Britain to bar consumers from borrowing to buy crypto under new regime
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Popular in TechMore ≫
Britain is to restrict consumers' use of credit cards to buy crypto and their access to crypto lending products, the regulator said on Friday, a move aimed at improving protection as cryptoassets are regulated for the first time.The finance ministry this week said it would bring cryptocurrencies under compulsory regulation, with exchanges, dealers and issuers all coming under the existing rulebook.Crypto trading has exploded in popularity, with around 7 million people - about 12% of the adult population - owning cryptoassets, but it remains largely unregulated, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said. The regulator maintains consumers "should be prepared to lose all their money" if they invest.Announcing new draft laws to regulate the sector, the government said it wanted to crack down on "bad actors" while supporting legitimate innovation in the burgeoning industry.The FCA is now looking at introducing curbs on retail investors using borrowed funds for crypto."We are considering a range of restrictions, including restricting the use of credit cards to directly buy cryptoassets, and using a credit line provided by an e-money firm to do so," it said in a paper seeking feedback on its proposals.Consumers would still be free to use borrowed money to buy stablecoins, digital currencies that aim to keep a fixed value relative to other assets such as the U.S. dollar, issued by FCA-regulated companies.The FCA, citing a survey it commissioned, said 14% of crypto investors had used credit to buy crypto last year, up from 6% in 2022.The regulator is also considering restrictions on the lending and borrowing of cryptoassets, including running credit checks and testing consumers' investment knowledge and experience.Cryptoasset lending involves the owner loaning their crypto in return for a yield, while cryptoasset borrowing sees customers get loans in crypto that are later paid back with interest.While a small part of the market, cryptoasset lending and borrowing presented "risks of significant harm", the FCA said, including loss of ownership, liquidity risks, limited borrower creditworthiness checks and a lack of consumer understanding.Institutional investor access would remain, it added.The regulator will also seek to improve transparency and consumer understanding of 'staking' - locking digital tokens in a blockchain network in return for rewards. A survey the FCA commissioned found 27% of UK adults who own crypto have used staking.Hannah Meakin, partner at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright, said the FCA was trying to balance innovation with appropriate oversight, "yet this is no easy feat and the proof will be in the pudding as to whether they can get this balance right."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
15 hours ago
- Mint
Free-AI: How well India adopts AI will shape its future
Rahul Matthan The Reserve Bank of India's Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI) has submitted its report. It has recommended an approach that enables innovation and mitigates risk. Contradictory as it sounds, it can be done. The Reserve Bank of India has constituted a Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI) Gift this article For the past six months, I served on the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI). It has been an enriching experience putting it together, and I am sure I speak for all members of the committee when I say that we are proud of what we produced. Now that we have submitted our report, I am glad to finally be able to write about it. For the past six months, I served on the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Committee on the Framework for the Responsible and Ethical Enablement of AI (Free-AI). It has been an enriching experience putting it together, and I am sure I speak for all members of the committee when I say that we are proud of what we produced. Now that we have submitted our report, I am glad to finally be able to write about it. Unlike most artificial intelligence (AI) regulation frameworks, this is not one that is focused solely on risk. On the contrary, we have proposed a two-pronged approach—one that both enables innovation and mitigates risk. In my view, the weaving together of these two seemingly contradictory sets of objectives is what's novel about this report. To enable the use of AI in the financial sector, we centred our recommendations around three distinct pillars: infrastructure, policy and capacity. We proposed the establishment of the sort of data infrastructure that would be necessary for building AI models and, more generally, encouraging the use of AI in the financial sector. There is a lot of financial sector data in disconnected silos that, if organized, can be helpful for building models and developing AI applications. To that end, we have recommended an initial investment of ₹ 5,000 crore, with an additional ₹ 1,000 crore per annum over the next five years. We have also suggested setting up an AI innovation sandbox in which RBI-regulated entities, fintech firms and just about anyone interested in applying AI innovations to the financial sector can experiment. Since the general-purpose large language models (LLMs) that are currently available may not serve the specialized needs of our financial sector, we have recommended developing sector-specific models capable of catering to the country's linguistic diversity. In order to reward innovation in all these areas, we are hoping that RBI will institute challenge grants and innovation prizes designed to shine a light on noteworthy innovations. Finally, we believe that AI can and should be integrated into India's digital public infrastructure so that its reach can be extended even further than is currently possible. Under the policy pillar, we believe that the country needs a flexible approach that can adapt to keep pace with the evolution of technology. Regulators should periodically assess existing policies and not be afraid to review and amend them if new technologies so demand. We have suggested that RBI constitute a permanent multi-stakeholder committee for this purpose. We were also keen to encourage the use of AI to reach those otherwise excluded or underserved. The report encourages the use of AI to bring first-time borrowers into the country's formal financial system and recommends appropriate relaxation of existing regulations to enable that. Recognizing that AI systems are fundamentally probabilistic, we believe that it would not be appropriate to apply the binary lens we currently use to determine liability. While we need to ensure that customers are always protected, if we penalize AI developers for each small misstep, we will stifle innovation. To that end, we have recommended a graded approach to supervisory action under which the first instance of a failure will not automatically trigger full scope supervisory action, as long as the regulated entity has taken appropriate steps to mitigate harm and proactively remediates issues that have been identified. There is a need for capacity building in the sector, and for that we have recommended measures to improve the capacity of regulated entities as well as the regulators and supervisors responsible for the sector. We have also suggested putting in place a framework for sharing best practices so that the entire sector can benefit from everyone's experiences with using AI. As important as it is to incentivize innovation, we must make sure that the framework is designed to mitigate risk. To that end, we have proposed 13 recommendations across three broad pillars: governance, protection and assurance. Regulated entities are encouraged to establish board-approved AI policies and to ensure that data is protected across the entire AI lifecycle. They need to ensure that they have in place appropriate governance frameworks for the AI systems they use. Since most regulated entities already have product approval processes, we ask that they be modified to take into account the use of AI in their products and services. Beyond pre-release testing, we also recommend regular red-teaming to ensure that failures can be anticipated in advance. Customer protection is paramount, and regardless of how AI is used by users, regulated entities must ensure that they are protected at all times. This includes appropriate grievance redressal measures and awareness campaigns to keep customers well-informed while interacting with AI. To ensure AI availability, regulated entities are encouraged to put in place business continuity plans. We have also suggested the establishment of an incident-reporting framework with a good-faith approach to encourage timely disclosure of notable incidents. AI can prove transformational for India's development and we have to do whatever is necessary to allow this to happen. It calls for an entirely different approach to regulation than what we currently have—one that encourages responsible innovation and also mitigates risks. This, in sum, is the Free-AI approach. The author is a partner at Trilegal and the author of 'The Third Way: India's Revolutionary Approach to Data Governance'. His X handle is @matthan. Topics You May Be Interested In
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Oman's 2025 salary law: What every employer needs to do before the September deadline
From September 2025, employers in Oman must pay at least 75% of salaries via the WPS/Representative Image Oman's Ministry of Labour has announced revised guidelines that make it mandatory for employers to pay at least 75% of their workforce through the Wage Protection System (WPS), a government-backed electronic salary transfer system aiming to ensure transparent and timely wage payments. The directive, issued under Ministerial Resolution No. 729/2024, takes effect with September 2025 wages and will tighten further to a 90% threshold in November. TL;DR: From September 2025, employers in Oman must pay at least 75% of salaries via the WPS; the threshold rises to 90% by November 2025. The WPS requires electronic wage transfers through Central Bank-regulated banks and financial institutions for private sector employees. The regulation is designed to protect workers' rights, ensure salary transparency, and enhance labour market oversight. What is the Wage Protection System (WPS)? The WPS is an electronic platform that tracks salary payments made from employers to employees' regulated bank accounts. Its main objectives are to guarantee that workers are paid on time, prevent salary fraud or withholding, and create an auditable digital record in line with Oman's updated labour laws (Royal Decree No. 53/2023). The WPS is already a common practice in several GCC countries and forms a cornerstone of labour protection initiatives. Implementation timeline and requirements Starting with wages for September 2025 (payable in October), all employers are required to pay at least 75% of their workforce through the WPS. Two months later, the threshold increases: starting in November 2025 (payable in December), a minimum of 90% of an employer's workforce must receive their salary through the WPS. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo All payments must be transferred via banks or financial institutions approved and regulated by the Central Bank of Oman. Faster timelines for wage disbursement and tighter monitoring are part of the new guidelines. The Ministry of Labour will actively monitor compliance and impose financial penalties on companies that fail to meet these requirements. Exemptions and oversight A few employer exemptions apply, including cases of prolonged labour disputes, work stoppages beyond employer control of more than 30 days, officially recognized worker absconding cases (over 30 days), employees newly hired for under 30 days, or those on unpaid leave. These exemptions are designed to maintain fairness without penalizing employers for factors beyond their control. The Wage Protection System reinforces Oman's labour market regulation, supporting job security, a core concern for Omani workers while providing the Ministry with a robust tool for oversight. According to the National Centre for Statistics and Information, Oman had 864,600 Omani workers across all sectors as of June 2025. These regulations aim to boost job security and economic stability by enforcing structured and legally protected wage practices. FAQ 1. What is Oman's Wage Protection System (WPS)? The WPS is an electronic system ensuring employers pay salaries directly to employees' bank accounts on time and transparently. 2. What is the new WPS compliance requirement for employers? From September 2025, employers must pay at least 75% of their workforce via WPS, increasing to 90% by November 2025. 3. Are there any exemptions to WPS rules? Yes, exemptions include labour disputes, work stoppages over 30 days, absconding cases, new hires under 30 days, and unpaid leave workers. 4. How does the WPS benefit workers? It guarantees timely payment of wages, reduces cases of salary withholding or delays, and creates a transparent payment trail. 5. What happens if employers fail to comply with WPS rules? Firms may face financial penalties and further labour ministry actions for non-compliance with wage payment regulations.
Mint
6 days ago
- Mint
UPI collect request for P2P transactions banned from Oct 1. What it means?
From October 1, 2025, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) has banned UPI peer-to-peer (P2P) Collect transactions. The collect transaction feature enabled the UPI users to seek money from other individuals via UPI. Earlier meant to introduce convenience, for example, to remind friends about due repayments or splitting bills, this has lately been often abused by fraudsters, and hence it is set to be discontinued. In its latest circular, NPCI has issued instructions to all UPI member banks, PSPs, and third-party app providers. 'All member banks, payment service providers (PSPs) and UPI apps are directed to implement the necessary changes in their systems and operational processes to ensure that no P2P collect transaction is initiated, routed or processed beyond Oct 2, 2025,' reads the circular. Signed by Kunal Kalawatia, chief of products, the latest instructions will come into force with effect from October 1. The latest circular dated 29 July 2025 also recalls users that NPCI has earlier imposed limits on UPI Collect transactions based on their types. Although verified merchants were permitted to generate collect requests for a higher amount, P2P collect requests could be made under a limit of ₹ 2,000, per the NPCI's circular dated 31 October 2019. In other news, ICICI Bank started charging payment aggregators (PAs) a fee for handling Unified Payments Interface (UPI) transactions that these PAs facilitate on merchant platforms w.e.f. Aug 1. PAs include Google Pay, PhonePe, Mobikwik, and Razorpay, among others. The bank has reportedly sent letters to payment aggregators intimating them of this decision. Quoting a source familiar with the development. In other news, Smart Payment Solutions, an RBI-regulated entity, launched Mony, a UPI-based mobile app that enables tourists and non-resident Indians (NRIs) to make payments across the country without requiring an Indian bank account. Built on India's UPI and part of the UPI One World initiative, the Mony app will let foreign nationals pay for goods and services by scanning QR codes at local shops, restaurants, and retail stores. The service is designed to reduce the challenges faced by international visitors who often find it difficult to access India's fast-growing digital economy. For all personal finance updates, visit here
