logo
EXCLUSIVE The NATO island being turned into a floating fortress ready to repel a Russian invasion of Europe

EXCLUSIVE The NATO island being turned into a floating fortress ready to repel a Russian invasion of Europe

Daily Mail​04-06-2025
Europe's efforts to make ready its armed forces in anticipation of a major conflict with Moscow have broken new ground as the Russia-Ukraine war entered a new phase yesterday following a historic operation by Kyiv 's security service.
Ukraine on Sunday pulled off an unprecedented attack in which swarms of kamikaze drones emerged from strategically placed trucks to demolish dozens of military aircraft at four separate airbases across the Russian Federation.
The breathtaking offensive, codenamed 'Operation Spiderweb' by Ukraine's SBU security service and personally overseen by President Volodymyr Zelensky - was so devastating that Russian military bloggers termed the operation 'Russia's Pearl Harbor'.
Now, as a furious Vladimir Putin plots his response, European leaders and defence chiefs are working to ensure their militaries can meet any threat from Moscow head-on.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer today vowed to make the UK 'battle-ready' while committing to building 12 new nuclear-powered submarines and at least six new munitions factories as part of the government's Strategic Defence Review.
Elsewhere, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz last week declared that Berlin will finance the production of long-range missiles in Ukraine, shortly after pushing a €500 billion defence and infrastructure spending bill through parliament.
But nowhere is this drive for remilitarisation more apparent than Sweden 's island of Gotland - a 1,000-square-mile tourist hotspot in the Baltic Sea undergoing a rapid transformation into a floating fortress and a key NATO military outpost.
On a visit to Gotland late last month, Sweden's Chief of Defence Staff and Vice Supreme Commander Carl-Johan Edström told MailOnline about his vision for Gotland as a future NATO hub and first line of defence against Russian aggression.
He also warned that the transatlantic security alliance 'cannot take its eyes off Russia for the next 15 years' and said that Gotland must be ready to 'take a hit' from Moscow's forces and keep fighting.
The recognition that Europe must prepare for a clash with Moscow comes amid fears Vladimir Putin will seek revenge after the Russia-Ukraine war entered a new phase this weekend
The importance of Gotland's position is hard to overstate.
It sits just 120 miles from the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - all NATO members - and only 230 miles from Russia's heavily militarised Kaliningrad exclave.
With Sweden now part of the transatlantic security alliance, Gotland offers allied nations an ideal base from which to surveil and deter Russian air and naval threats over the Baltic Sea, and - in wartime - provide air cover for NATO troops engaged in Europe while striking Russian-held positions.
But after a near-total demilitarisation of the island prior to the Russia-Ukraine war, Sweden's military is in a race against time to reconstitute the island's fighting force and build the infrastructure required to support a major conflict.
'Gotland is such an important island and territory for the defence and deterrence of the whole area of responsibility for NATO,' Lieutenant General Edström told MailOnline.
'I see one big role as being the hub for NATO logistics from the West to the East.
'The second role is to be a platform where you can project power to actually control the sea-level communications and also the airspace over the Baltic Sea to create our own A2/AD (anti-access and area denial) bubble.
'And the third one, (Gotland) would be a perfect place also to build up offensive capabilities needed for deep strike, for example, to defend NATO allies (from a Russian attack)'.
Gotland's strategic value as both a logistics hub and a launchpad for strikes against Russian military assets in the event of an attack on Europe is not lost on other Western defence chiefs.
German General Carsten Breuer said a huge increase in production by Russia's military industrial base indicated that Moscow is preparing its stockpiles of weaponry and ammunition for a future clash with NATO, adding that Baltic states were at a particularly high risk of being attacked.
'The Baltic States are really exposed to the Russians, right? And once you are there, you really feel this... in the talks we are having over there,' he told the BBC.
He recounted that Estonian defence officials had used the analogy of being close to a wildfire where they 'feel the heat, see the flames and smell the smoke', but in Western Europe 'you probably see a little bit of smoke over the horizon and not more'.
Last week, David Petraeus, a respected former US general and CIA chief, said Russia could launch an incursion into the Baltic state of Lithuania to test Western resolve, or as a precursor to a wider offensive.
Zelensky claimed that this attack was one for the 'history books'
From de-militarisation to re-militarisation
During the Cold War, Gotland was home to thousands of soldiers as Stockholm took precautions in the face of a potential Soviet attack, despite Sweden's two-century-long policy of military neutrality.
Defence analysts termed the island Sweden's 'unsinkable aircraft carrier', such was its strategic value. But in the post-Soviet era, with geopolitical tensions easing and defence budgets tightening, Stockholm began a gradual wind-down.
By 2005, the island was almost entirely demilitarised - its garrisons decommissioned, equipment sold off and personnel withdrawn, save for a skeletal presence of Home Guard troops.
Russia's annexation of Crimea and the eruption of war in Eastern Ukraine came as a wake-up call for Swedish defence planners.
The idea of conventional war in Europe no longer seemed far-fetched, and Gotland - adrift in the Baltic Sea within striking distance of Kaliningrad - looked dangerously exposed.
In response, Stockholm performed an abrupt about-face. A 2015 defence bill called for a new mechanised battalion to be re-established on the island, and by 2018, the Gotland Regiment had been formally reactivated.
In 2020, the regiment assumed command over a scaled-down unit known as the 181st Armoured Battalion, and new conscripts began training on the island for the first time since the Cold War.
But Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent the remilitarisation process into overdrive - and prompted Sweden to break with its long held policy of neutrality by applying to join NATO.
Now, a full brigade combat team is in development.
By 2027, Sweden wants the capacity to station around 4,500 troops on the island to not only oversee its air defence and reconnaissance operations, but to hold off invaders in the event of an attack.
Sweden's Defence Forces spokesman Tomas Angshammer told MailOnline this force will include a mechanised battalion, an infantry battalion and a Home Guard battalion, backed by specialised units including signal, engineering, air defence, artillery and medical support.
An Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) platoon and a combat logistics hub are also planned, ensuring that Gotland can both defend itself and receive and sustain reinforcements in the event of a conflict with full operational capacity by 2030.
A 2015 defence bill called for a new mechanised battalion to be re-established on the island, and by 2018, the Gotland Regiment had been formally reactivated
To support this force, Sweden's Fortification Agency has launched a sweeping infrastructure programme.
New barracks and a medical facility were completed last year along with a mess hall, exercise and maintenance areas to support permanent troops and the training of new conscripts, whose number is increasing year on year.
Maintenance facilities for tanks and armoured vehicles are almost complete, and construction has begun on a state-of-the-art logistics centre and agency office, set for completion next year.
These developments will enable Gotland to function not just as a standalone garrison, but as a fully fledged forward operating base capable of hosting allied forces and acting as a central hub for the defence of the Baltics and NATO's Eastern flank.
Lt. Gen. Edström acknowledged that a huge amount of work remains before Gotland can field a fully operable fighting force while also hosting allied troops, but said the island's regiment had been 'doing a really great job' in preparations thus far.
'I really love this regiment because the infrastructure is brand new, but it takes time... It takes time to build a new infrastructure.
'From that perspective, we have some constraints when it comes to how many soldiers we can take and host at one step,' he said.
'But I would say Gotland as an island has been used to host big international exercises for years - all the units that are working here are comfortable working together with allies already.'
Russian designs on Gotland
Moscow is well aware of Gotland's strategic importance.
If the Kremlin were also to gain control of the island, it would leave Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania sandwiched between the Russian mainland to the East, Kaliningrad to the West and yet another strategic location to the North.
Not only would this isolate the Baltic States from the rest of their NATO allies, it would dramatically enhance Russia's air and maritime capabilities in the Baltic Sea to threaten the Nordics and Western Europe.
A Russian annexation of Gotland would also allow Moscow to reinforce and provide air cover to its forces should Putin decide to launch an attack on the Suwalki Gap.
This 40-mile stretch of sparsely populated land along the borders of Poland and Lithuania has long been seen as one of NATO's strategic vulnerabilities and the only thing preventing Moscow from connecting Kaliningrad with satellite state Belarus.
Prior to the launch of Gotland's remilitarisation programme, Russia conducted a widely condemned military drill which saw two Tu-22M3 nuclear bombers, along with an escort of Su-27 fighter jets, perform dummy bombing manoeuvres that brought their wings within just 24 miles of the island.
Sweden's accession to NATO last year prompted alarm bells to ring in Moscow, with officials and analysts warning that Russia's forces could not allow a full remilitarisation of Gotland.
Russia's Strategic Culture Foundation - a platform for defence and geopolitical analysis - last year claimed that Gotland would be the 'number one target' of Russian nuclear weapons in the event of a full-scale European war.
'Experts from the Russian Analytical Center for Strategic Nuclear Forces indicate that at the very beginning of such a conflict, Russian armed forces would launch a nuclear strike on Sweden in order to prevent NATO cruise missile strikes on ships of the Baltic and Northern Fleets,' the publication read.
'It would be better for Sweden to remain a neutral country and for the island of Gotland to remain a tourist mecca than to become the number one target for Russian nuclear missiles.'
Russian military analyst and retired Navy Captain Vasily Dandykin also told Russian newswire Sputnik: 'The size of this island makes it possible to put aviation, airfields, and naval bases... (to serve) the dream of both NATO bloc and the Americans to turn the Baltic Sea into a NATO sea. We understand what kind of threat this is.
'In any case, more intensive [Russian] exercises will take place in the Baltic. We have to understand that Finland too is already a NATO member. Therefore, our actions will be adequate – both from Kaliningrad, where the Baltic Fleet is based, and from the rest of Russia.'
Lt. Gen. Edström told reporters in Gotland: 'It's very important to understand that, although Russia is engaged in special operations that were war against Ukraine, they see themselves in a long-term conflict with the West.
'Even if the war in Ukraine - which I hope really soon will have a ceasefire or even a peace agreement - comes to an end, that doesn't mean that Russia will change their mind, they will stay in conflict with the West.
'That means that we can't take our eyes off Russia, for the foreseeable 10 or 15 years to come.'
Sweden's total defence concept
The rapid militarisation of Gotland is symptomatic of a wider push to prepare Sweden's armed forces and civil society for war.
Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said in January that Sweden was 'not at war... but there is not peace either', and urged Swedes to prepare themselves for every eventuality.
This effort, known as 'Total Defence Duty', is laid out in stark terms by the government.
'From the year you turn 16 until the end of the year you turn 70, you are part of Sweden's total defence and required to serve in the event of war or the threat of war,' a statement on the Swedish government's crisis information portal reads.
Lt. Gen. Edström told MailOnline that Sweden's military is already working closely with various public sector agencies and private companies to provide training and instruction to civilians.
'We are doing that all the time - that's ongoing work. We have divided Sweden into four military regions, plus Gotland as a fifth. These regions are working very closely with civil agencies, authorities, entities, and companies to strengthen the total defence concept.
'That means also sometimes to share plans between military and civilian units and do joint exercises. This is something we're working on closely at the moment - these are active efforts with real training, cooperation plans, and integration.'
He later told reporters: 'We are building a resilient island that can take a hit and continue to work on the civilian as well as on the military side.
'That is our goal: to continue to grow the resilience of the Swedish society and the total defence concept, but also specifically for Gotland's capability to take a hit and continue to work.'
As part of the total defence concept, the government has created the post of minister for civil defence to work alongside the armed forces minister, so civilians can be mobilised as well as the military.
In November, Sweden's Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) distributed five million pamphlets to residents urging them to prepare for the possibility of war.
The booklet named 'If Crisis or War Comes' contained information about how to prepare for emergencies such as war, natural disasters, cyber attacks and terrorism.
The government is investing in improving the emergency services' capacity to operate during conflicts, strengthening cybersecurity and replenishing medicine stocks.
And the MSB said last month it had begun a huge project to modernise the nation's nuclear shelters - a task it expected to take 'two to three years' - which includes efforts to upgrade filters which help protect occupants from chemical and radiological weapons.
With 64,000 bunkers sites spread across the country, Sweden already has more shelters than almost every other nation with space for around seven million people - more than two-thirds of its population.
The bunkers are designed to provide protection against shockwaves and bomb fragments, the blast and heatwaves from a nuclear weapon, radioactive fallout, gas from chemical weapons and biological weapons.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five key takeaways from Zelensky's talks with Donald Trump at the White House
Five key takeaways from Zelensky's talks with Donald Trump at the White House

Metro

time25 minutes ago

  • Metro

Five key takeaways from Zelensky's talks with Donald Trump at the White House

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US president Donald Trump welcomed Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and several European allies to the White House yesterday. Following Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin's summit in Alaska on Friday, in which no ceasefire was reached, the 'coalition of the willing' rallied around Ukraine and strengthened their calls for a solution. UK prime minister Keir Starmer joined Trump and Mr Zelensky alongside several other European leaders – and Sir Keir said 'real progress' had been made during the summit held yesterday afternoon. He described the talks as 'good and constructive', adding: 'There was a real sense of unity between the European leaders that were there, and president Trump and president Zelensky.' Trump also described the talks as 'very good', saying on his Truth Social platform that 'everyone is happy about the possibility of PEACE for Russia/Ukraine'. And president Zelensky said the talks were 'the best' so far, adding: 'We are very happy with the president that all the leaders are here and security in Ukraine depends on the United States and on you and on those leaders who are with us in our hearts.' But what did the talks actually achieve? During the meeting, Trump promised the US would be involved in providing security guarantees for Ukraine. Trump reiterated ahead of the meeting that he is still totally against Ukraine joining Nato – but Putin is reportedly open to allowing the US to provide Ukraine with Nato-like 'robust security guarantees'. Speaking at the weekend, US envoy Steve Witkoff said: 'We were able to win the following concession: that the United States could offer article five-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato.' Nato's Article Five is the principle that an attack on one member is considered an attack on them all – and Russia has long opposed Ukraine being accepted into Nato. The US president added: 'I think that the European nations are going to take a lot of the burden. We're going to help them, and we're going to make it very secure.' Trump told the meeting that he had spoken directly with Putin to start planning a meeting between him and Mr Zelensky. In fact, according to an EU diplomat, Trump interrupted the meeting to call the Russian president, Sky News reports. Sir Keir said after the meeting: 'The other material outcome was the agreement that there will now be a bilateral agreement between president Putin and president Zelensky, followed by a trilateral which will then add in president Trump. 'That is a recognition of the principle that on some of these issues, whether it's territory or the exchange of prisoners, or the very serious issue of the return of children, that is something where Ukraine must be at the table. 'These were the two outcomes that were the most important coming out of today. They're positive outcomes, there was a real sense of unity. We've made real progress today.' Speaking to Fox News after the Alaska summit, Trump suggested it could be 'up to Zelensky' to make peace with Russia. If Trump is able to set up a meeting between Putin and Mr Zelensky, it would be only the second time the two leaders have met face-to-face. They last met in 2019 at the Élysée Palace in Paris to try and negotiate a solution after Russia annexed Crimea illegally in 2014 and Russian-backed separatists started to take control of parts of Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Trump also said that 'if everything works out well today' he would organise a meeting between himself, Putin, and Mr Zelensky. Mr Zelensky was reportedly using the meeting to push for a trilateral meeting between himself, Trump and Putin after he was excluded from the Alaska summit. From the perspective of Mr Zelensky and other European leaders, the priority for yesterday's talks seemed to be that further negotiations and talks about Ukraine's future must include Ukraine's input. French president Emmanuel Macron said while a trilateral meeting is important, he also wanted a 'quadrilateral' summit to take place afterwards. It wasn't clear whether he wanted the fourth party in the meeting to be France, Nato, the EU, or the 'coalition of the willing' as a whole. Following Friday's Alaska summit, where the prospect of a ceasefire was not discussed, Trump said there doesn't need to be a ceasefire in Ukraine, as a peace deal could be worked out while the two countries are still at war. He commented: 'I don't think you need a ceasefire. You know, if you look at the six deals that I settled this year, they were all at war, I didn't do any ceasefires. 'I know that it might be good to have, but I can also understand, strategically, why one country or the other wouldn't want it. 'You have a ceasefire and they rebuild and rebuild and rebuild and maybe they don't want that.' German chancellor Friedrich Merz seemed to oppose this, telling media in the White House: 'I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that and let's try to put pressure on Russia.' Trump later pushed back, saying: 'So if we can do the ceasefire, great, and, if we don't do a ceasefire… many other points were given to us, many, many points were given to us, great points.' Trump repeatedly said before this meeting that a discussion about territory exchanges needed to be discussed. He said any exchanges would need to 'take into consideration the current line of contact', adding: 'That means the war zone, the war lines that are now, pretty obvious, very sad, actually, to look at them and negotiating positions.' It's understood that during the Alaska summit on Friday Putin demanded Ukraine hand over its Donetsk and Luhansk regions as a condition for ending the war – a move which Trump reportedly endorsed privately. In exchange, Russia would reportedly give up other Ukrainian territories held by its troops. More Trending However Mr Zelensky has repeated that he is not able to give up any of his country's territory – including Crimea, which was illegally annexed by Russia in 2014. Speaking in April about the possibility of ceding land, he simply said: 'There is nothing to talk about here. This is against our constitution.' Article two of Ukraine's constitution states that its sovereignty 'extends throughout its entire territory' which 'within its present border is indivisible and inviolable'. For any change to the country's borders to happen, the Ukrainian parliament must authorise a national referendum for its citizens to vote on. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Fact check: Donald Trump boasts he's ended 'six wars in six months' but has he? MORE: Zelensky tells Trump 'it's the best I had' after turning up in black suit with no tie MORE: Russian troops troll Zelensky by flying US flag on mission into Ukraine

Amanda Knox working with Monica Lewinsky on latest docudrama about her life
Amanda Knox working with Monica Lewinsky on latest docudrama about her life

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Amanda Knox working with Monica Lewinsky on latest docudrama about her life

Monica Lewinsky and Amanda Knox are collaborating on a new Hulu docudrama titled The Twisted Tale of Amanda Knox, which premieres on Wednesday. Both women serve as producers on the series, which explores Knox's relentless fight to prove her innocence and reclaim her freedom. Lewinsky stated she saw in Knox "another young woman who had suffered in the media, had been feasted on, on the world stage," highlighting their shared experience of intense public scrutiny. Knox was wrongfully imprisoned for four years in Italy after being convicted of the 2007 murder of her flatmate, Meredith Kercher, a conviction later overturned due to errors in the forensic investigation. Knox identifies with a group she calls "The Sisterhood," comprising women subjected to excessive media speculation, and has since advocated for others behind bars.

Government must stop children using VPNs to dodge age checks on porn sites, commissioner demands
Government must stop children using VPNs to dodge age checks on porn sites, commissioner demands

The Independent

time25 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Government must stop children using VPNs to dodge age checks on porn sites, commissioner demands

England's children's commissioner has demanded that the government stop children from using virtual private networks (VPNs) to get around age verification on porn sites. Calling for change, Dame Rachel de Souza warned it is "absolutely a loophole that needs closing" as she released a new report, which found the proportion of children saying they have seen pornography online has risen in the past two years, with most likely to have stumbled upon it accidentally. VPNs are tools that connect internet users to websites via remote servers, enabling them to hide their real IP address and location, which includes allowing them to look as if they are online but in another country. This means the Online Safety Act, which now forces platforms to check users' ages if attempting to access some adult content, can be dodged. After sites such as PornHub, Reddit and X introduced age verifcation requirements last month, VPNs became the most downloaded apps, according to the BBC. A government spokesperson told the broadcaster that there are no plans to ban VPNs as they are legal tools for adults. Dame Rachel told Newsnight: "Of course, we need age verification on VPNs – it's absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that's one of my major recommendations." She called on ministers to look at requiring VPNs 'to implement highly effective age assurances to stop underage users from accessing pornography'. More than half (58 per cent) of respondents to the commissioner's survey said that, as children, they had seen pornography involving strangulation, while 44 per cent reported seeing a depiction of rape – specifically someone who was asleep. Made up of responses from 1,020 people aged between 16 and 21 years old, the report also found that while children were on average aged 13 when they first saw pornography, more than a quarter (27 per cent) said they were 11, and some reported being aged 'six or younger'. The research suggested four in 10 respondents felt girls can be 'persuaded' to have sex even if they say no at first, and that young people who had watched pornography were more likely to think this way. The report, a follow-on from research by the Children's Commissioner's office in 2023, found a higher proportion (70 per cent) of people saying they had seen online pornography before turning 18, up from 64 per cent of respondents two years ago. Boys (73 per cent) were more likely than girls (65 per cent) to report seeing online pornography. A majority (59 per cent) of children and young people said they had seen pornography online by accident – a rise from 38 per cent in 2023. Dame Rachel said her research is evidence that harmful content is being presented to children through dangerous algorithms, rather than them seeking it out. She described the content young people are seeing as 'violent, extreme and degrading' and often illegal, and said her office's findings must be seen as a 'snapshot of what rock bottom looks like'. Dame Rachel said: 'This report must act as a line in the sand. The findings set out the extent to which the technology industry will need to change for their platforms to ever keep children safe. 'Take, for example, the vast number of children seeing pornography by accident. This tells us how much of the problem is about the design of platforms, algorithms and recommendation systems that put harmful content in front of children who never sought it out.' The research was done in May, ahead of new online safety measures coming into effect last month, including age checks to prevent children accessing pornography and other harmful content. A Department of Science, Innovation and Technology spokesperson told the BBC that "children have been left to grow up in a lawless online world for too long" and "the Online Safety Act is changing that'. However, responding to Dame Rachel's remarks on VPNs, they added that there are no plans to ban them, "but if platforms deliberately push workarounds like VPNs to children, they face tough enforcement and heavy fines'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store