Major bank sets aside £1.2billion for car finance payouts after plans for compensation scheme announced
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A BIG bank has set aside £1.2billion to pay out victims of the car finance scandal.
Lloyds Banking group said it would keep the provision for motor finance claims after the Supreme Court ruling last week.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Lenders have set aside billions of pounds for potential car finance compensation
Credit: Getty
Although the court went largely in favour of the banks, it still left them facing millions of potential compensation claims.
In a statement Lloyds Banking Group said: 'The group currently believes that if there is any change to the provision it is unlikely to be material in the context of the group.'
It added that the provision will continue to be reviewed for any further information that becomes available, with an update provided as and when necessary.
The news comes after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said yesterday that it would consult on a redress scheme for motorists who claim to have been overcharged.
It estimates that the total bill could be between £9billion and £18billion.
The cost is likely to be much lower than earlier estimates, which had suggested it could be more than £30billion.
This is because on Friday the Supreme Court overturned an earlier Court of Appeal judgement that had widened the scope of valid claims.
There had been fears that if the Supreme Court upheld the ruling it would have caused pain for Chancellor Rachel Reeves as it could have had a wider impact on the economy.
Fearing this outcome, major banks have already set aside more than £1.5billion to prepare for potential claims.
Banking analysts at RBC estimated the cost would be £11.5billion pounds, which if true would leave several banks with not enough cash set aside.
'It's the next PPI' - Top lawyer claims Brits due 'billions' over dodgy car finance deals... here's how to make your claim
Other major banks have also reserved cash for potential car finance compensation payouts.
Among them is Santander, which has a reserve of £295million.
Meanwhile, Close Brothers has set aside £165million.
It gave no update on whether it would set aside more money in its update today.
Northridge and First Rand have also built up reserves of £143million and £140million respectively.
Who is affected by car finance?
Drivers who took out personal contract purchase (PCP) or hire purchase agreements before January 28, 2021 could be eligible for compensation.
Many of these motorists were impacted by 'discretionary commission arrangements' (DCAs), which were in place for 40% of car finance deals before this date.
Under DCAs, brokers and dealers could increase the interest rates they charge drivers without informing them, allowing them to earn higher commissions.
The FCA banned these arrangements in January 2021.
As a result, anyone affected by a DCA could now be entitled to compensation.
You are unlikely to be able to claim compensation for a car finance agreement taken out before April 6, 2007 as this is when the Financial Ombudsman began to handle motor finance complaints.
Between 2007 and 2020, around 14.6million car finance agreements were made under DCAs.
But the FCA said that drivers who took out deals without DCAs could still be eligible for compensation if excessive commission was involved.
This could mean that drivers who signed up for a DCA after 2021 may be entitled to compensation, depending on their circumstances.
Compensation claims will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Households with multiple vehicles could make more than one claim.
For example, a household could receive two payments of £950 each, which total £1,900.
What does it mean for you?
By Tara Evans, Head of Consumer
Millions of drivers will likely still be in line for compensation despite Friday's landmark judgement - but the payouts will be lower and not as many people will qualify for them.
Despite the judgement banks will still be responsible for any claims relating to discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs).
This is where drivers were charged excessive interest - and the higher they were the more commission they earned.
Those applied to around 40% of car finance deals.
The FCA has now confirmed that it will launch a car finance compensation scheme for drivers affected by this issue.
This consultation is set to begin by early October, and if the scheme is approved, the first payments could be made in 2026.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
28 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Brit investors face triple-whammy of taxes at Budget, Tories warn
Last month, the Chancellor opened the door to painful tax hikes after a week of Labour chaos Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TRIPLE-whammy of taxes could hit British investors at the Budget, the Tories warn. Measures such as removing a tax break on shares, scrapping the £500 tax-free dividend allowance and increasing dividend tax rates will dent confidence, they say. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 'The Government needs to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors', warned Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride Credit: Getty An estimated five million people would be dragged into paying dividend tax if that allowance went. Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride said: 'The Government needs to urgently rule out these tax hikes on savers and investors before speculation causes further economic harm.' Labour last night laughed off the jibes. A spokesman said: 'They have some brass neck. They've still not apologised for the damage caused by the Liz Truss mini-Budget.' READ MORE ON TAXES NIGE TURF WAR Nigel Farage urges Chancellor not to hike gambling taxes for horse racing Last month, The Sun reported that Brits were bracing for higher taxes after Rachel Reeves warned Labour's welfare U-turns would come at a 'cost" - with experts saying the bill could hit £40 billion. The Chancellor opened the door to painful tax hikes after a week of Labour chaos, which saw her break down in the Commons and lose control of key spending plans. In her first public comments since the dramatic scenes in Parliament, Ms Reeves admitted the Government's retreat on welfare cuts had blown a multi-billion-pound hole in the public finances — and taxpayers would be left to fill the gap. Pressed on whether she would raise taxes, she said: 'Of course there is a cost to the welfare changes that parliament voted through this week and that will be reflected in the budget. 'But I'm also very, very clear that [the] stability that we've been able to return to the economy, which has enabled the Bank of England to cut interests rates four times, is only possible because of the fiscal discipline which is underpinned by the fiscal rules. "And we'll be sticking to those because they're absolutely vital for the living standards of working people and also the costs that businesses face.' Tax and spending package of €9.4bn to form basis of Budget 2026
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Lenders deserve a pasting over the motor finance misselling scandal, says ALEX BRUMMER
The cloud of mistrust surrounding British finance will not be lifted by the Supreme Court ruling on motor finance. Modern history of the Square Mile is littered with examples of unwitting consumers being gulled into buying products they don't need and being cheated by finance providers. Pensions mis-selling and payment protection insurance come to mind. The Great Financial Crisis of 2008 may be a distant memory, but it was only two months ago that NatWest escaped from government ownership after an eye-popping £45.5billion taxpayer rescue. Indeed, the lingering costs of 2008 and the compensation culture it engendered are among the reasons why the UK's public finances are in the worst condition since the 1950s. Yet despite this, the Chancellor Rachel Reeves felt it was fine to go to the Mansion House and declare it time to place 'the boot on the neck' of the red tape of financial regulation. Quite the contrary. After scandals such as motor finance, the collapse of the Neil Woodford investment empire and the London Capital & Finance mini-bond scam, ever more vigilant enforcement is required if consumer confidence is to be nurtured. Tracing back victims of motor finance scandals to 2007 will be hard, and finding the data difficult. Yet it is unbecoming for Stephen Haddrill, who represents the Finance and Leasing Association, to shout foul and describe the proposal to pay out up to £18billion in compensation as 'completely impractical'. 'Caveat emptor' is fine as a mantra, but we shouldn't underestimate the deviousness of second-hand car merchants acting as agents for finance groups. I recall buying a second-hand VW and being told by the dealer that he didn't want cash because he would miss out on finance commissions. Investors in Lloyds Bank, Close Brothers et al yesterday enjoyed a relief rally at the expense of consumers treated unfairly. They should not escape retribution for unfitting behaviour. Private grief There is a prevalent view, fuelled by fee-hungry investment banks, that fending off private equity offers for FTSE-listed companies is impossible. Yet the bidding war which ended up with Primary Health Properties (PHP) fending off KKR and merging with rival Assura shows there are other choices. The outcome should be a plus for the NHS as it adopts Wes Streeting's desire to switch from big hospital provision of medical services to community-based health. PHP and Assura fended off private equity by fully engaging UK long-investors with 35 per cent of the votes, such as Schroders and Baillie Gifford. If the deal is approved next week, then it could free up to £300million for investment in updating and expanding facilities and building new health hubs. This is a more satisfactory outcome than some other recent private equity bids. Corporate ghouls Advent outbid rival KKR for Spectris, a vital British precision engineering firm which serves two critical industries: pharma and semiconductors. It is disappointing that no white knight offers emerged or that the Spectris board showed such little fight. Similarly, at a time when warehouses and data centres are all the rage, Warehouse REIT threw in its lot with Blackstone, reversing a decision to merge with Tritax Big Box. As customers of private equity-owned vet practices and dental surgeries would testify, unscrupulous owners rarely benefit the end-user. Lost love All hell has broken loose after Donald Trump fired the independent Bureau of Labour Statistics commissioner Erika McEntarfer because he didn't like 'rigged' jobs data which didn't suit his claims. The reality is that there is concern among some economists about the quality of data which showed that 258,000 fewer US jobs were created in May and June. Sound familiar? Here, the head of the Office for National Statistics Ian Diamond stepped down in May and UK Statistics Authority chair Robert Chote resigned in July. The departures came amid loud criticism from the Bank of England, among others, of poor labour force data. Lies, lies and damned statistics...
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Bank shares surge after Supreme Court slashes car loan compensation payouts
Shares in banks climbed yesterday as investors breathed a sigh of relief after lenders were let off the hook for car finance compensation. The City watchdog estimated that the scandal will cost between £9billion and £18billion – much lower than the previously forecasted £44billion – after the Supreme Court ruled on Friday that lenders would not be liable for most of the payouts. Lloyds was the biggest FTSE 100 beneficiary – rocketing 9 per cent, or 6.82p, to a ten-year high of 82.56p. Shares in Close Brothers, one of the lenders most exposed to the scandal, soared 23.5 per cent, or 93.6p, to 491.4p. The 147-year-old company, which had set aside £165million for potential payouts, had seen its shares fall by around 15 per cent over the last 12 months ahead of the ruling. Shares in Barclays, which was less exposed than many of its rivals, rose 1.6 per cent, or 5.8p, to 362.45p. The FCA estimated the car finance scandal will cost between £9bn and £18bn after the Supreme Court ruled lenders would not be liable for most of the payouts And car finance specialist S&U climbed 9.2 per cent, or 160p, to 1900p. The company said that the Supreme Court ruling was a 'victory for common sense'. Chairman Anthony Coombs said: 'It will significantly boost confidence throughout the motor finance industry and benefit lenders and consumers in attracting investment and increasing competition.' The UK's highest court last week dismissed a judgment that had found 'secret' car loan commission payments between lenders and dealers were unlawful. That dispelled fears that motor finance mis-selling would be the most expensive consumer banking scandal since the payment protection insurance scandal in the 2000s. But the court did rule that in certain circumstances, the failure to properly disclose commission arrangements could be unfair and therefore unlawful. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said on Sunday it would consult on a compensation regime, estimating that customers eligible for a payout were likely to get less than £950 each. Yesterday, Lloyds said: 'After initial assessment of the Supreme Court judgment, and pending resolution of the outstanding uncertainties, in particular the FCA redress scheme, the group currently believes that if there is any change to the provision it is unlikely to be material in the context of the group.' The banking giant, which owns motor finance provider Black Horse, had ring-fenced £1.2billion for potential compensation. In a statement, Close Brothers said: 'We look forward to engaging with the FCA in respect of the consultation.' Experts said that while the ruling had cleared up some uncertainty, there were still questions about the finer details of the FCA compensation scheme. Hyder Jumabhoy, a partner at law firm White & Case, said: 'Investors are comforted that a path through the uncertainty has emerged.' But he added it was 'by no means the end of the story and the FCA's statement could still have significant implications'. He also said that there could be a knock-on effect as the money set aside could now be used for other things including takeover bids. 'We expect this move to accelerate M&A activity due to some lenders having decreased risk appetite but also because of unused provision amounts becoming available for acquisitions,' Jumabhoy said. 'It could also prompt some car manufacturers to enter the UK motor finance market to steady the supply of finance to buyers of new vehicles.' Redress plans are 'completely impractical' The car finance industry has warned that a planned compensation scheme for unfair loans is 'completely impractical'. Stephen Haddrill, the director general of the Finance and Leasing Association, said that he has 'major concerns' after the City watchdog said it will consult on compensation from October, with payouts starting next year. The Supreme Court ruled last week that lenders were not liable for most complaints. But some consumers may get a payout if their relationship with the broker is deemed 'unfair'. Haddrill said: 'I've got a couple of quite major concerns.' The proposal has not 'come up with a solution of how you look at a whole range of factors' to decide if the lending was unfair. He said it was 'completely impractical' for redress to be open to loans dating back to 2007. 'It's not just firms that don't have the details about contracts, customers don't either,' he said. It came as the Financial Conduct Authority said consumers stand to lose up to 30pc of compensation if they sign up with claims managers, who take a portion of any money received. 'If we put a scheme in place it will be free,' FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi said. It has already acted against 225 adverts over 'exaggerated claims', he said.
