officials speaking, including Governor Michael Barr. Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
