CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews last night's TV: Are your neighbours Neanderthals? They really were 300,000 years ago
Ella Al-Shamahi, tracing the development of Homo sapiens across 300,000 years of prehistory in the first of a five-part series, Human, discovered two caves on the side of Mount Carmel in Israel.
In one, called Skhul cave, the remains of early modern humans similar to ourselves have been found. In the other, known as Tabun cave, Neanderthal fossils have been uncovered.
'We don't know if they interacted,' Dr Al-Shamahi said. 'But we do know that while Neanderthals remained in the region, all traces of this group of Homo sapiens vanished.'
It's pretty obvious the two families didn't get on. I'm guessing the Neanderthals left all kinds of rubbish strewn around their cave — half-eaten antelopes, bits of rubble, general detritus. Their kids probably ran around without any furs on, and on Saturday night, their teenagers stayed up till all hours banging rocks together.
This nightmare must have dragged on for years. The Homo sapiens tribe put their cave on the market, but no one was buying... so in the end, they gave up and left.
I'm speculating, of course, but that's the fun of ancient anthropology. Dr Al-Shamahi indulged in some guesswork herself, at another cave in Botswana, where a hoard of stone tools was discovered next to a rocky outcrop that resembled, in some lights, a snake.
The flints, she suggested, could have been 'offerings' — implying the snake was worshipped as a god. It seems perfectly feasible: no doubt, families of Homo sapiens across half the planet were praying, 'Dear Lord Snake, please smite the Neanderthals next-door, or at least get them to stop banging those bloody rocks together.'
Inevitably, much of the evidence about human evolution is based on fragments, with scientists building their theories from scattered finds and the odd bone. A handful of tiny shells with traces of red ochre was proof enough for Dr Al-Shamahi to suggest that people were wearing beads as jewellery, up to 70,000 years ago.
To help us envisage this, soft-focus scenes of our nomadic ancestors were shot against gorgeous sunsets and wild African landscapes. Much of this photography was absolutely sumptuous, with the human figures picked out in blurred silhouettes.
It was hard to see exactly what was going on, but the end credits listed an 'intimacy co-ordinator', so perhaps we should be grateful for the soft-focus.
BBC science shows can sometimes become overloaded with information, but this was well-paced, giving us a chance to enjoy the stunning pictures while mulling over what we'd just learned.
Though she has presented documentaries before, on the ancient Egyptians and other lost civilisations, this is Ella Al-Shamahi's first landmark series, and she handled it confidently: informative without being didactic, awed without being pretentious.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Plants make sounds animals can hear, say scientists
Plants make noises only non-human animals can hear, say scientists at Tel Aviv from the university have found the first evidence that animals like moths can hear noises coming from plants and may even react to those studying the behaviour of moths, the team discovered that female moths avoided laying their eggs on tomato plants if the plant made noises suggesting it was unwell or same team published research two years ago that suggested plants cry out when they are distressed or unhealthy. Animals react to sounds being made by plants, new research suggests, opening up the possibility that an invisible ecosystem might exist between are unable to hear the sounds plants make, but researchers believe plants can be heard by many insects, bats and some mammals."This is the first demonstration ever of an animal responding to sounds produced by a plant," said Professor Yossi Yovel of Tel Aviv scientists say that while plants are able to make noises that communicate how they're feeling, the plants themselves are not sentient – meaning they are not conscious and cannot sense or feel sounds are actually caused by physical changes in the plant. The researchers believe that animals may have coevolved with plants to understand the noises they make."Plants could evolve to make more sounds or louder ones if they were of benefit to it and the hearing of animals may evolve accordingly so they can take in this huge amount of information," says Professor Lilach Hadany."This is a vast, unexplored field - an entire world waiting to be discovered."
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
Animals react to secret sounds from plants, say scientists
Animals react to sounds being made by plants, new research suggests, opening up the possibility that an invisible ecosystem might exist between the first ever such evidence, a team at Tel Aviv University found that female moths avoided laying their eggs on tomato plants if they made noises they associated with distress, indicating that they may be team was the first to show two years ago that plants scream when they are distressed or sounds are outside the range of human hearing, but can be perceived by many insects, bats and some mammals. "This is the first demonstration ever of an animal responding to sounds produced by a plant," said Prof Yossi Yovel of Tel Aviv University."This is speculation at this stage, but it could be that all sorts of animals will make decisions based on the sounds they hear from plants, such as whether to pollinate or hide inside them or eat the plant."The researchers did a series of carefully controlled experiments to ensure that the moths were responding to the sound and not the appearance of the will now investigate the sounds different plants make and whether other species make decisions based on them, such as whether to pollinate or hide inside them or eat the plant."You can think that there could be many complicated interactions, and this is the first step," says Prof area of investigation is whether plants can pass information to each other through sound and act in response, such as conserving their water in drought conditions, according to Prof Lilach Hadany, also of Tel Aviv University."This is an exciting question," she told BBC News."If a plant is stressed the organism most concerned about it is other plants and they can respond in many ways." The researchers stress that plants are not sentient. They sounds are produced through physical effects caused by a change in their local conditions. What today's discovery shows is that these sounds can be useful to other animals, and possibly plants, able to perceive these that is the case, then plants and animals have coevolved the ability to produce and listen to the sounds for their mutual benefit, according to Prof Hadany."Plants could evolve to make more sounds or louder ones if they were of benefit to it and the hearing of animals may evolve accordingly so they can take in this huge amount of information."This is a vast, unexplored field - an entire world waiting to be discovered."In the experiment the researchers focused on female moths, which typically lay their eggs on tomato plants so that the larvae can feed on them once hatched. The assumption was that the moths seek the best possible site to lay their eggs - a healthy plant that can properly nourish the larvae. So, when the plant signals that it is dehydrated and under stress, the question was whether the moths would heed the warning and avoid laying eggs on it?The answer was that they didn't lay eggs, because of the sound the plants were research has been published in the journal eLife.
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
CHRISTOPHER STEVENS reviews last night's TV: Are your neighbours Neanderthals? They really were 300,000 years ago
Before the wheel, before language and art, before farming or anything else that made us civilised, mankind invented the Neighbours From Hell. Ella Al-Shamahi, tracing the development of Homo sapiens across 300,000 years of prehistory in the first of a five-part series, Human, discovered two caves on the side of Mount Carmel in Israel. In one, called Skhul cave, the remains of early modern humans similar to ourselves have been found. In the other, known as Tabun cave, Neanderthal fossils have been uncovered. 'We don't know if they interacted,' Dr Al-Shamahi said. 'But we do know that while Neanderthals remained in the region, all traces of this group of Homo sapiens vanished.' It's pretty obvious the two families didn't get on. I'm guessing the Neanderthals left all kinds of rubbish strewn around their cave — half-eaten antelopes, bits of rubble, general detritus. Their kids probably ran around without any furs on, and on Saturday night, their teenagers stayed up till all hours banging rocks together. This nightmare must have dragged on for years. The Homo sapiens tribe put their cave on the market, but no one was buying... so in the end, they gave up and left. I'm speculating, of course, but that's the fun of ancient anthropology. Dr Al-Shamahi indulged in some guesswork herself, at another cave in Botswana, where a hoard of stone tools was discovered next to a rocky outcrop that resembled, in some lights, a snake. The flints, she suggested, could have been 'offerings' — implying the snake was worshipped as a god. It seems perfectly feasible: no doubt, families of Homo sapiens across half the planet were praying, 'Dear Lord Snake, please smite the Neanderthals next-door, or at least get them to stop banging those bloody rocks together.' Inevitably, much of the evidence about human evolution is based on fragments, with scientists building their theories from scattered finds and the odd bone. A handful of tiny shells with traces of red ochre was proof enough for Dr Al-Shamahi to suggest that people were wearing beads as jewellery, up to 70,000 years ago. To help us envisage this, soft-focus scenes of our nomadic ancestors were shot against gorgeous sunsets and wild African landscapes. Much of this photography was absolutely sumptuous, with the human figures picked out in blurred silhouettes. It was hard to see exactly what was going on, but the end credits listed an 'intimacy co-ordinator', so perhaps we should be grateful for the soft-focus. BBC science shows can sometimes become overloaded with information, but this was well-paced, giving us a chance to enjoy the stunning pictures while mulling over what we'd just learned. Though she has presented documentaries before, on the ancient Egyptians and other lost civilisations, this is Ella Al-Shamahi's first landmark series, and she handled it confidently: informative without being didactic, awed without being pretentious.
