logo
Australia bans YouTube for children under 16, joining TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat in age limits

Australia bans YouTube for children under 16, joining TikTok, Instagram and Snapchat in age limits

Time of India20 hours ago
Australia is going to ban children under 16 from creating YouTube accounts starting December, expanding its world-first social media restrictions. The ban, which already applies to TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram, Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), now includes YouTube following recommendations from the eSafety Commissioner. Authorities argue that YouTube, despite being considered primarily a video platform, exposes children to harmful content and risks similar to traditional social media platforms.
Under the new rule, minors can still watch YouTube videos without an account but will lose features like personalised recommendations, posting content, and commenting. The move is aimed at protecting young Australians from online harm, cyberbullying and mental health issues linked to excessive social media use, setting an example for stricter global digital safety standards.
Australian government acts to safeguard children under 16 from online harm
As reported by Euronews, Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasised that the government is prioritizing children's safety and mental well-being in the digital era. He stated:
'We know that social media is doing social harm. My government and this parliament are ready to take action to protect young Australians.' This move follows mounting evidence that unrestricted access to online platforms can lead to issues such as cyberbullying, exposure to explicit content, online grooming, and excessive screen time that impacts mental health.
YouTube's widespread use among children prompts safety concerns
For years, YouTube was treated differently from other social platforms because it primarily serves as a video streaming service rather than a social networking site. However, its widespread use among children and the presence of harmful content prompted authorities to reconsider.
According to the eSafety Commissioner, three out of four Australian children aged 10–15 regularly use YouTube, making it more popular than TikTok and Instagram. Alarmingly, 37% of children who reported exposure to harmful online content said they encountered it on YouTube.
The commissioner concluded that providing YouTube with an exemption was inconsistent with the goal of protecting minors, leading to its inclusion in the ban. Children under 16 will still be able to view videos without an account but will lose access to personalised recommendations, commenting, and content creation features.
Public support for age restrictions
A survey conducted last month involving nearly 4,000 Australians revealed that nine in ten people support some form of 'age assurance' for social media platforms. This widespread public backing reflects growing societal concerns about protecting children's mental health, limiting their exposure to inappropriate content, and reducing online exploitation risks. Australia's decision is among the strictest social media regulations in the world, potentially influencing other countries to adopt similar measures. It also raises questions about digital freedoms, parental responsibility, and how tech companies will adapt to stricter compliance standards.
While critics argue such bans might limit digital learning and social connectivity, supporters believe strong guardrails are necessary in a digital environment dominated by algorithms designed to maximise engagement, often at the expense of young users' well-being.
Also Read |
OpenAI's ChatGPT agent outsmarts 'I am not a robot' test without detection, raising cybersecurity concerns
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pixel 10 series: Planning to buy Google Pixel 9? 3 reasons you should wait
Pixel 10 series: Planning to buy Google Pixel 9? 3 reasons you should wait

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

Pixel 10 series: Planning to buy Google Pixel 9? 3 reasons you should wait

Ahead of the Pixel 10 series launch next month, Google is offering discounts and promotional deals on its current Pixel 9 lineup. The base Pixel 9, for example, is now listed at Rs 69,999 on the Google Store online in India, down from its launch price of Rs 79,999. With the Pixel 10 series debut around the corner, should you consider waiting for the upcoming line-up or go with one of the models in the Pixel 9 series? Let us begin with what is expected from the Pixel 10 series. Google Pixel 10 series: Global launch Event: Made by Google Date: August 20, 2025 Time: 10:30 pm (IST) Livestream: YouTube Google Pixel 10 series: India launch Date: August 21, 2025 Google Pixel 10 series: What to expect Performance: The Pixel 10 is likely to feature the next-generation Google Tensor G5 chip. Built using TSMC's 3nm fabrication process, this marks a transition away from Samsung Foundry and is expected to bring gains in both speed and power efficiency. A notable change in the G5 could be Google's adoption of a GPU from Imagination Technologies—specifically the IMG DXT—replacing the Arm Mali-G715 MP7 used in the Tensor G4. Another important update may be a fully custom image signal processor (ISP), moving away from the semi-custom ISPs used in previous versions. This could lead to improved photo processing and overall camera performance. Camera: The Google Pixel 10 may become the first base model in the series to offer a telephoto lens. According to reports, this telephoto camera could be the same one used in the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, supporting 5x optical zoom. This would enhance the base model's camera capabilities, offering better zoom, improved portrait photos, and enhanced macro performance. In addition to the new telephoto lens, Google is expected to update the main and ultra-wide sensors on the Pixel 10. The primary sensor is likely to be a 50MP Samsung GN8, the same used in the Pixel 9a. Last year's Pixel 9 featured the 50MP Samsung GNV sensor, also found in the Pixel 9 Pro and Pro XL. The ultra-wide sensor may shift from the 48MP Sony IMX858 used in the Pixel 9 to a 13MP Sony IMX712. Although this may seem like a downgrade, the real-world image quality may improve thanks to the expected fully custom ISP on the Tensor G5 chip. Qi2 wireless charging support: The Pixel 10 series, including the standard model, is expected to support the Qi2 wireless charging standard. This means magnetic alignment-based wireless charging would be possible when paired with compatible accessories. Google may even skip the baseline Qi2 spec in favor of the upgraded Qi2 25W standard, which offers faster charging speeds. In addition to the phones themselves, Google is also said to be preparing a new accessory ecosystem under the 'Pixelsnap' name, which may include custom cases and magnetic wireless chargers. Google Pixel 9 series: Offers on Google Store Launch price: Rs 79,999 Google Store discount: Rs 10,000 No-interest EMI: Up to 24 months Bank offers: cashback of up to Rs 7000 on EMI Pixel 9 Pro: Launch price: Rs 109,999 Google Store discount: Rs 10,000 No-interest EMI: Up to 24 months Bank offers: cashback of up to Rs 10,000 on EMI Pixel 9 Pro XL: Launch price: Rs 124,999 Google Store discount: Rs 10,000 No-interest EMI: Up to 24 months Bank offers: cashback of up to Rs 10,000 on EMI Pixel 9 Pro Fold: Launch price: Rs 172,999 Google Store discount: Rs 10,000 No-interest EMI: Up to 24 months Bank offers: cashback of up to Rs 10,000 on EMI

YouTube begins testing new age verification feature amid chaos over Death Stranding photo mode loophole on Discord, and Reddit
YouTube begins testing new age verification feature amid chaos over Death Stranding photo mode loophole on Discord, and Reddit

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

YouTube begins testing new age verification feature amid chaos over Death Stranding photo mode loophole on Discord, and Reddit

(Image via Getty Images) YouTube has started testing a new age verification system in the United States, with the aim of better protecting young users. The move comes into effect with the growing pressure for better online safety. It's specifically after recently that the users found a way to bypass age checks, using Death Stranding 2: On the Beach photo mode. The development highlights the increased struggle for verifying age online in an effective way. YouTube experiments with an age verification feature After facing regulatory pressures, YouTube is finally out there testing a new method for estimating user ages in an accurate way. The trial currently running in the United States aims to restrict underage access to all available mature content. As per reports, the feature would analyse factors including account creation date, user behaviour, account activity, and even facial recognition age check in some cases. If the system flags an account to be potentially underage, the access of the users can be restricted. The users who will get flagged by the system will need to verify their age using their government IDs, selfie scans or credit card details. However, the significant concern that exists here is about the accuracy of the system—AI can misjudge the user's appearance. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo There are many users who doubt that YouTube can reliably guess ages based on nothing but users' activity itself. Privacy concerns online, though, continue to persist about sensitive documents sharing. Also, despite all the pushback, the move of YouTube aligns perfectly with global trends, such as the UK's Online Safety Act. What is the age check loophole that potentially led YouTube to test the feature? While the UK Online Safety Act is standing its ground despite more than three hundred and fifty thousand signatures standing against it, platforms like YouTube have started to push some new checks. The feature testing comes at a time when the gamers have found a workaround to the law, using Death Stranding photo mode. Platforms like Reddit and Discord age verification are in place within regions like the United Kingdom. It follows the new Online Safety Act and requires users to have facial scans to access certain content. However, using the detailed photo mode of Death Stranding 2 has proven to be the key for bypassing it. With the photo mode trick, users point the in-game camera at Sam Bridges to fool the verification AI of the platforms. Facial recognition mistakes a virtual model for a real person. It allows users to pass the checks without having to submit their personal IDs or pictures. It's working for Reddit, Discord and some other systems. The age verification loophole has highlighted the major flaw—current tech for age verification struggles to distinguish between digital avatars and real humans. While there are services like Bluesky that have caught this trick, others have failed. Such ease in bypassing the checks has raised major concerns about whether the measures can truly protect the minors or if they just create a false sense of security. Experts have suggested combining AI with manual reviews—a multi-layered verification, which could possibly help. But for now, the debate still continues about whether or not there exists any measure of safety. With Discord, Xbox and now YouTube age verification redefining the system, the one thing that remains clear is that digital age checks do need more than just the camera scan for working right. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

Australian court rejects X's appeal in child safety case, orders legal costs
Australian court rejects X's appeal in child safety case, orders legal costs

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Australian court rejects X's appeal in child safety case, orders legal costs

An Australian appeals court on Thursday ruled against X Corp., rejecting a challenge to a safety watchdog's demands for details on how the Elon Musk-owned company was combating widespread child exploitation material on its platform. Three federal court judges unanimously rejected X's appeal against a federal court decision in October last year that the company was obliged to respond to a notice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant on child abuse material being shared on X, which is incorporated in Texas. The judges also ordered X to pay the commissioner's legal costs. Inman Grant's office describes itself as the world's first government agency dedicated to keeping people safe online. Inman Grant has driven world-first legislation that will ban Australian children younger than 16 from social media platforms including X from December. The federal court case goes back to early 2023, when Inman Grant asked some of the world's largest technology companies to report on what they were doing about child abuse material appearing on their platforms. A reporting notice, issued under Australia's Online Safety Act, was sent to Twitter Inc., incorporated in Delaware, in February that year. Twitter merged with X the following month. X arguments against complying with Inman Grant's order included that Twitter no longer existed as a legal entity and that X did not carry its predecessor's regulatory obligations in Australia. Inman Grant, a former Twitter employee, welcomed Thursday's ruling. 'This judgment confirms the obligations to comply with Australian regulations still apply, regardless of a foreign company's merger with another foreign company,' she said in a statement. She said her agency would continue enforcing the Online Safety Act and 'holding all tech companies to account without fear or favor, ensuring they comply with the laws of Australia.' 'Without meaningful transparency, we cannot hold technology companies accountable,' she said. X lawyer Justin Quill said he had not yet read the appeals court judges' reasons and could not comment on the possibility of a High Court appeal. The High Court only hears around 10% of appeal applications, so the federal court full-bench decision could be final in X's case. X's media office did not immediately respond to an email request for comment on Thursday. In 2023, Inman Grant's office fined X 610, 500 Australian dollars ($385,000) for failing to fully explain how it tackled child exploitation content. X's response was considered incomplete or misleading. X refused to pay and the penalty is the subject of a separate and ongoing federal court case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store