
Writers, thinkers, criticise govt. order against Muharram
Citing concerns over law and order, district administrations in Ballari and Raichur have imposed prohibitory orders in several villages during the observance of Muharram. The restrictions prohibit public gatherings, processions, and the installation of symbolic structures (Panjas) in specific areas known for communal sensitivities.
In Ballari, Deputy Commissioner Prashant Kumar Mishra and Deputy Commissioner K. Nitish issued the orders, under provisions of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963, following intelligence reports that indicated a potential for tensions during Muharram observances in 21 villages in Ballari district and in 23 villages in Raichur district, respectively.
The officers cited past incidents of clashes involving youth from different communities during Muharram as the reason for the decision. The aim, they added in the orders, was to prevent any threat to public safety, life, or property. Officials clarified that the restrictions are precautionary, not absolute bans, but reasonable restrictions.
Speaking to The Hindu, Mr. Mishra said that similar restrictions were imposed in the past as well, after evaluating the law and order situations in certain villages.
'This is not a blanket prohibition on the observance of Muharram. The decision is based on police intelligence inputs and is imposed every year in sensitive areas to maintain peace. These are specific restrictions on certain activities. It is not a new thing as the administration does it every year,' he said.
Muharram, the first month of the Islamic calendar, is a period of mourning that commemorates the martyrdom of Imam Hussain, the grandson of Prophet Muhammad, at the Battle of Karbala. In many parts of Kalyana Karnataka, Muharram is observed with communal harmony, where both Muslims and Hindus participate in the rituals with mutual respect and solidarity, displaying the region's tradition of peaceful and harmonious coexistence.
Janekal, a village in Raichur district with no Muslim households, is a notable example where locals have traditionally observed Muharram by inviting a Muslim family from a neighbouring village to perform the rituals. However, the district administration banned the observance there following a violent clash between Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in 2013—an incident reportedly unrelated to the festival.
'The administration should focus on identifying and acting against troublemakers, rather than restricting religious or cultural practices that have long fostered unity,' said Channabasava, a resident of Janekal.
Authorities maintain that the orders are temporary and purely intended to preserve communal peace during a sensitive period.
Bellary based writer and publisher Lohia Chanabasavanna said that this was a regressive step. 'Muharram is not a festival of Muslims but of all communities. The government should support it and not ban it. If the government has specific intelligence input about any law and order issue in any village, it should depute additional police force and allow the festival, and not curb it,' he said.
Ladai Basu, writer and activist based in Gadag, said that such orders were an indication of the deep penetration of the right wing elements in to the government set-up. 'Such officers are disturbing harmony by crafting such inputs that lead to banning of such cultural events. The government should identify and weed them out. Otherwise, there will be no difference between this government and the earlier government,' Mr. Basu said.
Sabiha Bhoomi Gowda, former Vice-Chancellor of Karnataka State Akkamahadevi Women's University, recalls her childhood in Gajendragad where she watched the whole town celebrate Muharram. 'No one termed it a Muslim festival. There is no point banning such festivals. They bind the society together. We need more such celebrations, in these days where divisive forces are at work relentlessly,' she said.
I may miss other festivals, but I do not miss the annual Muharram in my village of Bedkihal. The Alabi deities are treated as village deities. It is a time for home coming for labourers who have migrated to Bengaluru and Mumbai, Dadasaheb S. Chougale, theatre personality, said. As an artist, I feel it is a cultural event and not a religious festival. It is unfortunate that officers are trying to stifle them, he said.
Yallappa Himmadi, chairman, Basavaraj Kattimani trust, spoke of Muharram celebrations in villages without a single Muslim families across northern Karnataka. 'The government should take a stand in favour of equality, liberalism and secularism and allow Muharram celebrations,' he said.
Thinker Rahamat Tarikere, who has studied and documented Muharram traditions across Karnataka and some other States, said festivals like Muharram were tools for reconciliation and friendship between communities and families. 'There may have been some law and order problems in some villages in the past during Muharram, but we should give an opportunity for healing. We should promote more such festivals to reduce hatred and promote harmony, rather than keeping communities isolated. Entire rural communities should not suffer a cultural punishment due to the mistakes of criminal elements,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Delhi cops extorted Rs 25k, kicked me on chest: Malda woman
Kolkata: Delhi cops kicked her on her chest and in the stomach, ordered her to chant "Jai Shri Ram", took away her family's citizenship documents and extorted Rs 25,000 from her family, the Malda woman — whose family is at the centre of a Delhi-versus-Bengal row over citizenship issues — has claimed. "They (Delhi cops) showed the CCTV footage of me returning home with my children but not the footage of them thrashing me near Mangalam Hospital or torturing us at a police station," Sajnur Parveen, originally from Malda's Chanchal and who now stays in the slums of Shri Ram Chowk in East Delhi's Pandav Nagar with her six-member family, said at a press conference organised by the Trinamool Congress in Kolkata on Wednesday. The woman and her family have been in the eye of a political storm after Delhi Police took the unusual step of publicly rebutting another state's CM's X post. Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee on Sunday evening had narrated on X the family's harrowing experience, calling the thrashing of a mother and her one-and-a-half-year-old son "terrible and atrocious". The family has now lodged a complaint against Delhi Police excesses at Kolkata's Pragati Maidan police station. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata Parveen claimed on Wednesday that her husband, Mukhtar Khan, was away at work when four cops came to their home last week. "They asked me to show our Aadhaar, which I was getting out, when they asked me where my husband was. They alleged we were Bangladeshis and warned us not to go anywhere before leaving with our papers," she added. Four cops, two of them women, returned the next day (last Saturday) around 11.30 am. "They told us to accompany them and called us Bangladeshis again. I was taking my daughter for her bath and my son was wearing only a T-shirt. I took him along with me in that state. The moment we reached a secluded spot (I could not say where exactly but they said it was near Mangalam Hospital), they started beating me and asked me my husband's whereabouts, all the time calling us Bangladeshis. They slapped me twice when I protested," Parveen said. She was then told to chant "Jai Shri Ram". "I said I was a Muslim and could not do what they said, prompting them to kick me. I was already unwell and my son fell from my grip when they tried to snatch him away. Then they slapped him as well. He still has weals near his ear," Parveen recounted on Wednesday. "They demanded Rs 25,000 for letting me go. I gave them my husband's number, after which they let me talk to him. My husband called his mother, who arranged for the money. They left us only after getting the money," Parveen said. But that was not the end of their ordeal as cops and mediapersons landed at their door the same evening (Saturday). "They took us to a police station where they separated me from my husband. It was here that they asserted that anyone from Bengal was a Bangladeshi. They did not even let the children stay with me," she added. "They let us go very late that night but told us we would not be spared if we dared talk about the incident in Bengal. 'Khel hoga (the Trinamool slogan of 'Khela hobe' in Hindi)', they told us," Parveen said at the press conference as Azmal Khan, her father-in-law, said they might be poor but were not "staging any drama". CM Banerjee first posted about the incident on Sunday and Delhi Police waited till Tuesday to call the video "fabricated and politically motivated". Trinamool latched on to the family's allegations, with state urban development minister and Kolkata mayor Firhad Hakim saying they had exposed the "conspiracy" to prove CM Banerjee wrong. The state would take the responsibility of all migrant workers and their families returning from other states, he added.


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Malegaon Blast Case Verdict Today, 17 Years After The Deadly Explosion
17 years after a powerful blast hit Malegaon in Maharashtra, a special NIA court in Mumbai will pronounce its verdict in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case today. The explosion, on the night of September 29, 2008, near Bhikku Chowk in Malegaon, killed six people and left more than a hundred injured. A low-intensity bomb fitted to a motorcycle went off near a busy intersection, triggering panic and chaos in the communally sensitive town. Initially investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), the case saw a dramatic turn when the probe led to the arrest of individuals linked to Hindu right-wing groups - giving rise to the controversial political phrase "Hindu terror." Among those arrested were former BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and former Army officer Lt Col Prasad Shrikant Purohit, who both denied involvement and were later granted bail. The case was transferred to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in 2011, which re-registered the offence and conducted further investigations. Since then, multiple chargesheets and supplementary reports have been filed. The trial began in 2018 after charges were formally framed against seven accused. Over the course of the trial, the court examined 323 prosecution witnesses and eight defence witnesses. A large volume of evidence was submitted, including more than 10,800 exhibits and over 400 articles seized during the investigation. Approximately 40 witnesses turned hostile during the proceedings. Final arguments from the prosecution and defence concluded in April 2025. The prosecution submitted detailed written arguments spanning over 1,300 pages, along with legal citations and documentary evidence. The judgment was reserved on April 19. The verdict will be pronounced by A K Lahoti of the Special NIA Court, Mumbai. All seven accused are currently out on bail. The Malegaon case has remained at the centre of legal, political, and ideological debates in India. With the court now set to decide on guilt or innocence, the verdict is expected to have significant ramifications across political and legal spheres. The 2 Main Accused-Sadhvi Pragya And Lt Col Purohit Among the seven on trial, Sadhvi Pragya and Lt Col Purohit emerged as the most prominent and controversial accused in the case. Sadhvi Pragya, a former Member of Parliament from Bhopal, was arrested in October 2008. The motorcycle used in the blast was registered in her name. The Maharashtra ATS claimed that she was part of a larger conspiracy to target Muslim-dominated areas in retaliation for earlier terror attacks. Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur's motorcycle was allegedly used in the blast Lt Col Purohit, then an Indian Army officer posted in military intelligence, was accused of providing logistical and material support to a radical Hindu group named Abhinav Bharat, which the ATS alleged was behind the Malegaon blast. Investigators claimed Purohit helped arrange explosives and was part of meetings where attacks were allegedly planned. Both have denied the charges, alleging they were falsely implicated and tortured during the probe. JP Mishra, advocate representing Sadhvi Pragya said, "The ATS planted evidence against Sadhvi Pragya Thakur and the other accused, because they couldn't find any evidence. MCOCA was slapped without any basis, accused were tortured. They fabricated evidence to prove their propaganda of 'saffron terror'. We are certain that truth will prevail and my client will be acquitted." The NIA, after taking over the case in 2011, dropped certain charges initially framed by the ATS, including those under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), but retained charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and the Indian Penal Code. Both accused were granted bail in 2017. ATS's Claims (Initial Investigation) The Malegaon blast was initially investigated by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS). The ATS, then led by Hemant Karkare, claimed that the blast was carried out by individuals linked to right-wing Hindu extremist groups. Their investigation marked a turning point in Indian counter-terrorism narratives, as it was the first time that individuals associated with Hindu organisations were accused of terrorism. The ATS arrested Sadhvi Pragya, whose motorcycle was allegedly used in the blast. Investigators claimed that she was actively involved in the planning and had provided the vehicle to the perpetrators. Lt Col Purohit was arrested later and accused of being a key ideologue and facilitator. The ATS alleged that Purohit, through his association with the group Abhinav Bharat, arranged meetings, recruited individuals, and procured RDX used in the blast. The ATS claimed the blast was part of a broader plan to carry out retaliatory attacks against Muslims. Statements from co-accused and witnesses were cited, including allegations that meetings were held in Bhopal, Faridabad, and other locations where the idea of forming a "Hindu Rashtra" and launching attacks was discussed. The ATS charged the accused under stringent laws, including the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) and Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). NIA's Arguments (Post-2011 Investigation) In April 2011, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over the case. While the NIA continued with the prosecution of the main accused, its findings diverged in some crucial areas from the ATS's earlier version. In its supplementary charge sheet filed in 2016, the NIA dropped charges under MCOCA and exonerated several individuals previously named by the ATS, citing lack of prosecutable evidence. NIA found serious loopholes in ATS probe and alleged that accused were tortured to extract confessional statements. The NIA, however, kept the charges under UAPA, IPC, and Arms Act intact against key accused like Sadhvi Pragya and Lt Col Purohit. The agency's case rested on the involvement of Abhinav Bharat, which it said was the ideological front where meetings were held to discuss retaliatory attacks. Although the NIA sought to discharge Thakur from the case, the special court held that there was sufficient prima facie evidence to proceed with her trial. Purohit, it alleged, had a larger role, supplying explosives, ideological support, and coordinating with other group members. The prosecution submitted over 1,300 pages of written arguments and cited forensic evidence, call data records, and statements from witnesses to support its claims. It examined 323 prosecution witnesses during the trial. Defence's Position The defence teams representing Sadhvi Pragya, Lt Col Purohit, and the other accused have denied all charges and claimed that the case is based on fabricated evidence and political motivation. For Sadhvi Pragya, the defence argued that the ownership of the motorcycle did not prove her involvement in the blast. She claimed the vehicle had been in someone else's possession for months. Her lawyers accused the ATS of implicating her without any direct evidence and questioned the credibility of witnesses whose statements were later withdrawn. Lt Col Purohit's defence centered on the claim that he was working as an undercover Army officer, infiltrating Abhinav Bharat to gather intelligence on extremist activities. His legal team said he had kept his superiors informed, and there was no evidence to show he supported or facilitated the blast. They further alleged that evidence was planted and RDX traces were manipulated by the ATS to frame him. Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit is accused of floating Abhinav Bharat The defence also pointed to the large number of hostile witnesses - nearly 40 - who retracted their earlier statements given to the ATS. They argued that the investigation lacked consistency and that key procedural lapses, including forced confessions and custodial abuse, undermined the prosecution's case. Ramesh Upadhyay, an accused on the case, said, "The investigation done by various agencies are totally fraud and false. They have framed us and cooked up evidence. We were tortured in police custody by the ATS, witnesses were also tortured to implicate us. The witnesses later retracted their statements taken out of coercion." In addition, the defence highlighted that the NIA itself dropped serious charges, including MCOCA, which weakened the theory of an organised crime conspiracy. They accused successive governments of politicising the case, especially with the usage of terms like "Hindu terror," and claimed the accused were being targeted for their ideological background. Sameer Kulkarni, an accused said, "Truth will be out on July 31. Case collapsed after the NIA took over, many witnesses turned hostile and many accused were also discharged. We hope top cops who misused their power to frame us will be punished." Political Reverberations The case became a national political flashpoint, as it was the first time individuals associated with Hindu right-wing groups were accused of terrorism. The term "Hindu terror" or "saffron terror" was widely used in political debates, with the Congress party backing the investigation at the time and BJP accusing it of defaming an entire community. BJP, in later years, strongly criticised the Congress for coining the term and fielded Sadhvi Pragya as a Lok Sabha candidate in 2019 - a move that further polarised public discourse. Conclusion The ATS built the initial framework of the case around a theory of right-wing terrorism, naming prominent individuals linked to Hindu nationalist groups. The NIA upheld the core allegation of a planned terrorist act but revised parts of the case, including dropping MCOCA and discharging some accused. The defence, in turn, maintained that the case is politically tainted and lacks credible, admissible evidence. As the Special NIA Court prepares to deliver its verdict, the judgment is expected to have lasting legal, political, and social impact, bringing closure to a case that has shaped the discourse on terror and investigation in India for nearly two decades. Key Milestones In The Case September 29, 2008: Blast kills six in Malegaon October 2008: ATS arrests Sadhvi Pragya, later followed by Purohit January 2009: First charge sheet filed by ATS April 2011: NIA takes over the case 2016: NIA files supplementary charge sheet, drops some charges but retains key terror charges 2018: Charges formally framed against seven accused 2018-2023: Prosecution examines 323 witnesses; Approximately 40 turn hostile April 2025: Final arguments conclude. Judgment reserved The Trial: One Of India's Longest Terror Cases The Malegaon blast trial has been one of the most complex and politically sensitive terror trials in recent memory: Over 10,800 exhibits were submitted 404 articles were seized and tagged as evidence The court examined 323 prosecution witnesses and 8 defence witnesses Nearly 40 witnesses turned hostile, including some key ones linked to the early ATS probe The trial spanned five different NIA judges The prosecution submitted its final written arguments in three volumes, totalling over 1,300 pages, in April 2025. Both sides were allowed rebuttals, and the verdict was reserved on April 19, 2025


NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Cop Father Of Man Who Allegedly Killed Dalit Techie In Tamil Nadu Arrested
Chennai: In a major breakthrough in the alleged honour killing of Dalit techie Kavin Selvaganesh, the Tamil Nadu police have arrested sub-inspector Saravanan, the father of the main accused Surjith, who had earlier been arrested for allegedly murdering Kavin for being in a relationship with his sister. This arrest comes amid sustained protests by the victim's family and public outrage over what they see as a premeditated caste-based murder involving police complicity. Kavin, a 23-year-old software engineer from the Scheduled Castes community, was murdered in Tirunelveli district, reportedly by Surjith, who was upset about his sister's relationship with Kavin. The woman is a Siddha doctor belonging to a dominant upper caste in the hierarchy and worked at a local Siddha centre, where the incident unfolded. Surjith, allegedly caught on CCTV taking Kavin away on his bike, was arrested soon after the murder. Police invoked sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, charged him for murder, and later slapped the Goonda Act on him. As the investigation progressed, suspicion grew over the role of his parents - both serving police officers - in abetting or orchestrating the crime. Now, sub-inspector Saravanan, Surjith's father, has been arrested for his alleged role in the murder. The case has been transferred to the CB-CID to ensure impartiality, and both Saravanan and his wife had earlier been suspended from duty. However, Kavin's family has refused to accept his body, demanding the arrest of Saravanan's wife, also a sub-inspector, alleging she too was involved. Actor-politician Kamal Haasan condemned the killing, calling for stringent punishment and a united political front to fight casteism. This case has sparked widespread debate in Tamil Nadu on caste, honour crimes, and police accountability. As the CB-CID investigates further, the demand for justice continues to grow louder - not just from Kavin's family, but from citizens and political voices across the state.