Former Romney adviser bankrolled by left-wing groups ripped for leading anti-DOGE charge: 'Paid puppet'
"Elon Musk is not actually a popular person, and the frame of politics that the DOGE crew is pushing is not an effective brand of politics," American Compass founder and chief economist Oren Cass told Politico in February.
Also in February, Cass wrote a piece for UnHerd, titled "Why DOGE will fail: There isn't an easy button for everything," where he argued that "DOGE is haphazardly cutting expenditures without even knowing what they are."
Cass has a long history of criticizing Musk, including last year when he took shots at Musk's personal character and said in a post on X that Musk's values are not aligned with the interests of the American people after the tech billionaire opened a factory in China.
In March 2024, Cass posted that Musk has "already committed to upholding core socialist values" to placate the Chinese Communist Party for financial gain.
Fox News Digital previously reported on Cass positioning himself as an ally of the Trump administration and that a significant chunk of American Compass' funding comes from a handful of foundations tied to liberal causes, including almost $2 million from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Omidyar Network, which is led by a founder described as "notable for funding liberal-in-conservative clothing groups that target former president Donald Trump and his supporters."
The Hewlett Foundation gave nearly $2 million, 44.1% of total funding, to American Compass from 2020-2023, including a startup grant, while Pierre Omidyar, of the Omidyar Network, gave $550,000, 11.3% of total funding, from 2020-2023.
Both the Hewlett Foundation and Omidyar Network have resisted the Trump administration.
Hewlett Foundation Director Of Economic And Society Initiative Jennifer Harris has been critical of Musk and DOGE's efforts on X, including riposting a criticism doubting that DOGE cuts would result in actual savings and sharing a post that said, "The Air Crashes Of The Past Two Days Show Us The Obvious: The Man In Charge Of @DOGE Runs Companies That No One Would Miss If They Disappeared Tomorrow. If Good Government Disappears, People Die."
The Atlantic posted a piece in February with the headline, "DOGE Is Failing on Its Own Terms." The bottom of that article stated, "Support for this project was provided by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation."
The Omidyar Network has been active behind the scenes pushing resistance against Musk and the Trump administration, the Washington Examiner reported in November, and has opposed Musk in various forms and previously backed corporate boycotts against Musk, the Washington Free Beacon reported.
Along with his criticism of DOGE, Cass has been a vocal opponent of another one of the Trump administration's top priorities, tax cuts.
Despite Cass offering some praise of Trump, he has been a longtime critic of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, calling them an "expensive failure" and saying Trumpism is facing an "inevitable expiration" and adding in September 2020 that Trump is "building no intellectual foundation, no institutional infrastructure and no policy agenda."
"Oren Cass is a former Romney staffer upset that Trump is cutting taxes and cutting government spending, DOGE shouldn't care about the political assessment of a man who just lost a local school board election," Mike Palicz, director of Americans for Tax Reform, told Fox News Digital.
David McIntosh, Club for Growth president, told Fox News Digital in a statement, "So American Compass opposes the Trump tax cuts, and now Elon Musk's work to cut federal government waste, it's almost like he's just a paid-puppet of the left – oh wait, he is."
After Trump's 2024 election victory, Cass continued to signal opposition to Trump's tax policy.
"Well, I think we have today a politics where both candidates go around talking about how they`re just going to cut everybody`s taxes," Cass told PBS on Nov. 10. "And, of course, everybody likes a tax cut. But I don`t think those are the things that are going to turn our economy in a much better direction."
During another interview earlier this year, Cass said one of the things he thought was "most encouraging" was that there are no "mini Trumps" and that he is "extremely encouraged" by the post-Trump-era Republican leaders he is seeing.
"American Compass advocates for limited government and a commitment to paying for the government that we have rather than leaving the bill to our children," Cass told Fox News Digital in November. "Anti-tax zealots can lobby for larger deficits if they want, but conservatives are under no obligation to follow them into the fiscal ditch."
In a statement to Fox News Digital, a Hewlett Foundation spokesperson said, "The Hewlett Foundation funds grantees across the ideological spectrum, including American Compass—specifically for its efforts to prioritize American prosperity and American workers."
Fox News Digital reached out to the Omidyar Network and American Compass for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
13 minutes ago
Trump says Smithsonian museums are too focused on 'how bad slavery was'
Pres. Trump's escalated attacks on the institution comes ahead of a White House review of the museums to ensure it aligns with the Trump's view of American history.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California's controversial parental rights bill
Amy Reichert had a few days notice to pack her bags and catch an early morning flight from San Diego to Sacramento. 'I just felt like I needed to be here physically,' she said. Reichert traveled to California to protest against Assembly Bill 495, or the Family Preparedness Plan Act, on Tuesday in front of the state Capitol. The bill is intended to aid migrant children of deported parents but the policy has a few holes, Reichert said. Proponents of the bill say it will help migrant parents, while opponents say it will strip parents of their rights to decide who cares for their children. The bill expands who is allowed to sign a caregiver's authorization affidavit, a legal form to give an adult authority over a child's schooling and healthcare decisions, allowing an adults to become a caregiver to a child without a requirement that parents sign the form. It also expands the definition of a caregiver to a relative or a nonrelative, which could include anyone, from a family friend to a teacher. The proposed bill relies on the caregiver's declaration and does not mandate any sort of background checks. What are critics saying? The mobilization efforts against the bill are growing. Among the people making opposed to the bill is Steve Hilton, a British-American political Republican commentator who is running for governor. In a video on X, he said the bill 'legalized kidnapping.' Critics, like Reichert, argue the bill will have negative consequences for American families and could lead to child exploitation. She hadn't seen any major red flags in an earlier version of the bill but then learned about the changes. 'There were more safeguards on it. Those safeguards were taken off and it was frightening because I do have a school aged child myself,' Reichert said. 'Remember — we all have different living situations," she said, adding that the bill could legally embolden one parent to make decisions without considering the other or going through the court system, should the couple be divorced or separated. Reichert, the founder of Restore San Diego, who also pushed for the reopening of schools and businesses in 2020, spoke to the Deseret News on her walk from the Hyatt Regency, where she attended a meeting to organize lobbying efforts against the bill, to the Capitol steps. She was tasked with leading people to Sen. Steve Padilla's office to ask him to vote against the bill, which passed the Assembly and is now being considered in the California State Senate. As Reichert arrived at the protest ahead of time, she switched to FaceTime, giving the Deseret News a peek into the scene on the ground. Live gospel music played in the background as hundreds of people held signs that said 'STOP AB 495″ and 'Don't Gamble with Child Safety,' as they stood scattered around the steps and the lawn waiting for the programming to begin. Legal precedent against AB 495 Will Estrada, the senior counsel at the Homeschool Legal Defense Association, who was also at the protest, chatted with the Deseret News ahead of attending and speaking at the rally. Estrada was at a hotel across the street, alongside a crowd of people with signs gathered in the atrium. 'As people have dug into this, they've realized that this is not just in an immigration context. This is a bill that really comes between the parent-child relationship,' he said. 'The family is the foundation of society,' Estrada said. Whether found in religious scriptures, from Jewish, Christian to Islamic, or Greek philosophy — most cultures are in agreement about this foundation, he said. The Supreme Court has protected this relationship for 102 years, he added. Beginning with Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) and Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925), the courts have asserted a child doesn't belong to the state. And 'just earlier this year, Mahmoud v. Taylor, the Supreme Court case regarding parental opt-outs of certain curriculum in the public schools,' reaffirmed parental rights as fundamental, as Estrada put it. He said he is optimistic California Gov. Gavin Newsom will listen to reason. He's a dad to four children himself, the legal counsel noted, adding, 'Parental rights are for everyone and the government should not come between that.' Proponents of the bill argue it will help ease disruptions for children when families are separated because of immigration issues. Parents facing tough situations, like sudden deportation because of their undocumented immigration status, are often faced with 'impossible choices,' Alliance for Children's Rights said in a statement. Incarceration, military service or illness are other reasons where such an affidavit comes into play. 'Some make the difficult choice to suspend their parental rights through the complicated probate guardianship process, others opt to use a caregiver's authorization affidavit for a more informal arrangement.' The statement noted these affidavits are already an existing route for caregivers who aren't the parent or legal guardian. This paperwork doesn't transfer over the custody of the child — a court order would still be required. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
India suspends cotton import duty in signal to US, relief for garment industry
By Nikunj Ohri and Manoj Kumar NEW DELHI (Reuters) -India has suspended an 11% import duty on cotton until September 30, in a move seen as a signal to Washington that New Delhi is willing to address U.S. concerns on agricultural tariffs, while also easing pressure on its garment industry. The temporary suspension, announced late on Monday, could benefit U.S. cotton growers and provide relief to India's apparel sector, which faces tariffs of nearly 60% on shipments to the United States from later this month. A planned visit by U.S. trade negotiators to New Delhi from August 25-29 has been called off, delaying talks on a proposed bilateral trade agreement and dashing hopes of relief from an additional 25% U.S. tariff on Indian goods from August 27. President Donald Trump earlier this month announced an extra tariff on Indian goods as punishment for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, doubling the total duty to 50% on U.S. imports of Indian goods from later this month. Indian exports had previously faced levies of 0-5%, with duties on some textiles ranging between 9% and 13% before Trump raised tariffs in April. The United States is the biggest market for India's garment exporters, who say steep tariffs are leading to order cancellations and making them uncompetitive against Bangladesh and Vietnam, which have U.S. duties of 20%, and China at 30%. India's labour-intensive sectors, including textiles, footwear, engineering goods and shrimp, have been jolted by U.S. tariffs, and are now seeking alternative markets. "The largest beneficiary of the duty free import will be the U.S., the second largest supplier to India," said Ajay Srivastava, founder of Global Trade Research Initiative, a New Delhi-based think tank, adding India already allows duty-free cotton imports from Australia within a quota. Cotton imports more than doubled to $1.2 billion in the 2024/25 fiscal year to March, from $579 million a year earlier, led by $258 million from Australia, $234 million from the United States, $181 million from Brazil and $116 million from Egypt, Srivastava said. The sharp rise in U.S. tariffs comes just as India was emerging as a stronger alternative for American garment buyers, with Bangladesh facing political uncertainty and companies seeking to diversify supply chains beyond China. Industry bodies such as the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) had urged the government to scrap the cotton import duty to help make the sector more competitive. Reuters earlier reported that some Indian exporters were scrambling to explore manufacturing options overseas to offset the impact of the higher tariffs. India's garment sector was already grappling with a labour crunch and limited production capacity. The prospect of exporters relocating production abroad poses a further challenge to the government's "Make in India" manufacturing drive. Industry officials now expect the government to extend duty-free cotton imports beyond September. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
