FUW on the private environmental payments for farmers
Payments for carbon sequestration, Biodiversity 'Net Gain', ecosystem services such as natural flood management, or habitat creation and 'nutrient trading', are showing an increase in interest from the private market.
The FUW's Land Use Committee have recently published a report outlining five key 'needs' to ensure farmers can take advantage of, but also be protected within, these new markets.
These include clarity and transparency; regulation and protection; access to schemes and rewarding active management; a balance between land use demands and permanence and last but not least; a fair price.
It's important the Union engages in the design of these markets to ensure they work for Wales' family farms whilst protecting food production and our rural communities.
Clarity and transparency is needed as it can be difficult for farmers to find opportunities, trusted brokers, and information on the practical and financial implications of these actions.
In addition farmers need clarity on how these opportunities will interact with public financing via government-led schemes.
Whilst standards and 'principles' have been published by the UK, Scottish and Welsh Government to improve the integrity of these markets, the FUW has argued that these do not go far enough in providing regulations which protect farmers.
For example, climate change brings more extreme weather, pathogens and pests but this is not considered a 'force majeure' (e.g. wildfires in planted woodlands) as the unpredictability of climate change has been predicted.
Such a situation has the potential to leave the farmer with costly replanting liabilities.
Access to these schemes is currently the biggest barrier for smaller farms, especially tenants.
The average size of a farm in Wales is 48 hectares, yet the cost of registration, validation and monitoring per project via, for example, the Woodland Carbon Code, means economies of scale are better suited to take advantage of the income available.
This perhaps explains why Scotland's estates are already active in these markets.
Balancing sometimes conflicting land use demands with the long term commitment of some of these schemes is a real challenge for farmers, in an uncertain trading and political climate, both domestically and globally.
Farmers have to weigh up current and potential future income streams with what works for their businesses, families and land types and find projects which complement the farming system, such as Soil Carbon payments.
A fair price should be a prerequisite but in reality farmers have seen dwindling government budgets for the maintenance and management of habitat, or schemes which provide 'income foregone' or capital contributions as opposed to genuinely reflecting the management skills, vision, planning time, local knowledge, capital costs and commitments these actions require.
The private market, if they are to succeed in their ambitions, will need to prove to farmers that it can provide a long term and fair return for their work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
5 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Kate Forbes will be badly missed at Scottish Parliament
She was catapulted to political stardom at 29, nearly won the election to lead her party and has been number two in the Scottish Government for the past 15 months. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But now Kate Forbes is quitting. The Deputy First Minister and SNP MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch, points out that the demands of her job and the four-hour drive between Edinburgh and her constituency mean she often doesn't see her three-year-old daughter from one weekend to the next. And, quite reasonably, she has decided she does not want to miss out on 'any more of these precious early years of family life'. In 2020, Kate Forbes was thrown in at the deep end when she had to present the Scottish Government's Budget at a few hours' notice after Finance Secretary Derek Mackay was forced to resign. | Andrew Cowan/Scottish Parliament Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But Ms Forbes will be badly missed. Her talents are widely recognised not only by fellow Nationalists but also by opponents. And she is seen as bringing an extra credibility to the government. Elected in 2016, she rose quickly, becoming deputy to Finance Secretary Derek Mackay in 2018. But she found herself suddenly thrust into the front line in 2020 when Mr Mackay was forced to resign on Budget day over allegations he sent inappropriate messages to a 16-year-old boy. With just a few hours' notice, Ms Forbes had to deliver the Budget in parliament , but carried it off with aplomb. She won plaudits for her performance and was made Finance Secretary as a result. When Nicola Sturgeon announced her resignation in 2023, Ms Forbes stood to succeed her in a three-cornered contest with Humza Yousaf and Ash Regan. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She faced controversy over her socially conservative views on issues like gender recognition and same-sex marriage, even though she made clear she would not try to reverse legislation. And some claimed she would shift the party to the right, despite her strong emphasis on greater equality alongside pro-business policies. In the final round, Mr Yousaf beat Ms Forbes by 52 per cent to 48 per cent. But in view of the turmoil the party was soon plunged into, with the police tent outside the home of Ms Sturgeon and Peter Murrell, Ms Forbes agreed her defeat meant she had "dodged a bullet". She was seen as a potential contender for the leadership again when Mr Yousaf resigned in May 2024, but ended up doing a deal with John Swinney and becoming Deputy First Minister. Her departure at next year's election is a sad loss not just for the SNP but for the country.
The Herald Scotland
19 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish economy second top on one measure, second last on another
The bank's headline growth tracker, a seasonally adjusted index that measures the month on month change in the combined output of the manufacturing and services sectors, fell to 48.7 in July from 50.9 in June on a seasonally adjusted basis. Royal Bank noted that 'positively, underlying data showed that the recent decline in manufacturing output had slowed'. It added that services activity had 'ticked down slightly after growing solidly in both May and June'. Scotland was placed 11th out of the 12 UK nations and regions in July in terms of the month on month change in its business activity. Seven English regions achieved rises in business activity, with London posting the strongest increase. The other five nations and regions covered by the survey saw declines. Meanwhile, Scotland was second out of the 12 UK nations and regions in the employment league table behind Northern Ireland, which was the only one to see an overall rise in private sector staffing. The decline in employment in Scotland was slight compared with the falls recorded in the other 10 nations and regions of the UK to post drops in staffing. Read more Royal Bank owner NatWest said: 'Challenging labour market conditions persisted across most parts of the UK in July. Employment fell in nearly all areas, dropping particularly sharply in Yorkshire & Humber and the North West [of England]. Northern Ireland went against the trend and recorded solid workforce growth, while Scotland also showed some resilience on the job front.' Scotland was the only part of the UK to post a rise in outstanding business - the volume of orders or projects awaiting completion - the survey showed. This was the first increase in outstanding business recorded by Scotland for more than a year, and was viewed by Royal Bank as a positive sign in terms of the employment outlook. Drops in outstanding business occurred in the other 11 nations and regions, which the bank declared was a "sign of underutilised capacity" across the rest of the UK. Scotland recorded the slowest rate of increase of prices charged for goods and services among the 12 nations and regions, registering the softest rise for a year, the survey showed. Judith Cruickshank, who chairs Royal Bank's Scotland board, said: "The start of the second half of the year largely mirrored the conditions observed in the first six months of 2025, with some positive signs in the services sector seen alongside more challenging conditions facing manufacturers. Read more "Encouragingly, the accumulation of outstanding work, which points to pressure on business capacity, could create opportunities for job growth in the coming months. Notably, the uptick in backlogs marked the first increase in 14 months, with Scotland defying the broader UK trend. Moreover, while nearly all parts of the UK highlighted challenges facing local labour markets, Scotland emerged as one of the few areas demonstrating resilience.' She observed that 'Scottish firms have also displayed flexibility regarding pricing'. Ms Cruickshank said: 'Although cost pressures have intensified, charges for Scottish goods and services increased at a softer pace, marking the weakest rise in a year. In light of current demand headwinds, Scottish firms are trying to stay competitive, even at the expense of their own profit margins it may seem." Sebastian Burnside, chief economist at NatWest, said: "There were pockets of solid business activity growth across the UK in July, namely in London and the East of England. In total, seven areas saw business activity rise in July, and several more were in or close to so-called recovery territory, with July's performance either in line with or better than the trend over the past six months. "The results were achieved amidst a backdrop of demand headwinds and stubbornly high price pressures, with firms across the UK indicating growing challenges when it comes to winning new business, as well cost increases that continue to outpace the long-run average.' He added: "Local job markets continue [to] feel the effects of the recent instability and the rise in labour costs, with employment falling in most areas in July. Nevertheless, a rise in growth expectations across the majority of nations and regions suggests that there's a sense among businesses that the worst of the disruption from the hikes in national insurance and tariff uncertainty has passed.'
The Herald Scotland
19 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Aberdeen oil jobs at risk as BP reviews operations
'The North Sea: We have a proud history and we're proud of the team producing for more than 60 years now, and it's been a tremendous piece of business for us,' the head of BP's oil and gas production unit Gordon Birrell enthused. He added: 'I would say the North Sea performance this year in terms of safety, production, costs has been tremendous. They really have stepped up … so kudos to the team up there.' Mr Birrell was speaking in a presentation to analysts fronted by BP chief executive Murray Auchincloss, who is leading a campaign to help the company retain its independence amid investor dissatisfaction with its performance. As BP's share price has trailed behind rivals such as Shell and US giants ExxonMobil and Chevron, some sector watchers think the firm could be vulnerable to a takeover bid. READ MORE: As Chevron closes Aberdeen office, what now for North Sea jobs? Mr Auchincloss decided to refocus BP on the oil and gas business after succeeding Bernard Looney, who championed a drive to turn the company into a renewables powerhouse. As the company posted $2 billion (£1.5bn) second quarter profits last week, Mr Auchincloss said he had agreed with chairman designate Albert Manifold that BP should conduct a thorough review of its portfolio of businesses to ensure it maximizes shareholder value. The decision to launch the review will cause concern among sector-watchers in Scotland amid fears that firms will slash investment in the North Sea in response to a series of tax hikes in recent years. Chancellor Rachel Reeves sparked outrage when she increased the rate of the windfall tax in her first Budget in October. The move gave added impetus to a shakeup in the area which has seen giants combining their North Sea businesses in a bid to reduce costs. The consolidation process will have worrying implications for jobs. Israeli-owned Ithaca Energy announced plans for lay offs in March months after it merged with the bulk of the North Sea portfolio amassed by Eni of Italy. READ MORE: Israeli-owned firm takes control of UK's biggest gas field Shell and Norwegian giant Equinor are in the process of combining their North Sea operations. Asked why BP had not made a similar move, Mr Birrell told analysts: 'The reason we haven't jumped into a joint venture is we believe we've got the best portfolio up there and that's been our view for quite a while.' His comments underline BP leaders' belief in the long-term potential of the company's North Sea assets and may help to dispel fears that the company is cooling on the area. The North Sea portfolio includes stakes in the giant Clair oil field West of Shetland and four big developments off Aberdeenshire. Mr Birrell has noted the potential to achieve a significant increase in production off Shetland where BP has been considering plans for a third phase of development of the Clair field. READ MORE: Just Transition Fund farce deepens as Scottish firms fight over windfarm scraps In the results presentation, BP noted that the Murlach oil field development in the North Sea is one of 10 major upstream projects that it expects to start up by the end of 2027. The list includes projects in the Americas, West Africa and Egypt. Murlach will be linked to the ETAP production platform 140 miles east of Aberdeen. However, Mr Birrell signalled that BP's enthusiasm for the North Sea may wane if Ms Reeves does not offer some concessions to the industry in the Budget she will announce later this year. 'We're also monitoring any potential changes to the fiscal situation in the North Sea which we expect to get some clarity on at some point this year,' he noted, adding: 'Once we've got clarity on the fiscal situation we'll then make decisions.' North Sea industry leaders have warned that the increase in the windfall tax that was announced in October will lead to big cuts in investment in the area. They have focused their campaigning efforts on a call for the Government to bring forward the expected end date for the windfall tax to 2026 from 2030. READ MORE: SNP Government green jobs failure seen in English city success The case for change has been boosted by the fall in the crude price in recent weeks amid concern about the outlook for global demand. Brent crude is selling for around $66 per barrel compared with $80/bbl in June. It fetched more than $120/bbl in 2022 when the windfall tax was introduced by the former Conservative Government. The OPEC oil exporters organisation has caused complications by agreeing to a significant increase in members' total production quotas. However, Ms Reeves has limited room for manoeuvre given her need to boost tax revenues to fund the Government's spending plans. The case for oil and gas tax cuts may have been undermined by ExxonMobil boss Darren Woods in comments reported by the FT this month. Mr Woods told reporters that ExxonMobil wanted to increase oil and gas production saying: 'Frankly if you look at the price environment we're in it's very attractive. So I think if you can't make money and generate good returns … you probably have a bigger, more fundamental issue.' READ MORE: Scotland set for surge in windfarm developments amid Donald Trump opposition Against that backdrop the Chancellor may not feel she needs to give much ground. It seems unlikely that BP would resort to a dramatic move such as a complete exit from the North Sea if hopes for significant tax changes are disappointed. If the company decided to sell off some North Sea assets bargain hunters might have the upper hand. However, BP is unlikely to commit to large scale developments such as an extension of the Clair field so long as its tax concerns are not addressed. BP provided a reminder last week that the outlook for jobs at the firm and in the wider sector will remain bleak regardless of what Ms Reeves does. The company said it planned to shed 6,200 jobs globally, including 4,700 under an existing programme of cuts, without specifying where. Mr Auchincloss highlighted the potential for AI to help the firm boost the efficiency of its exploration and production operations. News that the redundancy programme could result in a 15% cut in the number of office jobs at BP will spark alarm in Aberdeen. The company remains a major employer in the granite city despite axing hundreds of North Sea jobs during the downturns the industry has weathered in recent years.
