Germany: 1,300 Syrians return home since fall of Assad – DW – 08/13/2025
Some 1,337 Syrians living in Germany have gone back to Syria voluntarily since President Bashar Assad was deposed in December last year, the German Interior Ministry said on Wednesday.
The data was collected until the end of July.
More than 1 million Syrians, many of whom fled their homeland during the bloody civil war, live in Germany.
The announcement came as German Chancellor Friedrich Merz — who has made reducing immigration and increasing deportations a main focus of his government — marked his first 100 days in office.
The German government suspended processing asylum applications for Syrians, except in certain individual cases, in December.
Other applications have been put on ice while the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) continues to assess what was a "very volatile" security situation in Syria, a spokeswoman for the Interior Ministry said.
At the same time, the German government has been encouraging Syrians to leave Germany of their own free will.
In April, the Interior Ministry said it would allow Syrian refugees to visit their home country for short periods without fear of losing their protected status. A ministry spokesperson said that the aim was to enable Syrians to make the decision to return to Syria voluntarily.
"To do this, people from Syria must be able to see for themselves — for example, whether [their] houses are still standing, whether their relatives are still alive and so on," they said in April.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, however, is continuing to work toward the deportation of Syrians, his ministry said.
As with the recent renewed deportation of people to Afghanistan, the ministry said it would start by targeting convicted criminals.
However, the coalition government is also considering compelling people from Syria to return to their home country due to the change in the situation there.
"We are working on organizing additional deportation flights to Afghanistan and also to Syria," Dobrindt said last week.
The push for deportations to Afghanistan and Syria has come under fire due to the continued precariousness of the security situation in those countries.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Trump's DC intervention may be less likely in other cities – DW – 08/14/2025
US President Donald Trump has sent the National Guard into Washington, may well have other major cities in his sights. But could he replicate his capital intervention elsewhere? The arrival of 800 US National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. at the direction of President Donald Trump has been framed as an "authoritarian push" by the mayor of the nation's capital. Trump cast his decision to involve the National Guard in Washington and put the city's police force under the supervision of Attorney General Pam Bondi and Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole as a crime crackdown. He's calling the move a "Liberation Day" and claiming the city needed rescuing from "crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor." He's also named other cities, including New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Baltimore, as possible future targets if they don't address their own local crime issues. But federal data contradicts that claim, with statistics showing that violent crime is at a 30-year low. Critics say that based on this, there is no emergency that requires a military presence in the capital. "The numbers simply do not justify this measure," said Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser. So if crime has been going down in Washington, why the intervention? "It does look, if you look at the data, [like] crime is going down," said Laura Dickinson, a law professor at George Washington University, US. "City officials have not asked for help [from the president] so it really does seem at best questionable." "This is really problematic and contrary to our tradition in the United States, where we've been very cautious about using the military to do law enforcement functions," Dickinson added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In part, because he can. Washington, D.C. (which stands for District of Columbia) is not part of any US state and largely falls under the jurisdiction of the federal government. Under the 1973 Home Rule Act, presidents can take control of the DC police during emergencies for 30 days without congressional approval. And because it's a federal enclave, the president also commands the city's National Guard. Some US commentators have observed the move could be a political attempt to distract from ongoing controversy related to the Epstein Files and the release of jobs figures that showed a rise in unemployment. Trump's popularity in his flagship policy areas — in particular immigration — has also recently declined. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While Trump and his allies have pointed to city crime as justification for the move, his opponents inside and outside of congress say the action is designed to exact control over cities that do not support Congressional Black Caucus, which currently has no Republican members, also said the cities named by Trump as potential targets all have the common thread of being led by Black mayors, labelling the move a "blatantly racist and despicable power grab." The presidency has fewer powers outside of the nation's capital. The governors of the 50 US states preside over the National Guard within their own borders. It's a key distinction that William Banks, a law professor at Syracuse University, US, said would make it far more difficult for Trump to follow through on threats to extend interventions beyond the federal enclave of Washington, D.C. "It would be unwise, I think to generalize this example and apply it to other places in the United States," Banks told DW. "He can't go to Chicago or Philadelphia or New York City or Los Angeles and do the same thing. He simply doesn't have the authority." But what about in June, when he deployed the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles? Banks said there are provisions for limited interventions to protect federal property and personnel, but Trump "was walking on very thin ice." "His argument was that they were needed to ensure that the protesters didn't destroy federal property or harm ICE and other immigration personnel who are on the ground there doing their job." While they can protect federal assets, military personnel are banned from being actively used in domestic policing by the Posse Comitatus Act. In California, a three-day trial investigating whether the deployment of the National Guard was in breach of this law, and potentially unconstitutional, has recently wrapped up, with a decision pending. Dickinson said the use of military forces by the federal government in American cities could also impact how these institutions are perceived by the public. "It could damage the credibility and respect that Americans have for the military and the National Guard," Dickinson told DW. "These are some of the few institutions in the United States that enjoy very broad bipartisan support." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Federal command of the DC police ends after 30 days, unless the Republican-controlled Congress approves an extension. The National Guard can remain active indefinitely. Despite alarms being raised by Trump's opponents, who are calling the move an authoritarian flex, Banks expects a return to the status quo is more likely, particularly when it comes to threats to other states. He said the United States' foundational history overthrowing the British military, and the norm that law enforcement should be maintained by civilian police, are crucial in understanding what Americans will accept in their communities. "Our situation is somewhat unique in the United States in not having any expectation of military involvement in law enforcement," Banks told DW. "We don't like military uniforms on our streets, we don't like men and women with guns patrolling our streets, it just rubs against the grain. "Posse Comitatus codifies that principle, but I think the norm is even more important and more fundamental."
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Pakistan detains Afghans waiting for Germany relocations – DW – 08/14/2025
Pakistani police have been arresting Afghans, some of whom were awaiting relocation to Germany under special admission programs. Some detainees have reported surprise raids and separations from family members. Pakistani authorities detained Afghans in Islamabad in its latest crackdown on refugees from the country, including some who were set for relocation to Germany, police confirmed on Thursday. The arrests have drawn reactions from Berlin, with some of those sent to deportation centers already approved for relocation under Germany's admissions program as they flee the Taliban. Police in Islamabad said the group includes people registered in German programs, such as former local staff and others deemed at risk after the Taliban takeover in 2021. It was not clear how many such people were among those arrested. After the withdrawal of German troops, Germany had promised refuge from the Taliban to local staff who had supported Germany, as well as other Afghans facing persecution who fled to Pakistan. Some 2,400 of these people are now in Pakistan and hoping to leave for Germany. Among them, according to the German Interior Ministry, are about 350 former local staff of German institutions and their families. People in the region told the Reuters news agency that some have already been taken to the border region and even to Afghanistan. Witnesses described night raids on multiple guesthouses, saying entire families were taken away. "Seven families were arrested from my guesthouse alone," one owner told the DPA news agency. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The advocacy group Kabul Luftbrücke ("Kabul air bridge") said families have been split up, with minors removed from parents. For example, two sisters aged 17 and 18 were reportedly arrested without their family and taken to Afghanistan. "The German Embassy in Islamabad is apparently unable to effectively protect those affected," the group said in a statement. Those affected include a family for whom the Berlin Administrative Court had already issued a positive emergency ruling. Reporters Without Borders urged Berlin to secure the release of an Afghan journalist with a German admission promise, saying "Germany must act now." Pakistan began mass deportations of undocumented Afghans in late 2023 and extended the policy to registered individuals in April 2024. Officials in Islamabad say the plan is to remove up to 3 million Afghans, arguing that the policy is needed to put pressure on the Taliban government. Human rights advocates warn of serious danger for returnees, including possible retaliation for perceived acts against the Taliban as it was fighting its insurgency. When asked whether people who had already been deported to Afghanistan were now being brought back, German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said there was contact with these individuals through the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) and that they were receiving support. He added that each case would be examined for whether there was a legally binding obligation to admit them. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Interior Ministry has confirmed awareness of the detentions and said it has told Pakistan about detainees who are part of German programs. "We have a very close eye on the fact that in Pakistan," Dobrindt said. "The return of Afghans to Afghanistan is being accelerated." He said "in the vast majority of cases" there is still currently no entry permit for Germany, and whether one will be granted "cannot be said today." The Greens' Schahina Gambir called Pakistan's deportations "a scandal" and said "for months the federal government has been ignoring their legally confirmed need for protection." Clara Bünger of the socialist Left party described the situation as "immense inhumanity" and said "now action must be taken immediately: issue visas, stop deportations." Kabul Luftbrücke said it has 15 court rulings confirming individuals' right to admission, but that "appeals by the federal government often delay visa issuance." Rights groups and opposition parties continue to press for immediate visas and the safe return of those already deported. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Germany: End of the line for Deutsche Bahn railway chief – DW – 08/14/2025
The head of Germany's crisis-ridden rail operator Deutsche Bahn has been dismissed as the new German government looks to restructure and modernize the country's railways. The chief executive of Germany's rail network, , was dismissed on Thursday with the state-owned railway mired in economic, infrastructure and punctuality crises. Dr. Richard Lutz, who has headed up DB since 2017 after seven years as the company's finance director, had a contract until 2027 – but this has been cut short. "I thank Dr. Lutz for his efforts in difficult times," said German Transport Minister Patrick Schnieder (CDU), while a DB spokeswoman confirmed that Lutz would continue in his role on a caretaker basis until a successor is appointed. "I am sure that he will continue to do all he can for the railway in his remaining weeks," said Schnieder. , a joint-stock company owned 100% by the German state, was once famed for its efficiency and reliability, but its reputation has been shattered in recent years. Under Lutz, the punctuality of German long-distance trains has plummeted from 78.5% in 2017 to just 62.5% last year, meaning that over one third of trains arrived late, costing DB almost €200 million ($232.8m) in compensation. And despite years of under-investment and increasing ticket prices, DB continues to make annual losses. Lutz's days have been numbered since Germany's new government took office under Chancellor Friedrich Merz in May, pledging to restructure DB's management structure and modernize the country's creaking transport infrastructure. That reshuffle has now started, with Transport Minister Schnieder announcing the presentation of a new strategy on September 22. "Ideally we'll be able to present a new chief executive, too," he said. "Whether in terms of customer satisfaction, punctuality or economic performance, the situation on the railways is dramatic." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For Dirk Flege, head of Germany's leading railway lobby group ("pro-railway alliance"), the dismissal of Lutz now puts the pressure on Schnieder. "The pressure on the transport minister has now grown enormously," he said. "He now has just a few weeks to present a long-overdue government strategy for the railways and find a suitable new chief executive." Schnieder said the basic outline of the government's new concept was already agreed upon but that he would take his time to identify a suitable DB successor, promising: "Thoroughness and diligence before speed." In the meantime, elements of Lutz's own renovation plans are already underway, with plans in place for 40 key connections around the country. Currently, the route between Germany's two biggest cities, Berlin and Hamburg, is closed as it undergoes repair work set to last several months.
