
Would Europe actually retaliate against Trump's tariffs?
officials have spent this week working to finalize a plan to retaliate against President Donald
Trump
's tariffs, laying the groundwork to hit more than $100 billion worth of American imports with levies if negotiations on a new trade deal fail. But a question looms over that effort.
"If it comes to it, will they?" asked Frances Burwell, a fellow at the Atlantic Council's Europe Center, a research organization.
Officials from the 27-nation bloc have spent months preparing their plans to hit back, only to hold off in favor of more talks. In April,
EU
policymakers approved a plan to impose tariffs on 21 billion euros (nearly $25 billion) of American goods. But they abruptly suspended them in a show of goodwill when Trump pivoted at the last minute and paused some painful across-the-board tariffs. The goal was to negotiate.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Lifetime Office 365
ps.sbs
Download
Undo
No deal was forthcoming.
Instead, Trump said on social media last week that he planned to impose 30% tariffs on the bloc starting Aug. 1. After that announcement, EU officials chose to again delay that first batch of retaliatory tariffs -- which had been suspended only through July 14 -- to allow room for more talks. But they have also redoubled their vow to respond forcefully if necessary.
Live Events
Now, EU trade officials are finishing up a second list of tariffs that would target an even longer list of American goods, one that amounts to 72 billion euros ($84 billion) of products that include
Boeing
airplanes and Kentucky bourbon. The list was sent to member states Monday, said diplomats who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an internal process. National representatives have not yet voted on the list.
That push to prepare a retaliation plan is rooted in an uncomfortable reality. The EU would prefer to come up with a negotiated solution and avoid a painful and protracted trade war, but the talks could still fail. Strength, many politicians and ministers pointed out, seems to be the only negotiating language that Trump understands.
It is necessary to "flash some muscles," Lars Lokke Rasmussen, the Danish foreign minister, said Monday. "If you want peace, you have to prepare for war, and I think that's where we are."
But Europe is still trying to make a deal. Maros Sefcovic, the EU trade commissioner, talked to Howard Lutnick, the commerce secretary, on Monday. He was expected to speak with Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, on Tuesday. Trade experts who specialize in detailed negotiations were headed to Washington, Olof Gill, a
European Commission
spokesperson, said in a news conference.
But Sefcovic has said that European ministers have become more adamant about striking back if a negotiated solution could not be reached.
He had already spent months trying to reach a broad-brush agreement. Sefcovic and other negotiators thought that they were closing in on one up until last week -- only to have the situation blow up after Trump issued his threat last week to impose 30% tariffs.
"We have to protect the jobs, you have to protect the businesses," Sefcovic said at a news conference in Brussels on Monday.
Yet actually following through with the plan to hit back would be no easy choice.
Placing tariffs on American soybeans, handbags, machinery and other goods would make those products more expensive for consumers and businesses in France, Germany, Italy and other EU member states.
Given that, discussions over what products Brussels should target have been intense.
The tariffs that were prepared and nearly put into effect in April could be rolled out very quickly, because they were finalized and no longer up for debate. But they were always envisaged as only a first step: 21 billion euros' worth of goods is not a lot in the context of a 1.6 trillion euro trans-Atlantic trading relationship.
"We will continue to prepare further countermeasures so we are fully prepared," Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said Sunday.
EU member states would still need to vote to approve the second set of proposed tariffs that would apply to 72 billion euros worth of goods. The list initially covered 95 billion euros of products, but it was whittled down after feedback and lobbying.
After that, officials could consider using a new tool, the so-called anticoercion instrument, to target big technology firms or other American service companies by imposing trade or investment restrictions on them. Such a move could hit American businesses in the pocketbook, but because it would be so painful and risk escalating the trade war, it is sometimes referred to as the "nuclear option" in Brussels.
"We are not there yet," von der Leyen said Sunday, when asked about using the tool. "This is very important. This is now the time for negotiations."
Europe is still trying to speak gently while reminding the world that it carries several big sticks.
It would prefer not to use them.
Officials are hoping that a negotiated deal can be reached in the coming weeks and that the threatened 30% tariffs never come into effect. Tariffs hurt consumers on both sides of the Atlantic, they argue. By that logic, they say, delaying retaliation is a sign of rationality, not of timidity.
"I don't think this is weakness," Lokke Rasmussen said. "It's a clear signal that we don't want to escalate things."
Trying to shore up goodwill and hoping for the best has not been a winning strategy to date.
But "the pain threshold is quite high" for Europe to decide to retaliate, said Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe at the Eurasia Group, a political risk consultancy.
Rahman added that things would have to go very badly -- an across-the-board tariff rate of perhaps 15%, along with charges on sectors -- for Europe to hit back. Officials will want to avoid angering the Trump administration, especially at a time when the bloc depends heavily on the United States to help with the war in Ukraine.
"The Americans will really need to go mad if the Europeans are going to retaliate," he said.
But if Trump follows through with his latest threat, that would firmly push the bloc over the edge, predicted Ignacio García Bercero, a former EU trade official who is now at Bruegel, an economic think tank.
"A 30% tariff would be no choice but to retaliate," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
US unfreezes $1.3 billion education grants after GOP back bipartisan programmes
The Education Department will release $1.3 billion in previously withheld grant money for after-school programs, days after 10 Republican senators sent a letter imploring the Trump administration to allow frozen education money to be sent to Donald Trump's administration on July 1 withheld more than $6 billion in federal grants for after-school and summer programs, adult literacy and English language instruction, part of a review to ensure spending aligned with the White House's a letter sent Wednesday, Republican senators said the withheld money supported programs that had longstanding bipartisan support and were critical to local communities. The money had been appropriated by Congress in a bill that was signed by Trump. 'We share your concern about taxpayer money going to fund radical left-wing programs,' the senators wrote to the Office of Management and Budget. 'However, we do not believe that is happening with these funds.'The administration's review of the 21st Century Community Learning Centers, which support after-school and summer programming, has been completed, a senior official said Friday. The person declined to be identified so they could share progress from the review. That funding will be released to states, the official said. The rest of the withheld grants, close to $5 billion, continues to be reviewed for bias by the Office of Management and the money, school districts and nonprofits such as the YMCA and Boys and Girls Club of America had said they would have to close or scale back educational offerings this money being released Friday pays for free programming before and after school and during the summer. The programs provide child care so low-income parents can work, and they give options to families who live in rural areas with few other child care providers. Beyond just child care, kids receive reading and math help at the programs, along with enrichment in science and the the money's release Friday, schools and nonprofits have already been disrupted by two weeks of uncertainty. Some programs have made plans to close, and others have fallen behind on hiring and contracting for the fall.'While we are thrilled the funds will be made available,' said Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, 'the administration's inexplicable delay in disbursing them caused massive chaos and harm.' Many after-school programs had cancelled plans to open in the fall, she Monday, more than 20 states had filed a lawsuit challenging the $6 billion funding freeze, including the money for English language instruction, teacher development and adult literacy that remains on hold. The lawsuit, led by California, argued withholding the money was unconstitutional and many low-income families would lose access to critical after-school care if the grants were not Schuler, executive director of AASA, an association of school superintendents, praised the release of after-school money but said that the remaining education funding should not be withheld.'Districts should not be in this impossible position where the Administration is denying funds that had already been appropriated to our public schools, by Congress,' Schuler said in a statement. 'The remaining funds must be released immediately — America's children are counting on it.'Republican Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-West Virginia who chairs the Senate Appropriations subcommittee that oversees education spending, led the letter sent this week by Republican senators, protesting the funding freeze. The letter called for the rest of the money to be released, including funds for adult education and teaching English as a second language.'The decision to withhold this funding is contrary to President Trump's goal of returning K-12 education to the states,' the senators wrote. 'This funding goes directly to states and local school districts, where local leaders decide how this funding is spent.'advertisementSen. Patty Murray, D-Washington, called on the White House to release the rest of the money.'At this very moment, schools nationwide are crunching the numbers to figure out how many teachers they will need to lay off as Trump continues to hold up billions in funding,' Murray said Friday in a statement. 'Every penny of this funding must flow immediately.'- EndsMust Watch


News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
There should be no double standards: India on EU sanctions
New Delhi, Jul 18 (PTI) India does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said in response to the European Union announcing fresh punitive measures on Russia, especially on its energy trade. The European Union (EU) has announced a new package of sanctions aimed at Russia over its war against Ukraine. It also named India's Vadinar Refinery in which Russian energy firm Rosneft has a major stake. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India does not subscribe to any unilateral sanction measures. The 18th package of sanctions included measures largely aimed at curbing the revenues of Russia's oil and energy sector such as an import ban on refined petroleum products made from Russian crude oil. The EU's foreign and security policy chief Kaja Kallas said on social media that the 27-member bloc had approved 'one of its strongest sanctions packages against Russia to date". The new sanctions include a lower oil price cap, the designation of the 'biggest Rosneft refinery in India", and measures aimed at 105 more shadow fleet ships. 'We have noted the latest sanctions announced by the European Union," Jaiswal said. He said India is a 'responsible" actor and remain fully committed to its legal obligations. 'The government of India considers the provision of energy security a responsibility of paramount importance to meet the basic needs of its citizens," he said. 'We would stress that there should be no double standards, especially when it comes to energy trade," he added. PTI MPB ZMN (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 18, 2025, 22:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘I hit them very, very hard': Trump reiterates tariff threat for BRICS
US President Donald Trump has renewed his warning to the BRICS nations, suggesting he would impose harsh tariffs if the group strengthens ties. 'When I heard about this group from Brics, six countries, basically, I hit them very, very hard. And if they ever really form in a meaningful way, it will end very quickly,' Trump said. The BRICS group includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and has recently expanded to include other nations.