logo
Study Finds Direct Link Between Ultra-Processed Foods and Chronic Diseases

Study Finds Direct Link Between Ultra-Processed Foods and Chronic Diseases

Health Line17-07-2025
A new report states that ultra-processed foods are a major contributing factor to the obesity epidemic.
Researchers say these foods are designed to be palatable, causing people to overeat and gain weight.
Experts say the health risks from obesity range from heart disease to type 2 diabetes to sleep apnea.
A new report has concluded that ultra-processed foods are a driving force behind the obesity epidemic as well as a major cause of chronic conditions.
The findings, published in the journal Nature Reviews Endocrinology, were a summary by scientists of existing research on the potential connection between obesity and the advent of ultra-processed foods.
The researchers reported that there is strong evidence that ultra-processed foods promote overeating and increase the risk of obesity.
They said the additives and preservatives in ultra-processed foods such as chips, pre-cooked meals, and cookies can cause excessive energy intake, disrupt the digestive system, and affect the brain's ability to tell a person they have had enough to eat.
They add that ultra-processed foods can alter the way the body absorbs food as well as the gut microbiota's composition and function.
The researchers urged government leaders to take action to improve the food environment by enacting measures such as package labeling and marketing restrictions.
Experts not involved in the study say this research review is important.
'This confirms what we know that ultra-processed foods are a detriment to the body,' said Mir Ali, MD, a general surgeon, bariatric surgeon, and the medical director of MemorialCare Surgical Weight Loss Center at Orange Coast Medical Center in California.
'Research on UPFs [ultra-processed foods] is accumulating at lightning speed,' added Laura Schmidt, PhD, a professor in the School of Medicine at the University of California San Francisco. 'I like this review because it summarizes the latest evidence and puts it all in one place.'
How ultra-processed foods affect your health
David Cutler, MD, a family medicine physician at Providence Saint John's Health Center in California, noted that the origins of ultra-processed foods had some benefits for society. Cutler wasn't involved in the new study.
He notes that 150 years ago in the United States, there was widespread malnutrition and vitamin deficiency as well as disease from foods not properly preserved.
Cutler said the preservatives and additives put in food more than a century ago increased their shelf life and bolstered their nutrient value.
However, he noted, in recent decades ultra-processed foods have gone overboard with these scientific advances.
'The risks are now greater than the benefits we thought we got when we added these things to ultra-processed foods,' Cutler told Healthline.
Ali notes that ultra-processed foods tend to be calorie rich and nutrient poor. They are also designed to be tasty, which can cause people to overeat.
Travis Masterson, PhD, a professor of health promotion and disease prevention at Pennsylvania State University and a member of the communications committee at The Obesity Society, said it's not just the amount of ultra-processed foods that are consumed, it's also what's in them. Masterson wasn't involved in the new study.
In particular, he notes something called energy density.
'Energy density is how many calories can be packed into a food,' Masterson told Healthline. 'There is a pretty close relationship between how unhealthy a diet is and the energy density of a food.'
'Many ultra-processed foods tend to be high in energy because they strip out things like water and fiber to increase shelf stability and improve texture while also upping the levels of fat and sugar present,' he explained.
Ultra-processed foods and chronic disease risk
Past research has reported on the variety of health issues linked to ultra-processed foods.
A study published in April stated that ultra-processed foods may be tied to more than 120,000 preventable deaths in the United States every year.
A 2023 study found that ultra-processed food consumption increased the risk of heart disease, cancer, and diabetes.
In addition, a 2024 study suggested a potential connection between these foods and cognitive decline.
Experts say the damage goes beyond simple weight gain and the resulting chronic conditions.
Ali said ultra-processed foods can increase cardiovascular risks due to their preservatives. Schmidt added that the health effects can get down to the cellular level.
'UPFs also harm the gut microbiome by starving the 'healthy bacteria' of fiber and introducing chemical additives that eat away at the intestinal lining designed to seal off the gut,' she explained to Healthline. 'This means that bacteria in the gut can get into the bloodstream, causing chronic inflammation throughout the body — a risk factor for many chronic diseases.'
'Finally, the high levels of sugar, fat, and salt in UPFs (which are added to make them irresistible) have their own health effects that increase the risk of chronic diseases,' Schmidt said.
'The harms of UPF are multifaceted, but this study and others point to things like additives, emulsifiers, sweeteners, sodium, texture, and potentially additive properties,' noted Kristin Kirkpatrick, RD, the president of KAK Consulting and a dietitian at the Cleveland Clinic Department of Wellness & Preventive Medicine in Ohio. Kirkpatrick wasn't involved in the new study.
'The other component of concern is the fact that these foods are often hard to stop eating so hopes of portion control may not be as realistic when compared to whole foods,' she told Healthline. 'In addition to these items, UPFs often substitute and take the place of healthy, nutrient dense foods in a dietary pattern which could increase even further the risk of chronic conditions.'
How obesity impacts health
New research found that obesity-related cancers tripled in the past two decades. The preliminary findings, which have not been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, were presented on July 13 at ENDO 2025, the Endocrine Society's annual meeting in San Francisco, CA.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than 41.9% of adults in the United States are considered obese.
Now, a new measurement for obesity developed by researchers could raise that figure to more than half of U.S. adults. The European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) recently redefined obesity to include anthropometric measures beyond body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities, but this framework has not yet been validated.
What's more, over 9% of U.S. adults are described as having severe obesity, according to the CDC.
Among the health risks associated with obesity are:
type 2 diabetes
heart disease
stroke
high blood pressure
sleep apnea
liver disease
certain cancers
pregnancy complications
'Obesity affects every organ in the body,' said Ali.
Kirkpatrick said belly fat is particularly worrisome.
'Belly fat is active, close to organs, and inflammatory, so the risk of increased belly fat will ultimately increase the risk of metabolic disorders (diabetes, high lipids, etc.) and other chronic conditions,' she explained.
How to reduce ultra-processed foods in your diet
Experts say it can be difficult to cut back on the amount of ultra-processed foods you eat.
For starters, they dominate grocery store shelves. Examples of ultra-processed foods include:
sweetened breakfast cereals
soda
white bread
flavored granola bars
flavored potato chips
In addition, experts say, the preservatives in these foods make them easy to store as well as easy to prepare.
Then, there's the taste. Additives can make these foods difficult to resist.
'They're designed to be highly palatable,' Ali told Healthline.
'There are a variety of factors that make the foods tasty, soft, and calorie dense and this likely messes with how fast we eat, how we process foods both in the gut, and how rewarding these foods are,' added Masterson. 'Then there are a variety of factors that reinforce the consumption of these foods like convenience, availability, and aggressive food marketing.'
Cutler said reading labels can provide important information. He added that it's also helpful to spend more time shopping on the outer edges of the store, where fruits, vegetables, and fresh meat are displayed, and less time in the center of the store, where packaged food resides.
'Try to eat foods that are in their more natural state,' he said.
Masterson said cooking at home using basic ingredients is one way to improve your diet, although it's not always easy to do.
'Not everyone has time or the correct equipment to cook, but cooking is a great skill to invest into, no matter your situation,' he said.
Masterson added that better food choices can also help. Strategies include eating a banana instead of a snack bar or using whole grain bread instead of white bread.
Kirkpatrick advises clients to try to reduce ultra-processed foods in steps rather than eliminating them all at once.
'First look at frequency. For example, if you love a fast-food burger, then limiting consumption to once a month can make a big difference in protecting health,' she said.
'If every meal and snack is UPFs, then working with a dietitian to find substitutions, tools for cooking, and healthier grocery shopping may all help,' Kirkpatrick said. 'UPFs may have additive qualities, so eliminating them cold turkey may be harder than it sounds.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alcohol and Pancreatic Cancer: New Evidence About Risk
Alcohol and Pancreatic Cancer: New Evidence About Risk

Medscape

time3 hours ago

  • Medscape

Alcohol and Pancreatic Cancer: New Evidence About Risk

Does drinking alcohol increase the risk for pancreatic cancer? Researchers have long suspected it does, but the evidence has remained inconsistent. Now, a global study of more than two million people is firming up the case that a link exists. The study, which pooled data from 30 prospective cohorts, found that daily alcohol intake was associated with a 'modest' increased risk for pancreatic cancer in both women and men, regardless of smoking status. However, the extent of the risk depended somewhat on how the researchers modeled alcohol intake. One model, which mapped continuous increases in alcohol consumption, suggested there is no safe dose of alcohol — any amount can increase the risk for pancreatic cancer, though only by 3% for every additional 10 g of alcohol per day or about two thirds of a standard drink. The other model, which compared risk by alcohol volume categories, found that the risk does not become significant until a certain alcohol threshold — about two to three drinks per day for men and one to two for women. Still, overall, 'our findings provide new evidence that pancreatic cancer may be another cancer type associated with alcohol consumption, a connection that has been underestimated until now,' the study's senior author Pietro Ferrari, PhD, head of the Nutrition and Metabolism Branch at International Agency for Research on Cancer, said in a statement. The co-author Jeanine Genkinger, PhD, MHS, had a stronger take on the findings. 'I think this shows that alcohol use is a robust risk factor for pancreatic cancer,' said Genkinger, associate professor, epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York City, noting that even more moderate drinking levels— no more than one drink for women and two for men — might be enough to boost pancreatic cancer risk. How Much of a Risk? The latest data, published in PLoS Medicine, come at a time of increased attention to the alcohol-cancer link. Earlier this year, then-US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, MD, issued an advisory calling for cancer warnings to be added to alcohol labels. Major cancer organizations have determined alcohol to be an established risk factor for seven cancer types : those of the oral cavity, larynx, pharynx, esophagus, liver, breast, and colon/rectum. Despite the strong suspicion that drinking alcohol also contributes to pancreatic cancer risk, this aggressive cancer has not yet made the official list. The major reason is that the evidence surrounding an alcohol-pancreatic cancer link has been deemed 'inconsistent,' 'suggestive,' and 'inconclusive' by expert panels. Studies have been hampered by difficulties separating alcohol use from smoking — a known risk factor for pancreatic cancer — as well as varying findings by alcohol type and geographic location. In addition, certain studies highlighting a link have indicated that any association between alcohol and pancreatic cancer is driven only by more extreme drinking habits — more than four drinks a day, and sometimes as high as nine drinks. The latest analysis, Genkinger said, helps clarify uncertainty surrounding the alcohol-pancreatic cancer link, which is especially important for 'a disease where we don't have that many modifiable risk factors.' The findings are based on cohorts spanning four continents, all part of the Pooling Project of Prospective Studies of Diet and Cancer. Just under 2.5 million cancer-free participants were recruited between 1980 and 2013 (median age, 57 years), of whom 70% were alcohol drinkers, 47% were never-smokers, and 64% were alcohol drinkers and never smokers. Most study participants were from North America (60%), followed by Europe or Australia (32%) and Asia (8%). Alcohol intake was modeled in two ways: continuously for every 10 g/d increase and by volume threshold, using 0.1 to < 5 g/d as the reference for nondrinkers. For context, in the US, the amount of alcohol in a standard drink is defined as 14 g of pure alcohol — equivalent to a 12-ounce can of regular beer, a 5-ounce glass of wine, or a 1.5-ounce shot glass of distilled spirits. Over a median of 16 years, the researchers observed 10,067 incidents of pancreatic cancers. In the continuous model, the risk for pancreatic cancer rose by 3% for every additional 10 g of alcohol consumed per day (hazard ratio [HR],1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04). This association remained consistent and significant among women and men (HR, 1.03 for both), current smokers (HR, 1.03), former smokers (HR, 1.02), and never-smokers (HR, 1.03), and across cohorts from Australia, Europe, and North America (HR, 1.03 for all), though not Asia (HR, 1.00). The research team also found evidence that the type of alcohol mattered: Alcohol from beer and liquor/spirits was associated with a significantly increased risk for pancreatic cancer (HR, 1.02 and 1.04, respectively) but alcohol from wine was not (HR, 1.00). This finding is in line with some previous studies suggesting that wine may have a different relationship with cancer risk compared with other alcoholic beverages. But Genkinger pointed out, this finding could 'reflect the ways in which people tend to drink different types of alcohol.' Wine, she noted, is often part of a meal, and people who favor wine may be less likely to binge drink than those who typically choose other types of alcohol. This study, however, did not survey participants about specific drinking patterns, including binge-drinking. In the threshold model, however, the increased risk only became significant once alcohol intake reached a certain level. For women, drinking one to two standard drinks per day raised their risk for pancreatic cancer by 12% compared with little to no drinking. For men, the threshold was a little higher: Consuming two to four drinks a day was associated with a 15% increase in risk, whereas drinking more than that was tied to a 36% greater risk. Overall, this research contributes to the growing body of evidence that pancreatic cancer should be added to the official alcohol-cancer risk list, according to Alison Klein, PhD, MHS, professor of oncology, pathology, and epidemiology, at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, who was not involved in the research. Having the Conversation The recent Surgeon General's advisory encouraged clinicians to inform their patients that drinking is a cancer risk factor — something unknown to most Americans, according to recent survey findings. 'I think this study is a good reminder to all of us to talk to our patients about their alcohol use,' said Edward Thomas Lewis III, MD, an addiction psychiatrist and clinical assistant professor at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. Providers can take opportunities for those discussions during routine care, such as when prescribing a medication that can interact with alcohol or when a patient's health condition, such as high blood pressure or heart disease, can be exacerbated by drinking. 'I think these are opportunities to really remind people about moderation,' Lewis said, 'and to talk about some of the individual risk factors that may cause someone to make changes related to their drinking.' It's also possible that drinking might interact with certain genetic variants to modify pancreatic cancer risk — an avenue Klein and colleagues are exploring. What's challenging, Lewis said, is advising patients on what level of drinking is 'Okay,' given that even lower levels of alcohol consumption — around one to two drinks per day — may carry some risk. 'There is no zero-risk alcohol use,' Lewis said. But, he added, people do not necessarily have to abstain to see benefits, either. 'So it may be that a patient, at the end of the day, is able to reduce their alcohol consumption by two or three standard drinks over a given week. That still has a positive net effect,' he said. Another challenge is patients often don't know what a 'standard drink' looks like and can underestimate how much they drink. Showing patients visual examples — such as these— can be an eye-opener, Lewis said. Given the associations between drinking alcohol and many health outcomes, Genkinger said, it's important for clinicians to discuss alcohol use, just as they would discuss physical activity and healthy body weight. 'These are all lifestyle factors that have an impact on numerous disease outcomes, not only pancreatic cancer,' she said.

8 liver-friendly foods to add to your diet, as majority of cancer cases preventable
8 liver-friendly foods to add to your diet, as majority of cancer cases preventable

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

8 liver-friendly foods to add to your diet, as majority of cancer cases preventable

Want to look after your liver better? These eight foods could help. We all know the importance of eating healthily for our heart, gut, and brain – but there are some foods that are especially beneficial for your liver health, too. Despite the liver's status as a vital organ that performs a number of important bodily functions, including removing toxins and fighting infection, it's easy to forget about looking after it. But recent statistics highlight the importance of prioritising your liver health. Experts say that three in five liver cancer cases "are linked to preventable risk factors, mostly viral hepatitis, alcohol and obesity", but have raised concerns that cases caused by alcohol and obesity will increase in the coming years. According to The Telegraph, scientists predict that, by 2050, around 21% of liver cancers will be caused by alcohol and 11% will be caused by a severe form of fatty liver disease, which occurs when excessive fat builds up in the vital organ. Last year, analysis by Cancer Research UK revealed that the number of people dying from liver cancer had almost doubled in the last 20 years. The disease is now responsible for the deaths of 58,000 people in the UK each year, twice the rate recorded in the late 1990s. Cancer Research UK said the figure is projected to continue rising by a further 10% by 2040, warning that liver cancer will have killed around 135,000 people by then. While part of the rise in deaths has been driven by a growing British population, lifestyle factors also play a major role. Katrina Brown, senior statistics manager at Cancer Research UK, told The Independent that around half of all cases are preventable. Drinking alcohol and smoking are key drivers of the increasing number of cases, as well as being overweight or obese. Brown added: "The notable thing for liver cancer is overweight and obesity is a key risk factor, and that has been steadily increasing in the UK – around two-thirds of UK adults are overweight and obese." The number of people who have died with an underlying cause of liver disease in England has also risen in recent years. According to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), this figure rose to 10,127 from 9,218 in 2019, increasing further to 10,521 cases in 2021. Eating a healthy, well-balanced diet is important to protect your liver and keep it in good shape for longer. Certain foods have been found to enhance liver function, while others can help prevent or reverse liver damage, according to various studies. Here are eight liver-friendly foods to incorporate into your daily diet: 1. Leafy greens Leafy greens like spinach and kale are rich in antioxidants, vitamins and minerals, which can help protect the liver from oxidative damage. A 2019 study found that the chlorophyll in leafy greens also have detoxifying properties, which can help reduce liver toxicity. 2. Garlic While the phrase 'there's no such thing as too much garlic' may not be strictly true, eating garlic does come with health benefits. Garlic contains sulfur compounds that improve liver enzyme activity, as well as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which can reduce oxidative stress in people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, one study suggested. 3. Beetroot Bright red beetroot is known to help with high blood pressure, as it's rich with dietary nitrates. This root vegetable also contains betalains, a type of antioxidant, and compounds that may support liver detoxification by increasing the liver's production of detoxifying enzymes. 4. Turmeric Curcumin, the active compound in turmeric, has strong anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. A clinical trial published in the journal Hepatology showed that curcumin supplementation reduced liver inflammation in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. 5. Green tea A 2006 study, published in the International Journal of Molecular Medicine found that green tea extract improved liver function and reduced fat accumulation in the organ. This is believed to be thanks to the antioxidants called catechins that green tea is rich in. 6. Cruciferous vegetables Cruciferous vegetables refer to vegetables like broccoli, Brussels sprouts and cauliflower. They are rich in fibre and vitamins, as well as glucosinolates, which researchers believe stimulate the production of detoxifying enzymes in the liver and protect against oxidative damage. 7. Lentils and beans Experts often sing the praises of lentils and beans as a nutritious source of fibre and protein that is suitable for vegetarians and vegans. But that's not all – the high fibre content in lentils and beans can contribute to helping reduce liver fat accumulation and improving liver function. 8. Artichokes Researchers published a study in Phytotherapy Research that found artichoke extract, which contains cynarin, can aid in improving liver function. Cynarin is a compound known to stimulate bile production, which can helps with the detoxification process and protects liver cells. Read more about diet and nutrition: I'm a nutritionist on a budget and here's how I get my five-a-day for much less (Yahoo Life UK, 6-min read) 9 cheap, healthy and easy meal ideas with less than 6 ingredients (Yahoo Life UK, 9-min read) 5 ultra-processed foods you shouldn't stop eating (Yahoo Life UK, 5-min read)

More Sit-to-Stand Transitions Benefit Postmenopausal Women
More Sit-to-Stand Transitions Benefit Postmenopausal Women

Medscape

time4 hours ago

  • Medscape

More Sit-to-Stand Transitions Benefit Postmenopausal Women

TOPLINE: Reducing sedentary behavior with interventions such as increasing daily sit-to-stand transitions might help lower blood pressure in postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess how different strategies to reduce time spent sitting affected the physiologic responses of postmenopausal women who led sedentary lives. The researchers included 407 women in the postmenopausal phase (mean age, 68 years; 92% White) who had overweight or obesity (average BMI, 32), had a sitting time of at least 7 hours a day, and performed no more than 70 sit-to-stand transitions daily. The women were randomly assigned to one of three study arms: healthy living (n = 135), sit less (n = 136), and increased sit-to-stand transitions (n = 136). All arms received seven sessions of individual health coaching over 12 weeks. Researchers assessed blood pressure and markers of glucose regulation using fasting blood samples. Readings from thigh- and hip-worn accelerometers for 7 days were used to evaluate posture, sedentary behavior, and physical activity. Primary outcomes were measurements of glucose regulation and resting blood pressure at baseline and 3 months. TAKEAWAY: A total of 388 women completed the trial, with no serious adverse events related to the study. Participants in the sit-less arm had a daily sitting time of approximately 58 minutes less than those in the healthy-living arm (P < .001), whereas those in the sit-to-stand arm had 26 more sit-to-stand transitions daily (P < .001). Diastolic blood pressure fell by 2.24 mm Hg in the sit-to-stand arm compared with the healthy living arm (P = .02); the decrease in systolic blood pressure did not reach a predefined significance level. Compared with the healthy-living arm, neither intervention produced significant changes in markers of glucose regulation. IN PRACTICE: 'Postmenopausal women are at high risk of engaging in large amounts of sitting time and cardiovascular diseases. The present randomized controlled trial adds to existing evidence by demonstrating that within just 3 months, increasing' sit-to-stand transitions can lower diastolic blood pressure, the researchers wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Sheri J. Hartman, PhD, University of California, San Diego. It was published online on July 25, 2025, in Circulation. LIMITATIONS: The generalizability of findings was limited by the lack of ethnic and racial diversity. The 3-month intervention period may have been too brief to observe sizeable physiologic changes. Measurement of only fasting glucose parameters could not capture changes after meals. DISCLOSURES: This study received support from the National Institute of Aging. Additional support was provided by the Altman Clinical & Translational Research Institute at the University of California, San Diego, funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The authors did not report any conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store