
Google's Next Pixel Update—Apple's iPhone Falls Behind
Apple has some catching up to do.
Smartphones are now under threat from malicious text messages, attacks that come courtesy of China's organized criminal gangs. Whether its an unpaid toll or a DMV traffic offense or even an undelivered package, the threat is the same.
Google warns that these dangerous texts can be sent directly to your phone rather than via a mobile network, and that users should disable 2G networks to stay safe.
Those so-called SMS-blaster attacks trick your phone into connecting to a malicious device, thinking it's a legitimate cellular access point. That same kind of trickery can do more than just blast texts, it can actually intercept all traffic to and from the phone. You'll have heard of police use of so-called Stingrays — that's what this is.
Network defense at work.
Not only does Google enable 2G connections to be disabled where iPhone does not, but the Android-maker is now also launching a defense against these rogue cellular connections, warning when there's any unencrypted connection or when a network is repeatedly pinging a phone for its identifiers. Again, iPhone cannot do the same.
I've reported on this before, but with the release of Android 16 it's now imminent — with a catch. As Android Authority points out, 'it's unlikely that any current devices will be updated to support the notifications feature. We will most likely have to wait for upcoming devices that launch with Android 16, such as the Pixel 10 series.'
That's because this only works through an interface between the cellular modem and the phone's Android OS, and that's not expected to be available as an aftermarket upgrade. It also requires new modems capable of running the interface software. iPhones, by contrast, have to rely on filtering texts from unknown senders.
Network defense at work.
Android users with the right hardware — as and when it's available — should enable this protection. They should also disable 2G network connections and also enable Android 16's new Advanced Protection Mode, which — not be accident — disables 2G by default.
With the network defense and Advanced Protection Mode upgrades, Google is seriously raising the bar for Android users. Apple's iPhone is materially behind when it comes to network protection, albeit remains ahead when it comes to phone lockdowns, malware defenses, sandboxing apps and policing data harvesting permissions.
The gap between the two operating systems has never been narrower. A current Android phone with these protections enabled gives iPhone a run for its money for the first time. At least as regards external threats. You still need to be comfortable with Google's own tracking and data harvesting, and its expansive use of Gemini.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Bull Case for Apple: Is It a Sleeping Giant?
Apple's product concentration is both a risk and an opportunity. The tech company is exploring new categories with spatial computing and artificial intelligence. New product categories strengthen the flywheel effect of Apple's cohesive ecosystem of hardware, software, and services. 10 stocks we like better than Apple › Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) has underwhelmed investors this year. As of this writing, shares are down about 19% year to date. That compares with a gain of about 4% for the S&P 500 during the same time frame. The stock's underperformance has been driven by the company's disappointing growth. Apple's revenue in the first half of the year, for instance, grew just 4.4% year over year. With the tech company's total annual revenue hovering at around the $400 million level since 2022, there are some concerns that the iPhone maker may be nearing its maximum global sales potential. But before you count Apple out, consider the following unique bull case for the stock. It might change your mind. Apple's concentrated product line is primarily viewed as a risk for the company. For example, the fact that the iPhone accounts for about half of Apple's total sales means that any weakness in the key category will weigh heavily on the overall business. Adding to Apple's concentration risk, just three product categories -- iPhone, Mac, and iPad -- account for about two-thirds of the company's total annual sales. In addition, if you include the company's wearables, home, and accessories segment, primarily consisting of sales of Apple Watch and AirPods, in an assessment of Apple's product category concentration, just five product lines represent about three-fourths of total sales. The remaining sales come from Apple's services segment, which is diversified across a range of services, has a higher profit margin, and is more predictable than hardware sales. But if you flip the script, there's another way to look at this product concentration. Apple's powerful business model and its global and loyal customer base enable it to generate about $300 billion worth of product sales annually from just four product categories. Therefore, considering how much a single product category can move the needle for the company, a single successful new product would be a likely major tailwind for the company. Indeed, this is exactly what Apple did with AirPods and Apple Watch. Thanks to the launch of these iconic and wildly popular devices, starting with the Apple Watch in 2015 and the AirPods in 2016, the company's wearables, home, and accessories segment now represents more than 9% of total sales. And, looking further back, the company did the same thing with the iPad when it was launched in 2010. Today, the iPad represents 7% of total sales. All of this to say, the company's sales growth rates could materially accelerate if Apple sees success in a new product category. Strengthening this investment thesis for Apple even more, the analysis here arguably understates the impact of new product categories on the overall business. The reason is that every new product has a flywheel effect on other areas of the business, too. For instance, when a customer buys his or her first Apple Watch or iPad, it's likely to increase overall engagement with the Apple ecosystem, leading to higher services revenue, greater loyalty, and ultimately higher lifetime customer value. Today, Apple is already venturing into new product categories that could morph into major revenue streams in the future. The most notable one is the company's foray into spatial computing with Vision Pro. Launched just last year, these new goggles mark a new era of spatial computing, Apple CEO Tim Cook said just before deliveries of the new device started. While the new product is still considered a niche item that most customers pass on, it shows that the company is willing to explore new areas that could become the next iPad, Apple Watch, or AirPods for the company. In addition, investors shouldn't rule out Vision Pro specifically as a potential future catalyst. While it's not a major driver for the company today, future iterations of the device could lead to a tipping point in customer utility. With all of this said, Apple stock's price-to-earnings ratio of about 31 already seems to price in a return to higher growth rates at some point in the future. But this thesis at least helps strengthen the case for holding shares through this lull in growth. Still, the risks are significant. For instance, it's possible Apple's sales growth rates will never return to robust high-single-digit rates. An unfortunate outcome like this could be caused by weakness in one of the company's major product categories or simply a failure to gain traction in any new categories. But even with these risks in mind, the overall risk-reward profile seems attractive enough to hold onto shares. The fact that the company has been able to grow as much as it has over the past decade with just a handful of product categories suggests that Apple will likely find another new category over the next decade to help the company return to strong growth again. Before you buy stock in Apple, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Apple wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Daniel Sparks and his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. A Bull Case for Apple: Is It a Sleeping Giant? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Business Insider
32 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Apple really, really wants you to go see its 'F1' movie
An iPhone notification. A surprise Brad Pitt appearance at an Apple store. A fancy trailer that makes your iPhone rumble. Apple is going all out for its big-budget "F1" movie. If you own an iPhone or visited one of the company's retail stores recently, you've likely noticed the promotional push as the Apple synergy machine kicked into gear. Apple has pulled many of its levers across various channels to drum up excitement for its latest original film, "F1: The Movie," which arrived in theaters Friday. It's a marketing flex that few companies aside from Apple are capable of, since they don't have the massive built-in install base of the iPhone. Apple's strategy of continuing to make big-budget movies has some, including Business Insider's Peter Kafka, scratching their heads. The tech giant's marketing push around "F1," though, makes sense — Apple's got skin in the game for this movie. Not all of Apple's marketing tactics have gone smoothly, though. On Tuesday, some iPhone users took to social media to complain about a notification on their home screen that turned out to be an ad sent from the Wallet app tied to the movie. The promo offered $10 off two tickets to see "F1" when you purchase from Fandango using Apple Pay. Sure, you could easily dismiss the notification and move on with your day, but some compared it to Apple's free U2 album that it added to iPhone users' libraries. There have also been some pretty creative marketing efforts. If you have an iPhone, you can watch a special version of the "F1" trailer in the AppleTV app that activates the phone's haptic engines (basically fancy vibrations), so that your device rumbles along with the vehicles' engines. (You'll also be encouraged to buy tickets when you open the app.) Experience the new @F1Movie trailer on iPhone in a way only Apple can deliver. — Tim Cook (@tim_cook) June 11, 2025 And for even more immersion, Apple's Maps app allows you to virtually check out the famous tracks where "F1" was filmed. Then there was Apple's big annual Worldwide Developers Conference, which took place in the weeks leading up to the movie's release. Its Formula 1-themed intro featured Apple exec Craig Federighi driving laps on top of Apple's "spaceship" HQ. At one point, Tim Cook looks right at the camera and says, "Yes, F1, baby." In May, actor Damson Idris, who stars in the movie alongside Brad Pitt, walked the carpet of the Met Gala in an F1 driver's uniform and helmet before unveiling a suit underneath. He held on to his helmet as an accessory. Exactly how much Apple invested to make "F1" a reality isn't clear. Initial reports said that the movie cost around $300 million to make (not counting its marketing budget). However, producer Jerry Bruckheimer and director Joseph Kosinski said that wasn't the case in an interview with Deadline last year. In reality, Bruckheimer said, the estimate was "tens of millions of dollars out of whack." "We can't give you a number because that's Apple's money and they can talk about it," Bruckheimer said. "But what I think you can say is it's quite a bit lower than what's been reported." Apple did not immediately respond to a Business Insider's request for comment on the budget. Some of Apple's investments in movies have proven success in the past. AppleTV+ made a name for itself in the film industry with "CODA," a 2021 coming-of-age movie that went on to win Best Picture at the 2022 Academy Awards, making it the first film released by a streamer to win the top award at the Oscars. On June 15, people attending a panel discussion for another AppleTV+ offering, "Severance," were surprised when Brad Pitt came out to promote "F1." Tim Cook was there too, and he made sure to mention that the movie included footage filmed using the same camera technology you can buy in the latest iPhones.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Reddit will play an important role in the AI age, says COO
Content publishers such as Reddit (RDDT) are facing challenges as AI advances, with concerns that AI search will drive traffic away from the original sites. Reddit COO Jennifer Wong joins Yahoo Finance Executive Editor Brian Sozzi for an interview at Cannes Lions 2025 to discuss the company's investments in AI and its lawsuit against Anthropic. Reddit alleged the Amazon-backed (AMZN) startup scraped its users' personal data without their consent, then used the data to train its large language model Claude. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out Opening Bid here. Google is wreaking havoc on the publishing industry. Um I think of what they're doing with their AI snippets. It's really causing massive issues for media enterprises. What have the changes they have made, how is it, I guess, causing disruption at Reddit? I mean, search is under heavy construction right now, uh because there's this change that's happening with the introduction of LLMs and search generative results and Google has its own canyon to cross in bridging what's been the traditional UI to this new experience. Um, and everyone's feeling the volatility of that. Our corpus is obviously big and that's a source of traffic. But I think, you know, when I think about the long, if I just pull up and I think about the long term, I think that there is in the end, no AI or human or artificial intelligence without human intelligence. I think Reddit plays a really big role in that, both in broad-based search, whatever that looks like in the end, you know, maybe with summarization through LLMs, or the opportunity to have onsite search. I mean, Reddit, this is, you know, we are one of the few that has a really significant corpus that regenerates, you know, human opinion, real time that responds to everything happening in the world, that also creates an incredible opportunity for us to bring that experience, a unique experience onto Reddit. Now, uh, Reddit recently sued Anthropic for allegedly scraping your site. From the CEO perspective, how were you, how are you able to determine that they were allegedly doing that? Um, well, we know. I mean, we're able to see, uh, you know, what happens on our property. Um, but what I would say there is what's important to us is that, um, that we are able to protect our users privacy, their deletion rights. Like we have policies, um, that ensure that, you know, when users take down a post, like the post is taken down. And so it's really important, and as we said in our terms of service, that, you know, we have a conversation with folks who have access to our data because that's a commitment that we have in terms of our policies. Um, and it's also, you know, to know how Reddit data is used. And so that's what you see there just, you know, that's very important to us and we will, we will ensure that that's the case and that's very, very important to Reddit. Is the, is the best outcome that Anthropic would pay Reddit for your content or license it? I mean, I can't comment further on, on outcomes or, you know, what's happened. Reddit, the, you know, what's been filed publicly. Um but I will say that following our policies is incredibly important to us. As you look forward to, uh, on AI, how will AI show up throughout the platform? I know you're making a big push internationally, for example. Um, AI is an incredible tool for making our products better. Um, and it's, you see it throughout Reddit already today. Right? So our strategy is, you know, number one, improving that core community use case. Well, one of the things AI helps us do and helps moderators do is scale their moderation and help people post content more easily, help them follow and traverse the rules of communities, um, and help moderators moderate. That's incredible in terms of scale. In terms of growing internationally, as you know, Reddit is a lot of conversation and words, so AI allows us to machine translate global conversations into multiple languages and we're doing this today in French and German in fact and almost 12 different languages right now. And these are conversations that are about universal life experience, like parenting or pop culture, these things, um, uh, really apply and can be enjoyed globally where you take out the language friction. So that's a really exciting, you know, application. And then you see AI weaved into our advertising, you know, announcement yesterday just putting an LLM layer on top of the Reddit corpus creates insights for uh, businesses and brand marketers to understand, you know, where their opportunities are, what people think about their brands, where they can find communities to engage and grow their businesses. I think AI is unlocking just better and better product experiences. It'll make Reddit better and better. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data