&w=3840&q=100)
Is Putin using Trump to kill Nato?
Russia is counting on US President Donald Trump to render the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) meaningless.
Russia appears to have started laying the groundwork for Nato's demise with military deployment along its border with Finland — the nation joined Nato in 2023.
While the United States had been the driving force of Nato for generations, Trump has essentially withdrawn from the military alliance in his second term. On the campaign trail, he said that he would encourage Russia to invade Nato members and 'do whatever the hell they want' if they would not do his bidding.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As Trump remains not just non-committal to Nato but outright hostile, the alliance's basis of collective defence is under threat. It appears that Russia plans to needle Nato members in the coming years to erode the collective defence principle and render the alliance meaningless.
Russia ramps up military infra along Finland's border
In recent months, Russia has ramped up military infrastructure and deployment along the 830 mile-long (1,336.75 kilometers) border with Finland, according to satellite imagery obtained and analysed by The New York Times.
The imagery shows row after row of tents, new warehouses for military vehicles, beefed up shelters for fighter plane, and construction at a helicopter base.
Once the intense war with Ukraine ends or slows down, Russia could redeploy several thousands of soldiers along with heavy equipment along Finland's border to arm-twist Nato, according to analysts.
It looks like that Putin is preparing for war with NATO.
Russia is building up military forces near the border with Finland - constructing bases, bunkers, training grounds, and other military infrastructure in the area.
1/n pic.twitter.com/v3GUx4Zd50 — Roman Sheremeta 🇺🇸🇺🇦 (@rshereme) May 19, 2025
The Times reported Finnish government as saying that it has up to five years before Russia could amass forces across the border to threatening levels.
Other than the infrastructure described above, the satellite imagery also shows that Russia has also ramped up military presence and infrastructure in the general Arctic region near the border, according to the newspaper.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
ALSO READ: 3 years of Ukraine war: Zelenskyy stands cornered and betrayed as Trump mainstreams Putin
Russian helicopters have returned to a base near the Artic port city of Murmansk after more than two decades. Dozens of fighter planes have been deployed at the Olenya air base in the same region. Both of these bases are within 200 kms of the border with Finland.
Another base just 64 kms from Finnish border, at a place called Kamenka, has more than a hundred new tents, as per satellite imagery.
'They are expanding their brigades into divisions, which means that the units near our borders will grow significantly — by thousands,' Emil Kastehelmi, an analyst with the Black Bird Group told The Times.
Can Putin render Nato meaningless with such moves?
To be sure, analysts do not expect Vladimir Putin to make a move now when Russia is completely engaged in the war in Ukraine.
However, once the war ends in Ukraine or goes into a low-intensity mode, Russia is bound to turn its attention to its other neighbours.
Trump has made it clear that he is not interested in a peace deal that ends the war respectably for Ukraine or deters Russia from further military invasions of Europe. In fact, in a call with Putin on Monday, he endorsed the Russian position on the war and, in a blow to Ukraine and its European partners, gave up his own call for a 30-day ceasefire.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
It is not just on Ukraine that Trump and Putin are on the same page. They appear to be on the same page regarding Europe and the world at large too.
Putin invaded Ukraine out of his ideological commitment to the restoration of the sphere of influence that was lost with the fall of the Soviet Union. Trump believes in the same sphere of influence concept and the two leaders appear to have an understanding where Trump carves out his sphere in the Americas and Putin carves out his sphere in Europe. Hence Trump has abandoned Nato commitments in Europe and Putin is silent about US expansionism in Americas and Atlantic where Trump has announced he would annex Greenland island, Canada, and Panama Canal.
ALSO READ: In 100 days, Trump jolts settled ties and treaties to sow new global order
There are indications that European nations would hesitate to take military action against Russia without US support — even though the United Kingdom has been working on a 'coalition of the willing' to militarily support Ukraine, it has said it would not deploy soldiers to Ukraine without US support. Such US support would not be expected under Trump — or a successor who shares Trump's worldview.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
This would mean that Putin would need to mount incursions into smaller Nato members that share borders with Russia.
If these nations fail to respond on their own or fellow Nato nations fail to mobilise militarily to their defence under the collective defence principle, Nato would be essentially dead as there would be essentially no Nato without the collective defence principle, according to Jamie Metzl, a Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council who previously served in the White House National Security Council.
'If Putin gets anything resembling a victory in Ukraine, what he is going to do next is to needle a Nato member, such as Lithuania, and even if Russia goes just 50 feet inside Lithuania, the country is understandably going to invoke Article 5. If Nato fails to mobilise in Lithuania's support, then the collective defence principle of Nato would be dead and Putin would have defeated Nato with just a minor incursion with perhaps a small contingent of 'little green men' that he used in Crimea,' Metzl previously told Firstpost.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The build-up near Finland's border appears to be a preparation for such needling that threatens to render Nato meaningless.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
6 minutes ago
- First Post
Faulty math and accounting tricks: How much has DOGE inflated its savings numbers
Between February and July, DOGE's verifiable savings from cancelled contracts came to about $1.4 billion, far short of the $32.7 billion the agency claimed for that period. How did the numbers get so inflated? A man sprays paint graffiti against Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) on a Tesla showroom in New York, US, April 22, 2025, in this still image taken from video. Extinction Rebellion NYC via Reuters The Trump administration's flagship cost-cutting agency, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), says it has saved taxpayers more than $54 billion by tearing up federal contracts and taking a hard line on spending. A closer look at public data suggests those claims are greatly inflated. An analysis of federal spending records by POLITICO found that between February and July, DOGE's verifiable savings from cancelled contracts came to about $1.4 billion, far short of the $32.7 billion the agency claimed for that period. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even then, none of that money will reduce the federal deficit unless Congress takes back the funds. Under current law, most of it stays with the agencies, which must spend it. Counting credit limits as cash in hand DOGE uses the maximum possible value of each contract as its baseline for 'savings' — the ceiling value, not the amount actually committed. Contract experts say that approach is like canceling a credit card with a $20,000 limit and claiming you just saved $20,000. In many cases, these ceiling figures far exceed what the government was likely to spend. The White House insists DOGE's data is sound. Spokesman Harrison Fields said the figures are 'rigorously scrubbed' with agency officials and updated in real time. But POLITICO found that about 40 per cent of claimed savings from posted contracts could not be verified because DOGE withheld identifying details. Lowering the ceiling instead of closing the account In many cases, DOGE is not canceling contracts outright but lowering their ceiling values. That reduces the theoretical maximum cost, but it does not mean those dollars would have been spent. For the contracts that could be traced, ceiling reductions totaled about $14 billion— well below the $32.7 billion in claimed savings. Some cancelled contracts have even been restarted. At the Department of Veterans Affairs, DOGE claimed $932 million in savings from cancellations, including a suicide prevention services contract. Records show the VA recovered only $132 million, then reinstated the suicide prevention work. Headline figures vs. reality on the ground One of DOGE's largest single claims involves a migrant shelter contract in Pecos, Texas. DOGE said canceling it would save $2.9 billion. In reality, the maximum savings before the contract's scheduled review date in November would be about $126 million — roughly 4 per cent of DOGE's claim. The inflated number came from subtracting the $428 million actually obligated from the $3.3 billion ceiling. Another example is a consulting contract at the Energy Department to help set appliance efficiency standards. DOGE listed it as canceled, claiming $166 million in savings. The department says it was reduced, not cancelled, and that the real change was lowering the ceiling by just under $100 million. No funds have been returned. Hard to measure, harder to prove Experts note that true savings from canceling contracts are difficult to calculate. Terminations can trigger extra costs such as paying for work already done, settling leases, or covering subcontractors' expenses. Those bills can take years to finalise. By law, agencies must spend the money Congress gives them, even if a contract is canceled. They can shift it to other priorities but cannot simply leave it unspent without a formal rescission from Congress. A shrinking 'wall of receipts' DOGE's online 'wall of receipts,' a public log of terminated contracts, has seen slower updates since Elon Musk left the agency in May. The page went weeks without new entries this summer. Musk has since turned on Trump, criticising a spending bill the president signed in July and promising to launch his own third party to push for deeper cuts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For now, DOGE's lofty savings numbers remain a staple of administration talking points. But federal records suggest the truth lies somewhere in the middle, well below the headline figures and far above zero, with the real impact still years from being known.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump aims for Ukraine ceasefire at Alaska summit with Putin, says Macron
Speaking after the virtual meeting between Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, Macron said Trump was prioritising a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia AP Berlin French President Emmanuel Macron says US President Donald Trump was very clear in a meeting with European leaders that the US wants to achieve a ceasefire at the summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Speaking after the virtual meeting between Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders, Macron said Trump was prioritising a ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia. He added that Trump had been clear that territorial issues relating to Ukraine ... will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president. Following his meeting with the Russian leader, Trump will also seek a future trilateral meeting one involving Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy, Macron said. I think that's a very important point in this regard. And we hope that it can be held in Europe, in a neutral country that is acceptable to all parties, Macron said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hans India
6 minutes ago
- Hans India
Putin–Trump Meeting Set for Alaska, Former Russian Territory Sold to U.S. in 1867
Separated from the Asian continent by the narrow-cold Bering Strait where the two continents of Trump Putin meet is the United States' biggest state of Alaska. U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet in Alaska summit on Friday in a bid to find potential solutions to the Russia Ukraine war, now in its fourth year. Alaska itself used to be a part of Russia until the U.S. bought it in the 19th century. Putin is the first Russian head of Alaska history, which is across the strait from Russia. The move can be a symbolic, but a bitter one for Putin, who cherishes the lands once a part of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. Alaska was a mineral-rich and strategically important Russia diplomacy that the Russian Tsar sold in 1867 to the US for the rock-bottom price of $7.2 million, even at today's rate, a steal. In current dollars, $7.2 million would be about $160 million. But, at the time, this $7.2 million dollar deal was infamously described as 'Seward's Folly' after the US Secretary of State William H Seward who negotiated it. It was regarded as a frozen wasteland and fool's gold. Alaska is now one of the richest U.S. regions with its vast natural resources and geographic advantages. Russia sold Alaska to the U.S. more than 150 years ago, in 1867, but President Putin is due to arrive there to attend a headline-grabbing meeting with symbolic overtones. The location of the meeting itself has a symbolism. It gives Putin a way out of his geopolitical isolation from the West while meeting Trump in the part of the Americas closest to Eurasia. It is also, in some sense, nearer home for Putin. Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy utilized an X post to drive home how the Alaska Summit 2025 will serve as a linchpin to make progress on strategic objectives.
