Should the state pension age be raised above 66? Yahoo readers have their say
Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers.
Huge changes to the UK's pensions could be on the cards as chancellor Rachel Reeves seeks to balance the government account books.
Ministers have announced the Pensions Commission - which recommended auto-enrolment in workplace schemes in 2005 - is set to be revived for the first time in almost two decades in a bid to get Britons saving more for retirement.
But the age at which the state pension can be drawn is also expected to be increased, with Reeves saying it was "right" to examine the issue in light of increasing life expectancy.
Currently set at 66, the age is due to rise to 67 by 2028 and then to 68 between 2044-2046 - although the prospect of bringing this timeline forward has also been raised.
Last year, the UK spent £138 billion on the state pension, equivalent to 5% of GDP, a figure the Office for Budget Responsibility expects to rise to 7.7% by the 2070s.
Changes to the pensions 'triple lock', which ensures state pensions rise by 2.5%, CPI inflation, or the increase in average earnings every year, are also being considered.
However, the triple lock will not be considered by the Pensions Commission and Labour has promised it will not be altered before the end of the current Parliament.
In our poll earlier this week, Yahoo News UK asked our readers: "Should the state pension age be raised above 66?"
It received 5,403 votes and showed an overwhelming majority - 85% - in favour of keeping the current age in place.
The poll also asked readers for their thoughts on the pensions triple lock.
Once again, 85% said they wanted to see the guarantee maintained, with even fewer arguing it should be scrapped.
The poll's Have Your Say feature elicited some strong feelings and a mixture of opinion, with most feeling the state pension age should not be raised - but even this provoked a split over why it should be held steady.
JanR, from Hertfordshire, said: "I think the state pension age should remain as it is. Most people work all their lives and deserve some down time whilst they are hopefully fit enough to enjoy it."
David g, from Manchester, agreed, but said the focus should be on younger people still climbing the career ladder, rather than those already at the top.
He said: "Keeping people in work longer to shorten the amount of pension they claim in what remains of their lives is the wrong thing to do. What about the younger generation looking for their first jobs? What will be left for them to do? Nothing. The government has totally got its priorities wrong. Why should we be forced to work for over fifty years? This is grossly unfair"
P smith, from south Wales, also concurred, but argued those who had contributed to their pensions should not be penalised at the expense of those who had not, saying: "Why should people who have contributed to a works pension scheme work later in life to help support those who haven't."
Others however, like Kevin F, from Derby, took the opposite view. He said: "The pension age has to increase in line with life expectancy. It's only fair to the younger generation."
Read more of Yahoo UK's Poll of the Week articles
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why people on £35K should opt out of winter fuel payment by September deadline to avoid HMRC headache
People earning £35,000 or more will still receive the benefit in their bank accounts - but will then be forced to pay it back in tax. Millions of pensioners will once again receive the winter fuel payment later this year. After the government sparked uproar last winter by taking the benefit from 10 million people, chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed in June it would be restored to pensioners who have an income of less than £35,000 a year. Those who earn more than the threshold will actually receive the winter fuel payment in their bank accounts as well, though it will be taken back at a later date in tax - prompting experts to urge them to opt out of the scheme before the September deadline to avoid a potential "tax clawback headache". What is the winter fuel payment? It's money from the government to help pensioners pay their heating bills over the winter. The payment is between £100 and £300, depending on each person's circumstances, and will automatically be paid into bank accounts in November or December. People will receive letters before then telling them how much they will get and what account it will be paid into. The winter fuel payment has been one of the most contentious issues for Sir Keir Starmer's government. Last summer, it decided to limit the payment to only those who claimed pension credit in one of its first acts, aimed at balancing what was described as a £22bn 'black hole' in the public finances. This meant the number of pensioners receiving the payment was reduced by around 10 million: from 11.4 million to 1.5 million. YouGov polling suggested 57% of Britons were against this. Who is eligible? Everyone who was born before 22 September, 1959, and lives in England or Wales, will receive the winter fuel payment. What are the tax implications for people earning £35,000? The approximately two million pensioners whose annual income is above the £35,000 threshold will also receive the payment if they don't opt out - though it will be taken back in tax. The government will take the money back by either changing their 2026/27 tax code or adding the figure to their 2025/26 self-assessment return. John Havard, a consultant at tax advisors Blick Rothenberg, warned on Monday that anyone who doesn't opt out and earns even £1 above £35,000 could face a "tax headache". "A 'wealthier' individual with an income over £35,000 will be subject to a tax 'clawback', where the winter fuel payment they receive is required to be returned to the government," he wrote in a blog. Watch: Reeves on pensioners earning under £35k to get winter fuel payments "Given this will be a complex process, and just £1 of income above the £35,000 limit is enough to trigger a clawback, those in favour of a simple life will need to opt out." He said the clawback process is "potentially complex" and an "administrative headache". Havard also said people near the threshold should watch out for any small increases to their income, such as a pension payment, interest or part-time earnings that could "tip someone over the limit and cause them to fall into the clawback process". Can you opt out of the winter fuel payment? People can choose to opt out of the winter fuel payment by contacting the government. This has to be done before 15 September. Contact details can be found here. Read more Winter fuel allowance: the scammers pounce on government U-turn (The Guardian) Millions to lose up to £18,000 from pension reforms (The Telegraph) What is a wealth tax – and would it work in the UK? (The Independent)
Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
Schwab Trading Activity Index™: Cautious Optimism in July as STAX Score Edges Upward
WESTLAKE, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Schwab Trading Activity Index™ (STAX) increased to 41.79 in July, up from its score of 40.66 in June. The only index of its kind, the STAX is a proprietary, behavior-based index that analyzes retail investor stock positions and trading activity from Schwab's millions of client accounts to illuminate what investors were actually doing and how they were positioned in the markets each month. The reading for the four-week period ending July 25, 2025, ranks 'low' compared to historic averages. 'What the July STAX shows us is that while Schwab's retail clients are bullish, that optimism is measured,' said Joe Mazzola, Head Trading and Derivatives Strategist at Charles Schwab. 'The S&P 500 may have hit new all-time highs in July, but when we consider the ways Schwab's retail clients are engaging with the markets, we're not seeing the kinds of risk-on strategies that would indicate a lot of confidence in the rally's longevity.' Stock market volatility fell to five-month lows in July, easing as geopolitical worries receded and the U.S. budget debate got settled relatively easily. Tariff concerns remain in the market, but a deal with Japan in late July with 15% tariffs on its products appeared to calm worries. The Cboe Volatility Index® (VIX) fell beneath 15 by late July, well below its historic 20 average. Economic data generally held up decently during the STAX period, with June seeing 147,000 U.S. jobs created and unemployment dropping to 4.1%, both improvements from May. Retail sales in June grew a healthy 0.6% from May, and preliminary July University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment rose to 61.8, its highest level in five months. Inflation reports in July brought new concerns that tariffs might be factoring into price growth, though monthly gains weren't extraordinary. The June Consumer Price Index (CPI) saw headline CPI up 0.2% and core – which excludes food and energy – up 0.3% from May. And on an annual basis, the CPI rose 2.7%, up from 2.4% in May. Even as services prices saw slower increases, prices of goods ticked higher, to some a sign that tariffs were beginning to take their toll. Prices for toys, clothing, and furnishings rose. Second quarter earnings season got off to a mostly solid start in July, with around 83% of companies exceeding Wall Street analysts' expectations. The estimate for blended second quarter profit growth, which includes companies reporting and projections of companies yet to report, rose while actual earnings from companies reporting the first few weeks of earnings season climbed more than 8%. The rally in July broadened through the month, with nearly 75% of S&P 500 stocks trading above their respective 50-day moving averages by the end of the STAX period. Volatility continued to depress, pushing the VIX to the low 15's, as the S&P 500 failed to record a 1% move for the fourth consecutive week. Stocks briefly dove and yields for the 10-year Treasury note climbed to nearly 4.5%, the high end of their recent range, on media reports that President Trump had asked congressional Republicans if he should fire U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. After reassurance that the termination would not take place, stocks resumed their rally and yields eased. Aside from that spike, the Treasury market generally marched in place during July despite worries that the Republican budget plan could significantly raise U.S. debt (yields trade inversely to Treasuries). Yields again fell below 4.3% for the benchmark 10-year note in early July, but mostly stayed between 4.3% and 4.5%, not far from the Fed's target range. Popular names bought by Schwab clients during the period included: NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) Tesla Inc. (TSLA) Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) Inc. (AMZN) UnitedHealth Group Inc. (UNH) Names net sold by Schwab clients during the period included: Apple Inc. (AAPL) Ford Motor Co. (F) Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) Boeing Co. (BA) Nike Inc. (NKE) About the STAX The STAX value is calculated based on a complex proprietary formula. Each month, Schwab pulls a sample from its client base of millions of funded accounts, which includes accounts that completed a trade in the past month. The holdings and positions of this statistically significant sample are evaluated to calculate individual scores, and the median of those scores represents the monthly STAX. For more information on the Schwab Trading Activity Index, please visit Additionally, Schwab clients can chart the STAX using the symbol $STAX in either the thinkorswim ® or thinkorswim Mobile platforms. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Content intended for educational/informational purposes only. Not investment advice, or a recommendation of any security, strategy, or account type. Historical data should not be used alone when making investment decisions. Please consult other sources of information and consider your individual financial position and goals before making an independent investment decision. The STAX is not a tradable index. The STAX should not be used as an indicator or predictor of future client trading volume or financial performance for Schwab. About Charles Schwab At Charles Schwab, we believe in the power of investing to help individuals create a better tomorrow. We have a history of challenging the status quo in our industry, innovating in ways that benefit investors and the advisors and employers who serve them, and championing our clients' goals with passion and integrity. More information is available at Follow us on X, Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn. 0825-TAZA
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Chancellor Osborne Warns UK Is ‘Completely Left Behind' on Crypto
Former UK Chancellor George Osborne has issued a blunt warning over Britain's approach to crypto, arguing that regulatory caution is costing the country its place in the next wave of financial innovation. In an op-ed published by the Financial Times, Osborne accused Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey of falling behind global peers. 'On crypto and stablecoins, as on too many other things, the hard truth is this: We're being completely left behind,' Osborne wrote in his op-ed. 'It's time to catch up.' He likened crypto's rise to the Big Bang reforms of the 1980s that cemented London's financial dominance. Osborne also singled out the Bank of England's stablecoin policy, calling it a roadblock to innovation. Bailey, meanwhile, had earlier warned that stablecoins should not replace traditional money, and has supported rules that critics say would make sterling-pegged coins commercially unworkable. Osborne's comments follow renewed tensions between UK regulators and the industry. In the past week, UK broadcasters pulled a Coinbase ad that showed the financial system collapsing like a crumbling ceiling. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong responded Sunday. "Our ad which got banned in teh UK by the TV networks has sparked quite a reaction," he wrote on X. "If you can't say it, then there must be a kernel of truth in it." The UK has stricter rules than many jurisdictions. The Financial Conduct Authority, or FCA's, 2023 regime includes 24-hour cooling-off periods for new investors, bans referral bonuses, and restricts crypto advertising, classifying it as high-risk. CryptoUK, a digital assets trade group, echoed Osborne's concerns. There is a call for 'the recognition of stablecoins in UK law and fairer banking policies, so more digital asset companies can use the same financial services other businesses in the UK can use,' Su Carpenter, director of operations at CryptoUK, told Decrypt. She added that 'there is a real lack of recognition of how the tax framework can and will apply,' which 'has inhibited economic growth in the crypto sector.' Barclays Joins List of UK Banks Restricting Credit Card Crypto Buys Carpenter said CryptoUK has been pressing for broader access to crypto-linked investment products and continues to 'inform, educate and address policymakers' to shift the debate. While UK regulators stress stability and consumer protection, industry voices warn the country risks falling behind. FCA data from 2024 shows 12% of UK adults now hold crypto, up from 10% in 2022. Meanwhile, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Abu Dhabi have moved ahead. FCA Asks for Public Feedback on UK Crypto Legislation London-headquartered Alvara Protocol, which builds tokenized asset baskets on Ethereum and Avalanche, voiced similar frustration with the UK's regulatory gridlock. 'The UK talks a big game about being a global crypto hub, but it's still miles behind the EU's MiCA framework and even the US's chaotic, but active, approach,' Callum Mitchell-Clark, co-founder of Alvara, told Decrypt. 'Everything feels stuck in consultation mode: too slow, too cautious, and totally out of sync with how fast the industry moves.' Mitchell-Clark said the govermment's messaging hasn't matched its policy actions. 'To me, the UK's current stance sends a clear message: 'we support innovation in theory' he said. 'If the UK keeps dragging its feet, it risks becoming irrelevant while builders and capital head to places like the EU, U.S., or even Dubai.'
