
What is 'sanctuary jurisdiction', how was US list of them made?
WASHINGTON: The US government's list of "sanctuary jurisdictions" that includes hundreds of communities, both red and blue, is confounding critics. They have noticed the list included misspellings, communities with small immigrant populations, and those with strong support for cooperation with federal authorities.
Jessica Vaughan is director of policy studies at the Centre for Immigration Studies, which favours anti-sanctuary policies and started publishing a list of sanctuary jurisdictions 10 years ago.
The centre's list is different from the government's. Vaughan noted that the centre discloses its methodology and frequently updates its list.
"That's one thing that I feel is missing from the (government's) list is some documentation as to why they're appearing on the list," she said.
The list is part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdiction s that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the US without legal authorization.
What are the stakes?
The Department of Homeland Security and the US attorney general will send them official notice to the 500 jurisdictions on the list "regarding its defiance of Federal immigration law enforcement and any potential violations of Federal criminal law", according to an executive order from President Donald Trump.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
The list could be updated when the administration receives new information, but those that remain on the list could face serious financial consequences, including suspended or terminated federal grants and contracts by the Office of Management and Budget.
It is not clear what legal actions the government will pursue.
How was the list made?
In response to questions Friday about the list, the Department of Homeland security reiterated that it was compiled using a number of factors, including whether the localities identified themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions, how much they complied with federal officials enforcing immigration laws, if they had restrictions on sharing information with immigration enforcement or had any legal protections for people in the country illegally.
The agency noted in an email that the list will be updated regularly.
But experts said it was difficult to understand the criteria used to make the list.
"It seems quite arbitrary because not all of these states or specific jurisdictions have a policy that limits cooperation with ICE," said Nithya Nathan-Pineau, an attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Centre.
How did communities that support Trump's policies end up on the list?
That's unclear.
Several communities said they have been outspoken supporters of the president and his stringent immigration policies and do not understand why they have been included. Among them: Shawano County, Wisconsin; Alexandria, Virginia; and Huntington Beach, California.
Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a "Second Amendment Sanctuary County" that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants.
He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies.
What is a sanctuary city?
There is no clear definition of a sanctuary jurisdiction, but it is generally understood to apply to state and local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
DHS said it took into account "factors like compliance with federal law enforcement, information restrictions, and legal protections for illegal aliens".
The notion of sanctuary dates back to Medieval Europe, when civil law enforcement entities were not allowed to enter churches, Cesar Garcia Hernandez, a professor at Ohio State University's College of Law, explained Friday.
The term evolved into the "sanctuary movement" among US churches and other religious institutions that would house Central Americans fleeing civil war in the 1980s.
"There there was no legal guarantee of immunity for people who were who were spending their time inside church buildings, but there was policy" that prohibited immigration arrests, Garcia Hernandez said.
That changed under the current Trump administration.
The Immigrant Legal Resource Centre, a nongovernmental organisation, said that when compiling its own list of sanctuary jurisdictions, it considers how they limit interactions with ICE and federal law enforcement, and how they protect information.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Is Harvard training officials from China's Xi Jinping's party?
Harvard University has come under scrutiny for its alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). A US House committee led by Republicans has reportedly shot off a letter to the varsity's president, Alan Garber, accusing Harvard Kennedy School of training high-level Chinese government officials. This comes amid the Trump administration's efforts to bar the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign students read more A view of Harvard campus on John F. Kennedy Street at Harvard University is pictured in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, December 7, 2023. File Photo/Reuters Harvard University, which is in the crosshairs of the Donald Trump administration in the United States, has come under scrutiny for its ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). A report has revealed that Harvard Kennedy School of the prestigious varsity has been accused of partnering with an organisation associated with Xi Jinping's party. The report comes at a time when Harvard University is embroiled in a dispute with the Trump administration, with the US government freezing billions of dollars in federal funds. The US president has also alleged that universities allowed antisemitism during pro-Palestinian protests on campus last year. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But does Harvard really have ties to China's CCP? We will explain. Harvard's ties to CCP A US House of Representatives committee led by Republicans has alleged that Harvard Kennedy School collaborated with an organisation linked to the Chinese Communist Party, as per The Harvard Crimson report. A House Select Committee on the CCP started investigating Harvard University's alleged links to groups affiliated with China's party in May. In a letter to Harvard University President Alan Garber last week, the panel accused Harvard Kennedy School of training high-level Chinese government officials through a 'formal partnership' with the Chinese Executive Leadership Academy Pudong (CELAP). 'Under that partnership, the rising CCP elite who are being prepared for senior Communist Party leadership positions participate in training at Harvard in the United States,' Committee chair John R Moolenaar wrote in the letter. The committee asked the university to submit any documents linking Harvard to the CCP and furnish details of any money or benefits received from the CCP. According to Moolenaar, whistleblowers revealed the alleged tie-up between the school and CELAP, a training institution in Shanghai's Pudong district managed and funded by the Chinese government. Feng Jun, executive vice president of CELAP, attended the Harvard Kennedy School's now-defunct programme for senior Chinese officials known as 'China's Leaders in Development", calling HKS a 'model' for the Chinese school, according to Harvard University's student newspaper. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Is Harvard CCP's 'party school'? Many US universities, particularly Harvard, have offered programmes to Chinese officials to study governance. A Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report in June found that thousands of mid-career and senior bureaucrats of the CCP have visited the US for executive training and postgraduate studies for decades. Harvard University has been described by some in China as the top 'party school' outside the country. 'If we were to rank the Chinese Communist Party's 'overseas party schools,' the one deserving top spot has to be Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government in the US,' said a 2014 commentary published by Shanghai Observer. Some key Chinese officials to have graduated from Harvard Kennedy School are an ex-vice president of China and a top trade negotiator. Li Yuanchao, China's vice president from 2013 to 2018, took part in a mid-career training programme at Harvard Kennedy School in 2002. Several top Chinese officials have attended Harvard Kennedy School. File Photo/AFP Liu He, a retired vice premier, has a master's degree in public administration from Harvard Kennedy School. He was Chinese President Xi Jinping's top trade negotiator during talks with the first Trump administration. Li Hongzhong, currently a Politburo member and senior legislator, attended a short-term programme at Harvard in 1999. Syracuse, Stanford, the University of Maryland and Rutgers have also offered executive training to Chinese officials, WSJ reported, citing publicity materials and other disclosures. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD China began sending officials for mid-career training at Harvard Kennedy School in the 1990s. One such programme, launched in 1998, provided fellowships and executive training courses to around 20 senior officials each year. Harvard launched another programme, 'China's Leaders in Development,' in the early 2000s, under which Chinese officials attended a training course, with their time split between Harvard and Beijing's Tsinghua University. As per Harvard, the now-defunct programme was to 'help prepare senior local and central Chinese government officials to more effectively address the ongoing challenges of China's national reforms." Trump's attempts to ban foreign students at Harvard Amid the ongoing standoff, the Trump administration has tried to bar Harvard from enrolling international students and prevent foreigners from entering the US to study at the elite varsity. However, both efforts were temporarily blocked by a court. Last month, the US State Department said that it launched an investigation into Harvard University's compliance with the government-run visa programme for international students. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the State Department would analyse Harvard's sponsorship eligibility under the Exchange Visitor Program certification, or J-1 visa programme, reported NBC News. The secretary of state said in a statement that all sponsors of the programme 'must comply with all regulations, including conducting their programmes in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students. The investigation will ensure that State Department programmes do not run contrary to our nation's interests,' Rubio said. A spokesperson for Harvard said that the Ivy League school 'is committed to continuing to comply with the applicable Exchange Visitor Program regulations.' 'This investigation is yet another retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment right. Harvard continues to enrol and sponsor international scholars, researchers, and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for US visas and travel to campus this fall,' the spokesperson added. With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
‘This happens in a banana republic': Trump's Greece and China-like reaction to job data draws flak
History shows that when political leaders manipulate or interfere with economic statistics, the results are often disastrous. read more US property mogul Donald Trump leads a media event on the sand dunes of the Menie estate, the site for Trump's proposed golf resort, near Aberdeen, north east Scotland, May 27, 2010. File Image/Reuters When President Donald Trump received disappointing jobs numbers on Friday (August 1), his response was swift and alarming: he fired Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). This unprecedented move has raised concerns among economists and experts, who warn that meddling with government data can have far-reaching consequences. History shows that when political leaders manipulate or interfere with economic statistics, the results are often disastrous. Why is Labor Department's independence critical? The BLS, though officially part of the Labor Department, operates independently to produce nonpartisan data on critical metrics like employment, prices, and wages. This impartiality is vital, as reliable statistics help make sound decisions in both the public and private sectors. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For instance, the Federal Reserve relies on BLS data on inflation and unemployment to set interest rates, which directly impact the cost of mortgages and car loans for millions of Americans. As Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell recently stressed at a news conference, 'Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but it also helps the private sector.' He added, 'The United States has been a leader in that for 100 years, and we really need to continue that in my view.' Trump's decision to dismiss McEntarfer has drawn sharp criticism, with many seeing it as a step toward undermining the integrity of economic data. Former Treasury Secretary and Federal Reserve Chair Janet L. Yellen called the move deeply troubling, stating, 'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic.' Lessons from history History offers stark warnings about the dangers of manipulating government data. In the early 2000s, Chinese local authorities fudged economic figures to meet Beijing's growth targets, rendering official data unreliable. Analysts and policymakers were forced to turn to alternative measures to understand the true state of China's economy. Similarly, Greece's government falsified deficit numbers for years, a deception that fueled a crippling debt crisis requiring multiple international bailouts. When the head of Greece's statistical agency insisted on reporting accurate figures, he faced criminal prosecution. Perhaps most notoriously, Argentina systematically understated inflation rates during the 2000s and 2010s, leading the international community to dismiss its data entirely. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD These examples show the chaos that ensues when political pressures compromise data integrity. Economists warn that Trump's firing of McEntarfer risks setting the US on a similar path, eroding trust in the numbers that guide critical economic decisions.


Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
US, Russia meet soon? Trump confirms US envoy Witkoff's visit this week — ‘To avaoid sanctions, Moscow must...'
Donald Trump confirmed Sunday his special envoy Steve Witkoff will visit Russia in the coming week, ahead of a deadline the US president has set for imposing fresh sanctions on Moscow. Speaking to reporters, Trump also said that two nuclear submarines he deployed following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev were now 'in the region.' Trump has not said whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the exact deployment locations, which are kept secret by the US military. The nuclear saber-rattling came against the backdrop of a deadline set by Trump at the end of next week for Russia to take steps towards ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions. The Republican leader said Witkoff would visit 'I think next week, Wednesday or Thursday.' Russian President Vladimir Putin has already met Witkoff multiple times in Moscow, before Trump's efforts to mend ties with the Kremlin came to a grinding halt. When reporters asked what Witkoff's message would be to Moscow, and if there was anything Russia could do to avoid the sanctions, Trump replied: 'Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed.' Trump has previously threatened that new measures could mean "secondary tariffs" targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. This would further stifle Russia, but would risk significant international disruption. Despite the pressure from Washington, Russia has continued its onslaught against its pro-Western neighbor. Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said Friday that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half-year invasion were "unchanged." "We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries," Putin told reporters. But he added that "the conditions (from the Russian side) certainly remain the same." Russia has frequently called on Ukraine to effectively cede control of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, a demand Kyiv has called unacceptable. Putin also wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join NATO. Ukraine launched a drone attack Sunday which sparked a fire at an oil depot in Sochi, the host city of the 2014 Winter Olympics. Kyiv has said it will intensify its air strikes against Russia in response to an increase in Russian attacks on its territory in recent weeks, which have killed dozens of civilians. Russia's Ministry of Defence said on Monday, its air defences intercepted 61 Ukrainian drones overnight. One person was killed by Russian shelling in the southern Kherson region, Ukraine's military administration said in Telegram post early Monday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also said Sunday that the two sides were preparing a prisoner exchange that would see 1,200 Ukrainian troops return home, following talks with Russia in Istanbul in July. Trump began his second term with his own rosy predictions that the war in Ukraine -- raging since Russia invaded its neighbor in February 2022 -- would soon end. In recent weeks, Trump has increasingly voiced frustration with Putin over Moscow's unrelenting offensive.