Construction plans for Africa's largest toll road stall as US firm faces major setback
Kenyan authorities rejected a proposal from US firm, Everstrong Capital for the Nairobi–Mombasa Expressway
The project was to be Africa's largest toll road but has been revised for practicality and feasibility.
Everstrong Capital is invited to restructure and resubmit its plans to meet existing standards.
According to the Kenya National Highways Authority (KeNHA), the bid fell short of several key benchmarks set by the Public Private Partnership (PPP) Committee, prompting officials to request that the company review and resubmit its plans rather than face outright disqualification.
The revision will see the original plan for a new expressway scrapped in favour of expanding the existing Nairobi–Mombasa highway.
With this change in scope, the development effectively signals the end of what had been set to become Africa's largest toll road and one of the most ambitious US-backed infrastructure projects on the continent.
Kenyan authorities downplay proposal
The decision comes just two months after Everstrong Capital, led by Senior Advisor Kyle McCarter, submitted a 2,300-page feasibility study report to KeNHA for review.
'The PPP Committee of the National Treasury and Economic Planning delivered its decision during its 54th Ordinary PPP Committee meeting held on July 2, 2025, ' KeNHA stated.
'It was determined that the proposal does not meet the relevant criteria and should be abandoned per Section 43(11)(c) of the PPP Act, 2021.'
While the current proposal has been rejected, KeNHA has invited Everstrong Capital to restructure the project to meet the required standards, specifically by focusing on upgrading the existing highway rather than building an entirely new road.
The proposed expressway, aimed at easing traffic congestion, reducing travel time between Kenya's capital and its main port city, and boosting trade along the Northern Corridor, has been a priority project for Nairobi for several years.
The revised proposal may be resubmitted for fresh consideration by the PPP Committee in accordance with Section 43 of the PPP Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
20 minutes ago
- CBS News
Zelenskyy on Trump-Putin summit: "Talks about us, without us, will not work" for Ukraine
Russia has signaled to the U.S. that it may be willing to end the war in Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told reporters Tuesday. "We had a call with President Trump and with some European leaders. During the call, there was a signal from Mr. Witkoff, who was also on the call, that Russia is ready to end the war — ready for a first step, at least, toward a ceasefire," Zelenskyy said, referencing U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff. "And that this is the first such signal from them." However, Zelenskyy also warned that "talks about us, without us, will not work," ahead of President Trump's one-on-one summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska scheduled for Friday. The call involving Zelenskyy, Mr. Trump and Witkoff took place last week, a spokesperson for Zelenskyy's office told CBS News Tuesday. While Zelenskyy said "everyone on the call" was encouraged by what was viewed as a "shift" in Russia's position, the Ukrainian leader said Ukraine will not, under any circumstances, withdraw its forces from the Russian-occupied Donbas region in the east of Ukraine. "Our territories are illegally occupied. For the Russians, Donbas is a springboard for a future new offensive. If we leave Donbas of our own accord or under pressure, we will invite a third war," Zelenskyy said. The summit between Mr. Trump and Putin is the first in-person meeting between Putin and a sitting U.S. president since Russia invaded Ukraine. It was described as "a listening exercise for the president," by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt Tuesday. "Only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present, and so this is for the president to go and to get, again, a more firm and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end," Leavitt said. It is widely expected that Putin will demand that Ukrainian forces withdraw from all parts of Ukraine's Donbas region —parts of which Russian forces held since the country's 2014 annexation of the Crimean peninsula. Following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the area under Russian occupation has increased, though Ukrainian forces do currently hold territory in parts of Donetsk, a province located within the Donbas. Ahead of Mr. Trump's meeting with Putin, a spokesperson for Zelenskyy's office has confirmed to CBS News that he will attend a virtual meeting Wednesday with Mr. Trump and European leaders to discuss the war. Speaking to reporters in the White House briefing room Monday, Mr. Trump expressed optimism that his meeting with Putin will be "constructive," and said that he is planning to establish an in-person meeting involving Putin and Zelenskyy. "The next meeting will be with Zelenskyy and Putin or Zelenskyy and Putin and me," Mr. Trump said. Two sources familiar with those negotiations told CBS News Tuesday that the U.S. is working on a site for a Trump-Putin-Zelenskyy meeting as soon as the end of next week. But Zelenskyy was adamant in his remarks Tuesday that no such meeting should take place without the involvement of European leaders. "The presence of Europe in one form or another is very important, because ultimately, so far, no one but Europe has provided us with security guarantees," he said. As for Mr. Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska, Zelenskyy said that the meeting would only benefit one person— the Russian leader. "I believe that Putin will benefit from this, because what he is seeking, frankly, is photographs. He needs a photo from a meeting with President Trump," Zelenskyy said. "Ukrainian issues should be discussed by at least three parties."Jennifer Jacobs contributed to this report.
WIRED
22 minutes ago
- WIRED
AOL Will Shut Down Dial-Up Internet Access in September
Benj Edwards, Ars Technica Aug 12, 2025 6:55 PM The move will pinch users in rural or remote areas not yet served by broadband infrastructure or satellite internet. Around 175,000 households still use dial-up internet in the US. A logo for America Online photographed in the early 2000s, when the company provided internet access for millions of people over phone lines. Photograph:After decades of connecting US subscribers to its online service and the internet through telephone lines, AOL recently announced it is finally shutting down its dial-up modem service on September 30, 2025. The announcement marks the end of a technology that served as the primary gateway to the web for millions of users throughout the 1990s and early 2000s. AOL confirmed the shutdown date in a help message to customers: "AOL routinely evaluates its products and services and has decided to discontinue Dial-up Internet. This service will no longer be available in AOL plans." Along with the dial-up service, AOL announced it will retire its AOL Dialer software and AOL Shield browser on the same date. The dialer software managed the connection process between computers and AOL's network, while Shield was a web browser optimized for slower connections and older operating systems. AOL's dial-up service launched as "America Online" in 1991 as a closed commercial online service, with dial-up roots extending back to Quantum Link for Commodore computers in 1985. However, AOL didn't provide actual internet access yet: The ability to browse the web, access newsgroups, or use services like gopher launched in 1994. Before then, AOL users could only access content hosted on AOL's own servers. When AOL finally opened its gates to the internet in 1994, websites were measured in kilobytes, images were small and compressed, and video was essentially impossible. The AOL service grew alongside the web itself, peaking at over 25 million subscribers in the early 2000s before broadband adoption accelerated its decline. According to 2022 US Census data, approximately 175,000 American households still connect to the internet through dial-up services. These users typically live in rural areas where broadband infrastructure doesn't exist or remains prohibitively expensive to install. For these users, the alternatives are limited. Satellite internet now serves between 2 million and 3 million US subscribers split between various services, offering speeds far exceeding dial-up but often with data caps and higher latency. Traditional broadband through DSL, cable, or fiber-optic connections serves the vast majority of US internet users but requires infrastructure investments that don't always make economic sense in sparsely populated areas. The persistence of dial-up highlights the ongoing digital divide in the United States. While urban users enjoy gigabit fiber connections, some rural residents still rely on the same technology that powered the internet of 1995. Even basic tasks like loading a modern webpage—designed with the assumption of broadband speeds—can take minutes over a dial-up connection, or sometimes it doesn't work at all. The gap between dial-up and modern internet connections is staggering. A typical dial-up connection delivered 0.056 megabits per second, while today's average fiber connection provides 500 Mbps—nearly 9,000 times faster. To put this in perspective, downloading a single high-resolution photo that loads instantly on broadband would take several minutes on dial-up. A movie that streams in real time on Netflix would require days of downloading. But for millions of Americans who lived through the dial-up era, these statistics tell only part of the story. The Sound of the Early Internet For those who came online before broadband, dial-up meant a specific ritual: clicking the dial button, hearing your modem dial a local access number, then listening to the distinctive handshake sequence—a cacophony of static, beeps, and hissing that indicated your computer was negotiating a connection with AOL's servers. Once connected, users paid by the hour or through monthly plans that offered limited hours of access. The technology worked by converting digital data into audio signals that traveled over standard telephone lines, originally designed in the 19th century for voice calls. This meant users couldn't receive phone calls while online, leading to countless family disputes over internet time. The fastest consumer modems topped out at 56 kilobits per second under ideal conditions. AOL didn't invent dial-up internet access, but the company perfected the art of making it accessible to non-technical users. Where competitors required users to understand concepts like PPP settings and TCP/IP configurations, AOL provided a single software package that handled everything. Users just needed to insert one of the billions of CD-ROMs the company mailed out, install the software, and click 'Connect.' The company's cultural impact extended far beyond mere connectivity. AOL Instant Messenger introduced many users to real-time digital communication. Chat rooms created some of the internet's first social networks. The famous "You've Got Mail" notification became so iconic that it was a title for a 1998 romantic comedy. For better or worse, AOL keywords trained a generation to navigate the web through corporate-curated portals rather than open searching. Over the years, Ars Technica documented numerous dial-up developments and disasters that plagued AOL users. In 2015, 83-year-old Ron Dorff received phone bills totaling $24,298.93 after his AOL modem started dialing a long-distance number instead of a local access point—a problem that had plagued users since at least 2002, when New York's attorney general received more than 50 complaints about similar billing disasters. The financial risks weren't limited to technical mishaps: AOL itself contributed to user frustration by repeatedly adjusting its pricing strategy. In 2006, the company raised dial-up rates to $25.90 per month—the same price as broadband—in an attempt to push users toward faster connections. This followed years of subscriber losses that saw AOL's user base fall over time as the company struggled with conflicting strategies that included launching a $10 Netscape-branded service in 2003 while maintaining premium pricing for its main offering. The Infrastructure That Remains AOL's shutdown doesn't mean dial-up is completely dead. Several niche providers like NetZero, Juno, and Dialup 4 Less continue to offer dial-up services, particularly in areas where it remains the only option. In the past, some maintained dial-up connections as a backup connection for emergencies, though many still use it for specific tasks that don't require high bandwidth, like processing credit card payments. The Public Switched Telephone Network that carries dial-up signals still exists, though telephone companies increasingly route calls through modern packet-switched networks rather than traditional circuit-switched systems. As long as traditional phone service exists, dial-up remains technically possible—just increasingly impractical as the web grows more demanding. For AOL, maintaining dial-up service likely became more about serving a dwindling but dependent user base than generating meaningful revenue. The infrastructure requirements, customer support needs, and technical maintenance for such a legacy system eventually outweigh the benefits. The September 30 shutdown date gives remaining dial-up users just over one month now to find alternative internet access—a challenge for those in areas where alternatives don't exist. Some may switch to satellite or cellular services despite higher costs. Others may lose internet access entirely, further widening the digital divide that dial-up, for all its limitations, helped bridge for three decades. This story originally appeared on Ars Technica.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
State Department human rights report scaled back, omits details on abuses in politically allied countries
The US State Department on Tuesday released a pared-down version of its annual report meant to catalogue human rights concerns in countries around the world. The report covers the 2024 calendar year – before the Trump administration took office – and sources told CNN it was largely completed before the US president began his second term. However, it underwent significant revisions in the subsequent months. There were notable changes between the previous report released April 2024 – covering 2023 – and the one released Tuesday. For some countries like El Salvador whose leaders are political allies of the Trump administration, there was far less criticism and detail about reports of their human rights abuses. In traditionally allied countries like Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, the latest report alleged a deteriorating human rights situation in 2024, noting that 'significant human rights issues included credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression.' Trump administration officials have lambasted European nations with allegations of free speech backsliding. Asked about the perception that the State Department watered down reports for countries that work closely with the administration, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said, 'obviously, President Trump is someone who has been working with a lot of countries' and said the reports should be viewed 'as an indication of our point of view in general, that there's no country that is singled out for condemnation or singled out for praise.' Breaking with precedent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not provide a written introduction to the report nor did he make remarks about it. The latest report was stripped of many of the specific sections included in past reports, including reporting on alleged abuses based on sexual orientation, violence toward women, corruption in government, systemic racial or ethnic violence, or denial of a fair public trial. Some country reports, including for Afghanistan, do address human rights abuses against women. 'We were asked to edit down the human rights reports to the bare minimum of what was statutorily required,' said Michael Honigstein, the former director of African Affairs at the State Department's Bureau of Human Rights, Democracy and Labor. He and his office helped compile the initial reports. The report itself acknowledges that it was adjusted, saying the country reports 'were streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, and to be more responsive to the underlying legislative mandate and aligned to the administration's executive orders.' 'We minimize the amount of statistical data in the report. In the age of the internet, the underlying data are generally available,' an appendix to the latest report said. 'For purposes of focus and streamlining, the reports select illustrative examples of alleged abuses and in most instances follow up only on high-profile unresolved allegations from previous years,' it said. A senior State Department official said that 'US policy on promoting respect for human rights around the globe, or in any particular country has not changed.' The release of the report comes after significant changes were made to the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor – which housed the teams that prepare the annual, congressionally-mandated reports. Many of the staff who worked on the reports, including drafts of the ones released Tuesday, were fired last month. The bureau's focus has been shifted to 'advancing the Administration's affirmative vision of American and Western values.' The report on El Salvador, where the US deported Venezuelan migrants earlier this year, is much shorter than the one released last year. The latest one claims 'there were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses' in 2024. However, it notes that 'there were several reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings during the year' and that some suspects arrested under suspicion of gang affiliation 'died in prison prior to conviction or completing their sentences.' The report from the previous year – which was four times as long – describes 'significant human rights.' These included 'credible reports of: unlawful or arbitrary killings; enforced disappearance; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by security forces; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; extensive gender-based violence, including domestic and sexual violence, and femicide; substantial barriers to sexual and reproductive health services access; trafficking in persons, including forced labor; and crimes involving violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons.' Asked about the change to the El Salvador report, Bruce said she would not speak 'from country to country' and referred people to the report itself. The report on Israel includes a far less extensive documentation of reports of human rights abuses, leaving out any reference to 'significant human rights issues,' which is in the 2023 report. The latest report mentions Hamas and Hezbollah only in a very sparse section about reports of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Last year's report, however, noted allegations of 'extensive and in many cases unprecedented conflict-related abuses' and war crimes committed not only by Hamas, but also Israel, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other Palestinian militant groups. There is no reference to allegations of torture of Palestinian detainees by Israeli government officials – which were included in the previous year's report, but the report says that the Israel Security Agency and police 'used violent interrogation methods.' There is also no mention of the criminal trial of Prime Minister Netanyahu on charges of bribetaking, fraud and breach of trust, which were ongoing at the time. The latest country report on Afghanistan is also far shorter than last year's. However, it still describes reports of 'significant human rights issues' and 'widespread disregard for the rule of law and official impunity for those responsible for human rights abuses.' The report notes a 'significant deterioration in respect for women's rights' in 2024 due to edicts 'effectively removing them from public spaces.' Despite such findings, the Trump administration sought to end Temporary Protected Status for Afghans in the US, citing 'notable improvements in the security and economic situation' in Afghanistan. The latest report on Russia, while lengthier than others, was still shorter than the one released last year. It points to the death of Aleksey Navalny in a Russian prison in February 2024, noting the prison is 'known for harsh conditions and alleged torture.' It also cites vast human rights abuses inside Russia, including extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances perpetrated by government authorities. But the report does not include a full section on corruption, which was described as 'widespread throughout the executive branch' in last year's report. The report also says there were credible reports that some Russian forces committed war crimes and crimes against humanity as they continued their invasion of Ukraine. 'Russia's forces and officials committed crimes against humanity, including but not limited to deporting thousands of civilians to Russia, including children. The government operated an extensive system of filtration and detention operations that sometimes included the use of forced labor,' the report says. Not all of the reports were drastically changed from last year. The latest country report on China is very similar. It notes that genocide and crimes against humanity occurred against predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and members of other ethnic and religious minority groups in Xinjiang, the report says. It also concludes that the Chinese government did 'not take credible steps or action to identify or punish officials who committed human rights abuses' in 2024, which mirrors the findings from the previous year's report. This story has been updated with additional developments.
