'Government is beggar': Maharashtra minister Manikrao Kokate sparks row with fresh remark; CM Fadnavis terms it 'inappropriate'
NEW DELHI: Maharashtra agriculture minister Manikrao Kokate who was recently caught playing rummy on his mobile phone during the monsoon session of the state legislature landed into another controversy Tuesday after referring to the government as a "beggar" while trying to explain a previous statement about farmers.
Earlier this year, Kokate faced backlash for allegedly comparing farmers to beggars."Even a beggar does not take Re 1 in alms, but here we are giving crop insurance for Re 1. Even then, some people try to misuse it," he had said, as reported by PTI.
On Tuesday, while clarifying this statement, he told reporters, "The government doesn't give Re 1 to farmers, it takes Re 1 from them. The government is a beggar."
Kokate, who represents the Sinnar constituency in Nashik district, claimed that 5 lakh to 5.3 lakh bogus applications under the now-scrapped Re 1 crop insurance scheme were rejected, and corrective steps were taken.
The scheme has since been replaced with the Prime Minister Crop Insurance Scheme.
Reacting to the minister's latest remarks, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said as quoted by PTI, "If he has made such a comment, it is inappropriate for ministers to speak in this manner. We have taken corrective measures in the crop insurance scheme as we saw insurance companies benefitting and not farmers."
"We have taken steps to make an investment of Rs 5,000 crore every year in the agriculture sector.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
Maharashtra's economy is good despite challenges," he added.
NCP
(SP) MP Supriya Sule also criticised Kokate's comments, calling them insensitive. "It is an insult to the hard work of all the chief ministers of the state so far and the people of the state. We will never tolerate this insult," she said in a post on X.
Last week, NCP (SP) MLA Rohit Pawar shared a video that appeared to show minister Kokate playing Rummy on his phone during the monsoon session of the Maharashtra legislature.
The following day, Jitendra Awhad also posted two more videos, claiming Kokate was playing 'Junglee Rummy' during the proceedings.
Dismissing the allegations, Kokate told PTI, "I don't know how to play online rummy. One needs an OTP, and a bank account needs to be linked to play the game. One can check if my mobile phone is linked to any such game. I was trying to skip a game which popped up on my screen for 10 to 15 seconds," He also threatened legal action against opposition leaders for allegedly defaming him by circulating the video.
When asked about the mounting calls for his resignation, Kokate pushed back strongly, saying, "Tell me what has happened for which the resignation has been demanded. Have I molested someone? Have I stolen something or decided against farmers? Do I have a criminal background?"
Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis also voiced disapproval over the video, prompting a response from Kokate, who said, as cited by PTI, "The CM's reaction is based on media reports.
It's true I didn't brief him".
Kokate maintained he has followed legislative rules for the past 25 years, but legal trouble continues to mount. A magistrate court in Nashik district recently convicted Kokate and his brother Sunil Kokate for submitting fake documents to secure flats under a government quota. They were sentenced to two years of imprisonment.
Their conviction was stayed by the district court on March 5.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
NDA outrage more meaningful if support on Manipur violence too: Dimple Yadav on cleric's remark
Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav on Monday said the NDA's outrage over a cleric's derogatory comments against her would be more meaningful had similar solidarity been shown during incidents like the violence in Manipur. The cleric, Maulana Sajid Rashid, reportedly made a misogynistic comment about Yadav who was wearing a sari at a meeting in a mosque and compared her to another woman SP MP, Iqra Hasan, who had covered her head. The comment led to widespread condemnation on social media and in political circles, including from BJP's Bansuri Swaraj and Congress' Renuka Chowdhury. NDA MPs also held a protest outside Parliament in protest. 'It's good that action is being taken now…But it would have been better if similar protests and support had been visible when horrifying incidents like the one in Manipur came to light through footage on social media. Back then, if people had stood together the way they are now over the Operation Sindoor issue, it would have shown genuine concern,' Yadav said.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
'She should have learnt from Iqra Hasan how to sit': Maulana Sajid Rashidi justifies remarks on Dimple Yadav; targets SP MP Mohibbullah Nadvi, says he was 'sitting like a slave'
All India Imam Association (AIIA) president Maulana Sajid Rashidi. NEW DELHI: Amid widespread criticism over his remarks against Samajwadi Party MP Dimple Yadav , All India Imam Association (AIIA) president Maulana Sajid Rashidi on Monday stood by his statements, claiming they were rooted in Islamic principles. 'As per the Islamic faith, I object to the way she (Dimple Yadav) was sitting inside the Mosque. It is not appropriate to sit like that inside a Mosque. She should have learnt from Iqra Hasan how to sit," news agency ANI quoted Rashidi as saying. Earlier, the cleric had reportedly made a misogynistic comment about Yadav who was wearing a sari at a meeting in a mosque and compared her to another woman SP MP, Iqra Hasan, who had covered her head. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi He also took aim at SP MP Mohibbullah Nadvi, who was present at the mosque during the visit. 'The Maulana who was present there is no longer a Maulana; he is an MP now. He was not authorised to sit there. He is sitting there with joined hands like a slave. Would he have had the courage to tell the Supremo's wife that she is sitting in the wrong position? The biggest perpetrator is him,' Rashidi said. He further criticised Nadvi for allegedly serving refreshments during the mosque gathering: 'Had he been a Maulana, he would have immediately objected and said that a Mosque is not a place for having discussions… He had to bring tea and snacks for Akhilesh Yadav in the Mosque, which is against Islam.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Installing Solar Panels in Bangladesh Might Be Cheaper Then You Think Solar Panels | Search Ads Get Info Undo Maulana faces FIR Late on Sunday, Lucknow Police registered an FIR against Maulana Rashidi following a complaint filed by Pravesh Yadav, a resident of Gomtinagar's Vikalp Khand. The complaint alleged that the Maulana made objectionable, inflammatory, and misogynistic remarks on media platforms, targeting Dimple Yadav and allegedly inciting communal disharmony. According to East Zone DCP Shashank Singh, the FIR has been filed under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including: Maulana Sajid Rashidi has previously made public comments that triggered controversy. Reacting NDA's stance on Rashidi's remark, Dimple Yadav said the ruling coalition's outrage would be more meaningful had similar solidarity been shown during incidents like the violence in Manipur. "It's good that action is being taken it would have been better if similar protests and support had been visible when horrifying incidents like the one in Manipur came to light through footage on social media. Back then, if people had stood together the way they are now over the Operation Sindoor issue, it would have shown genuine concern," Yadav said. (With agency inputs)
News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
Not Rafale Or F-35, Indian Army Wanted This Air Defence System For Rs 1.12 Lakh Crore
Last Updated: India is investing Rs 1.12 lakh crore in the QRSAM system, known as the "Baby S-400," developed by DRDO to counter drones and low-flying threats, enhancing air defence. The push to turn India into an air-tight fortress is gaining momentum. After the high-stakes Operation Sindoor, the Centre has accelerated military modernisation with a mega project valued at over Rs 3 lakh crore. Among the headline approvals is a Rs 1.12 lakh crore push to bolster India's air defence capabilities with the indigenous Quick Reaction Surface-to-Air Missile (QRSAM) system. Here's what's changing on the ground. The Ministry of Defence has just greenlit military procurement proposals exceeding Rs 1 lakh crore. These include 12 Mine Counter Measure Vessels (MCMVs) worth Rs 44,000 crore, but the big-ticket item is the Rs 36,000 crore allocated for six regiments of QRSAMs. Out of these, three regiments will be delivered to the Army and Air Force. The QRSAM isn't just any system. It's being called the 'Baby S-400", a nod to its smaller size but strategic importance. Developed by the DRDO, this air defence system can neutralise enemy aircraft, drones, and missiles within a 30 km radius. While that range may seem modest compared to the 400 km reach of the Russian-origin S-400 and the 100–200 km envelope of the Akash system, QRSAM's quick reaction time and battlefield mobility give it a distinct tactical edge. That's where QRSAM steps in. During Operation Sindoor, Pakistan, rattled by India's precision strikes, launched a barrage of drones, reportedly with Chinese and Turkish support. Hundreds were detected. India's Akash systems held the line. Still, experts say the absence of a mobile, quick-launch system like QRSAM was felt sharply. Now, with six regiments approved, the game is shifting. But it's not enough. According to defence officials, the Indian Army had originally asked for 11 QRSAM regiments. The Air Force reportedly had a similar requirement. Meeting both demands would require 22 regiments in total, pegged at a cost of roughly Rs 1.12 lakh crore. That's how the number came into play. Each QRSAM regiment costs about Rs 6,000 crore. While six have been cleared, that leaves a shortfall, one that defence planners say could prove critical if not addressed. Why does it matter? Because India's adversaries, especially China and Pakistan, are investing heavily in stealth drones, cruise missiles, and electronic warfare capabilities. The battlefield is shifting toward high-speed, low-visibility threats. QRSAM fills the gap between long-range missile shields like S-400 and medium-range options like Akash. If fully deployed, QRSAM would add another layer to India's multi-tier air defence strategy, creating a net that could detect and destroy nearly anything from UAVs to 5th-generation fighter jets. This isn't just about defence. It's about deterrence. With three regiments apiece going to the Army and Air Force, the system is finally getting into deployment phase. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
