
Judge restores Democrat to Federal Trade Commission, ruling her firing by Trump was illegal
U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan ruled late Thursday that federal law protects FTC commissioners from being removed by the president without cause, citing a key 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the FTC.
The decision allows Rebecca Kelly Slaughter to resume her duties as commissioner. The FTC website had been updated by Friday morning to show that Slaughter is among four sitting commissioners.
Attorneys for the Trump administration almost immediately declared their intent to appeal, and the case could make its way to the Supreme Court. The conservative-led court already has narrowed the reach of the 90-year-old decision, known as Humphrey's Executor, and some justices have called for overturning it altogether.
The high court also permitted Trump to fire the heads of other independent agencies. In May, the court allowed Trump to remove members of the National Labor Relations Board and the Merit Systems Protection Board, despite lower court rulings that Humphrey's Executor should protect them from arbitrary dismissal.
The justices are currently weighing an emergency appeal from the administration to oust three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Trump fired them in May, but a federal judge restored them to their positions a month later.
The legal fight over the firings also could extend to the Federal Reserve and the prospect of Trump firing Fed chairman Jerome Powell. The justices suggested in May that Trump may not have the same freedom to upend the leadership of the Fed, describing it as 'a uniquely structured, quasi-private entity.'
In her opinion, AliKhan said she was required to abide by the Humphrey's Executor decision, in which the court rebuffed President Franklin Roosevelt and held that FTC commissioners could be removed only for cause, not at the president's whim.
She said her ruling would uphold 'clearly established law that has been enacted by a coequal branch of government, reaffirmed by another coequal branch, and acquiesced to by thirteen executives over the course of ninety years.'
But the judge acknowledged that hers probably would not be the last word. 'Defendants are, of course, free to take their quarrels with Humphrey's Executor to the Supreme Court. This court has no illusions about where this case's journey leads,' she wrote.
Trump fired Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, the commission's two Democratic members in March. The FTC is a regulator created by Congress that enforces consumer protection measures and antitrust legislation. Its seats typically include three members of the president's party and two from the opposing party. The commissioners sued to reclaim their jobs, saying they'd been dismissed illegally. Slaughter has four years left in her term as commissioner. Bedoya submitted his resignation in June, and AliKhan dismissed his claim as a result.
'As the Court recognized today, the law is clear, and I look forward to getting back to work,' Slaughter said in a statement Thursday.
During a May court hearing in federal court in Washington, D.C., plaintiffs' attorneys warned against granting the president 'absolute removal power over any executive officer,' saying it would effectively eliminate an important check on his power.
'That has never been the case in this country,' said attorney Aaron Crowell. 'That's not the law. That has never been the law.'
A politicized FTC also could favor powerful corporations while driving up prices for consumers, the lawyers for the fired commissioners said.
But attorneys for the Trump administration argued that the FTC's role has expanded since the 1930s, and as such, its members should answer directly to the president.
'The president should be able to remove someone who is actively blocking his policies, for example,' Justice Department lawyer Emily Hall said during the hearing.
AliKhan, who was nominated to the federal bench by President Joe Biden in 2023, noted the long line of presidents before Trump who didn't try to push the limits.
Commissioners are appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They serve seven-year terms that are staggered to prevent multiple vacancies at once. They can be fired for displaying specific bad behaviors, including inefficiency, neglect of duty and malfeasance in office.
Trump told Bedoya and Slaughter that he was dismissing them because their service on the commission was inconsistent with his administration's priorities, according to the lawsuit.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Focus on tariffs is ignoring Canada's fastest-growing trade opportunity
With the latest 35 per cent tariff threat from United States President Donald Trump, the national trade discussion and news headlines are, understandably, fixated once again on tariffs on goods and what to do about them. As a relatively small, open economy, Canada relies heavily on trade — especially trade with our neighbour and the world's largest market — to sustain living standards. But focusing only on physical goods risks missing a major opportunity. Canada's fastest-growing export category is not oil or autos. It is digitally delivered services. These services are delivered remotely or sold via digital platforms. Digital services do not move across physical borders. They move through code, platforms and cross-border data flows. Over the past 20 years, they have grown nearly four times faster than Canada's other exports, yet they remain largely absent from the national trade conversation. A new discussion paper from the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada points out that digital service exports now account for almost two-thirds of Canada's commercial services exports. Growth is strongest in sectors such as software, engineering, audiovisual services and IT consulting. Digital services are also the fastest-growing part of global trade. Since 2005, they have grown more than three times faster than goods trade globally. Their share of total world services exports has climbed to more than 50 per cent from 30 per cent. The fastest-growing importers of digital services include Indonesia, Vietnam, Chile, Peru, the Philippines and India, where demand for digital solutions is growing rapidly across sectors such as information technology, fintech and e-commerce. Many fast-growth markets now import more digital services than traditional goods. Cloud-based collaboration, seamless and instant language translation, and digital platforms are accelerating this shift. New artificial intelligence (AI) developments further expand the menu of what can be traded globally. Canada has the foundations in place to seize this opportunity. This country has world-class AI researchers, firms that are digitally enabled and diaspora connections to emerging digital markets. Canadians are also among the top global users of generative AI tools. The federal government now has a dedicated minister for AI and digital innovation. Canadian trade policymakers have been leaders in including digital provisions in trade agreements. The Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) already contain modern digital trade rules, and Canada has just announced a new digital trade agreement to be negotiated alongside the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA). But despite all these tools, Canada is punching far below its weight. Our digital services exports have rapidly grown, but our global market share remains below three per cent. That is well behind the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands. Ottawa needs to reframe Canada's trade discussion for the digital and AI era. Digital trade is growing quickly, faces different restrictions than physical trade and relies less on geography, and is aligned with Canada's relative strengths. Canada should adopt a clear national goal: double its share of global digital services exports by 2030 and ensure that at least half go to markets beyond North America. This target would focus national attention and provide a benchmark for progress in a fast-growing part of the global economy. It would also help identify and address the barriers that digital exporters face. Canada already offers support through trade commissioners and export financing, but these efforts are rarely co-ordinated around a shared objective. Moreover, those responsible for AI and digital innovation do not co-ordinate with those responsible for trade. A clear target would connect these discussions. Canadian firms in traditional sectors such as manufacturing, agri-food and mining could also benefit from embedding more digital services into their exports. But the data on digital services inputs shows that most are not adopting these inputs in significant ways. Strengthening digital services trade would support these sectors by making their offerings more competitive and more resilient amid the trade crisis. Policymakers should treat digital trade as core to the country's economic strategy. Canada has the tools it needs to capitalize on the new trade possibilities that have already emerged. Jack Mintz: Governments may overproduce, but not the private sector Opinion: Our long-running trade soap opera with the Americans An increased focus on digital trade also helps derisk Canada's overall trade portfolio. It expands both the types of trade and markets for that trade, making Canada's economy more resilient in the face of tariff whiplash under Trump 2.0. Kati Suominen is the founder and chief executive of Nextrade Group, and Danielle Goldfarb is a distinguished fellow at the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Media's Bitcoin Holdings Grow to $2B as President Trump Advances Crypto Agenda
Key Takeaways Trump Media & Technology Group's Bitcoin and related holdings have grown to about $2 billion. The company, founded by President Donald Trump, said it plans to keep buying Bitcoin and crypto securities. On Friday, Trump signed the pro-stablecoin GENIUS Act into law and two other crypto-related bills passed in the U.S. House. Bitcoin recently traded at about $119, Media & Technology Group (DJT) has amassed roughly $2 billion in bitcoin and Bitcoin-related securities, as its founder, President Donald Trump, has worked to reshape American crypto policy. The Truth Social parent said it plans to keep buying bitcoin, and allocated $300 million to an options acquisition strategy for bitcoin-related securities. The company's bitcoin and related holdings make up about two-thirds of its $3 billion in liquid assets. Trump Media has also filed in recent weeks to launch a trio of crypto exchange-traded funds that invest in Bitcoin and other digital assets. The ETFs are expected to launch later this year in partnership with Bitcoin traded near $119,000 Monday, days after the president signed the pro-stablecoin GENIUS Act into law and two other crypto-related bills passed in the U.S. House. Largest Corporate Bitcoin Holder Buys More Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, bought 6,220 bitcoin last week in its latest round of crypto purchases, according to a regulatory filing. The company's holdings have climbed to a whopping 607,770 bitcoin, worth $72.32 billion at Bitcoin's current price. The price of Bitcoin has jumped by one-third over the past three months and hit a record high of more than $123,000 last week. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump posts fake video showing Obama arrest
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The fake video purports to show FBI agents bursting into the meeting, pushing Obama into a kneeling position and putting him in handcuffs as Trump looks on smiling, while the song 'Y.M.C.A.' by the Village People plays. Later, the fake video shows Obama in an orange jumpsuit pacing in a cell. The start of the video shows a compilation of actual footage of Democratic leaders, including Obama and former President Joe Biden, saying, 'no one is above the law.' Advertisement Obama's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the video. Trump regularly reposts AI-generated or mocked-up videos and photographs on his Truth Social account. Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said last week that the latest report released by her offices showed a 'treasonous conspiracy in 2016' by top Obama administration officials to harm Trump. She said she would make a criminal referral to the FBI based on recently released documents. Advertisement A link to real video footage from an interview that Gabbard gave to Fox News on Sunday on the subject was also posted to Trump's social media. Democrats have denounced the administration's effort to discredit Obama as politically motivated and riddled with errors, and contradicting previous reviews of the assessment. The latest document, issued last week, did not show Russian manipulation of the election, and instead reinforced the view of intelligence officials who found no evidence that Russia hacked voting systems to change votes. Democrats have cited reports by intelligence agencies and Senate investigators who found that, while Russian hackers probed election systems to see if they could change vote outcomes and extracted voter registration data in at least two states, there was no evidence that they attempted to change votes. The Obama administration's assessment also did not say that Russian hackers manipulated votes. Trump has been trying to change the conversation among his supporters, after the Justice Department walked back its promise to release the full collection of files about Epstein, a multimillionaire financier and convicted sex offender who died in prison in 2019. That decision angered some of the president's most ardent supporters. Some have questioned Trump's judgment on the matter, causing strife within the MAGA movement that powered Trump to two presidential election victories. This article originally appeared in .