
Sales tax hike dumped in favor of 1% grocery tax by Naperville council
Councilman Benny White, who previously supported increasing the home rule sales tax to compensate for the $6.5 million loss in state grocery tax money, said he had a change of heart after concluding a hike in the sales tax would place a heavier burden on local business owners and those struggling to afford items like diapers and basic cleaning supplies.
'In my opinion, the grocery tax, by keeping it where it is … I think it doesn't affect our residents,' White said. 'I think they're used to paying that particular tax so to have our businesses pick up the slack, I'm struggling with that.'
The council had been scheduled to take a final vote on escalating the city's sales tax before a motion was made to swap it with the local grocery tax.
Last month, the council voted 5-4 to raise the city's sales tax by 0.25%, which it can do without voter approval because it is a home rule municipality. The tax increase would have applied to restaurant meals and store purchases, including clothing, electronics and personal care products.
By increasing the home rule sales tax, the city also would have been required to decrease the downtown food and beverage tax by the same percentage, per a city ordinance. Naperville's current downtown food and beverage tax is 1.75%.
Gov. JB Pritzker repealed Illinois' 1% grocery tax last year, saying it hit poorer families harder than others. However, because revenue from the tax goes directly to municipal governments rather than to the state government, towns were granted the ability to levy their own 1% tax on groceries by Oct. 1. Many communities in Illinois have already opted to implement a local grocery tax.
Finding a replacement for the state-wide grocery tax is crucial for Naperville, which collects $6.5 million annually from the income source.
Naperville Finance Director Raymond Munch said at a previous council meeting that the grocery tax and the home rule sales tax currently bring in about the same amount of revenue, but the local grocery tax is a more stable form of revenue.
The vote on reinstating the local grocery tax was 5-4, with Mayor Scott Wehrli and council members Josh McBroom, Nate Wilson and Allison Longenbaugh joining White in voting yes.
Council members Ian Holzhauer, Ashfaq Syed, Mary Gibson and Patrick Kelly voted against it.
Holzhauer reiterated the same points he made at last month's council meeting, emphasizing that a grocery tax combined with cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) under President Trump's tax bill could harm people who are already struggling.
City staff previously noted that SNAP recipients would not feel the effects of the grocery tax, but would see the impact of a home rule sales tax increase.
'There is only so far that we can push that social safety net before it breaks,' Holzhauer said. 'If we have the opportunity to take a vote to make food more affordable for people whose lives just got a lot harder, I think we need to do that.'
McBroom, however, argued that the volatility of the home rule sales tax could put people at risk by impacting essential city services should it bring in less money than expected.
'If we're worried about vulnerable people, vulnerable people need police, vulnerable people need fire departments to come to their neighborhood,' McBroom said. 'We are going to have an economic contraction at some point, and that's going to put a future city council in an impossible political position to raise property taxes to pay for our essential services.'
McBroom also serves as the liaison to the Naperville Financial Advisory Board, which voted 5-1 in May to recommend the adoption of the grocery tax over increasing the home rule sales tax.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Trump to join police, National Guard on D.C. patrol
1 of 3 | Members of the National Guard patrol as demonstrators hold signs in front of Union Station in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 14. President Donald Trump said he plans to patrol Washington with the Guard and D.C. Metro Police on Thursday. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo Aug. 21 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump said he will go out on patrol with Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police on Thursday night amid his federal crackdown on crime in the district. "I'm going to be going out tonight, I think, with the police and with the military, of course. So we're going to do a job," Trump told conservative radio host Todd Starnes on his show. "The National Guard is great. They've done a fantastic job." A senior White House official said that the details of the evening were still being worked out. White House officials said Thursday that there had been more than 600 arrests since federal officers were deployed in the city on Aug. 7. Of those, 251 were arrests of immigrants in the country illegally, the White House said. On Wednesday, Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth treated National Guard members to lunch at the city's Union Station. They were greeted with protests, which Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller derided. "We're going to ignore these stupid White hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old," The Hill reported Miller as saying. "And we're going to get back to the business of protecting the American people and the citizens of Washington, D.C." A Washington Post-Schar School poll of 604 District residents published Wednesday found 65% did not think Trump's actions would make the city safer. About 80% of residents said they opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
It's Not Tariffs, It's You: How Marketing Missteps and Tone-Deaf Collabs Are Crushing Brands
In the past, brand partnerships were seen as monumental cultural events—think 18th-century royals lending their names to luxury goods or icons like Babe Ruth fronting tobacco campaigns in the 1930s. They were rare moments that generated headlines and shaped consumer trends. Fast-forward to the digital age. Collaborations have become an industry in themselves, with influencers, celebrities and corporations teaming up on a near-constant basis. More from Sourcing Journal Wrangler and Coors Banquet Celebrate the Spirit of the West in New Collection Target CEO Cornell Resigns, but His Delivery and Fulfillment Investments Endure American Eagle's Foot Traffic Drops Amid Sydney Sweeney Controversy While that might sound like a win from a profit standpoint, oversaturating the market with high-profile campaigns has its downside, according to Dave Mayer, a senior partner at global brand consultancy Lippincott. 'Any collaboration is only as good as the benefit that it delivers to its customers. Initially, that's boosted by novelty (I mean, we are designed to seek new experiences for the dopamine hit and social recognition that comes from being early adopters),' Mayer told Sourcing Journal. 'However, as collabs become more common, the novelty wears off. At this stage, the underlying value proposition—meaning, the tangible benefits and relevance to consumers—becomes the primary factor determining their excitement.' Nowadays, brands are locked in an arms race to launch the hottest campaign with the flashiest star, hoping to grab attention and drive sales. But with collaborations dropping in a near-constant cycle, there's little time left for thoughtful curation, and that rush to stay relevant can make campaigns more prone to missteps or outright controversy. Take, for example, American Eagle's (AE) Fall 2025 campaign featuring 'Euphoria' star Sydney Sweeney. In one of the promotional videos for the campaign, Sweeney says, 'Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality and even eye color. My jeans are blue.' A voiceover then states, 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.' Almost immediately after the campaign went live, fans across social media tore apart the wording, posting comments like: 'This is what happens when you have no [people] of color in a room. Particularly in a time like this…this ad campaign got so caught up in this 'clever' play on words and this stunt the [people] in the room missed what was so blatantly obvious to anyone not White.' The backlash wasn't confined to just social media, though. According to AI-powered geospatial insights company Pass_by, AE's in-store traffic decline accelerated in the wake of the controversy. For the week of Aug. 3–9, visits were down 8.96 percent year-over-year, following a 3.9 percent drop the previous week. 'When a collaboration goes wrong, the cost is more than just wasted media spend. Trust erodes, acquisition costs climb and retargeting pools shrink,' Joseph Perello, founder and CEO of performance-based creator marketing platform Props, told Sourcing Journal. 'AE's Sydney Sweeney campaign shows a different risk. After decades out of the cultural spotlight, the brand staged a provocative return. Investors cheered, with AEO shares spiking nearly 24 percent,' he added. 'Yet the sales data told another story. Early analysis showed little impact on demand or in-store traffic. The campaign generated headlines, political commentary and trading frenzy, but not sustainable consumer behavior. It serves as a reminder that shock value may stir markets in the short term, but it rarely builds long-term brand equity.' AE hasn't cut ties with Sweeney, and in Perello's estimation, the campaign's unfortunate subtext could amount to a blip on consumers' radar. However, there are instances when brands' handling of collabs gone wrong could prove critical. If history is any guide, companies that cling too tightly to a controversial figure risk deeper financial fallout. Adidas learned that lesson in 2022 when it severed its nearly decade-long partnership with iconoclastic creative Kanye West following his antisemitic remarks. The breakup reportedly cost the sportswear giant around $247 million in lost sales. Other partners including Balenciaga and Gap quickly followed suit in severing ties, also suffering fiscal blows. Lost sales don't always stem from a poorly executed campaign or a celebrity scandal; they can also be driven by the players behind the brand itself. In 2024, Lululemon founder and former CEO Chip Wilson drew sharp criticism for controversial remarks about the company's customers and marketing direction. Wilson, who resigned in 2013 after infamously blaming a yoga pants recall on the size of women's thighs, resurfaced in a Forbes interview to slam Lululemon's diversity and inclusion efforts. He accused the brand of becoming 'like the Gap—everything to everybody,' and dismissed ads featuring models he claimed were 'not inspirational.' 'I think the definition of a brand is that you're not everything to everybody,' Wilson told Forbes. 'You've got to be clear that you don't want certain customers coming in.' While the company didn't suffer an immediate collapse in sales, its performance in the Americas showed signs of strain. Net revenue in the region grew just 4 percent in 2024 compared to the year prior, with comparable sales flat in the fourth quarter and down 1 percent for the full year, according to a Lululemon press release, suggesting a slowdown in what remains its most critical market. All in all, it was a relatively modest ding in sales for Lululemon. More recently, though, retail giant Target proved that the way a company represents its values can have bigger consequences. In 2024, the retailer—long praised for its Pride merchandising—reversed course, announcing it would sell Pride-themed apparel and home goods for adults only 'in select stores, based on historical sales performance.' It was a drastic shift for a chain that had featured such items widely across its U.S. locations for more than a decade. The move was compounded by fresh backlash this year after Target announced it was winding down certain diversity initiatives, saying it needed to 'stay in step with the evolving external landscape'—namely, the Trump administration's crackdown on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI)—while still claiming a commitment to 'inclusion' and 'belonging,' according to an internal memo from chief community impact and equity officer Kiera Fernandez. The consequences were swift. Coupled with mounting tariff pressures, Target acknowledged that customer boycotts tied to its DEI retreat had dented performance. Quarterly sales fell 2.8 percent to $23.85 billion, missing Wall Street's $24.23 billion expectations and down from $24.53 billion a year earlier. On Wednesday, following the company's earnings announcements, 11-year CEO Brian Cornell announced he would step down as the company works to steady itself amid ongoing backlash and wavering consumer loyalties. Amid the upheaval, Target and Ulta Beauty announced this week that they will not renew their shop-in-shop partnership once the current agreement concludes in August 2026, a move that's likely to dampen in-store traffic and weaken a program once touted as a key growth driver. 'The increasing polarization of values has made it more difficult for mass market brands to embrace collabs with other brands that may have characteristics that alienate a subset of their audience. This polarization—particularly along the conservative to liberal spectrum—has fractured collaboration opportunities into distinct pools where political values must align as a prerequisite,' Mayer said. 'So, a mass-market retailer like Target is largely limited to collaborating within a similar market space and cannot easily engage with brands strongly identified with either progressive or conservative ideologies without risking audience backlash,' the consultant added. Whether it's a tone-deaf executive or a poorly executed campaign, the bottom line is that consumers aren't rejecting collaborations altogether. But brands will pay the price for inauthenticity. Younger shoppers in particular want partnerships to stand for something bigger, whether that's innovation, sustainability, inclusivity or 'even just joy,' as Alexis Quintal, CEO and founder of Rosarium PR & Marketing Collective, put it. 'The real business value today lies in how intentional and authentic the partnership feels to the consumer,' Quintal told Sourcing Journal. 'When brands treat collaborations as short-term stunts or cash-grabs, fatigue can set in. But when they focus on shared values, storytelling and creating something consumers couldn't access otherwise, the return on investment (ROI) remains strong.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jack White Responds to Trump Official Calling Him a 'Washed-Up, Has-Been Loser'
Jack White, February 2025 (John Nacion/Variety via Getty Images) Jack White is a longtime critic of President Donald J. Trump and his administration, and the musician has even taken legal action against the politician and his campaign. The latest chapter in the saga of White vs. White House came earlier this week when the White Stripes rocker insulted Trump's redecoration of the Oval Office, saying that it now looks like 'a vulgar, gold leafed and gaudy, professional wrestler's dressing room.' The barb elicited a response from Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, who told The Daily Beast that White is 'a washed up, has-been loser posting drivel on social media because he clearly has ample time on his hands due to his stalled career.' Cheung further defended his boss' aesthetic choices, telling the outlet: 'It's apparent he's been masquerading as a real artist, because he fails to appreciate, and quite frankly disrespects, the splendor and significance of the Oval Office inside of 'The People's House.'' The war of words continued yesterday (August 20), with White sharing a lengthy statement against Trump and his administration on Instagram. White criticized Trump's 'blatant fascist manipulation of government, his gestapo ICE tactics, his racist remarks about Latinos, Native Americans, etc. his ridiculous 'wall' construction, his attacks on the disabled, his attempted coup and mob insurrection and destruction of the sacred halls of congress,' and plenty more. He went on to use Cheung's words against Trump, writing that the president 'is masquerading as a human being,' and 'masquerading as a christian, as a leader, as a person with actual empathy.' Several artists—including Margo Price and Michigander's Jason Singer—have supported White in the comments on his post. 'You hit a fuckin' nerve 'cuz they don't put out statements this length for earthquakes and shootings,' Patton Oswalt wrote. 'Keep going.' Cat Power's Chan Marshall added, 'LOVE YOU JACK❤️🔥.' Originally Appeared on Pitchfork