Chalmers ‘confused' about veteran MPs' super tax escape clause: Bragg
Liberal senator Andrew Bragg has accused Treasurer Jim Chalmers of not knowing how the government's new super tax will work after a senior Labor minister refused to say whether it was fair that some public officials would be able to delay paying their resultant tax bill.
Bragg, in a statement on Tuesday, said Chalmers had been unclear and confused about how the tax on super balances of more than $3 million would apply to the prime minister.
'Chalmers clearly hasn't read his unrealised gains tax bill and draft regulations,' he said. 'He doesn't know how it works for the prime minister and retired politicians.'
Pressure on the government's new tax on superannuation earnings has come from tax experts and investors who say the threshold should be indexed and the capturing of unrealised capital gains trashed. Chalmers himself has dismissed the calls.
The new tax, set to take effect on July 1, will double the tax rate for superannuation earnings from 15 per cent to 30 per cent for the portion above $3 million in a super balance. The tax rate will also apply to unrealised capital gains on amounts above this threshold.
Chalmers, at a press conference earlier this month, said he was unable to put an exact number on the amount of tax the prime minister would pay in the first year of his pension, but said there were provisions in the draft regulations for defined benefit schemes that would ensure the taxes were fair.
'When it comes to the prime minister, his pension's not yet known,' he said. 'There are calculations, [and] those calculations are very similar to the ones that the Liberals and Nationals put in when they changed superannuation in the last term of the government and will apply to the prime minister, [and] any politician who's got the equivalent of more than $3 million in super.'
Appearing on Nine's Today Show on Tuesday morning, Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth deflected a question on whether it was fair that some politicians elected before John Howard scrapped the scheme in 2004 could wait until retirement to pay the tax bill on their savings, while others caught by the tax – estimated to be just 1 in 200 people – would have to find the cash to pay immediately.
Rishworth, elected in 2007, will not get annual salary when she leaves parliament, but argued that all politicians would still have to pay the higher tax rate on earnings if their super balances tipped over the new threshold.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Liberal frontbencher James Paterson says Coalition should not have opposed Labor's ‘meagre' tax cuts before election
Senior opposition frontbencher James Paterson has conceded the Coalition's immediate objection to Labor's $5-a-week tax cuts contributed to the opposition's blistering election result, stating that party 'unity' was put before 'robustly interrogating policy ideas'. The $5-a-week tax cuts which come into effect from July 2026 were introduced by Jim Chalmers in the March federal budget. While the 'meagre' measures were criticised for being untargeted, they were passed through parliament just before Anthony Albanese called the election and are set to come into effect from July 2026. Speaking to Sky on Sunday, Senator Paterson conceded that the opposition should not have opposed the policy as it allowed Labor to claim that taxes would be higher under a Coalition. 'I don't think we should have opposed the government's tax cuts, as meagre and miserly as they were. In the core of the liberal party's DNA is lower taxes, and we should never oppose a tax cut,' he said. 'We should never allow the Labor Party as audacious a claim as it was to go to an election, to claim to be the party of lower taxes. The Liberal Party must always own the space of lower taxes, and under Ted O'Brien's role as Shadow Treasurer and me as shadow finance minister, that will be the case.' Although Senator Paterson declined to say whether he had personally advocated for further tax relief, stating he didn't want to go into 'private conversations' had by the leadership group, he said he personally believed lower taxes are a core Liberal value. Reflecting on the Coalition's thumping defeat that reduced its representation in the lower to house by 15 seats to 43, Senator Paterson also said that 'with the benefit of hindsight,' he believed the Coalition 'prized unity over robustly interrogating policy ideas'. 'I should have spoken up more. I should have pushed back more. I should have contested ideas more. I think all my colleagues in the parliamentary party have had that conclusion,' he said. 'Unity and discipline in politics is a critical feature of a successful political party, and we will need that in this parliamentary term, but it should never come at the expense of taking, of really contesting those ideas, of really robustly considering them, making sure that they are fit for public consumption, making sure that they contribute to the public, believing that we are ready to govern.' Party pollster Freshwater also failed to identify the Liberal's poor performance in key seats like Banks, Hughes, Menzies, Sturt and Deakin which were all lost to Labor, Senator Paterson added. He said that had the party been aware of the potential swings against the incumbent MPs, then opposition leader Peter Dutton would have spent more time campaigning in those vulnerable electorates. 'We particularly would have spent our resources differently, we wouldn't have had such an aggressive map going after safer Labor seats in the outer suburbs … had we known that we needed to be spending more to defend those seats of our own,' he said. 'You have to rely on polling for that kind of intelligence, and so that is a real problem, and I feel terribly sorry for my colleagues who are victims of that.' As it stands the Coalition holds 43 of the 150 seats in the Lower House. The Liberals are likely to gain the blue-ribbon Sydney seat of Bradfield. The initial count revealed that Liberal candidate Gisele Kapterian had won the seat by a whisper-thin eight votes, however the slim margin triggered an automatic recount, with teal independent Nicolette Boele yet to concede the vote.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth does not rule out portable leave and remote work penalty rates
The Albanese government has left the door open to allowing workers to receive penalty rates while working from home, as well as the possibility of a federal portable leave scheme. Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth did not rule out either possibility but told Sky News Sunday Agenda she was focused on delivering on election promises. The Albanese government has promised to legislate penalty rates, forcing employers to pay overtime for work performed outside of normal conditions The Australian Industry Group has brought forward the case that, under the clerks' award, some workers could get penalty rates while working from home. 'Let's be really clear, our commitment we made in the election was protecting penalty rates in awards, that is the safety net,' Ms Rishworth said. 'We are working through and consulting on the details but the principle is pretty clear, and that is we are going to protect penalty rates in the awards system. 'Because that is a safety net and of course enterprise bargaining is available to others.' She added that the government's plan to legislate penalty rate protections would not interfere with enterprise-level negotiations. Ms Rishworth also left the door open to introducing a federal portable leave scheme—a policy advocated for by unions such as the Australian Workers' Union. Portable leave would allow employees to carry entitlements like annual or long service leave across different jobs and employers. When asked whether she could rule out implementing the scheme during Labor's second term, Ms Rishworth responded that she would 'consider' different ideas put forward. She reiterated that her top priority was fulfilling Labor's existing promises, including legislating to protect penalty rates and supporting a rise in the minimum wage. The Fair Work Commission will announce its minimum wage decision on Tuesday 3 June 2025. Unions have asked for a 4.5 per cent increase, while employers want 2.6 per cent, roughly the rate of inflation. There is an expectation the increase will be around 3 per cent. 'We have put forward a submission that has called for an economically responsible real wage increase,' Ms Rishworth said. 'We don't want to see our minimum and award wage workers go backwards.'
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese holding firm on US push for 3 per cent defence spending ahead of meeting with President Trump
Sky News Sunday Agenda understands Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will not bow to US pressure to raise Australia's defence spending to three per cent of GDP. The move comes despite renewed calls from Washington and an upcoming high stakes meeting with US President Donald Trump. Instead, sources have said that Mr Albanese will stick with Labor's existing policy of increasing defence funding to 2.33 per cent of GDP by 2033. The government has left open the possibility of spending more than that, but maintains that additional funding will be based on strategic necessity, not pressure from the US. Meanwhile, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth met with Defence Minister Richard Marles at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore last week to discuss defence spending. 'Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' Mr Hegseth said in his keynote speech. 'China envies what we have together … but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing.' In response, Mr Marles appeared open to increasing defence spending, ahead of Mr Albanese and President Trump's first meeting. 'Clearly we have increased defence spending significantly, and that is acknowledged,' Mr Marles said in his own address. 'But we want to be making sure we are calibrating our defence spending to the strategic moment that we need to meet, so we are up for the conversation. 'The American position has been clear and its understandable, and that's a conversation that we will continue to have with the US.' However, Sky News Sunday Agenda understands Mr Albanese has no intention of shifting Labor's position on defence spending. Under the government's projections, defence spending is forecast to reach 2.33 per cent of GDP by 2033–34, up from about 2.05 per cent in 2025-26. Mr Albanese lashed out on Thursday at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) after it published a report criticising the government's funding trajectory. 'Seriously, they need to, I think, have a look at themselves as well and the way that they conduct themselves in debates,' Mr Albanese told ABC Radio. 'We've had a Defence Strategic Review. We've got considerable additional investment going into defence – $10 billion." ASPI Executive Director Justin Bassi defended the report, saying the government was failing to meet the urgency of the global threat landscape. 'ASPI was set up to deliver the hard truths to the government of the day,' Mr Bassi told Sky News. 'Unfortunately the world has these threats that do impact Australia and to counter these threats we need to, unfortunately, spend more money in the area." Mr Albanese's highly-anticipated meeting with US President Donald Trump appears likely to occur at the G7 Summit in Kananaskis from June 15 to 17, 2025.
