Justin Baldoni's Lawyer Reacts to Claim Director Was ‘Fired' by WME Out of Blake Lively Loyalty
Justin Baldoni's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, has responded to Ari Emanuel's alleged reasons for dropping the actor-director as a client.
'Mr. Ari Emanuel is notably one of the best agents, and clearly the most loyal, in Hollywood,' Freedman told the Daily Mail on Friday, February 14. 'Perhaps Ari's perspective would be different if they had ever met in the half-decade they were clients of his agency.'
Emanuel is the chief executive of WME's parent company, Endeavor, and recently claimed that he 'fired' Baldoni, 41, as a client out of loyalty to Blake Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds. (News broke in December 2024 that WME stopped representing Baldoni shortly after Lively's sexual harassment lawsuit made headlines.)
'I mean it is a f—ed up, bad situation with what Baldoni … is doing,' Emanuel said during a live taping of the 'Freakonomics' podcast earlier in February. '[He was my client] until I fired him.'
WME Head Says He 'Fired' Justin Baldoni Because He Is 'Ride or Die' for Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds
When pressed if he actually fired Baldoni, Emanuel succinctly said, 'I am a ride or die. And [Lively and Reynolds] are good people.'
Lively, 37, sued Baldoni in December 2024 for sexual harassment and fostering a 'hostile work environment' when they filmed It Ends With Us together. She also claimed that Baldoni, who both starred in and directed the picture, tried to destroy her reputation. Baldoni, meanwhile, denied the allegations before filing a defamation suit against Lively. He also named Reynolds, 48, in the motion. The married couple, meanwhile, denounced the accusations.
"It's not really fair,' Emanuel said on the Wednesday, February 12, episode. 'I've known Ryan and Blake for over a decade. They're really incredible people. In Hollywood, they have been incredibly successful. People work with them, they've never had any bad mojo out there or treated people badly.'
He added, 'They are charitable — we help them with their foundation [and] they've given tons of money away.'
Emanuel also had a difficult time believing Baldoni's version of events.
Justin Baldoni's Former Agency WME Denies Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively Pressured Them to Drop Him
'If what is alleged in her lawsuit [and] what happened on social media is true, just because she complained to the studio that things were unhealthy on the set and that he was director and this man was the producer, and they did to her what is being alleged, they're really bad people,' Emanuel said. 'I know Blake, I know Ryan; they're good people. Social media is a really good thing at times because it lets stars connect with their fans, but these two guys [Baldoni and his team] used it in an evil way if that's true.'
Emanuel further implored Baldoni's camp to 'just stop since they think they're innocent.' Baldoni's attorney, Freedman, has been vocal in the media arguing his client's perspective, even launching a website that documents their team's alleged proof.
'Let the process play itself out,' Emanuel stressed on Wednesday. 'These are good people that have been in the business for decades and have never had any bad press about them and all the people they work with like them. So, if it's true what they're saying in that allegation, these are two bad guys.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Loose Women cuts live studio audience amid ITV budget cuts
Loose Women is poised to experience an overhaul as one of the show's key parts is 'axed' amid 'brutal' budget cuts across ITV. The show, which features a rotating panel of presenters, has been running since 1999, and has traditionally been filmed in front of a live studio audience – but reports suggest that this has now been cut. The in-person attendees are considered a vital part of the show, providing applause, laughter, feedback, and exchanges with presenters throughout the live programme. It comes after the show's output was cut to only 30 weeks a year, just as Lorraine also saw its time slot slashed in half. 'The panelists are really upset over the decision to axe the live studio audience from the show,' a source told the Daily Mail. 'It's what sets the series apart from the rest of ITV daytime and now there are massive fears that viewers will switch off completely.' They continued: 'The only concern now is to cut costs and having a live studio audience can be expensive, with the added need for security and a warmup artist. 'Presenters already know how it feels to broadcast the show without an audience because that's what happened during the pandemic, and they all know it creates low mood and lack of atmosphere.' ITV declined to comment when approached by The Independent. However, a source said: "While there is a proposal to not have a studio audience for Loose Women from 2026, that doesn't necessarily mean that we'll never have a studio audience again, it just won't be in the same way as it is now. At this stage we are still exploring new ways of working and producing the show when we move to a new studio next year." Loose Women presenter Nadia Sawalha expressed fear for her job earlier this week as she shared her concerns on social media. Sawalha, who has been a panellist since 1999, addressed the news of cuts on her YouTube channel. 'What people don't realise at Loose Women is that we're self-employed. I am self-employed. Every contract is a new contract. I could be let go tomorrow. I could be let go in five years. You don't know because we're not employees.' Getting emotional, the former EastEnders actor, 60, continued: 'What's been brutal, absolutely brutal, over the last week, honestly I feel tearful about it, is that hundreds of people… are going to be made redundant out of the blue. These are all the people behind the scenes that support us in every way. 'A lot of my friends and colleagues on this show and have worked for ITV have been there for decades… and I can't tell you how upsetting it was to see people walking around numb with shock and fear about what they are going to do.' She added that 'television is coming very slowly to its natural end'.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Blake Lively Drops Lawsuit' Continues to Trend Despite Ongoing Case
has dropped two 'emotional distress' claims from her lawsuit against after his legal team sought access to her medical records. A federal judge ruled Tuesday that the actress cannot present emotional distress evidence at trial, though she continues pursuing emotional distress damages through her remaining sexual harassment and retaliation claims. The strategic move has sparked confusion among observers, wondering if Blake Lively drops the lawsuit entirely. So, here's why netizens are searching 'Blake Lively drops lawsuit' online and the latest updates in her legal battle against Baldoni. Fans are searching whether Blake Lively has dropped her lawsuit against her It Ends With Us co-star after the recent developments in the case. Reports claim Justin Baldoni's legal team demanded to check her medical records, including 'therapy notes.' The medical records were required as Lively's original claims stated she suffered 'severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, (and) embarrassment' due to Baldoni's actions. Moreover, a Variety report alleges that Lively is trying to drop the 'emotional distress' claims. However, she maintains 13 other claims in the ongoing legal battle. A filing from the legal records further notes, 'Instead of complying with the Medical RFPs, Ms. Lively's counsel recently advised us, in writing, that Ms. Lively is withdrawing her [infliction of emotional distress] Claims.' Meanwhile, the Gossip Girl star's lawyers, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, called the filing 'a press stunt.' They stated, 'The Baldoni-Wayfarer strategy of filing retaliatory claims has exposed them to expansive new damages claims under California law.' Hence, it rendered certain of 'Ms. Lively's original claims' as 'no longer necessary.' Hudson and Gottlieb added, 'Ms. Lively continues to allege emotional distress, as part of numerous other claims in her lawsuit, such as sexual harassment and retaliation, and massive additional compensatory damages on all of her claims.' As per the report, the court can decide to compel the actress to turn over the information on her mental health. It could also 'dismiss' the two claims with or without prejudice. Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni's lawsuit saga began in December 2024. The Age of Adaline star filed an official complaint accusing him of sexual harassment. Moreover, she claimed that Baldoni launched a campaign to 'destroy' her reputation. Originally reported by Arpita Adhya on The post 'Blake Lively Drops Lawsuit' Continues to Trend Despite Ongoing Case appeared first on Mandatory.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Beyoncé Reportedly Faces Struggle To Sell Hundreds Of Tickets Ahead Of Cowboy Carter Tour In The UK
Beyoncé is reportedly yet to sell out hundreds of tickets to her first UK "Cowboy Carter" show at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium tonight. The stadium, which holds around 62,000 people, is said to have more than 500 unsold seats ahead of the first of six scheduled performances in London. In April, reports surfaced suggesting that Beyoncé had significantly reduced ticket prices for certain shows in an attempt to boost sales. According to the Daily Mail, hundreds of seats remain unsold for Beyoncé's upcoming show at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium tonight. The renowned singer is currently in the UK as part of her Cowboy Carter tour, but she seemingly hasn't been able to draw the same numbers she did during her Renaissance World Tour in 2023. Reports suggest there are still over 500 tickets available, with the cheapest priced at £71 [$96] and premium seats going for up to £278 [$377]. Still, despite not pulling in the same numbers as before, many fans remain excited to see the singer perform and have been lining up outside the stadium since the early hours of the morning. Beyoncé is scheduled to perform in London for six nights, with each show taking place at the same 62,000-capacity venue she last visited during her previous tour. After her London dates, the singer will travel to Paris, where she is set to perform three shows at the iconic Stade de France. Much like the UK leg, the U.S. portion of Beyoncé's "Cowboy Carter" tour faced lower-than-expected ticket sales. At one point, speculation began circulating that ticket prices might be reduced to encourage more purchases. Several theories also emerged as to why the shows haven't sold out at the same rate as her record-breaking Renaissance tour. On one hand, fans voiced frustration over the higher ticket prices, which may have served as a major deterrent. Additionally, some concertgoers appeared to be less enthusiastic about the country-inspired "Cowboy Carter" material, which differs significantly from the songs on "Renaissance." However, perhaps most controversial is the speculation that Beyoncé's reduced ticket sales could be tied to her husband Jay-Z's past association with disgraced music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs. "Beyoncé isn't worried about her fans not supporting her, but some close to her are concerned about how casual listeners may have responded to the association with Diddy," a source said at the time, per the Daily Mail. "Beyoncé and Jay-Z see him as a thing of the past so it is irritating to some extent that being associated with him may have affected her ticket sales," the source added. Following the arrest of Diddy last year, an attorney named Tony Buzbee filed a civil sexual assault suit against the embattled rapper on behalf of a Jane Doe who remained anonymous throughout the case. The suit was later amended to include Jay-Z, with claims that the music mogul and Diddy took turns assaulting Jane Doe at an MTV Awards after-party in 2000. Jay-Z's inclusion led to several back-and-forths between the rapper's legal team, led by Alex Spiro, and Buzbee, with much of it occurring in the media. Jay-Z also vehemently denied the accusations, describing them as a blackmail attempt to extort money from him. Throughout the duration of the case, Beyoncé and her family remained united, even making several public appearances together. Ultimately, the case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice, according to court documents filed by Buzbee. Following the dismissal, sources close to the family said Beyoncé felt "relieved" by the outcome. "Relief is too simple a word to describe what Bey is feeling right now after Jay's current legal issues were dropped," an insider told the Daily Mail at the time. However, had the case progressed further and gone to trial, the source claimed that Beyoncé fully intended to continue supporting her husband in court. Blue Ivy has become a major part of the Cowboy Carter Tour experience due to her starring role as her mother's backup dancer. As she rises to stardom, her mother is making sure that she continues to stand out. Earlier in the year, the pop star received approval to trademark her daughter's name, which PR expert Grayce McCormick claimed "reflects her keen awareness of personal branding and legacy building." According to The U.S. Sun, the Lightfinder PR founder also hinted that Beyoncé bringing her daughter on her then-Renaissance World Tour was an act of introducing her into the "public consciousness as an emerging talent." Further reflecting on the trademark, McCormick said it will ensure that Blue Ivy's name cannot be used for "unauthorized purposes" that "could harm their reputation or exploit their identity." She added that it would also help the family to "build a consistent and authentic brand narrative" for Blue Ivy regardless of what endeavors she intends to use it for.
