&w=3840&q=100)
Is Harvard training officials from China's Xi Jinping's party?
A view of Harvard campus on John F. Kennedy Street at Harvard University is pictured in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, December 7, 2023. File Photo/Reuters
Harvard University, which is in the crosshairs of the Donald Trump administration in the United States, has come under scrutiny for its ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). A report has revealed that Harvard Kennedy School of the prestigious varsity has been accused of partnering with an organisation associated with Xi Jinping's party.
The report comes at a time when Harvard University is embroiled in a dispute with the Trump administration, with the US government freezing billions of dollars in federal funds. The US president has also alleged that universities allowed antisemitism during pro-Palestinian protests on campus last year.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But does Harvard really have ties to China's CCP? We will explain.
Harvard's ties to CCP
A US House of Representatives committee led by Republicans has alleged that Harvard Kennedy School collaborated with an organisation linked to the Chinese Communist Party, as per The Harvard Crimson report.
A House Select Committee on the CCP started investigating Harvard University's alleged links to groups affiliated with China's party in May.
In a letter to Harvard University President Alan Garber last week, the panel accused Harvard Kennedy School of training high-level Chinese government officials through a 'formal partnership' with the Chinese Executive Leadership Academy Pudong (CELAP).
'Under that partnership, the rising CCP elite who are being prepared for senior Communist Party leadership positions participate in training at Harvard in the United States,' Committee chair John R Moolenaar wrote in the letter.
The committee asked the university to submit any documents linking Harvard to the CCP and furnish details of any money or benefits received from the CCP.
According to Moolenaar, whistleblowers revealed the alleged tie-up between the school and CELAP, a training institution in Shanghai's Pudong district managed and funded by the Chinese government.
Feng Jun, executive vice president of CELAP, attended the Harvard Kennedy School's now-defunct programme for senior Chinese officials known as 'China's Leaders in Development", calling HKS a 'model' for the Chinese school, according to Harvard University's student newspaper.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Is Harvard CCP's 'party school'?
Many US universities, particularly Harvard, have offered programmes to Chinese officials to study governance. A Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report in June found that thousands of mid-career and senior bureaucrats of the CCP have visited the US for executive training and postgraduate studies for decades.
Harvard University has been described by some in China as the top 'party school' outside the country. 'If we were to rank the Chinese Communist Party's 'overseas party schools,' the one deserving top spot has to be Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government in the US,' said a 2014 commentary published by Shanghai Observer.
Some key Chinese officials to have graduated from Harvard Kennedy School are an ex-vice president of China and a top trade negotiator.
Li Yuanchao, China's vice president from 2013 to 2018, took part in a mid-career training programme at Harvard Kennedy School in 2002.
Several top Chinese officials have attended Harvard Kennedy School. File Photo/AFP
Liu He, a retired vice premier, has a master's degree in public administration from Harvard Kennedy School. He was Chinese President Xi Jinping's top trade negotiator during talks with the first Trump administration.
Li Hongzhong, currently a Politburo member and senior legislator, attended a short-term programme at Harvard in 1999.
Syracuse, Stanford, the University of Maryland and Rutgers have also offered executive training to Chinese officials, WSJ reported, citing publicity materials and other disclosures.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
China began sending officials for mid-career training at Harvard Kennedy School in the 1990s. One such programme, launched in 1998, provided fellowships and executive training courses to around 20 senior officials each year.
Harvard launched another programme, 'China's Leaders in Development,' in the early 2000s, under which Chinese officials attended a training course, with their time split between Harvard and Beijing's Tsinghua University.
As per Harvard, the now-defunct programme was to 'help prepare senior local and central Chinese government officials to more effectively address the ongoing challenges of China's national reforms."
Trump's attempts to ban foreign students at Harvard
Amid the ongoing standoff, the Trump administration has tried to bar Harvard from enrolling international students and prevent foreigners from entering the US to study at the elite varsity. However, both efforts were temporarily blocked by a court.
Last month, the US State Department said that it launched an investigation into Harvard University's compliance with the government-run visa programme for international students. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the State Department would analyse Harvard's sponsorship eligibility under the Exchange Visitor Program certification, or J-1 visa programme, reported NBC News.
The secretary of state said in a statement that all sponsors of the programme 'must comply with all regulations, including conducting their programmes in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law, and provide safe environments for all students. The investigation will ensure that State Department programmes do not run contrary to our nation's interests,' Rubio said.
A spokesperson for Harvard said that the Ivy League school 'is committed to continuing to comply with the applicable Exchange Visitor Program regulations.'
'This investigation is yet another retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment right. Harvard continues to enrol and sponsor international scholars, researchers, and students, and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for US visas and travel to campus this fall,' the spokesperson added.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Canada airdrops aid into Gaza, says Israel violating international law
Canada said on Monday (August 5, 2025) it delivered humanitarian assistance through airdrops to Gaza, which has been under a devastating Israeli military assault for almost 22 months, with Ottawa again accusing Israel of violating international law. "The (Canadian Armed Forces) employed a CC-130J Hercules aircraft to conduct an airdrop of critical humanitarian aid in support of Global Affairs Canada into the Gaza Strip. The air drop consisted of 21,600 pounds of aid," the Canadian government said in a statement. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reported that it was Canadian Armed Forces' first humanitarian airdrop over Gaza using their own aircraft. The Israeli military said 120 food aid packages for Gaza's residents were airdropped by six countries, including Canada. The other five were Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Germany and Belgium. Canada said last week it plans to recognise the State of Palestine at a meeting of the United Nations in September, ratcheting up pressure on Israel as starvation spreads in Gaza. Canada also said on Monday that Israeli restrictions have posed challenges for humanitarian agencies. "This obstruction of aid is a violation of international humanitarian law and must end immediately," Canada's government said. The Israeli embassy in Ottawa had no immediate comment. Israel denies accusations of violating international law and blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza. Israel cut off food supplies to Gaza in March and then lifted that blockade in May - but with restrictions that it said were needed to prevent aid from being diverted to militant groups. President Donald Trump also claimed Hamas militants were stealing food coming into Gaza and selling it. However, Reuters reported late last month that an internal U.S. government analysis found no evidence of systematic theft by Hamas of U.S.-funded humanitarian supplies. Israel says it is taking steps for more aid to reach Gaza's population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, allowing airdrops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas attacked Israel, killing 1,200 and taking about 250 hostages, Israeli tallies show. Gaza's health ministry says Israel's subsequent military assault has killed over 60,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, internally displaced Gaza's entire population and prompted accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
How The U.S. Rewired Pakistan's Air Force; Why That Legacy Still Matters Against India
New Delhi: When Indian jets pounded Pakistani positions under Operation Sindoor, Islamabad's narrative tried to flip the script. Claims of tactical success echoed through Pakistani media, even as damage reports told a different story. But behind these optics, Pakistani defence analysts are pointing to a system that did not come from China, but from the United States nearly 70 years ago. Defence portal Quwa highlighted how the foundations of Pakistan's air force still rest on operational practices and doctrine handed down by the United States as far back as the 1950s. The report claims that what many today call 'software', mindset, structure and operational culture, was installed in the early days of the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) by American advisors. That legacy has shaped PAF's command philosophy to this day. It even influenced the decision to move the Air Force Headquarters from Rawalpindi to Peshawar, giving the force its own command ecosystem, distinct from the army's shadow. How America Gave PAF Its Operational 'Software' According to Quwa, in the early 1950s, Pakistan's air force lacked both equipment and a professional framework. The turning point came with the 1950 Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement with the United States. Under this, Washington not only provided F-86 Sabre aircraft to Pakistan but also embedded an entire operational doctrine into the PAF. Considered the architect of a modern PAF, then Air Marshal Asghar Khan recognised that the United States was sending jets as well as exporting a full system. This included depot-level aircraft maintenance, rather than the traditional squadron-level model; strict safety regulations, based on U.S. Air Force protocols; and clearly separated departments for operations, maintenance and administration. This model replaced the older British system and gave Pakistan's air force an American-style command structure that is still in use today. According to Quwa, this is the backbone that allows the PAF to integrate foreign fighter jets, including the Chinese J-10CE, into its arsenal smoothly. The report argues that this inherited mindset enables faster pilot adaptation and more coherent training cycles, which translates into better performance during real combat situations. A Quiet Nod to the U.S., Not China While Pakistani media has hyped up the role of Chinese-origin J-10CE fighter jets in countering India's Rafales, Quwa takes a more nuanced position. It suggests that the real enabler was not Chinese technology, but American methodology. The systems laid down decades ago by the United States, it claims, allow the PAF to function as a streamlined and adaptable air force, something its regional rivals have had to build from scratch. This legacy also explains the PAF's ability to quickly operationalise new platforms. Pilots transitioning to newer aircraft often show higher mission-readiness because the doctrine standardises procedures across the force. And it was this very consistency, Quwa argues, that allowed Pakistan to mount any kind of coordinated air response during India's strikes. What Really Happened in the Skies? Despite Pakistan's claims, the outcomes of the recent aerial confrontations tell a more complex story. Islamabad managed to shoot down one Indian aircraft, but failed to intercept or prevent Indian strikes on nine strategic sites in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). Indian Rafales inflicted heavy damage. In military terms, Quwa concedes, these results raise questions. One of the contributing factors was a misjudgement by Indian forces regarding the range of China's PL-15 missiles, a gap in calculation that Pakistan used to its advantage. Even then, say Indian analysts, PAF's performance could only be counted as successful if it had prevented India's deep-penetration airstrikes, not merely retaliated after the fact. A Legacy That Still Shapes Air Battles Pakistan's narrative of victory, critics say, may not hold up under scrutiny. But the story that emerges from Quwa's reporting is not about flashy dogfights or headline-grabbing missile launches. It is about how a 70-year-old framework continues to define one of South Asia's most professionalised air forces. In the end, as Quwa puts it, it was not Chinese, but American 'software' (a system of discipline, structure and long-term strategic thinking) that made the real difference.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why Trump's threat is unlikely to wean India off Russian crude
AI photo NEW DELHI: Trump's latest threat is unlikely to affect India's decision to source crude from Moscow as long as it's cheaper than the alternatives. "We will go solely by the interest of our consumers and opt for the best option price-wise. If Russian crude works out cheaper than what we can get from other sources, why should we penalise our consumers?" said a senior government source who did not rule out the possibility of India exploring further discounts from Moscow in the light of Trump's threat. Sources said NSA Ajit Doval's visit to Russia, beginning Tuesday, will yield clarity on the geo-economic trilemma. The Centre has so far not made any move to wean off Indian oil refiners from Russian crude, which comes at a steep discount compared to purchases from west Asia or US. It has not just helped keep domestic pump prices lower, but also benefited European countries, which have been major buyers of diesel and jet fuel from India, sources said. Biz circles agree with Centre's criticism of Trump's latest diktat Business circles in New Delhi agreed with the Centre's criticism of Trump's latest diktat. "India's oil trade with Russia has taken place with full transparency and broad understanding with the US. One of the key reasons India stepped up Russian oil purchases was to help stabilise global oil markets after Western sanctions disrupted traditional supply chains. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World Click Here Undo By maintaining diversified and affordable energy access, India contributed to preventing a global oil price shock. Trump's decision to raise tariffs on India citing oil trade is not only unjustified - it ignores market realities, misrepresents trade data, and undermines a key strategic partnership in the Indo-Pacific," trade research body GTRI said in a note. Interestingly, Trump's sudden bid to arm twist India into abandoning purchase of Russian crude follows declining purchase from Moscow because of sheer logic of markets. In May, India's crude petroleum imports from Russia fell almost 10% to $9.2 billion. Trump's latest comment is expected to create fresh uncertainty among American buyers, who are in talks with Indian exporters for placing orders for the busy Christmas season. The government's firm stand on farm and dairy is seen to have come as a blow for Trump, who had gone public over a dozen times claiming that India had agreed to slash tariffs. Shaken by the govt's steadfast opposition to blocking genetically modified American corn and soybean as well as its public rebuttal of claims over the US mediating a ceasefire during Operation Sindoor have hurt Trump's claim to have brokered several peace deals - one in each month of his second term as president. During the talks, negotiators had indicated the government's willingness to step up purchases of American oil, gas, fertilizer and defence equipment to improve the trade balance which is tilted in India's favour. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025