logo
Mrs Gandhi, Nixon, and the 1971 war: Did PM ‘grovel' before US president as BJP claims?

Mrs Gandhi, Nixon, and the 1971 war: Did PM ‘grovel' before US president as BJP claims?

Indian Express6 days ago
Atal Bihari Vajpayee hailed Indira Gandhi as 'Durga' after the 1971 war, praising her role in the liberation of Bangladesh and dealing Pakistan a crushing military defeat. However, during the recent debate in Parliament on Operation Sindoor, BJP leaders questioned Mrs Gandhi's role during the war, claiming she 'grovelled' before US President Richard Nixon to try and get him to make Pakistan back off.
The comments after Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday targeted the government over US President Donald Trump's claims that he brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Rahul said if Trump was 'lying' about the ceasefire, PM Narendra Modi should call him out, if 'he has even 50% of the courage of Indira Gandhi', his grandmother.
Gandhi said the Modi government did not have the 'political will' to wage a war with Pakistan. 'If you want to use the Indian forces, then you should have 100% political will … (Defence Minister) Rajnath Singh compared the 1971 (war with Pakistan) and Operation Sindoor. There was political will in 1971 … The then Prime Minister (Indira Gandhi) said, 'We will do whatever we want to do in Bangladesh' … political will without any confusion,' he said.
In response, the BJP's Godda MP, Nishikant Dubey, said that on December 5, 1971, Mrs Gandhi wrote to Nixon and 'literally begged him to use his influence to stop the war with Pakistan'. Former Union Minister Anurag Thakur told the House, 'Indira Gandhi wrote to Nixon in a way that it seemed that she was grovelling before Nixon. Let the nation decide whether that government was iron or irony.'
How it all unfolded
Historian Srinath Raghavan, in his book Indira Gandhi and the Years that Transformed India, writes that by March 19, 1971, preparations for a military crackdown were underway in East Pakistan (present-day Bangladesh).
Mrs Gandhi was aware of the considerable 'parliamentary and public pressure on the government to do something' and met Opposition leaders on the evening of March 26 to explain her thinking. 'She also requested that the government's policy on the matter should not become a subject matter of public debate,' Raghavan writes.
Parliament was tense in the following days. Minister of External Affairs Swaran Singh informed Parliament about the situation in East Pakistan, telling both the Houses that the government.was 'gravely concerned' about the situation and 'our hearts go out in sympathy to the people who are undergoing suffering', Raghavan writes.
But he came under sharp criticism, with several MPs, many from Bengal and with roots in Bangladesh, expressing concern about the situation. The PM had to intervene and assure Parliament that 'we are fully alive to the situation'.
Raghavan writes that there was huge pressure to recognise Bangladesh. 'Several political parties passed resolutions demanding immediate recognition of Bangladesh. Legislative Assemblies in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Assam, Nagaland, and Tripura adopted resolutions urging the Central government to formally recognise Bangladesh … More uncomfortable was the demand for recognition from the Congress's principal ally, the Communist Party of India. These calls were echoed in the press and lent credence by Pundits.'
Veteran leader Jayaprakash Narayan, who would later take on Mrs Gandhi during the Emergency, also pushed the government for action.
According to Raghavan, the PM felt that since the international community believed East Pakistan was Pakistan's internal matter, India could face pushback. Her strategy was to support the guerrilla movement in the neighbouring country.
This was the stance till May 7, when she held another meeting with the Opposition. While supporting the guerrilla campaign, she said that 'we cannot contemplate armed intervention at all'.
But the refugee crisis soon arrived, with almost 1 lakh refugees landing up in India, according to some estimates. Raghavan writes that Mrs Gandhi reached out to Atal Behari Vajpayee, then a leader of the BJP's precursor Jana Sangh, to 'request him to not politicise' the issue as it would 'help Pakistan portray the refugee problem as a Hindu-Muslim and India-Pakistan problem'.
Mrs Gandhi changes her mind
Within days, there was a shift in the PM's stance. On May 24, she spoke in Parliament about the extent of the refugee crisis.
'…So massive a migration, in so short a time, is unprecedented in recorded history. About three and a half million people have come into India from Bangla Desh during the last eight weeks. They belong to every religious persuasion – Hindu, Muslim, Buddhist and Christian… They are not refugees in the sense we have understood this since Partition. They are victims of war who have sought refuge from the military terror across our frontier,' she said.
She added that India had not tried to 'interfere with the internal affairs of Pakistan, even though they have not exercised similar restraint'.
'And even now, we do not seek to interfere in any way. But what has actually happened? What was claimed to be an internal problem of Pakistan, has also become an internal problem for India. We are, therefore, entitled to ask Pakistan to desist immediately from all actions which it is taking in the name of domestic jurisdiction, and which vitally affect the peace and well-being of millions of our own citizens. Pakistan cannot be allowed to seek a solution of its political or other problems at the expense of India and on Indian soil.'
By mid-October 1971, there was a growing sense within the government that it had to fully support the rebels. To shore up international support, the PM travelled to Moscow in September to persuade the leadership. She also visited key Western capitals, which only 'elicited only a modicum of sympathy and support'. Her meeting with US President Richard Nixon was 'frosty', writes Raghavan.
'The consequences of military action, Nixon warned, were 'incalculably dangerous'. Nixon's Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger held a meeting to take stock of the situation. It was here that Nixon remarked that Mrs Gandhi was being a 'bitch' and Kissinger replied that 'Indians are bastards anyway'. Mrs Gandhi held a meeting with the President that same afternoon. 'She did not bring up the South Asian crisis at all. Instead, she probed Nixon about US foreign policy across the globe. Her attitude, Kissinger would later write 'brought out all of Nixon's latent insecurities',' Raghavan writes.
On December 3, after Pakistan launched an airstrike, India declared war. Two days later, Mrs Gandhi wrote to Nixon to apprise him of the situation. 'I am writing to you at a moment of grave peril and danger to my country and my people. The success of the freedom movement in Bangla Desh has now become a war on India due to the adventurism of the Pakistan military machine,' she wrote.
'In this hour of danger the Government and the people of India seek your understanding and urge you to persuade Pakistan to desist forthwith from the policy of wanton aggression and military adventurism which it has unfortunately embarked upon. May I request Your Excellency to exercise your undoubted influence with the Government of Pakistan to stop their aggressive activities against India and to deal immediately with the genesis of the problem of East Bengal which has caused so much trial and tribulations to the people not only of Pakistan but of the entire sub-continent,' she told the US president.
After an almost two-week campaign, the Pakistan Army surrendered on December 16. Mrs Gandhi immediately rushed to Parliament after Dhaka fell, declaring it was now a 'free capital' of a 'free country'. 'The parliament erupted in acclamation and every line of hers was cheered to the echo. In the days ahead, Indira Gandhi would be praised in Parliament with awe bordering on veneration… She was compared to Durga…,' Raghavan writes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After Pakistan and Israel, THIS country nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
After Pakistan and Israel, THIS country nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Hindustan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

After Pakistan and Israel, THIS country nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

After Pakistan and Israel, the latest country to back US President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize is Cambodia. The Southeast Asian nation on Thursday formally nominated Trump for the top peace prize, citing his "visionary and innovative diplomacy." The Southeast Asian nation on Thursday formally nominated Trump for the top peace prize, citing his "visionary and innovative diplomacy."(AP) Cambodia's decision comes after the United States brokered a ceasefire with Thailand after five days of hostilities between the neighbouring countries. What has Cambodia said in its letter for Trump? "President Trump's extraordinary statesmanship -- marked by his commitment to resolving conflicts and preventing catastrophic wars through visionary and innovative diplomacy -- was most recently demonstrated by his decisive role in brokering an immediate and unconditional ceasefire between Cambodia and Thailand," the letter said. "This timely intervention, which averted a potentially devastating conflict, was vital in preventing great loss of lives and paved the pay towards the restoration of peace," the letter added further. Also Read | Why does Donald Trump want the Nobel Peace Prize so badly? It's his self-image, and Obama, say analysts Last week, Cambodia's deputy prime minister Sun Chanthol had stated that the country would work to nominate Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize for his help in reaching a truce with Thailand. 'He should get the Nobel, not only for his work on Cambodia, but also elsewhere,' the deputy PM said. Pakistan, Israel on list of countries backing Trump. Pakistan became the first country to openly back the US President's bid for a Nobel Peace Prize. Islamabad's statement came after Trump's involvement in the ceasefire deal with India, which the US president has claimed full credit for. Also Read | 'No leader in world asked India to stop': PM shuts down Trump's ceasefire claim Despite his claims, India has denied a foreign hand in its ceasefire understanding with Pakistan after hostilities between the two nations in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor. Israel's backing for a Nobel for Trump formalised during Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington DC. During this meet, the Israeli leader presented Trump with a letter, expressing Tel Aviv's support for a peace prize nomination.

BJP accuses Rahul Gandhi of displaying ‘selective outrage' over ECI remarks
BJP accuses Rahul Gandhi of displaying ‘selective outrage' over ECI remarks

The Hindu

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

BJP accuses Rahul Gandhi of displaying ‘selective outrage' over ECI remarks

The Bharatiya Janata Party on Thursday (August 7, 2025) accused Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi of showing 'selective outrage', stating that his allegation about 'large-scale' electoral roll fraud was a sign of 'frustration and election rage'. Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said Mr. Gandhi had completely lost his 'composure in the agony of losing power'. 'The ideologically hollow Congress party is systematically attacking constitutional institutions. It cannot be ruled out that there is a larger conspiracy against India's democracy and Constitution behind this calculated deceit. After all, their family's history is also filled with the dark chapter of the 'Emergency',' he posted on X. Mr. Pradhan said by attacking the EC, Mr. Gandhi was insulting the discerning decision of the public, which was universally accepted in a democracy. 'Where was Rahul Gandhi when the EC invited every party to file complaints regarding the SIR [Special Intensive Revision] in Bihar? Neither Congress nor any party from the INDI Alliance approached the EC at that time,' he said. 'This double standard will no longer work — praising the EC when victorious and calling it biased when defeated! Rahul Gandhi needs to understand that his family's victory is not the definition of democracy. The people of Bihar are now ready to give a befitting reply to such opponents of democracy and the Constitution,' said the Union Minister. At a press conference, BJP MP and spokesperson Sambit Patra said the Congress leader was displaying 'selective outrage' as he never made such accusations with respect to the States where his party won. 'When they got 99 seats in the Lok Sabha election, the Congress celebrated all over the country. They did not allege the EC was compromised,' he said. Mr. Patra said the BJP, which remained in the Opposition for long, never resorted to the kind of indecorous language used by Mr. Gandhi. 'He threatened that if the Opposition comes to power, the EC officials would face 'serious consequences',' he said, adding that the language showed his 'frustration' and 'election rage'. 'If you think that there were irregularities in the Maharashtra polls, you should have instructed your partymen to approach the court within the prescribed time period. You did not go to court, your proxy petitioned the Bombay High Court. The court dismissed the plea terming it a gross abuse of the process of law. Then, a Constitutional Bench of High Court found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting and emphasised that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate any personal legal injury or enforceable right...,' said Mr. Patra. Referring to the EC's letter to Mr. Gandhi asking him to submit through an affidavit the relevant papers supporting the charges made on Thursday, the BJP leader said the Congress's Karnataka unit had gone to the EC on August 3. 'On August 6, the EC asked them to come on August 8. However, Mr. Gandhi held the press conference a day earlier...,' said Mr. Patra. The BJP leader said after Mr. Gandhi raised objections related to the Maharashtra election for the first time in November 2024, the EC had invited him for a discussion. However, he did not meet them. Then, taking note of his news article published on the election, it again sought a meeting, but he did not go. Responding to Mr. Gandhi's 'My word is my oath' remarks, Mr. Patra said the Congress leader's words had 'no meaning'. 'That is the reason you have to give the details in an affidavit to the EC,' he said. Questioning Mr. Gandhi's charge that the BJP used the Pulwama terror attack to reverse 'anti-incumbency', the BJP leader asked if it was an attempt to insinuate that the attack was orchestrated by India. He said the manner in which the Congress leader raised doubts about Operation Sindoor, air strikes, and the surgical strike, and targeted constitutional institutions, the people would start accusing him of being a 'traitor'. Four-term BJP MP from Bangalore Central P. C. Mohan, through a post on X, added: 'Electoral rolls are prepared as per the RP Act, 1950, and the Rules, 1960. Draft rolls (SSR 2024) were shared with Congress in Nov 2024. Not a single appeal was filed after the final publication. Now, after losing Bangalore Central, they cry vote theft at a press conference.'

NSA Ajit Doval meets Putin in Moscow day after Trump slaps tariffs
NSA Ajit Doval meets Putin in Moscow day after Trump slaps tariffs

Hindustan Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

NSA Ajit Doval meets Putin in Moscow day after Trump slaps tariffs

National Security Adviser Ajit Doval met Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin during his visit to Moscow for bilateral talks focused on security, economic, and energy cooperation. NSA Ajit Doval meets Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin.(Kremlin ) The meeting came a day after US President Donald Trump announced steep new tariffs on Indian imports in response to New Delhi's continued purchases of Russian crude oil. Trump, on Wednesday, signed an executive order imposing an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, effectively doubling the total tariff burden to 50 per cent. India has defended its energy trade with Russia, maintaining that its oil imports are 'driven by national interest and market dynamics.' In a video released by Russian state media outlet Sputnik News, Doval described India's relationship with Russia as 'very special,' underlining the depth of long-standing strategic ties between the two countries. 'We have got a very special relationship, long relationship and we highly value our strategic partnership. We have had high-level engagements and these have contributed very substantially,' Doval said. He also welcomed the announcement of an upcoming state visit by President Putin to India, saying summit meetings have historically marked key moments in bilateral ties. 'We are very excited and delighted to learn about the visit of His Excellency, the President of Russia, President Putin, to India. I think that the dates are almost finalized now. The more important thing is that the summit meetings have always been a watershed point,' Doval added. According to sources cited by news agency ANI, while Doval confirmed that plans for the Russian president's visit are underway, no specific dates were finalised during his engagements in Moscow. India and Russia continue to expand their defence cooperation. In 2018, India signed a $5.43 billion deal for five squadrons of the S-400 Triumf air defence missile system from Russia. So far, three squadrons have been delivered.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store