GP warning as bedtime habit could be affecting your health
And according to a nationwide survey of more than 1,000 adults, nearly a third of Brits admit to eating in bed.
But is the habit that's increasingly common, surprisingly harmful?
Working closely with Land of Beds on the study, health expert and GP Dr Katrina O'Donnell, said: 'Eating close to bedtime or in bed can affect sleep quality and disrupt your sleep pattern.
'This is often due to issues like acid reflux and indigestion, which can be triggered by lying down with a full stomach.
'It puts extra strain on the digestive system and can make it harder to relax and fall asleep.'
Not only can it affect our digestion, but it also increases the likelihood of bacteria, dust mites, and mould producing in our sheets.
Dr O'Donnell continued: 'From a hygiene perspective, eating in bed can create a breeding ground for bacteria.
Tips for sleeping in the heat
'Crumbs may attract pests and food can leave stains or odours that require more frequent changing of bed linen.
'In general, it's best to avoid eating in bed to help maintain a clean, healthy, and restful sleep environment.'
Eating in bed wasn't the only bad hygiene habit that was found. The study also revealed that:
A third of Brits have slept in the same bedsheets for over a month
Around one in six have never washed their duvet or pillows
60% use their phones in bed before sleep
44% don't shower before bed
28% of people let their pets sleep in their bed
22% have never cleaned their mattress
Around one in six have signs of mould or damp in their bedroom
How do I improve my sleep naturally?
Ideally, everyone would like to achieve eight hours of sleep, so setting a sleep schedule could be a good idea.
Recommended reading:
Creating a restful environment by keeping your room cool and dark is also essential, as well as limiting any naps in the day.
Trying to aim for at least 30 minutes of physical activity daily is also important.
This could range from having a brisk walk, cycling, swimming, or even just parking further from the supermarket to carry bags back to the car.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
5 hours ago
- New Statesman
Schools need more sex education, not less
Illustration by Chris Rogers / Getty Images The grand total of my sex education when I was at school in the Noughties went like this: in Year 6, the girls and boys were split up, and the girls were made to watch a graphic birth video; in Year 8, we carried 'flour babies' around school for a week; in Year 9, we received a self-defence lesson in which the male instructor told us not to wear our hair in a ponytail because an attacker could grab it; and in Year 10, the school nurse demonstrated how to use a condom while we all giggled hysterically. It was entirely focused on the mechanics of sex and the risks it posed to our life outcomes and health. There was no discussion of consent, no suggestion that sex could or should be pleasurable. And there was no mention of the internet and the ways it was already shaping our early, faltering romances. My peers and I learned far more about sex outside the classroom – from playground gossip, chat rooms, TV and porn – than we ever did within it. And yet this is the sort of sex education the last government wanted to return to. In May last year, the then education secretary, Gillian Keegan, published draft revised guidance for Relationship, Sex and Health Education (RSHE), which proposed age limits on what children could be taught. Children, it said, would not be informed about puberty before Year 4 (when they are aged eight to nine), sex before Year 5 (nine to ten), sexual harassment or pornography before Year 7 (11-12) or STIs before Year 9 (aged 13-14). There are basic biological problems with this chronology: girls could start their periods before learning what it is (one in four girls already reports that this is the case); pupils could be offered the HPV vaccine before learning what an STI is. But setting all this aside, it is deluded to believe that children are not exposed to everything Keegan wished to protect them from, and much more, beyond the school gates. So, the new RSHE guidance, released by Bridget Phillipson's Department for Education on 15 July, is a welcome relief. While it incorporates some sensible Tory proposals, such as teaching children about the prevalence of deepfakes, age restrictions have been removed. There is greater emphasis on tackling misogyny and incel culture, which Phillipson described, in the aftermath of the Netflix drama Adolescence, as 'a defining issue of our time'. To the previously planned content on stalking, revenge porn and upskirting, Labour added financial sexual exploitation, strangulation, and 'personal safety in public spaces, recognising that sexual harassment and abuse are never the fault of the victim'. Schools will have the flexibility to teach in late primary about sexual imagery online 'where this is an issue in their school'. Keegan's ban on sex education for children aged nine and under received much media attention at the time, thanks largely to the efforts of Miriam Cates, then the Tory MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge, who coordinated a letter to Rishi Sunak raising concerns about the appropriateness of RSHE content. Cates, who lost her seat last July, has since said the subject should be 'scrapped' altogether. Children, she told the Commons, employing some bad-faith hyperbole, were being taught 'graphic lessons on oral sex, how to choke your partner safely and 72 genders'. (This last was a reference to news reports about a school on the Isle of Man, which is not part of England and therefore falls outside the Department for Education's remit.) It may indeed seem inappropriate to teach children about strangulation during sex. We instinctively feel that they should not have to know about such things – not yet, not ever. And yet it is necessary that they do. No one wants to have to prepare a small child for the possibility that another child or an adult might try to touch their genitals, but they should know that such an act would be wrong and that they should report it. If a child brings to their teacher a question about, say, a pornographic video that has been shared with them, that teacher should be allowed to sensitively discuss with them what they have seen. Children must be prepared for the world as it is, not as we might wish it to be. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This is the world as it is: one in ten children has seen pornography by the age of nine, according to the Children's Commissioner, Rachel de Souza. The same research found that nearly half of 18- to 21-year-olds have experienced a violent sex act. More than a third of girls at mixed-sex schools have experienced sexual harassment at school, and, according to the teacher survey app Teacher Tapp, one in eight secondary-school teachers say a student in their school sexually assaulted another pupil in the last autumn term. Pornographic deepfakes are a growing problem; in June 2024 a girls' school alerted authorities that deepfake images and videos depicting its pupils were circulating a nearby boys' school. Despite the UK's overall falling birthrate, pregnancy rates among the under-20s are rising; so too is the prevalence of STIs. 'All children,' as Baroness Strange put it in a debate in the Lords on sex education in 2000, 'have a right to their childhood and their innocence.' Yet it is not schools that threaten their innocence, but technology, which moves at such a pace legislation cannot keep up. Children should be given every opportunity to bring to a trusted adult – whether a teacher or a parent – what they hear and see in the dark corners of the playground or the internet. The alternative is not that they are protected from inappropriate content, but that they are left to process and navigate it alone. [See also: Kemi Badenoch isn't working] Related
Scotsman
6 hours ago
- Scotsman
Too hot to handle: Nearly half (43 per cent) of UK dog owners walk pets in dangerous heat
Nearly half of UK dog owners walk their pets in dangerous heat With temperatures climbing to a sizzling 30°C this week, new research from the world's largest online marketplace for loving pet care, reveals that over two fifths (43 per cent) of UK dog owners regularly walk their pets when the weather hits 24°C or above - a temperature at which heat-related health risks for dogs can begin to escalate. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... 43% of dog owners regularly walk their pets when the weather hits 24°C or above 1 in 3 (34%) admit to spotting signs of heatstroke, such as heavy panting, but continue to walk their dog anyway Yet more than half of Brits (53%) give their dog priority over the fan during hot weather 54% of pet owners mistakenly believe their dog will cool itself down when overheating Rover's Canine Behaviourist Expert says: "Walking a dog in hot weather can be the equivalent of asking a human to run a marathon while wearing a fur coat.' During walkies, more than a third (34%) admit they've noticed their dog panting heavily, but continued regardless - despite this being an early sign of heatstroke. Adding to the concern, over a quarter (29%) of owners confess they don't always check the pavement temperature before heading out during summer. Yet, when it comes to keeping pets cool indoors, pet parents are 'pup-ared' to roll over for the safety of their best friend. Over half (53%) give their pooch first dibs on the fan, while 22% even sacrifice their own comfort by sleeping somewhere less favourable so that their dog can rest in the coolest spot. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With a staggering 93% expressing concern about soaring summer temperatures, it's clear many are trying to do the right thing. However, dangerous misconceptions around dogs' ability to cope in the heat still persist. And with 50% of pet parents planning to or already taking their pup to an event this summer, these misunderstandings could have serious consequences. In fact, many believe their dog would instinctively seek shade (55%) or stop walking and lie down (48%) when overheating. Even more alarmingly, two thirds (67%) are unaware that flat-faced breeds, like Pugs and Bulldogs, are significantly more vulnerable to overheating. Rover's Canine Behaviour Expert, Adem Fehmi warns of the dangers of taking your dog out during a heatwave, and urges owners to rethink their routines: "Walking a dog in hot weather can be the equivalent of asking a human to run a marathon while wearing a fur coat. Owners need to be aware that when the temperature hits 24°C or above, it could become a serious risk for some dogs - especially for enthusiastic breeds like Labradors and Border Collies that will keep going long after it's safe, driven by their desire to please their owners and their natural enthusiasm for walks.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Dogs can't sweat like humans – they can only cool down through panting and through their paw pads, making them incredibly vulnerable to overheating.' "What's particularly concerning is that many dogs simply won't stop when they're struggling. Their loyalty and eagerness to please mean they might keep going even when they're in distress. I've seen dogs collapse from heat exhaustion because their owners assumed they'd naturally slow down or seek shade. "The truth is, if it's too hot for your dog, it's absolutely okay to leave them safely at home. A cancelled walk is always better than an emergency vet visit." What to watch out for: Excessive panting with drooling Lethargy or reluctance to move Vomiting or diarrhoea Loss of coordination Bright red or pale gums Collapse With temperatures continuing to soar, Rover is urging owners to rethink their summer routines to help protect dogs from the risk of heatstroke. That means swapping midday walks and busy days out for safer, more dog-friendly alternatives. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Adem Fehmi shares his top tips for caring for your dog in the heat: Using indoor enrichment games to keep dogs stimulated without overheating – more tips on these from Canine Behaviour Expert, Adem Fehmi here Walking in the early morning or evening, when it's coolest. If your schedule doesn't allow it, consider getting a dog walker for the summer months Following the 'seven-second rule' – if you can't comfortably hold your hand on the pavement for seven seconds, it's too hot for your dog's paws Leaving your dog at home with a trusted pet sitter if it's too hot to take them with you To support owners during the hotter months, Rover is offering a £25 discount on your first booking with the code SUMMER25 – helping keep pets cool, calm and cared for this summer. For more tips on how to take care of pets this summer, visit
Scotsman
8 hours ago
- Scotsman
Attendance Allowance: Martin Lewis highlights £5,600 benefit
Millions of older Brits could be missing out on vital extra cash to ease the cost of aging 💷 Sign up to the weekly Cost Of Living newsletter. Saving tips, deals and money hacks. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Martin Lewis is urging pensioners to check if they qualify for Attendance Allowance The benefit offers up to £5,644 a year to help with care needs in later life It's not means-tested, so savings and income don't affect eligibility Over 1.1 million people may be missing out, often due to lack of awareness Common conditions like arthritis, dementia, and heart disease may qualify you Martin Lewis is urging older people to check if they qualify for a little-known benefit that could boost their income by over £5,600 a year — with no impact from savings or pensions. The consumer champion says Attendance Allowance, which supports people over State Pension age with health or care needs, is 'massively underclaimed', despite being worth thousands of pounds annually and offering crucial help as medical costs mount in later life. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'For many older people who are ill or start to face mental or physical disability, life doesn't just get tougher – it gets costlier too,' Lewis wrote in his latest MoneySavingExpert newsletter. Lewis highlights that an estimated 1.1 million eligible pensioners aren't claiming the benefit, often because they don't know they're entitled to it or assume they won't qualify. The money is yours to use however you like – whether that's on care, transport, heating, food delivery, or anything else that helps maintain quality of life. (Photos: Getty Images) | Getty Images What is Attendance Allowance? Attendance Allowance is a tax-free benefit for people aged 66 or over who have a disability, long-term illness, or mental health condition that means they need help with personal care or supervision. It offers: Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad £73.90 per week for those needing support during either day or night (lower rate) £110.40 per week for those needing help day and night, or who are terminally ill (higher rate) That's worth up to £5,644 a year — and crucially, it's not means-tested, meaning you can claim it regardless of your income or savings. Who is eligible for Attendance Allowance? Conditions that could make you eligible include: Arthritis Asthma Dementia Heart disease Mental health conditions Parkinson's Disease Sight or hearing loss You don't need a formal diagnosis, and you don't need to be receiving hands-on care — just struggling with personal tasks like washing, dressing, or staying safe. Who can claim? To be eligible to claim Attendance Allowance, you must: Be State Pension age (currently 66 or over) Have had care needs for at least six months Live in Great Britain, and have done so for two of the past three years Not be claiming PIP or Disability Living Allowance (DLA) If you or someone you know is struggling with health issues and over 66, it could be well worth a 20-minute check. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How to apply for Attendance Allowance The application process for Attendance Allowance can be lengthy and detailed, but support is available. Charities such as Age UK and Citizens Advice can help with the form and ensure you explain your needs clearly. You'll need: Your National Insurance number NHS number Any prescription lists, hospital appointments, or diagnosis letters Most decisions are based purely on the form – no medical assessment is required in most cases. More info and the application forms are available at or contact Age UK or Citizens Advice for support. Are you struggling to make ends meet as costs continue to rise? You can now send your stories to us online via YourWorld at It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.
