Several people arrested in Bali on drugs charges that could carry death penalty
The move comes after three British nationals accused of smuggling nearly a kilogram of cocaine into Indonesia were charged on Tuesday in a court on Bali.
Customs officers at Bali's Ngurah Rai International Airport arrested an Indian national with the initials HV, who was carrying a duffel bag, in the customs and excise inspection area on May 29.
The officers found narcotic-related items in his belongings, authorities said.
Following up on the interrogation of HV, later that day officers from the National Narcotics Agency of Bali Province arrested an Australian man with the initials PR, who has been visiting Bali since 1988.
PR asked HV to bring the duffel bag from Los Angeles to Bali, said I Made Sinar Subawa, an official from the narcotics agency, at a news conference.
During a search at a house where he stayed, officers found drugs in the form of hashish, a cannabis concentrate product, that belonged to PR and had been purchased over the Telegram messaging app.
The hashish was shipped from Los Angeles and Philippines before finally being received in Bali, Mr Subawa said. Officers seized 191 grams of hashish along with some candies consisting of tetrahydrocannabinol, and 488 grams of marijuana.
Both PR and HV are now suspected of dealing in narcotics, based on the evidence that was found with them, Mr Subawa said.
'PR is suspected of violating Indonesia's Narcotics Law which carries the death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a minimum of four years and a maximum of 12 years,' said Mr Subawa.
Along with HV and PR, the agency also arrested WM, an American, on May 23 while he was collecting a package from a post office in Bali.
An officer opened the package carried by WM and found seven pieces of silver packaging containing a total of 99 orange amphetamine pills and secured one white Apple iPhone.
The agency, at a news conference in the city of Denpasar on Thursday, presented the evidence, including marijuana and hashish, seized from the suspects.
All suspects will undergo legal proceedings in Indonesia, including trial and sentencing.
The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime says Indonesia is a major drug-smuggling hub despite having some of the strictest drug laws in the world, in part because international drug syndicates target its young population.
The south-east Asian country has extremely strict drug laws, and convicted smugglers can face severe penalties, including the possibility of execution by firing squad.
About 530 people, including 96 foreigners, are on death row in Indonesia, mostly for drug-related crimes, latest figures from the Ministry of Immigration and Corrections show.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
3 hours ago
- ITV News
Melania Trump threatens $1bn lawsuit over Hunter Biden's 'salacious' Epstein comments
Melania Trump has demanded that Hunter Biden retract comments linking her to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and threatened to sue him for over $1 billion in damages if he does not. Trump takes issue with two comments made by the son of former President Joe Biden in an interview this month with American journalist Andrew Callaghan. He alleged that Epstein introduced the first lady to her husband, President Donald statements are false, defamatory and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in a letter to Biden. Biden's remarks were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world, causing the first lady 'to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm,' he wrote. Biden made the Epstein comments during a sprawling interview in which he lashed out at 'elites' and others in the Democratic Party he says undermined his father before he dropped out of last year's presidential campaign.'Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep,' Biden said in one of the comments Trump disputes. Biden attributed the claim to author Michael Wolff, whom Trump disparaged in June as a 'Third Rate Reporter.' He has accused Wolff of making up stories to sell books. Asked in a subsequent interview on Callaghan's Channel 5 News YouTube channel if he would like to apologise, Biden bluntly responded: "F**k that. That's not going to happen." The first lady's threats echo a favoured strategy of her husband, who has aggressively used litigation to go after critics. Public figures like the Trumps face a high bar to succeed in a defamation president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modelling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in letter is dated August 6 and was first reported Wednesday by Fox News Lowell, a lawyer who has represented Biden in his criminal cases and to whom Brito's letter is addressed, has been contacted for comment.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
I fear visiting Britain to promote my book, when speaking freely can get you in trouble
'New Zealand woman … and 6-year-old son detained by US immigration,' blared a recent story in the New Zealand Herald. So far, so scary. It seems the woman went to the US based on her marriage to an American. They divorced before she adjusted her status to permanent resident. When she tried to get back into the US from a trip to Canada, she and her son were detained by US Customs and Border Protection. She reportedly applied to re-open her green-card application on the grounds that she was allegedly a survivor of domestic abuse. She may or may not have a case. But the bottom line is that this is a complicated immigration case that will work itself out in due course, not an innocent tourist mum being blocked by the American jackboots of Leftist imagination. A few weeks ago, I was invited on a podcast in New Zealand. The other guests were Stephen Young, a professor at Otago University whose 'areas of research involve the intersection of Indigenous peoples … drawing from critical and social theories,' and Zane Wedding, 'an activist who's been involved in recent pro-Gaza rallies'. They appeared to want me as a proxy pinata for President Trump's highly successful (though controversial) policies to control the southern border and deport aliens here illegally. The podcast's premise was that Kiwi academics were being hassled at US airports. 'A number of our universities are now advising academics to clean their social media profiles, travel with burner phones, and reconsider attending US conferences altogether,' they said. Their implication was that research would grind to a halt, tourism would dry out, and sundry other disasters would result from the alleged border crackdown. But when I researched the claims, practically nothing came up. Yes, a May 2025 article alarmingly said 'NZ travellers warned of increased detention risk at US border', and the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade's travel advice for the United States is set at level 2, 'exercise increased caution'. But the Ministry said that in the year to that point, '24 New Zealand passport holders have sought our assistance because they have experienced immigration difficulties in the US … Typically, we would see 14-25 cases per year.' No crisis there. Indeed, a government spokeswoman said that 169,000 New Zealanders had travelled to the US in the year to March 2025 – up from 168,000 for the same period a year earlier. The global Left is panicking about the US president or secretary of state using powers in immigration law to deny visas or entry to foreigners who endorse or espouse terrorism or undermine our national security or foreign policy. They seem to believe that the United States, uniquely among nations, is obliged to admit foreigners who rail against our system of government and capitalism, and advocate for radical foreign political causes. We don't. We have rules which visitors are asked to respect, or else they're not welcome. Meanwhile, the rest of the Anglosphere is policing speech not just about politics, but about statistical and biological truth. I worry more about free speech there than here. Armed with facts, I was easily able to counter the narrative that the US was a threat to free speech. In fact, I told the podcast hosts that I was more afraid of speaking in New Zealand – or Australia, Canada, and Great Britain, the rest of the 'Five Eyes' of English-speaking countries that share intelligence data. To promote my new book, The Ten Woke Commandments (You Must Not Obey), I will be speaking in the US and Europe. In the United States, our First Amendment protects my free speech. I'll go to the Five Eyes countries if invited, but with trepidation, because several of the woke commandments I urge readers to reject in the book appear to have become state-sanctioned truth in some of these countries. Deviation from that dogma, or adherence to factual truth that threatens some sub-group's subjective sense of safety, can result in cancellation, ostracisation – or, in some cases, legal trouble. In Australia, the case of Tickle v Giggle grinds on. It boils down to a website for women being sued by a biological male who wants access to the site. Commenting on the case might be risky – 'transgender vilification', defined as 'a public act that could incite hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule towards people who are transgender', is against the law in New South Wales. Kirralie Smith, head of the Australian group Binary, says she's had 'vilification' complaints against her 'for calling male soccer players 'male''. In my book, I discuss gender ideology in two chapters. I state the fact (not opinion) that mankind is a sexually dimorphous species with only two sexes. If one bloke in Scotland finds it offensive, could that be 'stirring up hatred' – an offence under their Hate Crime and Public Order Act? I'd hope not, but the fact the question even has to be asked is chilling to free expression. In the chapter titled 'You Will be 'Woke' to Imaginary Oppression', I use hard data to debunk myths about crime – who are the victims, and who are the perpetrators. In Britain, a data point in the debate about migration is the rate of crime by foreign compared to UK-born men. Whatever the true statistics are, they might cause someone offence – but that does not make them false. Facts are facts. Their purpose is not to vilify, but to inform policy. The Free Speech Union is fighting to protect ordinary Britons who state factual truths or express their opinions. The British Government, meanwhile, seems determined to crack down on negative views of mass migration if they are injudiciously expressed. In Canada, former PM Justin Trudeau's government suppressed free speech over Covid mandates and advocated an Online Harms Act that would create a new hate-crime offence with a maximum sentence of life in prison. His Liberal Party successor, Mark Carney, seems little better. And in New Zealand, they have a Human Rights Act under which using 'words which are threatening, abusive, or insulting' or 'inciting racial disharmony' are offences. Such laws naturally chill free speech, because the definitions and lines are rarely clear, absent court cases of which no one wants to be the guinea pig. The New Zealand Law Commission has been looking at extending the categories protected under the Human Rights Act to 'people who are transgender, people who are non-binary and people who have an innate variation of sex characteristics'. But while people with disorders of sexual development indubitably exist, the concepts of 'transgender' or 'non-binary' require a belief – that humans have a 'gender' which sometimes doesn't match their biological sex, and that human beings can exist without being of either sex. These are convictions of faith, not facts that can be proven or disproven empirically. Despite the panic from the Anglophone Left, the home of free speech remains the United States. It's in the rest of the ex-British Empire where it is in jeopardy. Simon Hankinson is a senior research fellow in The Heritage Foundation's Border Security and Immigration Center and author of The Ten Woke Commandments (You Must Not Obey) from Academica Books
STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
Melania Trump threatens $1bn lawsuit over Hunter Biden's Epstein comments
Melania Trump has demanded that Hunter Biden retract comments linking her to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and threatened to sue him for over $1 billion in damages if he does not. Trump takes issue with two comments made by the son of former President Joe Biden in an interview this month with American journalist Andrew Callaghan. He alleged that Epstein introduced the first lady to her husband, President Donald Trump. The statements are false, defamatory and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in a letter to Biden. Biden's remarks were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world, causing the first lady 'to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm,' he wrote. Biden made the Epstein comments during a sprawling interview in which he lashed out at 'elites' and others in the Democratic Party he says undermined his father before he dropped out of last year's presidential campaign. 'Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep,' Biden said in one of the comments Trump disputes. Biden attributed the claim to author Michael Wolff, whom Trump disparaged in June as a 'Third Rate Reporter.' He has accused Wolff of making up stories to sell books. Asked in a subsequent interview on Callaghan's Channel 5 News YouTube channel if he would like to apologise, Biden bluntly responded: 'F**k that. That's not going to happen.' The first lady's threats echo a favoured strategy of her husband, who has aggressively used litigation to go after critics. Public figures like the Trumps face a high bar to succeed in a defamation lawsuit. The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modelling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. The letter is dated August 6 and was first reported Wednesday by Fox News Digital. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer who has represented Biden in his criminal cases and to whom Brito's letter is addressed, has been contacted for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
